Efficacy and Safety of Fondaparinux in Elderly Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Data From the OASIS 6 Trial Ron J.G. Peters,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Mehilli, A. Kastrati, K. Huber, S. Schulz, J. Pache, C.Markwardt, S. Kufner, F. Dotzer, K. Schlotterbeck, J. Dirschinger, A. Schömig. Abciximab in Patients.
Advertisements

Efficacy and Safety of Fondaparinux in Elderly Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Data From the OASIS 6 Trial Efficacy and Safety.
Keith A A Fox Royal Infirmary & University of Edinburgh CURE and PCI-CURE.
ISAR-REACT 2 ESC 2007 M. Seyfarth, A. Kastrati, J. Mehilli, F.-J. Neumann, J. ten Berg, O. Bruskina, F. Dotzer, J. Pache, J. Dirschinger, P. B. Berger,
MICHELANGELO: Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS) 6 Trial Disclosure Funded by Organon, Sanofi-Aventis & GSK Mehta & Yusuf.
Major Hemorrhagic Events (Acute Phase) No significant increase in rate of major hemorrhage ESSENCE n = 3171 TIMI 11B n = 3910.
Low vs. Standard Dose Unfractionated Heparin for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients treated with Fondaparinux: the.
VBWG OASIS-5 The Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes trial.
C.R.E.D.O. C lopidogrel for the R eduction of E vents D uring O bservation Multicenter Multinational (USA, Canada) Prospective Randomized Double Blind.
Adnan Kastrati, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany Abciximab plus Heparin versus Bivalirudin in Patients with NSTEMI Undergoing.
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
OASIS 5 Access AHA 2006 Martial Hamon, Shamir Mehta, Gabriel Steg, David Faxon, Prafulla Kerkar, Hans-Jürgen Rupprecht, Jean-Francois Tanguay, Rizwan Afzal,
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
RITA-3 Is this a benign lesion in a benign condition? Who Needs Angioplasty in 2008? Stable Angina Stable Angina Keith A A Fox Professor of Cardiology.
HORIZONS AMI Trial H armonizing O utcomes with R evascular IZ ati ON and S tents In A cute M ycoardial I nfarction H armonizing O utcomes with R evascular.
Compared to Heparin/Enoxaparin with GP IIb/IIa inhibitors,Bivalirudin monotherapy significantly reduces major bleeding while providing similar ischemic.
ISAR REACT 3 A. Kastrati, F.-J. Neumann, J. Mehilli, S. Schulz, G. Richardt, R. Iijima, R.A. Byrne, P.B. Berger, A. Schömig Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
STEMI < 6 h Lytic eligible Lytic choice by MD (TNK, tPA, rPA, SK) ENOX < 75 y: 30 mg IV bolus SC 1.0 mg / kg q 12 h (Hosp DC) ≥ 75 y: No bolus SC 0.75.
Baseline Characteristics Current or Former Smoker Diabetic Hypertension 25.7 Prior MI Prior Heart Failure.
Do Tirofiban And ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial Presented at AHA Scientific Sessions Nov. 15, 2000.
LBCT March 29, 08 ISAR REACT 3 A. Kastrati, F.-J. Neumann, J. Mehilli, S. Schulz, G. Richardt, R. Iijima, R.A. Byrne, P.B. Berger, A. Schömig Bivalirudin.
GUSTO IV ACS: Trial Design Abciximab versus placebo in very high-risk patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: – ST  > 0.5 mm or – elevated.
NSTE Acute Coronary Syndromes
VBWG OASIS-6 The Sixth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes trial.
Organization for the Assessment of Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes 6 (OASIS-6) Trial Presented at The American College of Cardiology Scientific Session.
Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy for Acute Myocardial Infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI) Trial ASSENT- 4 PCI Trial Presented at.
1 Do Tirofiban And ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial N Engl J Med 2001;344:
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Adnan Kastrati
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
Major Bleeding is Associated with Increased Short-Term Mortality and Ischemic Complications in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: The ACUITY Trial.
Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany
The European Society of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Saman Rasoul
Antiplatelet Therapy For STEMI: The Case for Cangrelor
POISE-2 PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation-2 Trial
POISE-2 PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation-2 Trial
Neal Kleiman Director Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
Seeking the Optimal Upstream Therapy for Patients with ACS: Fondaparinux- Low Bleeding Rate and Low Cost Sanjit S. Jolly MD, Interventional Cardiologist,
Tenecteplase (TNK-t-PA)‏
The DANAMI-2 Trial Danish Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction-2
Dr. Harvey White on behalf of the ACUITY investigators
The following slides highlight a discussion and analysis of presentations in the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session from the 55th Annual Scientific.
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Presented by Dr. Leif Thuesen
Figure 3 Ischaemic outcomes in the ST-segment elevation myocardial
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Maurits T. Dirksen
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stephan Windecker
The Time Dependence of Anti-thrombin Initiation in Patients with Non-ST-segment –elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Subgroup Analysis form the ACUITY.
Late Breaking Clinical Trials
European Society of Cardiology 2003
The following slides are based on a presentation at a Satellite Symposium in association with the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Lake Louise, Alberta,
Figure 2 Ischaemic and bleeding outcomes in the major clinical trials
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
American Heart Association Presented by Dr. Julinda Mehilli
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Michel R. Le May
Erasmus MC, Thoraxcenter
Implications of Preoperative Thienopyridine Use
on behalf of the ACUITY investigators
What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose?
ARISE Trial Aggressive Reduction of Inflammation Stops Events
Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin vs UFH in ST-elevation MI: A Meta-Analysis of 27,000 Patients Sabina A Murphy C Michael Gibson, David A Morrow, Carolyn.
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
OASIS-5: Study Design Randomize N=20,078 Enoxaparin (N=10,021)
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany
European Heart Journal Advance Access
Bleeding and Outcomes OASIS Registry, OASIS - 2, CURE (n=34,146) Death
Presenter Disclosure Information
Presentation transcript:

