Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short MAC Header Date: Authors: John Doe, Some Company
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0413r0 Submission March 2010 Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)Slide 1 TGac March 2010 Closing Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0147r0 Submission January 2012 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)) Slide ai Spec Development Process Update Proposal Date:
Relationship between peer link and physical link
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
TGai Second Vice Chair Candidate Overview: Robert Stacey
Relay Flow Control Date: Authors: May 2013 Month Year
Technical comparison of the value of proposed MAC features
Software Documentation
1MHz SIG Field Discussions
TGac Ad-hoc lifecycle model
On the Implementation of Dynamic Load Balancing for A-BFT Channel
Towards an Improved Proposal Development Process for VHT
Proposed Modification to the Draft ad Selection Procedure
Proposed response to 3GPP ED request
Sounding and P Matrix Proposal
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
Proposal for TGad Selection Procedure and Timeline
Towards an Improved Proposal Development Process for VHT
Guidelines for Internal TGad Comment Submission and Resolution
TGac Ad-hoc lifecycle model
Guidelines for Internal TGad Comment Submission and Resolution
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
TGe “Fast-Track” Proposal
Replies to Q&A following 10/0788r2
Spec Text Motion Date: Authors: March 2018 Month Year
Spec Text Motion Date: Authors: July 2018 Month Year
Adrian Stephens nominee statement for Working Group Vice Chair
General ad hoc- LB115- Comment Resolutions – Jan 08
Calibration using NDP Date: Authors: December 2006
TGac Ad-hoc lifecycle model
Proposed Scope for Tgac Ad Hoc Groups
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
WUR Discovery Frame Format
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
802.11ai Spec Development Process Update Proposal
TGac MU-MIMO ad-hoc report Nov 09
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
<author>, <company>
AP Power Down Notification
January, 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [January 1394-Wireless Working Group Liaison.
DL MU-MIMO ack protocol
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
FD TIG Summary for EHT Date: Authors: November 2018 Name
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
TGe Consensus Proposal
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
(60GHz New Technique Proposal)
January, 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [January 1394-Wireless Working Group Liaison.
Multi-TID Aggregation for 11ay
TG1 Draft Topics Date: Authors: September 2012 Month Year
D1.0 PHY Comments Discussion
802.11ax Spec Development Process Proposal
LB97 Coex: Duplicate DSSS
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
FD TIG Summary for EHT Date: Authors: November 2018 Name
Spec Framework Decision Process Alternatives
FD TIG Summary for EHT Date: Authors: November 2018 Name
Proposed Scope for Tgac Ad Hoc Groups
802.11ax Spec Development Process Proposal
Comments to IEEE /68 Date: Authors: September 2009
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
TGu/TGv Joint Meeting Date: Authors: May 2008 Month Year
Transmit OOB emission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Response to PAR/CSD Comments Bob Heile Chair, IEEE
80 MHz Channelization Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments Date: 2009-09-22 Authors: John Doe, Some Company

Introduction This document describes some of the thinking behind the proposed specification framework document 11-09/0992r0. What is the specification framework? How does the specification framework evolve? This document does not address the formal rules by which the specification framework document is modified These should be addressed in the Selection Procedure (last revision: 11-09/0059r4)

What is the Specification Framework? Provides the framework from which the draft amendment will be developed It is a working document that will start out small, evolve and grow with group consensus At some point, the document will include enough detail on features and architecture that the document can be frozen and work begin on the draft amendment itself The scope of the work on the draft amendment is constrained to the features in the spec framework A discussion of what features TGac supports occurs in the context of the specification framework document All features should be present in the spec framework before work begins on the amendment

Evolving the Spec Framework (1) The document begins with a small, core set of feature i.e., the requirements with broad consensus The document then evolves in two ways: New features that have broad support are added Detail is added

Evolving the Spec Framework (2) Adding features: The spec framework begins as a slim document Features should be thoroughly vetted before addition to the spec framework Features with a major impact on the system design should be investigated in detail in the ad-hocs To gain an idea of complexity of the feature To gain a good understanding of the performance benefit Ultimately all features need to show a reasonable cost/benefit tradeoff

Evolving the Spec Framework (3) Adding detail: Feature requirements acquire more detail with time This occurs as specific techniques are discussed and technology options explored Some features are fundamental with other features dependent on the details For example, information present in the preamble signaling field may need to be specified in detail since it impacts MAC protocol design (e.g. aggregation bit impacts use or normal ack and block ack) Thus some parts of the spec framework may require significant detail while other parts do not