OBJECTIONS Functionalism. Something is a functional kind iff it can be analyzed in terms of a causal role (e.g., something is an F iff it play the F-role).

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EECS 690 April 5. Type identity Is a kind of physicalism Every mental event is identical with a physical event In each case where two minds have something.
Advertisements

Sections 2 and 3 Chapter 1. Review of the Scientific Method The scientific method is not a list of rules that must be followed but a general guideline.
The Extended Mind.
The Social Scientific Method An Introduction to Social Science Research Methodology.
Minds and Machines Summer 2011 Monday, 07/11.
Functionalism. SUMMARY FROM LAST TIME “Multiple Realizability”
Philosophy of Mind Dualism: in addition to the physical/material body, there is an immaterial mind Dualism: in addition to the physical/material body,
Summer 2011 Tuesday, 8/ No supposition seems to me more natural than that there is no process in the brain correlated with associating or with.
The Identity Theory. The Identity Theory says that mental states are physical states of the brain. Cf. Property dualism, which says they are non- physical.
Faculty of Arts Postgraduate Open Day
Section 2.3 I, Robot Mind as Software.
Functionalism. Something is a functional kind only if, and because, it can be analyzed in terms of a causal role (e.g., something is an F only.
INTRODUCTION Functionalism. Something is a functional kind iff it can be analyzed in terms of a causal role (e.g., something is an F iff it plays the.
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Functionalism and Qualia Critics of functionalist accounts of the mental often appeal to thought experiments in which.
Section 2.2 You Are What You Eat Mind as Body 1 Empiricism Empiricism claims that the only source of knowledge about the external world is sense experience.
To Beam or not to Beam? A study in personal identity.
Multiple Realizability, Qualia and Natural Kinds Dr. Andrew Bailey Philosophy Department University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
Introduction to Cognitive Science Philosophy Nov 2005 :: Lecture #1 :: Joe Lau :: Philosophy HKU.
Mind and Body I Bodies and Ghosts, Qualia, and Mind-Brain identity.
Chapter 4 Number Theory.
Pragmatic action (Kirsh and Maglio 1994) Task-performance is often described in terms of step-by-step progression through a range of states of the world.
Thoughts on ratio variables and other algebraic manipulations of raw variables (Second draft) DAG-perspective Eyal Shahar April 2008.
Chapter 4 Number Theory. Terms Factors Divides, divisible, divisibility Multiple.
Lecture 3 Anomalous Monism
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Physicalism The physicalist answer to the question of the relation between the mental and the physical: The mental.
Functionalism. The Pain Role : (i) An internal state, (ii) primarily caused by tissue damage, (iii) which can result from kicking, burning, etc. and (iv)
The Mind-Body Problem. Some Theories of Mind Dualism –Substance Dualism: mind and body are differerent substances. Mind is unextended and not subject.
The Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 5: Functionalism.
© Michael Lacewing Functionalism and the Mind- Body Problem Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Mental causation Michael Lacewing
Substance dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing
1 The Methods of Biology Chapter Scientific Methods.
Chemistry is the science that investigates and explains the structure and properties of matter. Matter is the stuff that’s all around you: the metal and.
Evaluate the following: Recall: a logarithm is an exponent. So in each case, we are looking for the exponent of 2 to get a number. In the first example,
Chapter 2 The Mind-Body Problem McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Human Nature 2.3 The Mind-Body Problem: How Do Mind and Body Relate?
Section 2.3 I, Robot Mind as Software McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Reduction Nomological Reduction –1-1 relations –Many-1 relations (supervenience) Functions & mechanisms? Emergence –The problem of epiphenomenalism Attribute.
Anomalous monism Michael Lacewing uk.
Eliminativism Philosophy of Mind. Today’s lecture plan: The ‘theory-theory’ of common sense psychology A Choice: Vindication or elimination (Isomorphic.
The Scientific Method What is the Scientific Method? Click here!
Chapter 5: Mind and Body The Rejection of Dualism
OBJECTIONS Identity Theory. The Identity Theory The Identity Theory: Mental states identical to physical states of the brain. To be in pain is to have.
Eight problems Descartes and his immediate successors were concerned with 1. The Mind-Body Problem 2. The Problem of Other Minds 3. The Problem of Skepticism.
SCIENCE There is a method to the madness!! SCIENTIFIC METHOD State the Problem State the Problem Gather Information Gather Information Form a Hypothesis.
Eliminative materialism
Narrow narrow content Narrow content is whatever is shared by physical duplicates. It is a function (in the mathematical sense) from environments to broad.
2.1 Properties and Operations
Identity theory. The Identity Theory : Mental states are physical states of the brain. Something is in pain only if, and because, its c-fibers are firing.
Chapter 1 Section 2 Review
INVESTIGATION AND EXPERIMENTATION (I & e) : What is “Science”? Observations, Inferences, and Controlled Experiments.
Identity theory. Theory of Mind : Mental states are. Something is in pain only if, and because,. The Identity Theory : Mental states are physical.
The zombie argument: objections Michael Lacewing
Laws of Exponents. Exponents The exponent of a number says how many times to use the number in a multiplication.
INTRODUCTION Identity Theory. The Identity Theory The Identity Theory: Mental states identical to physical states of the brain. To be in pain is for your.
J.J. and Richard are arguing about how we come to know the world around us. Richard says, “The way we perceive our environment is heavily influenced by.
Multiplication Timed Tests.
Mind body problem What is the relationship between mental states and the physical world? Zoltán Dienes, Philosophy of Psychology René Descartes ( )
Chapter 7: Induction.
ATS2840 Philosophy of Mind Semester 1, 2017
Problems for Identity Theory
The zombie argument: responses
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
True or False: Materialism and physicalism mean the same thing.
What is good / bad about this answer?
The Scientific Method.
EQ: What is the goal of science?
Warmup Chapter P Review
1.3 Properties of Numbers.
Presentation transcript:

OBJECTIONS Functionalism

Something is a functional kind iff it can be analyzed in terms of a causal role (e.g., something is an F iff it play the F-role). F is realized by P in X iff P plays the F-role in X. A property is multiply realizable iff it can be realized by different things in different objects.