Efficacy and Safety of Fondaparinux in Elderly Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Data From the OASIS 6 Trial Ron J.G. Peters, MD Cardiologist Department of Cardiology University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands

Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux in elderly patients with STEMI results of the OASIS 6 trial RJ Peters, C Joyner, JP Bassand, R Afzal, S Chrolavicius, JW Eikelboom, SR Mehta, Fox KAA, S Yusuf, For the OASIS 6 investigators

Disclosure Funded by Organon, Sanofi-Aventis, GSK All authors have received grants and honoraria from these companies and from several others

Fondaparinux: Mechanism of Action Intrinsic pathway Extrinsic pathway Antithrombin AT AT AT Xa Xa Fondaparinux II IIa THROMBIN Recycled Fibrinogen Fibrin clot Turpie AGG et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:619.

OASIS 6: Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy 12,000 Patients with STEMI < 12 h of symptom onset Inclusion: ST   2 mm prec leads or  1 mm limb leads Exclusion: Contra-ind. for anticoagulant, INR>1.8, pregnancy, ICH<12 mo. Lytics (SK, TPA, TNK, RPA), Primary PCI or no reperfusion (eg. late) Stratification UFH not indicated UFH indicated In the ISAR-REACT study, patients (N=2,159, mean age 66 years) received 600 mg clopidogrel at least 2 hours before a PCI procedure with aspirin and a heparin bolus of 70 U/kg. They were then randomized to either abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg, infusion 0.125 mg/kg/min for 12 hours) or a placebo infusion. Thereafter, all patients received clopidogrel 75 mg twice daily until discharge and then 75 mg clopidogrel daily for at least 4 weeks along with aspirin (100 mg/d). All patients had symptomatic coronary artery disease, but patients with acute coronary syndromes and other patients considered to be at high risk were excluded.* *High-risk exclusion criteria: acute coronary syndromes; acute myocardial infarction within 14 days, ST-segment depression, positive biomarkers, insulin-dependent diabetes, chronic total occlusions, ejection fraction  30%, thrombus and lesions in bypass grafts. Schömig A, Mehilli J, Dotzer F, et al. ISAR-REACT: glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with abciximab in patients undergoing coronary stenting after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel: a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Presented at: 52nd Annual Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology; March 30-April 2, 2003; Chicago, Ill. Randomization Randomization Fondaparinux 2.5 mg Placebo Fondaparinux 2.5 mg UFH

Primary Efficacy Outcome Death/MI at 30 Days 0.12 UFH/Placebo 0.10 Fondaparinux 0.08 0.06 Cumulative Hazard HR 0.86 95% CI 0.77-0.96 P=0.008 0.04 0.02 0.0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 Days

