MIPAS-2D water database and its validation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MIPAS view of the stratosphere by the Bologna team B.M. Dinelli, E. Castelli, E. Arnone, ISAC-CNR, Bologna M. Carlotti, E. Papandrea, L. Magnani, DCFI,
Advertisements

Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
Satellite Validation HALOE: –Excellent data access page, but can be a bit painful to download years of data. –O 3, H 2 O,
SCILOV-10 Validation of SCIAMACHY limb operational NO 2 product F. Azam, K. Weigel, Ralf Bauer, A. Rozanov, M. Weber, H. Bovensmann and J. P. Burrows ESA/ESRIN,
SCILOV-10 Validation of SCIAMACHY limb operational BrO product F. Azam, K. Weigel, A. Rozanov, M. Weber, H. Bovensmann and J. P. Burrows ESA/ESRIN, Frascati,
Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) nadir stare ozone profiles using ozonesonde measurements during Arctic Research on the Composition.
Page 1 MIPAS QWG #15, ESRIN, 23-25/01/08 Bianca Maria Dinelli Istituto di Scienze dell'Atmosfera e del Clima CNR (Italy) Enzo Papandrea Massimo Carlotti.
Full Resolution – Reduced Resolution differences E. Papandrea, M. Carlotti, M. Ridolfi, E. Arnone DCFI, University of Bologna, Italy B.M. Dinelli ISAC-CNR,
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft NDACC H2O workshop, Bern, July 2006 Water vapour profiles by ground-based FTIR Spectroscopy:
Microwindow Selection for the MIPAS Reduced Resolution Mode INTRODUCTION Microwindows are the small subsets of the complete MIPAS spectrum which are used.
Page 1 CO2 distribution in stratosphere from MIPAS Bianca Maria Dinelli Istituto di Scienze dell'Atmosfera e del Clima CNR (Italy) Massimo Carlotti Enzo.
E.Papandrea PM4 - Esrin, 5 th Nov 2004 DFCI Page 1 Topics 1.MWs Joint Retrieval of pT, H 2 O, O 3 without CO2MIX as a source of systematic error; MWs Joint.
Page 1 ENVISAT Symposium – Salzburg - Austria 6-10 September 2004 GEO-MTR: A 2-Dimensional Multi Target Retrieval System for MIPAS/ENVISAT Observations.
Analysis of L1b files with restituted attitude Bianca M. Dinelli E. Papandrea.
Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, University of Oxford A Dudhia ASSFTS-13 Toulouse 7-9 Nov 2007 Page 1 Oxford Retrievals of MIPAS Data Anu Dudhia.
MIPAS2D: nighttime-daytime CFC11 E. Arnone, M. Carlotti, E. Papandrea, M. Ridolfi DCFI, University of Bologna, Italy B.M. Dinelli ISAC-CNR, Bologna, Italy.
Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, University of Oxford A Dudhia MIPAS QWG14 Bologna 9-11 Oct 2007 Page 1 Oxford Work  Update L2 OFL Error Analyses.
Chiara Piccolo and Anu Dudhia Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Department of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK Predicted.
Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, University of Oxford A Dudhia MIPAS ST7 Salamanca Mar 2008 Page 1 Recent MIPAS L2 Data Retrieved at Oxford.
Page 1 Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, University of Oxford MIPAS QWG9 Florence 01/02 Feb 2006A Dudhia Microwindow Selection for new* Nominal.
Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, University of Oxford A Dudhia MIPAS ST6 Karlsruhe 18/19 Sep 2007 Page 1 Long Term Trends Anu Dudhia University.
On average TES exhibits a small positive bias in the middle and lower troposphere of less than 15% and a larger negative bias of up to 30% in the upper.
Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, University of Oxford QWG-11, October 2006, Bologna Chiara Piccolo and Anu Dudhia Precision Validation.
Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, University of Oxford A Dudhia MIPAS QWG16 Venice Apr 2008 Page 1 Recent MIPAS L2 Data Retrieved at Oxford.
Page 1 ENVISAT SYMPOSIUM - Montreux – 23/27 April 2007 Page 1 Stratospheric Distribution of CO 2 from the MIPAS High-resolution Full Mission Bianca Maria.
Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.
HIRDLS High Resolution Dynamic Limb Sounder. Basics Set to fly on the Aura mission of NASA’s Earth Observation System Set to fly on the Aura mission of.
