Hengistbury Head By Craig Beavers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Features of EROSION & Features of DEPOSITION
Advertisements

Features of EROSION & Features of DEPOSITION
Starter-The Coast & Music-Benjamin Britten Benjamin Britten was one of the most famous English 20 th century composers. He lived in Suffolk and he was.
copyright manuel smith 2006 High rise living – apartments and holiday accommodation Nerang River Canal estates a few metres above sea level Recreation.
The guide Carlos Cantú. First look the location…. East of London in the county of Kent. The major part of the area we will study lies within the Reculver.
Case study: coastal management in Holderness
The Dorset Coast (and a little bit of Hampshire!) ~ a virtual field trip ~ I took this picture!
The Holderness Coastline – The Management of Coastal Erosion Holderness is a lowland region of England that lies between the chalk hills of the Wolds and.
THE SEA LEARNING OUTCOMES TODAY WE ARE GOING TO LEARN ABOUT THE ACTION OF THE SEA. AT THE END OF THIS CHAPTER YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DISCUSS THE DIFFERENT.
FEATURES OF SEA EROSION AND DEPOSITION
Geography at Key Stage 2 Unit 23: Investigating coasts.
Depositional coastal features
The Sea Creator and Destroyer.
Case Study: Christchurch Bay
What do all these pictures have in common? 3 answers required.
COASTAL DEFENCES. There are many techniques used for reducing the power of waves before they erode a coastline. The photos illustrate some methods used.
How should we manage this section of coast to please everyone? Some facts: Longshore drift west to east. Cliffs soft clays and sands. Cliffs eroded at.
Holderness protection objectives and management strategies Since the late 19th century coastal protections have been used to enforce a ‘hold the.
Sec 2 IDS, 2010 Coastal Management. You will learn: 1.Evaluate the feasibility of coastal protection measures at Pulau Ubin.
Coastal Landscapes Introduction. The sea, just like rivers and ice is a very powerful agent of erosion. It erodes a variety of landforms, and just like.
Unit 1 Topic 5 – Coastal Change and Conflict On your A3 sheet: What key terms can you remember?
 The aim is to protect the coastline by preventing the waves eroding the coastline.
Unit 1: Land and Water Forms Wearing Down Landforms Wind and Waves
Coastal Erosion Processes:
A study of 2 sites along the Hat Pran Khiri stretch of coastline whereby coastal management has taken place and one whereby no management has been used.
Using last lesson can you answer the following questions about Happisburgh? 1.What is the stretch of coastline Happisburgh is on? 2.Which direction is.
TOPIC COASTLINES. Local Geology The coastline of the British Isles is not smooth. Why ? The nature of the rocks is important. Some are very hard but some.
Coastal Environments How the coast is eroded Landforms and characteristic features Transport and deposition of material Coastal management issues Sustainable.
Prediction and Prevention of the effects of coastal flooding by forecasting, building, design, planning and education.
Objectives To identify and describe the different types of coastal management available. To evaluate the positives and negatives of each option. How do.
World Geography Unit 1: Land and Water Forms Wearing Down Landforms Wind and Waves.
Erosion on the Holderness Coast
Coastal Management Lesson Objective: Understand why methods of engineering to protect the coast have advantages and disadvantages.
COASTS PROTECTION METHODS.
Key words Geology- the study of solid Earth, the rocks of which it is composed, and the processes by which they change. Strata/ stratum- In geology and.
DEPOSITIONAL LANDFORMS
Coastal erosion Holderness Coastline
11 October 2011 JANE MOON IMPACT OF THE TERMINAL GROYNE ON SEDIMENT TRANSPORT IN MINEHEAD BAY SENIOR GEOMORPHOLOGIST.
A Case study of a coastal landform (A headland): Flamborough Head.
Beach Nourishment. Beach nourishment— also referred to as beach replenishment or sand replenishment —describes a process by which sediment (usually sand)
TOPIC COASTLINES Jq03NBao.
SEA WALL Description Concrete or rock barrier built at the foot of cliffs or at the top of a beach. Has a curved face to reflect the waves back into the.
Chapter 2: Coastal Landscapes and Processes NEXT EDEXCEL GCSE GEOGRAPHY A TEACHING AND LEARNING RESOURCES Chapter 2 Coastal Landscapes and Processes Image.
Swanage Bay case study: Causes of coastal recession Odd one out and why: 1.spit, beach, bar 2.Attrition, abrasion, biological 3.Fetch, longshore drift,
Applied Fieldwork Enquiry
What would you do? You are a planning officer responsible for choosing the best coastal defences to use for a number of different places. You need to look.
How successful are the coastal defences in Christchurch Bay?
Impact of industry and People
A Case Study of Coastline Management
Coastal Depositional Landforms
A CASE STUDY OF COASTAL EROSION & MANAGEMENT
Unit 1 Dynamic Planet Revision
Coastal Defence.
How successful are the coastal defences in Christchurch Bay?
Coastal Management Strategies
Coastal Management.
Managing coastal erosion
Sea wall It is a concrete or rock barrier against the sea. Placed at the foot of cliffs or at the top of a beach. Has a curved face to reflect the waves.
Coastal defence (management) against flooding and erosion.
What determines whether a particular stretch of coastline is protected or not? Whether land is protected or not comes down to the economic value of the.
Waves and the Shore.
Managing the Coastline
PowerPoint 9: Coastal management strategies
Hard Engineering Case Study
SEA DEFENSES : hard engineering
Shorelines.
People and coastlines.
The Dorset Coast (and a little bit of Hampshire!)
Erosion on the Holderness Coast
Presentation transcript:

Hengistbury Head By Craig Beavers

Hengistbury Head is a 35 metre high sandstone headland, approximately 1 kilometre in length. It stands half way between the entrance to Poole Harbour and Hurst Spit on the south coast of England. It forms the main division between Bournemouth and Christchurch Bays.

