Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Retail Treatment of Zonal Generation Prices in Massachusetts

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Retail Treatment of Zonal Generation Prices in Massachusetts"— Presentation transcript:

1 Retail Treatment of Zonal Generation Prices in Massachusetts
Alvaro E. Pereira Director of Economic & Policy Analysis Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources September 13, 2002 Electric Restructuring Roundtable

2 LMP in New England Transmission congestion is substantial in NE
location of generation does not match demand some congestion is economic but current pricing prevents an economic solution Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) will eliminate most cross-subsidies between zones encourage competitive suppliers to reduce inefficiencies (and offer hedges?) encourage economic location of new resources generation, transmission, demand response

3 Supply Outlook and Transmission : New England, 2002-2006
3

4 8 LMP Zones in NE 740+ Nodes aggregated into 8 LMP Zones (or CMS Load)
Hub 8 LMP Zones in NE 740+ Nodes aggregated into 8 LMP Zones (or CMS Load) Differ from RTEP sub areas (13) LMP zones based on load-service territories and potential congestion problems 4

5 LMP should be an Energy Cost
Generators will charge zonal prices to wholesalers Wholesalers will charge zonal prices to retailers Retailers must recover zonal generation costs Recover these costs in the energy part of the bill: make costs subject to competitive pressure keep a level playing field between SO/DS and others

6 Distribution Territories and Zones
Some distribution territories are within one zone Western Mass, Fitchburg, Cambridge, Commonwealth Boston Edison is in two zones 32 towns in NEMA, 7 towns in SEMA Massachusetts Electric is in three zones 26 towns in NEMA, 44 in SEMA, 94 in WMA

7 3 LMP Zones in MA

8 Charging a Zonal Price Customers in low cost zones no longer subsidize those in high cost zones Competitive suppliers can compete with SO/DS Customers in high cost zones less likely to return to DS Customers who can to respond to congestion price signals encouraged to do so Competitive suppliers compete to hedge congestion

9 Charging an Average Price
Congestion costs should be socialized for customers with little ability to change consumption customers with few or no competitive options customers whose small demand provides little incentive to change behavior An anti-competitive advantage is tolerable when competitive suppliers are not likely to differentiate zonal prices

10 DOER Recommendations Include LMP cost recovery in the energy portion of the bill Differentiate cost recovery by type of customer Charge zonal price for large customers, permanently Charge average price for mass market, through end of the Standard Offer Prior to end of Standard Offer, re-evaluate policy


Download ppt "Retail Treatment of Zonal Generation Prices in Massachusetts"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google