8-years of global observations of water isotopologues in the stratosphere and mesosphere by the Odin satellite J. Urban, D.P. Murtagh, P. Eriksson,...
ICDC7, Boulder, September 2005 CH 4 TOTAL COLUMNS FROM SCIAMACHY – COMPARISON WITH ATMOSPHERIC MODELS P. Bergamaschi 1, C. Frankenberg 2, J.F. Meirink.
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
Different options for the assimilation of GPS Radio Occultation data within GSI Lidia Cucurull NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC GSI workshop, Boulder CO, 28 June 2011.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
Atmospheric Science Conference, ESA-ESRIN, 2006 Spatial and temporal distributions of water vapour in the UTLS as observed with MIPAS/Envisat M.Milz for.
Page 1 MIPAS QWG#12 14/16 February 2007 Retrieval of 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio from MIPAS spectra Feasibility of 15 N/ 14 N isotopic ratio profile retrieval.
INTRODUCTION When two or more instruments sound the same portion of atmosphere and observe the same species either in different spectral regions or with.
Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 Measurements.
Page 1ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 ENVISAT VALIDATION WORKSHOP GOMOS Recommendations by the ESL team : Service.
SCIAMACHY long-term validation M. Weber, S. Mieruch, A. Rozanov, C. von Savigny, W. Chehade, R. Bauer, and H. Bovensmann Institut für Umweltphysik, Universität.
Seasonal variability of UTLS hydrocarbons observed from ACE and comparisons with WACCM Mijeong Park, William J. Randel, Louisa K. Emmons, and Douglas E.
ROSA – ROSSA Validation results R. Notarpietro, G. Perona, M. Cucca
Water vapour, temperature, and ice particles in polar mesosphere as measured by SABER/TIMED and OSIRIS/Odin instruments A.G. Feofilov 1,2, S.V. Petelina.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
Retrieval of Methane Distributions from IASI
Validation of OMI NO 2 data using ground-based spectrometric NO 2 measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia A.N. Gruzdev and A.S. Elokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute.
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
A new spectroscopic observatory in Créteil to measure atmospheric trace gases in solar occultation geometry C. Viatte, P. Chelin, M. Eremenko, C. Keim,
1 COST 723 WG1 Meeting 1 October 6-7, 2003 University of Bern, CH Availability of UTLS relevant SCIAMACHY data C. von.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
MAXDOAS observations in Beijing G. Pinardi, K. Clémer, C. Hermans, C. Fayt, M. Van Roozendael BIRA-IASB Pucai Wang & Jianhui Bai IAP/CAS 24 June 2009,
Correlative Analysis of PMC Existence and Mesospheric Temperature and Water Vapour A.G. Feofilov 1,2, S.V. Petelina 3, A.A. Kutepov 1,2, W.D. Pesnell 1,
Page 1 COST 723 – Opening Workshop - ESTEC March 2004 GEO-MTR: A 2-Dimensional Multi Target Retrieval System for MIPAS/ENVISAT observations Bianca.
Methane Retrievals in the Thermal Infrared from IASI AGU Fall Meeting, 14 th -18 th December, San Francisco, USA. Diane.
AGU 2008 Highlight Le Kuai Lunch seminar 12/30/2008.
ESA Climate Change Initiative Sea-level-CCI project A.Cazenave (Science Leader), G.Larnicol /Y.Faugere(Project Leader), M.Ablain (EO) MARCDAT-III meeting.
MIPAS Monitoring at Oxford
R2971 Seq0100 Scn003 Hohenpeissenberg (48N, 11W)
Kris Wargan & Natalya A. Kramarova(*)
MIPAS database: New HNO3 line parameters at 7
Paulina Wolkenberg1, Marek Banaszkiewicz1
Hyperspectral Wind Retrievals Dave Santek Chris Velden CIMSS Madison, Wisconsin 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science 8 June 2005.
Intercomparison of IASI and CrIS spectra
“Brief” update on ACE water vapour
Enceladus Plume Simulations
University of Colorado and NCAR START08/Pre HIPPO Workshop
Comparability and Reproducibility of RO Data
Directions of Inquiry Given a fixed atmospheric CO2 concentration assimilation scheme, what is the optimal network expansion? Given the wide array of available.
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Intercomparison of tropospheric ozone measurements from TES and OMI
Presentation transcript:

