Dominion Retail Default Service for Smaller Customers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEREGULATION 1. BEFORE DEREGULATION 2. AFTER DEREGULATION Local
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
P OWERING Y OUR E NERGY S OLUTIONS. Recent decline in energy pricing has created a major buying opportunity. Crude Oil Natural Gas Coal Unleaded Gas.
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
WAL-MART STORES, INC. DEMAND RESPONSE. Wal-Mart in New York Supercenters45 Discount Stores45 Neighborhood Markets 0 Sam’s Clubs17 Distribution Centers4.
Texas Deregulation – A Success Story The ERCOT Market Framework Has Been A Success Implementation  Bilateral Contracts - Participants contract up to 100%
ECO 436 Natural Gas. ECO 436 David Loomis Natural Gas Unbundling in IL for Small Customers 1What are benefits to unbundling? 1What are the.
Pricing Strategy Considerations for a New Business A Macro Overview of Setting & Influencing Prices Class 26 Marketing Pricing Strategies Tuesday November.
Electric Restructuring- Experience in other states.
Community Electricity Aggregation Public Information Session May 21, 2015 Martha Grover, Energy Efficiency Manager Office of Planning and Community Development.
Organization of the electricity supply industry © 2012 D. Kirschen & University of Washington 0.
Pricing the Components of Electric Service in Illinois Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
Online Energy Procurements: Creating Efficiencies & Reducing Costs November 10, 2010.
NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS Turning on the Lights 2011: The Consumer Benefits of Electric Power Competition by Carl Johnston and Lynne Kiesling.
November 13, 2007 The Evolving Roles and Responsibilities of Gas Utilities In Today’s Markets: Giving Customers More Choices.
The Evolving Roles and Responsibilities of Gas Utilities In Today’s Markets Presented by: Hank Linginfelter Executive Vice President, Utility Operations.
Electric Restructuring In Pennsylvania Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate May 10, 2007 Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Transforming.
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (c) 2013 New Jersey Government Energy Aggregation P.L c. 24 “GEA Act” Gary E Finger Ombudsman New Jersey Board.
NOTICE: The information contained in this document is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) that were initially given access,
BEYOND THE STANDARD OFFER- FULFILLING THE PROMISE OF 1997: COMPETITION, RELIABILITY AND STABILITY.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
The Texas Renewable Energy Program National Governors Association Scottsdale, Arizona April 29, 2004.
NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS Turning on the Lights 2011: The Consumer Benefits of Electric Power Competition by Carl Johnston and Lynne Kiesling.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
BEYOND THE STANDARD OFFER: DEVELOPING THE RETAIL ELECTRIC MARKET IN MASSASHUSETTS. RETAIL AGGREGATION AND AUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL AND.
Introducing Competition in the ESI Naresh Singh Head: Compliance.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Lessons from Winter 2014 Preparing For Winter 2015 Amanda Noonan Director, Consumer Affairs NH Public Utilities Commission.
Interstate Gas Supply, Inc. (IGS Energy®) November 13, 2007
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION BALANCED RATES RULEMAKING R California Water Association’s Restatement of Goals and Objectives for the.
Musings of a Midwest Non-Utility Guy Greg Collins Vectren Retail, LLC Marketing Executives Conference San Antonio, Texas October 19, 2009.
Indy Butany DeSouza Consumer Benefits from the Competitive Provision of Energy Services and the Ontario Smart Meter Implementation.
MODULE 7 WHO IS OUR COMPETITION?. WHAT IS SUPPLIER COMPETITION? OTHER SUPPLIERS In a deregulated market, fair competition is important! This means IGS.
September 25, 2001 Maryland Public Service Commission Retail Gas Market Conference Timothy S. Sherwood Department Head, Energy Acquisition.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
PJM Restructuring Roundtable Panel I: The Integration of Variable Energy Resources in PJM Markets, Planning, and Operations March 30, 2016 Eric Thumma,
San Francisco’s Community Choice Program
PJM Footprint Roundtable
Avalon Energy Consultants
Mass Market Demand Solutions in PJM
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
NordREG Nordic harmonized electricity market by 2015?
Retail Treatment of Zonal Generation Prices in Massachusetts
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Electricity Procurement Options
Advancing Solar PV at Lower Cost: Performance Based Incentives, Price Certainty, and Equitable Rate Treatment Ronald Gerwatowski – Senior VP, National.
Restructuring Roundtable April 11, 2008 Richard Cowart
Company Overview.
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
Preserving Competition and Promoting Clean Energy (for All)
Marginal Cost Pricing: Why Is It Important? Have We Achieved It?
Presentation to Massachusetts Electricity Roundtable
Utility Owned Generation? (UOG)
1/16/2019 Univ. of Chicago/Argonne Agents 2002, Oct. 12, 2002 Introduction to Electricity Regulation Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial.
The GridSolar Project Presentation – NRCM January 21, 2010
Suppliers Are Not Providing Value to Individual, Residential Customers
New England Economic Partnership James Daly Vice President Energy Supply Energy Market Perspectives Reliable Energy, Competitive Prices and.
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable February 28, 2003 Bill Huss – Senior Vice President Tom Michelman – Principal Consultant Summary Results.
Maine's Standard Offer Service
Wind Development & Policy Options
Electric Service for Residential and Small Business Customers
Paul D. Jones II, P.E., General Manager August 25, 2016
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Energy Supply Business Model enabled by the Clean Energy Package
Portfolio Standards and the Supply of Renewable Energy in New England
Effect of LMP on Massachusetts Electric’s Retail Rates
XENERGY Executive Forum May 18, 2001 Irene Prezelj
Presentation transcript:

