SEASONAL sensitivity study on COBEL-ISBA LOCAL FORECAST SYSTEM for fog and low clouds at Paris CDG airport ROQUELAURE Stevie and BERGOT Thierry Météo-France.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Streamflow assimilation for improving ensemble streamflow forecasts G. Thirel (1), E. Martin (1), J.-F. Mahfouf (1), S. Massart (2), S. Ricci (2), F. Regimbeau.

Advertisements

Medium-range Ensemble Streamflow forecast over France F. Rousset-Regimbeau (1), J. Noilhan (2), G. Thirel (2), E. Martin (2) and F. Habets (3) 1 : Direction.

On the importance of meteorological downscaling for short, medium and long-range hydrological ensemble prediction over France G. Thirel (1), F. Regimbeau.

Description and validation of a streamflow assimilation system for a distributed hydrometeorological model over France. Impacts on the ensemble streamflow.

R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.

Estimation of clouds in atmospheric models Tomislava Vukicevic CIRA/CSU and PAOS/CU.

EURO4M Météo-France motivations and contributions.

Ongoing developments on radar data assimilation in AROME E. Wattrelot and O. Caumont Météo-France/CNRM.

Data assimilation experiments for AMMA, using radiosonde observations and satellite observations over land F. Rabier, C. Faccani, N. Fourrié, F. Karbou,

GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg CTM - IFS interfaces GEMS- GRG Review of meeting in January and more recent thoughts Johannes Flemming.

Rossana Dragani Using and evaluating PROMOTE services at ECMWF PROMOTE User Meeting Nice, 16 March 2009.

Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.

Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.

ECMWF Training Course 2005 slide 1 Forecast sensitivity to Observation Carla Cardinali.

The University of Reading Helen Dacre AGU Dec 2008 Boundary Layer Ventilation by Convection and Coastal Processes Helen Dacre, Sue Gray, Stephen Belcher.

The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.

The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.

Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor University of Reading, UK What is the half-life of a cloud forecast?

1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Carol Roadnight, Peter Clark Met Office, JCMM Halliwell Representing convection in convective scale NWP models : An idealised.

Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting

Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Oct 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Mark Naylor Data Assimilation, NWP NAE 4D-Var – Testing and Issues EWGLAM/SRNWP meeting Zurich 9 th -12.

On the Closure of the Surface Energy Balance in Highly Complex Terrain Mathias W. Rotach, Pierluigi Calanca, Andreas Weigel, Marco Andretta Swiss Federal.

CHIMERE air quality forecasts : results during Pays de la Loire summer 2004 experiment and end-user point of view ! Arnaud REBOURS - AIR PAYS DE LA LOIRE.

Critical issues of ensemble data assimilation in application to GOES-R risk reduction program D. Zupanski 1, M. Zupanski 1, M. DeMaria 2, and L. Grasso.

Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.

COSMO General Meeting Zürich, Sept Stefan Klink, Klaus Stephan and Christoph Schraff and Daniel.

1 Les règles générales WWOSC August, Montréal, Canada Didier Ricard 1, Sylvie Malardel 2, Yann Seity 1 Julien Léger 1, Mirela Pietrisi 1. CNRM-GAME,

1D Dice Experiment at Meteo-France and LES preliminary result E. Bazile, I. Beau, F. Couvreux and P. Le Moigne (CNRM/GAME) DICE Workshop Exeter October.

Microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds Evaluation of the representation of clouds in models J. Delanoë and A. Protat IPSL / CETP Assessment.

Fog Forecasting at Roissy Airport (Paris) with 1D model Thierry Bergot and Joël Noilhan Météo-France 1) Methodology Cobel : 1D model of boundary layer.

1 Operational low visibility statistical prediction Frédéric Atger (Météo-France)

1 Intercomparison of low visibility prediction methods COST-722 (WG-i) Frédéric Atger & Thierry Bergot (Météo-France)

Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.

Verification of Numerical Weather Prediction systems employed by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology over East Antarctica during the summer season.

Results of an Adaptive Radiative Transfer Parameterisation for the Lokal-Modell LM-User-Seminar 5 th – 7 th March 2007, Langen Annika Schomburg 1), Victor.

Jamie Wolff Jeff Beck, Laurie Carson, Michelle Harrold, Tracy Hertneky 15 April 2015 Assessment of two microphysics schemes in the NOAA Environmental Modeling.

Aviation Cloud Forecasts – A True Challenge for Forecasters v       Jeffrey S. Tongue NOAA/National Weather Service - Upton, NY Wheee !

Hongli Jiang, Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Zoltan Toth

Meso-γ 3D-Var Assimilation of Surface measurements : Impact on short-range high-resolution simulations Geneviève Jaubert, Ludovic Auger, Nathalie Colombon,

EU COST Action 722: The Understanding of Fog Structure, Development and Forecasting Presented on behalf of the 13 participant countries 1. Background.

COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept Dependance of bias on initial time of forecasts 1 WG1 Overview

Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Introduction 2) The methodology of the inter-comparison 3) Phase 1 : cases study Inter-comparison of numerical models.

Fog prediction in a 3D model with parameterized microphysics Mathias D. Müller 1, Matthieu Masbou 2, Andreas Bott 2, Zavisa I. Janjic 3 1) Institute of.

Evaluation of the Latent heat nudging scheme for the rainfall assimilation at the meso- gamma scale Andrea Rossa* and Daniel Leuenberger MeteoSwiss *current.

High resolution simulation of August 1 AMMA case: impact of soil moisture initial state on the PBL dynamics and comparison with observations. S. Bastin.

Use of radar data in ALADIN Marián Jurašek Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute.