The Pain Role The Pain Role: (1) An internal mental state, (2) typically caused by tissue damage, (3) which can result from kicking, burning, etc. and (4) which commonly causes crying, frowning, and whimpering, as well as (5) anger, the desire for it to stop, the belief that one is in pain, etc.

Functionalism Realizer Functionalism: Mental states are states that play a characteristic causal role. To be in pain is to be in the state that plays the pain role. Role Functionalism: Mental states are higher-order properties, like the property of having some state or other that plays the characteristic causal role. To be in pain is to be in some state or other that plays the pain role.

Preview In the previous chapter we noticed that mental states can be multiply realized. In humans the state which realizes pain is (say) c-fiber firing; in squid its (say) d-fiber firing. Multiple realization raises a puzzle: what do old Eight-legs and I have in common when we are both in pain? It cant be c-fiber firing because Eight-legs has no c-fibers (or so I will assume). And it cant be d-fiber firing because I have no d-fibers (or so I will assume). In virtue of what, then, is it true that Eight-legs and I are both in pain? Functionalism provides an answer to this puzzle. Ravenscroft, p.50.

Realizer Functionalism 1) Pain = R. 2) R = c-fiber firing. 3) [So] Pain = c-fiber firing.

Realizer Functionalism 1) Pain = R. 2) In humans, R = c-fiber firing. 3) [So] In humans, pain = c- fiber firing. 1) Pain = R. 2) In squids, R = d-fiber firing. 3) [So] In squids, pain = d- fiber firing.

Realizer Functionalism The Relativized Identity Theory: Mental states are identical to physical states of the brain. To be in pain-for- humans is to have C-fibers firing, to be in pain-for-squids is to have D-fibers firing, to be in pain-for-Orkans is to have activity in silicon chip E, etc.

Realizer Functionalism 1) Pain = R. 2) In humans, R = c-fiber firing. 3) [So] In humans, pain = c- fiber firing. 1) Pain = R. 2) In squids, R = d-fiber firing. 3) [So] In squids, pain = d- fiber firing.

Realizer Functionalism 1) Hamlet = H. 2) In 1990, H = Mel Gibson. 3) [So] In 1990, Hamlet = Mel Gibson. 1) Hamlet = H. 2) In 1996, H = Kenneth Branagh. 3) [So] In 1996, Hamlet = Kenneth Branagh.

Realizer Functionalism 1) The 1990 Hamlet = H in the 1990 movie. 2) H in the 1990 movie = Mel Gibson. 3) [So] The 1990 Hamlet = Mel Gibson. 1) The 1996 Hamlet = H in the 1996 movie. 2) H in the 1996 movie = Kenneth Branagh. 3) [So] The 1996 Hamlet = Kenneth Branagh.

Realizer Functionalism 1) Pain = R. 2) In humans, R = c-fiber firing. 3) [So] In humans, pain = c- fiber firing. 1) Pain = R. 2) In squids, R = d-fiber firing. 3) [So] In squids, pain = d- fiber firing.

Realizer Functionalism 1) Pain-in-humans = R in humans. 2) R-in-humans = c-fiber firing. 3) [So] Pain-in-humans = c- fiber firing. 1) Pain-in-squids = R in squids. 2) R in squids = d-fiber firing. 3) [So] Pain-in-squids = d- fiber firing.

Realizer Functionalism The Relativized Identity Theory: Mental states are identical to physical states of the brain. To be in pain-for- humans is to have C-fibers firing, to be in pain-for-squids is to have D-fibers firing, to be in pain-for-Orkans is to have activity in silicon chip E, etc.

Role Functionalism Role Functionalism: Mental states are higher-order properties, like the property of having some state or other that plays the characteristic causal role. To be in pain is to be in some state or other that plays the pain role.

Role Functionalism Role Functionalism: Mental states are higher-order properties, like the property of having some state or other that plays the characteristic causal role. To be in pain is to be in some state or other that plays the pain role. The Disjunctive Identity Theory: Mental states are identical to physical states of the brain. To be in pain is to either be a human and to have C-fibers firing or to be a squid and to have D-fibers firing or to be an Orkan and to have activity in silicon chip E or…

Role Functionalism Functionalists have often touted the phenomenon of multiple realization as a basis for the claim that the properties studied by cognitive science are formal and abstractabstracted from the material compositional details of the cognitive systems. What our considerations seem to show is that cognitive science properties so conceived threaten to turn out to be heterogeneous disjunctions of properties after all. And these disjunctions seem not to be suitable as nomological properties –properties in terms of which laws and causal explanations can be formulated. If this is right, it would disqualify mental properties, construed as second-order properties as serious scientific properties. -Kim, p.166

The Master Argument 1) If Functionalism is correct, then either (a) Realizer Functionalism is correct, or (b) Role Functionalism is correct. 2) If (a), then the Relativized Identity Theory is correct. 3) The Relativized Identity is incorrect. 4) If (b), then the Disjunctive Identity Theory is correct. 5) The Disjunctive Identity Theory is incorrect. 6) [So] Functionalism is incorrect.