Hengistbury Head forms a natural breakwater protecting Christchurch Harbour from the prevailing south westerly winds. A sand spit (this is a ridge of sand that runs away from the coast). forms the easterly perimeter of Christchurch Harbour. Beach huts located on the spit help to maintain its stability. Without Hengistbury Head it is probable that most of the town of Christchurch and all of Christchurch Harbour would cease to exist. Bournemouth Bay and Christchurch Bay would merge and become one.

The mudflats in Christchurch Harbour are important for birds as they eat many creatures that live there. Many of the birds nest in the reeds around the harbour and this habitat is extremely important in supporting some migratory species from Africa! The Head is designated as a Public Open Space (P.O.S.) and a Scheduled Ancient Monument (S.A.M.), with important Stone Age and Celtic archaeology. Hengistbury Head has been designated a Site of Special Scientific Interest (S.S.S.I.) along with most of Christchurch Harbour and the lowland marshes of Stanpit. (A marshland area at the junction of the rivers Stour and Avon). The Head is also a Special Area for Conservation (S.A.C.).

Erosion has been a continuous problem at Hengistbury Head since the sea finally reached the cliff base a few thousand years ago. However, the natural defence provided by the Ironstones (Doggers), ensured that this erosion had been reduced over the last two thousand years. Unfortunately a number of man made events have taken place, mainly in the last 150 years (such as the removal of some Doggers) that have wrecked this natural equilibrium. These events have destabilised Christchurch Bay and although remedial action has alleviated the situation, continued erosion occurs at Hengistbury Head.

Groynes trap Long Shore Drift material, helping to create a wider beach and thus reduce wave attack on the cliff. They do however cost £80,000 each and are therefore not the cheapest form of defence. To limit erosion groynes, gabions, and boulders have been sited at strategic points along the Head. The large Iron Stone doggers that had fallen to sea level from the eroded Upper Hengistbury Beds have provided the original natural defence against Long Shore Drift.

Along with a set of new groynes either side of the original 1938 Long Groyne a gabion revetment (series of wire cages filled with stones) has been built to protect the weakest point in the eastern end of Hengistbury Head. The gabions placed at this point also protect the Double Dykes (an Iron Age defensive structure) from further extensive erosion by the sea. The gabions may not be the best visual choice and can be seen as a bit of an eye sore but they do stop the waves from washing away the precious beach / cliff material.

Beach renourishment took place in 1989 with shingle dredged from the local area and off the Isle of Wight. Approximately 10% of this new beach material is lost each year due to Long Shore Drift. By the year 2000 little remained. Shingle is less prone to Long Shore Drift and reduces the overall loss of sand, but it does not solve the problem of coastal erosion and has to be repeated approximately every ten years. Although natural in its appearance it is not popular with the tourist who would prefer a sandy beach.

At the Head one major problem is the tourist as well as the local resident. 1 ¼ million people visit each year bringing around 750,000 dogs and their mess! This causes mass trampling of precious vegetation and erosion of the cliff as the visitor looks over the edge.

It has been suggested that to ‘move west’,would be the best protection for the Head. The aim is to move anything that attracts the locals / tourists, west, away from the Head itself. This would then reduce the Head’s erosion by human feet and the digging of dogs. It is estimated that the public are only willing to walk around 200 yards from their car or attractions. This will then keep them off the Head if the proposed plan is put into action. The Solent Meads car park is the targeted area. If the café and other attractions were moved closer to here, the majority of people wouldn’t walk on the Head and thus the erosion would be reduced.

There are great advantages to this plan but it all comes at a cost, particularly on the local residents. The visitors may be felt to be too close for comfort as now the residential area would be opposite the Heads main attractions. The roads may be blocked, noise and litter increase together with pollution levels. The red arrow is marking the designated area where the facilities are proposed to be located with the possibility of the car park being enlarged and the café being rebuilt close by.

The original car park near the café will have to be closed and the shutting off of the Broadway is an issue to be considered so that no one can travel down and park their cars on the verge. To further divert the tourists from wandering around the Head, the Noddy Train could be made to pick up and drop off passengers from the Solent Meads car park, thus stopping them from trampling across the Head. To help the public in their understanding of the Head, an Interpretation Centre could be located at the Hungry Hiker café site. A museum could also be placed here as the building is large enough to support both. But this will attract tourists and encourage them to walk over the Head and thus increase erosion.

Are we willing to pay for these new facilities and help reduce the problem of erosion on the Head ?