Understanding Progress 8

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joining the dots Supporting & challenging your school Governor Dashboard 1 Paul Charman Director of Strategy & Operations, FFT Chair of Governors, Dyson.
Advertisements

EiS – Education iT Services “Our passion in EiS is to make a real difference in education and ultimately children’s lives by providing innovative solutions.
Progress 8: An Explanation
Introduction to Value-Added Data Dr Robert Clark.
 New National Curriculum from September 2014 Key stage 3Key stage 4 Year groups7 – 910 – 11 Core subjects English  Mathematics  Science  Foundation.
FFT Data Analysis Project – Supporting Self Evaluation  Fischer Family Trust / Fischer Education Project Extracts may be reproduced for non commercial.
Feyisa Demie Adviser for school self-evaluation and
Summary and analysis of school data on pupil achievement 2012 ‘How are we doing?’
Introduction to Value-Added Data Dr Robert Clark.
Understanding The PLAN. What Do My Scores Mean?  Your scores range between 1 and 32.  The PLAN takes the number of correct responses on each test and.
YEAR 10 GUIDANCE EVENING Progress 8 The Government have introduced a new value-added performance measure which will replace 5+ A*-C inc Maths/English.
Mike Treadaway Director of Research Fischer Family Trust Using FFT Live Secondary Schools.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Assessment at KS4 Bury C of E High School Engaging Parents Information.
1.Examination & Curriculum reform 2. Accountability & Progress 8 Stakeholder Forum Wednesday 12 November 2014 Dom Ward – Deputy Headteacher.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
 DATA fit for purpose I am no EXPERT But we are trying to make targets SMART.
National Curriculum – changes and implications Assessment – changes and implications SATs 2016 – Year 2 & 6.
An introduction to SEN Data analysis The Research and Evaluation Unit.
Empowering Informed Decisions Using RAISEonline data to improve governor effectiveness Dave Thomson Head of Data Analysis, RM Education.
Data update Autumn Overview About the new targets progress attainment Raise On Line (ROL) data reports and analyses historic results future estimates.
Statutory Target Setting 2006 Governors’ Meeting 5 th December 2006 KS (Current Year 8) GCSE 2008 (Current Year 10) St John Plessington Catholic.
Progress 8 The government will give every child an EXPECTED grade for every subject. VA is then the ACTUAL grade minus the EXPECTED grade. A pupil’s VA.
FFT Data Analysis Project Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
Joining the dots Governor Dashboard 1 Chris Wood.
Option Choices 2017.
Life After Levels Parent Workshop March 2016.
HWS PSA Meeting Thursday 29th September 2016.
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Objectives To explore the data analyses that are available in RAISEonline and how they can be used to identify differences in progression rates To consider.
Head teacher presentation 2015
Welcome to the Year 10 Information Evening
Targets, Assessment and Reporting
Options for 2017 Do not limit your children to your learning,
Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
Full Governors Meeting
Governors’ Update RaiseOnline & Fischer Family Trust
Options for 2016 Do not limit your children to your learning,
Year 9 Options’ Information Evening
Information for Parents
Year 7 Information Evening
The Key Stage 4 Curriculum at Christleton High School
SCHOOL SUBJECTS ARTS ENGLISH MATHS MUSIC Play.
Making Key Stage 4 Choices
Thursday 28th September 2017 Exam Results Patrick Cozier Headteacher
Workshop 2S (Secondary)
Year 7 Curriculum Evening
New Key Stage 3 Assessment
Guided Choices Process
The Key Stage 4 Curriculum at Christleton High School
Making the Right Choices 15th March 2018
Glossopdale School KS4 Options
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Year 7 Target Setting and Assessment Evening.
Progress 8: an explanation
Key Stage 3 Progress Assemblies
Performance Measures 2016 and beyond
EYFS Attainment 1. Levels % Good Level of Development England School
Life beyond levels Analysing school performance using scaled scores
KS3 Data Information Evening
Making Key Stage 4 Choices
Year 9: Guidance For Choosing Your Options
Understanding ASP and FFT Data
Year 7 Curriculum Evening
Proposal for changes to KS3 Monitoring and Reporting
Welcome Year 9 Parents and Pupils
Evelyn CP School - Foundation Stage Results
Evelyn CP School - Foundation Stage Results
Performance Measures 2016 and beyond
The Key Stage 4 Curriculum at Christleton High School
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Progress 8

Staggered introduction of 9-1 grades

Who did better? Student A Student B English Language – Grade 6 English Literature – Grade 7 Maths – Grade 4 Combined Science – Grade 4 Combined Science – Grade 3 RE – Grade 4 German – Grade 2 History – Grade 6 Music – Grade 5 PE- Grade 8 English Language – Grade 8 English Literature – Grade 7 Maths – Grade 7 Combined Science – Grade 7 RE – Grade 4 Geography – Grade 5 History – Grade 6 Drama – Grade 8 Music- Grade 4

Attainment 8 = 54 Each pupil gets an Attainment 8 score 14 + 8 +6 +4 Student A Results 2018 English Language – Grade 6 English Literature – Grade 7 Maths – Grade 4 Combined Science – Grade 4 Combined Science – Grade 3 RE – Grade 4 German – Grade 2 History – Grade 6 Music – Grade 5 PE- Grade 8 = 54 14 + 8 +6 +4 +3 +8 +6 +5 14 + 8 +6 +4 +3 +8 +6 +5 = 5.4 10