MIPAS-2D water database and its validation B.M. Dinelli ISAC-CNR – Bologna – Italy With the help of E. Arnone, E. Castelli - ISAC M.Carlotti, L. Magnani, E. Papandrea DCFI – University of Bologna - Italy M. Prevedelli, M. Ridolfi DF- University of Bologna – Italy A. Burini, S.Casadio SERCO - Italy

MIPAS/ENVISAT MIPAS measurements have been mainly acquired using two different spectral and geographical resolutions: Full Resolution mission (FR) From June 2002 to March 2004 Spectral resolution 0.025 cm-1 ~72 scans per orbit on 17 views ranging from 6 to 68 km Optimized Resolution mission (OR) From January 2005 to April 2012 Spectral resolution 0.0625 ~92 scans per orbit on 27 limb views ranging from 3 to 70 km MIPAS measurements are directly processed by ESA in two stages Interferograms are converted in calibrated and geolocated spectra (level1b data) Spectra are analysed to obtain vertical distributions of p,T and VMRs of several key species: H2O, O3, HNO3, CH4, N2O, NO2, etc. (level 2 data) ESA level 2 data are obtained with the ORM algorithm (retrieval on tangent points, horizontal atmospheric gradients neglected)

FR OR ∆Lat = ~4.6o ∆Lat = ~3.7o Constant altitudes along the orbits Variable altitudes along the orbit ~72 scans ~94 scans 17 altitudes 27 altitudes 0.025 cm-1 0.0625 cm-1 ∆Lat = ~4.6o ∆Lat = ~3.7o OR FR

GMTR retrieval system The GMTR code (Carlotti et al., Appl. Opt., 45, 716-727, 2006) has been developed to analyse MIPAS observations The main characteristics of GMTR are: The horizontal inhomogeneities of the atmosphere are properly modelled using a 2-D discretization of the atmosphere. Observations of a full orbit can be simultaneously analyzed The (2-D) retrieval grid is fully independent from the measurement grid. Target species can be retrieved simultaneously (Multi-Target-Retrieval) in order to suppress the systematic error due to spectral interferences.

GMTR retrieval system The 2-D FM internal to the GMTR code can be used to study the effects of horizontal gradient in 1-D analysis The data retrieved with GMTR are not affected by the error due to neglecting temperature horizontal gradients (Kiefer et al., AMT,3 1487-1507, 2010)

MIPAS2D database The GMTR code has been applied to the full MIPAS mission and the MIPAS2D database has been developed (Dinelli at al., AMT,3, 355-374, 2010) Retrievals have been performed using Optimal Estimation Cloudy spectra have been removed from the analysis The database is public and can be downloaded following the instructions given in the web sites: http://www.isac.cnr.it/~rss/mipas2d.htm http://www.mbf.fci.unibo.it/mipas2d.html The database containes 2-D fields of: p, T, H2O, O3, HNO3, CH4, N2O, NO2 for the full mission CFC-11, CFC-12, N2O5, COF2, ClONO2 (minor species) are also present Because of their correlations P,T, H2O, O3 have been jointly retrieved The other targets are retrieved singularly in cascade. 2-D Averaging Kernels available upon request

MIPAS2D database The data have been retrieved on a fixed vertical grid (17 altitudes) From 6 to 42 km at 3 km steps + 47, 52, 60, 68 Two types of horizontal grids for both the FR and OR mission GRD - fixed at 5 degrees latitudinal steps NOM – at the average latitude of each MIPAS scan The GRD retrieval grid makes the spatial resolution of both FR and OR products homogeneous Level 1b data processed with IPF V5.X Originally the analysis was performed with two different sets of MWs (target dependent) one for the FR mission and one for the OR mission FR mission has been analysed also with the OR MWs For this analysis the spectral resolution of MIPAS spectra has been artificially degraded to the OR Most MIPAS observation modes analysed (NOM - UTLS - MA)

H2O time-series 15N-15S

Time series of month-pressure distributions of water vapor anomalies in the vertical range 50 to 5 hPa (15N-15S)

Zonal mean of water distribution from 2002 to 2010

Validation We have started to validate the version 2 of MIPAS2D We are currently using data from other satellite instruments (MLS, ACE) Coincidence criteria: Time mismatch 60 min Distance < 500 km

Water MIPAS2D vs ACE South Pole

MIPAS2D vs MLS South Pole

North Polar region

Mid-Lat North

South Polar region

Comparison with ACE and MLS January South Pole Mid-Lat South Mid-Lat North North Pole

Comparison of Temperature with MLS and ACE South Pole Mid-Lat South Mid-Lat North North Pole

Conclusions We have analysed all the measurements in the observation modes NOM UTLS and MA of MIPAS for the whole mission (July 2002 to April 2012). The 2D fields of pressure, temperature and VMR of H2O, O3 have been obtained on a fixed altitude grid at two horizontal grids: fixed at 5 deg steps or at the scan geolocation, for the whole mission. The analysis has been performed with the GMTR system that enables the tomographic retrieval of MIPAS data taking properly into account the horizontal inhomogeneities of the atmosphere. The resulting database is available to end users and can be dowloaded following the instructions contained into the web sites: http://www.mbf.fci.unibo.it/mipas2d.html and http://www.isac.cnr.it/~rss/mipas2d.htm The database includes results for the FR mission analysed with the same set of MWs of the OR 2-D Averaging Kernels can be distributed upon request

Conclusions Validation with satellite data (ACE and MLS) shows a positive bias of about 5% from 200 to 1 hPa wrt both instruments Above and below higher differences are present Consistent behavior in all latitude bands Comparison of the temperature profiles (retrieved simultaneously) with ACE and MLS doesn’t show the same behavior therefore no correlations We are currently working to reduce the differences by changing the set of analysed MWs