Dominion Retail Default Service for Smaller Customers Post Standard Offer Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable by Rich Zelenko January 28, 2005

Dominion Retail Profile Dominion Retail is an affiliate of Dominion Resources headquartered in Richmond, VA. Serve 1.2 million customer accounts in 8 states Primary focus is the residential and small commercial market: Electricity and natural gas Warranty products and services Dominion Retail is anxious to expand our market in Massachusetts

Dominion Retail Markets Ohio Gas 185,048 Electric 86,957 Services 288,250 Customers: 395K Gas 250K Electric 512K Services 1.2 Million Total Massachusetts Electric 10,888 Connecticut Electric 20,839 Pennsylvania Gas 120,246 Electric 131,048 Services 145,960 Illinois Gas 90,184 Virginia Services 68,831 West Virginia Services 11,415 North Carolina Services 165

What Makes a Competitive Retail Electric Market? A desire by the Commonwealth is to establish a true retail market that benefits consumers consistently over time. A robust wholesale supply market The price-to-compare is representative of retail market pricing. Incumbent utility/PUC retail rules that are not overly burdensome and costly.

Why Limited Retail Competition in Massachusetts? The “Playing Field is Not Level” Price-To-Compare (PTC) is not reflective of Retail Offers – retail suppliers must include additional costs in their offer that are not included in the PTC. Some Examples: Bad debt EDI data exchange- set-up/daily transactions/maintenance Compliance w/consumer protections and notifications Database capital investment and management Attrition- auto replenishment of moves/relocations for default supplier (i.e. churn) Supplier license, other misc. Marketing costs/Customer Service costs

Why Limited Retail Competition in Massachusetts? Other Retail HURDLES: Acquisition Costs Particularly residential and small commercial customers (acquisition costs range from $20 to $250 per customer) Retailers must provide long term rate stability or a meaningful discount to get customers to act Acquisition costs are the single largest retail hurdle for mass market customers Customer List & Information Unique identifier or account number Significant acquisition cost reduction- increased sales rate of 20% if account no. not required from customers, more accurate enrollments Processes for consumer protection have been implemented in other states that allow distribution of account numbers

“The Mastermind of New England”

Default Service – The “Ultimate” Game Plan The default price needs to be exactly reflective of the market The default price provides the lowest price possible to consumers The default service has the lowest price volatility on the planet Default supply needs to be derived from 100% renewables The default service RFP always attracts several wholesalers with plenty of “extra” supply that provides market liquidity The default service allows retail competition to flourish with lots of new products & services introduced and record setting switching The default service and pricing decisions allow all politicians to win their election of choice

What is Needed Next in Massachusetts for Default Service Dominion’s Recommendation- A Balanced Approach: 1. Define, bid and publish Default pricing for a one year term Tweak current term to a one year fixed price- will allow consumers to make easier price comparisons and match their 1 yr term preference Provides reasonable price stability 2. Begin appropriate rate unbundling - from distribution portion of rate. 3. Transition to a competitively bid Retail Auction Start with one utility Implement new programs/incentives to promote retail options- (ex. NIMO in NY) Develop customer volunteer list for participation in a Retail Auction Implement statewide Retail Auction with legislation – (i.e. Bosley/Morrissey proposal)

Summary – LT Benefits of Retail Competition 1. Better electric offers for varying consumer needs/segments fixed long-term, fixed medium-term, variable, variable w/Cap, DSM, aggregation, renewables, switching incentives, fixed bill w/no true-up, etc. New product & service innovations home warranty products, metering technologies, DSM, distributed generation, etc. Long-term competitive forces to keep prices in check retailers will compete every day for customer’s business, looking at longer-term “life time” value of electricity and other products & services New Generation investment tied to Retail load growth Economic development- tailored/lower rates/incentives to site business, use of local contractors for ancillary products & services Retail competition improves service customers reward good service (and punish bad service) quickly and efficiently