Primary Efficacy Outcome Death/MI at 30 Days No. of Events (%) Control Fonda HR 95% CI P No. of Patients 6056 6036 Death or Re-MI 11.2 9.7 0.86 0.77-0.96 0.008 Death 8.9 7.8 0.87 0.77-0.98 0.026 Reinfarction 3.0 2.5 0.81 0.65-1.01 0.057

Death at Study End (3 or 6 months) 0.12 UFH/Placebo 0.10 Fondaparinux 0.08 0.06 Cumulative Hazard HR 0.88 95% CI 0.79-0.99 P=0.029 0.04 0.02 0.0 18 36 54 72 90 108 126 144 162 180 Days

Efficacy of Fondaparinux by Strata on Death/MI at Study End No. of Events (%) Control Fonda HR 95% CI Stratum I (n = 5658) (Fonda vs. Placebo) 17.3 15.9 0.87 0.76-0.99 Stratum II (n = 6434) (Fonda vs. UFH) 12.7 11.2 0.88 0.76-1.02

Pre-Specified Subgroup Analyses Death or MI at 30 days Interaction P value N UFH/Placebo Fonda Overall 12092 11.2% 9.7% Initial Reperfusion Rx 0.04 None 2867 15.1 12.2 Thrombolytic 5436 13.6 10.9 Primary PCI 3789 4.9 6.0 GRACE Risk Score 0.03 < 112 5958 4.3 4.6 >=112 6134 18.0 14.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 2.0 Fonda better UFH/Plac better Hazard Ratio

Severe Hemorrhage definition Fatal Intracranial Cardiac tamponade Clinically significant hemorrhage with decrease Hb > 5 gm/dl with each unit of transfusion counting for 1 gm/dl Hb

Severe Hemorrhage at 9 Days No. of Events Control Fonda HR 95% CI P Severe Hemorrhage 79 (1.3%) 61 (1.0%) 0.77 0.55-1.08 0.13 Fatal 49 35 0.72 0.47-1.10 ICH 10 11 1.10 0.47-2.60 0.82 Retroperitoneal 2 - Cardiac Tamponade 48 28 0.59 0.37-0.93 0.02 Hg drop ≥ 5 g/dL 17 19 1.12 0.58-2.15 0.74

Severe Hemorrhage by type of reperfusion therapy at 180 Days No. of Events Control Fonda HR 95% CI P None 1.8% 1.6% 0.84 0.47-1.50 0.55 Thrombolytics 2.3% 0.66 0.44-0.98 0.04 Primary PCI 1.0% 1.2% 1.18 0.63-2.22 0.60

Death and Net Clinical Benefit at Study End Death/MI/Stroke/ Severe Hemorrhage HR (95% CI) P No Reperfusion 0.84 (0.69-1.01) 0.06 0.81 (0.69-0.96) 0.016 Thrombolytic 0.85 (0.73-0.99) 0.04 0.83 (0.73-0.95) 0.007 1o PCI 1.09 (0.83-1.44) 0.52 1.12 (0.90-1.39) 0.29 Overall 0.88 (0.79-0.99) 0.029 (0.80-0.97) 0.009

Elderly patients with STEMI Higher risk of adverse outcome Higher risk of bleeding with thrombolytics Higher risk of bleeding with anticoagulants Net clinical outcome not predictable

Elderly patients in OASIS 6 methods Post hoc analysis  ≥ 75 years versus < 75 years Primary endpoints as in main study Net clinical benefit: death, MI, severe hemorrhage at 30 days

Death and MI at 30 days ≥ 75 Yr ≥ 75 Yr ≥ 75 Yr ≥ 75 Yr

Death and MI at 30 days ≥ 75 Yr ≥ 75 Yr ≥ 75 Yr ≥ 75 Yr

Severe hemorrhage at 30 days

Death/MI/sev.hemorrhage Net clinical benefit Death/MI/sev.hemorrhage Control Fonda difference HR <75 10.0% 8.6% 1.4% 0.85 (0.74-0.97) >= 75 25.6% 22.5% 3.2% 0.87 (0.72-1.05)

conclusions In patients with STEMI who are not treated with PPCI: The efficacy and safety of fondaparinux as compared to control treatment are consistent across age groups Consequently, the net clinical benefit of fondaparinux is consistent across age groups

Question & Answer