Attainment 8 = 70 16 +14 +7 +7 +6 +8 +7 +5 16 +14 +7 +7 +6 +8 +7 +5 Student B Results 2018 English Language – Grade 8 English Literature – Grade 7 Maths – Grade 7 Combined Science – Grade 7 RE – Grade 4 Geography – Grade 5 History – Grade 6 Drama – Grade 8 Music- Grade 4 = 70 16 +14 +7 +7 +6 +8 +7 +5 16 +14 +7 +7 +6 +8 +7 +5 = 7.0 10

KS2 AVG Points Score National data 1.5 13.89 2 15.7 2.5 17.76 2.8 19.1 2.9 20.77 3 22.27 3.1 22.83 3.2 22.82 3.3 24.52 3.4 25 3.5 26.09 3.6 27.27 3.7 28.38 3.8 29.28 3.9 30.4 4 31.65 4.1 32.82 4.2 33.98 4.3 35.72 4.4 37.42 4.5 39.03 4.6 41.28 4.7 42.96 4.8 45.2 4.9 47.63 5 49.99 5.1 52.62 5.2 54.89 5.3 57.59 5.4 60.68 5.5 63.81 5.6 67.35 5.7 71.79 5.8 76.75

Progress 8 Each Pupils Attainment 8 figure is then compared to the national figure for all pupils with the same KS2 Score Student A (Key stage 2 APS = 4.9) Attainment 8 score = 54 National average in 2018 (for all pupils with KS2 APS = 4.9) = 47.63 Progress 8 score 54-47.63 = 6.37 6.37 ÷ 10 = 0.637 This means that he achieved 6 (and a bit) grades more than other pupils with the same prior attainment at KS2…or just over half a grade better in every subject Student B (Key stage 2 APS = 5.7) Attainment 8 score = 70 National average in 2018 (for all pupils with KS2 APS = 5.7) = 71.79 Progress 8 score 70-71.79 = -1.79 -1.37 ÷ 10 = -0.179 This means that she achieved (nearly) 2 grades less than other pupils with the same prior attainment at KS2

Whole school Progress 8 All Pupils progress 8 scores are then averaged out to give the whole school progress 8 score Pupil No. Name Progress 8 score 1 Student A +0.637 2 Student B -0.137 … Student … 224 Student …. +0.001 Sum +16.72 224 pupils so 16.72/224 = +0.07

So what does it mean?? If the school P8 figure was +0.5 Every pupil in every subject is getting half a grade better than pupils nationally with the same ability. Or For every 100 Exam results, 50 of them are 1 grade higher than ‘expected’ e.g In Dormston we have a cohort of 224 pupils. That’s 224 x 10 results = 2240 results and 1120 of them would be 1 grade higher than expected

So what does it mean?? If the school P8 figure was -0.2 Every pupil in every subject is getting 2 tenths of a grade worse than pupils nationally with the same ability. For every 100 Exam results, 20 of them are 1 grade too low. e.g In Dormston we have a cohort of 224 pupils. That’s 224 x 10 results = 2240 results and 448 of them would be 1 grade lower than expected

What is our P8 for 2018? Class of 2018 = -0.02 (Every student is 2 hundredths of a grade below expectations on average or 2 out of every 100 exam results are 1 grade too low (44 out of 2240)

What about in Years 7,8 and 9 The students in Year 7, 8 and 9 don’t have a KS2 score in NC levels (4.5, 4.6, 4.7….) they have a ‘standardised score’ (99, 100, 101, 102 etc). This means there is not yet any national data for us to make comparisons with. We (along with lots of other schools) use a company called Fisher Family Trust (FFT) who have access to the universal set of data from all year groups across the entire country. They generate a Year 11 target grade based on 3 things (Prior attainment, Gender and Month of Birth.) They compare each student to ‘similar’ students. We use this end of Year 11 target and work it backwards in equal steps all the way down to Year 7.

Flightpaths…. YR 11 YR 10 YR 9 YR 8 YR 7 2- 1+ 1- w5 W4 2= 2+ 1= w6 3- 3= 3+ 4- 4= 4+ 5- 5= 5+ 6- 6= 6+ 7- 7= 7+ 8- 8= 8+ 9- 9= 9+ Flightpaths….

FFT(20) We actually use FFT(20) targets. This means we use the most common grade of all ‘similar’ students ranked in the 20th percentile. This is approximately half a grade more challenging than FFT(50). As a school we have high (but realistic) expectations. So for example a boy born in May with an average KS2 standardised score of 104 might get a FFT(20) target grade of a 5+. This means that out of all the ‘similar’ students in the country the 20th percentile student would get a grade 5+.

FFT - Value Added In each subject a student gets a target grade for the end of the year. We then work out a VA score for each subject If a student’s target is a 4+ and he actually achieves a grade 5 then the VA is +1 (1 ‘full’ grade higher than expected). If they got a 3- , the VA would be -1 etc We then average out all of these scores to give an overall VA which tells us if that student is On target, underperforming or exceeding expectations.

Student A – FFT VA Subject Grade Target VA English Language 6 5- +1 English Literature 7 5= +2 Maths 4 4+ Combined Science -1 3 -2 RS 5+ German 2 History Music 5 PE 8 +3 Average VA = 0.1