Samples and MC Selection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SU1 sample 176 k events Athena Full Reconstruction.
Advertisements

Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
8. Statistical tests 8.1 Hypotheses K. Desch – Statistical methods of data analysis SS10 Frequent problem: Decision making based on statistical information.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
1 W’  tb  lnubb: the first read. 2 introduction sample: W’  tb  lnubb generator: PYTHIA number of events: 5000 will only use events in the good run.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
A Feasibility Study on Measuring a Strange Sea Asymmetry in the Proton 14/07/05Laura Gilbert, Jeff Tseng.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Muon rates from minimum bias (without PionDecayer)
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
HFT-prototype BUR considerations (Quantitative) What physics is possible in Run-13 assuming some (prototype) sectors are there? Relates to how long would.
FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.
1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Data vs MC … issues of the K +- group 1.Accidentals … contribution from Erika & Roberto 2.DC background.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
NIPHAD meeting 16 September 2005, T. Cornelissen 1 Tracking results in the testbeam Thijs Cornelissen.
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
Feb. 4,2009 Jongseok Lee (Sungkyunkwan University)
LoF Rejection for Your Analyses & Preliminary Report on Multijet Background May 3, 2011 Steve Alkire.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
Search for A’ from p0  A’ g
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=1031
W→τν Note & Tau candidates in first data
Top quark search update
Measurement of the γ,W,Z with ATLAS for the ATLAS Collaboration
Rare and Forbidden Charm Meson Decays in FOCUS
Electron Identification Based on Boosted Decision Trees
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Reconstruction of short-lived resonances in pp collisions
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Search for supersymmetric neutral Higgs bosons in the decay channel A/H->m+m- in the ATLAS detector George Dedes , Sandra Horvat Max-Planck-Institut.
Muon Trigger Software Status
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Last update at the RPVLL meeting:
Missing B-tracks in L1 trigger
Muons from light meson decays
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
10 TeV BJ/K at CMS Zheng Wang Apr
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment
Reconstruction and calibration strategies for the LHCb RICH detector
Presentation transcript:

Study of muons rejection on single p and minimum bias forced with PionDecayer tool

Samples and MC Selection Signal sample: Single m at various pT (~1.5M events) Background simulated with p/K forced to decay (12.0.6 with PionDecayer tool) Minimum bias (~113k events) Single p (~1M events) Selected MC generated m with |h|<2.7 coming from a forced decay of p/K (also with |h|<2.7) MC events selected: min bias ~56k single pion ~930k

Cut strategy Select events running full muon trigger slice on 12.0.6 (LVL1, LVL2 and standard EF) no last optimized version of MuComb pT>2GeV cut applied @ LVL2 Define a set of critical variables ID d0, # pixel hits, hit on B layer, # SCT hits Ratio of pT in ID and MS Combined match c2 Evaluate efficiency of each cut w.r.t. standard EF combined muon EF efficiency w.r.t. LVL2 on single m (p) ~95% (~90%)

optimal cut could be different at different pT Cut power rejection Efficiencies for signal and fake as a function of exclusive cuts # pixel d0 # SCT pT(ID)/pT(MS) optimal cut could be different at different pT Each cut is evaluated w/o applying the other cuts Match c2 muons pions Here a choice of cuts (red arrows) in the assumption of nominal detector performance

Efficiency (single particle samples) Applied cuts Inner Detector d0 ≤ 0.15 ID number of pixel hits ≥ 3 ID number of B layer hits ≥ 1 ID number of SCT hits ≥ 6 pT (ID) / pT (SA) ≤ 1.25 Combined match c2 ≤ 26 Single m efficiency loss between 25% @ 4GeV 10% @ 20GeV Forced single p efficiency reduced at 65% @ 4GeV 75% @ 20GeV

Efficiency for p/K in minimum bias Compatible with results on single p sample, high statistical errors separated contribution for pions and kaons after all cuts are applied Kaons are cutted away more easily than pions: candidates no cut cut Kaons 98 50 Pions 840 586

Backup

Reconstruction selection Required first LVL1 threshold (totally open) passed and LVL2 pT>2GeV (no optimized MuComb of rel13) At EF level, found ID track used for combination using closest DR Applied following cuts to ID track Inner Detector d0 ≤ 0.15 ID number of pixel hits ≥ 3 ID number of B layer hits ≥ 1 ID number of SCT hits ≥ 6 Found MS track (SA) used for combination requiring same RoI index Required @ EF level to have at least one combined track with pT (ID) / pT (SA) < 1.25 Combined match c2 ≤ 26 events triggered and passed to EF: min bias 1030 single pion 73551 LVL1 events triggered: min bias 1292 single pion 82619 events passing all EF cuts: min bias 620 single pion 44953