Ensemble Kalman Filter in a boundary layer 1D numerical model Samuel Rémy and Thierry Bergot (Météo-France) Workshop on ensemble methods in meteorology.

AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.

T. Bergot - Météo-France CNRM/GMME 1) Methodology 2) Results for Paris-CdG airport Improved site-specific numerical model of fog and low clouds -dedicated.

Terradellas, E; Bergot, T A comparison between two single-column models designed for short-term fog and low clouds forecasting Terradellas, E. and T. Bergot.

EMS LJUBLJANA, 2006 Mathias D. Müller 1, C. Schmutz 2, E. Parlow 3 An ensemble assimilation and forecast system for 1D fog prediction 1,3) Institute of.

Sean Healy Presented by Erik Andersson

MSG cloud mask initialisation in hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic NWP models Sibbo van der Veen KNMI De Bilt, The Netherlands EMS conference, September.

An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented.

Incrementing moisture fields with satellite observations

Evaluation of cloudy convective boundary layer forecast by ARPEGE and IFS Comparisons with observations from Cabauw, Chilbolton, and Palaiseau  Comparisons.

Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Methodology 2) The assimilation procedures at local scale 3) Results for the winter season Improved Site-Specific.

Development of a 1D ensemble forecast System with variational assimilation Mathias D. Müller Institute of Meteorology, Climatology & Remote Sensing University.

Towards Assimilation of GOES Hourly winds in the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) Xiujuan Su, Jaime Daniels, John Derber, Yangrong Lin, Andy Bailey, Wayne.

The presence of sea ice on the ocean’s surface has a significant impact on the air-sea interactions. Compared to an open water surface the sea ice completely.

Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.

OSEs with HIRLAM and HARMONIE for EUCOS Nils Gustafsson, SMHI Sigurdur Thorsteinsson, IMO John de Vries, KNMI Roger Randriamampianina, met.no.

Soil analysis scheme for AROME within SURFEX

I. Sanchez, M. Amodei and J. Stein Météo-France DPREVI/COMPAS

Intercomparison between 1D Fog Forecasting Models

Liquid Water Path Variabilities Damian Wilson

HIRLAM mesoscale report

Systematic timing errors in km-scale NWP precipitation forecasts

Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Hongli Jiang Paul Schultz and ZoltanToth

Radiation Fog Forecasting Using a 1-D Model

Presentation transcript:

SEASONAL sensitivity study on COBEL-ISBA LOCAL FORECAST SYSTEM for fog and low clouds at Paris CDG airport ROQUELAURE Stevie and BERGOT Thierry Météo-France WSN05 september 2005

Outlines Météo-France + COBEL-ISBA numerical prediction model + Advection sensitivity on winter season + Cloud (fluxes) sensitivity on winter season + 3h data assimilation vs 1h data assimilation (winter ) + Conclusions WSN05 september 2005

Cobel-Isba numerical prediction Météo-France 3h -Assimilation : - Var + fog and low clouds initialisation 3h -Assimilation : 1D- Var + fog and low clouds initialisation Observat ions ISBA offline COBEL/ISBA – 1D 12h local forecasts: Detection of LVP conditions (fog and low clouds) on 30minutes Visibility < 600m & ceiling < 200ft forecasters guess Aladin forecasts (3D) ? WSN05 september 2005

Advection (T,q) sensitivity Météo-France + Simulations set ( winter season): - ref : without advections - adv : temperature & humidity advections - AT + std : advections + temperature std - AT – std : advections - temperature std - Aq + std : advections + humidity std - Aq – std : advections - humidity std Aq + std Aq - std ref (no advections) Aq AT WSN05 september 2005

Advections (T,q) STD distributions Météo-France + Advection are calculated from NWP model Aladin - spatial and temporal consistency advection std distributions constant linear constant linear WSN05 september 2005

Advections (T,q) effects on LVP forecasts Météo-France + All scores are from: winter season (5 months dec-April) - 3h assimilation scheme (0Z, 3Z …., 21Z) (~1200 simulations) + Scores are calculated from all initialisations time - Hite Rate = ( forecasted&observed LVP / observed LVP ) - False Alarm Rate = ( forecasted&non-observed LVP / non-observed LVP) WSN05 september 2005

Advections (T,q) effects on LVP forecasts Météo-France Advection effect + No improvements with advections (HR & FAR) + Adv is slightly better than persistence (HR) WSN05 september 2005

Temperature advection std effects on LVP forecasts Météo-France cold effect + No symetrical effect (cold/warm advection) + AT std impact is important on LVP (colder advection) + No major degradation in FAR WSN05 september 2005

Humidity advection std effects on LVP forecasts Météo-France humidification + No symetrical effect (moist/dry advection) + AQ std impact is important on LVP (moist advection) + Degradation in FAR (~10%) with moist advection WSN05 september 2005

Clouds initialisation Météo-France + Initialisation of fog and low clouds iterative method for minimizing the divergence between observed & cobel radiation fluxes + Simulations set ( winter): - ref : with low clouds & fog initialisation - no : no low clouds & fog initialisation - aladin : low clouds & fog initialisation + cloud cover from aladin (IR and VIS) - obs : low clouds & fog initialisation + persistence of observed clouds (IR) WSN05 september 2005

Clouds (oberved IR vs COBEL IR) Météo-France No Bias=-44.2 W/m 2 Ref Bias=-16.6 W/m 2 Aladin Bias=-6.4 W/m 2 Obs Bias=-2.3 W/m 2 WSN05 september 2005

Clouds effects on LVP forecasts Météo-France WSN05 september 2005

LVP: 3h data assimilation vs 1h data assimilation Météo-France + This result is from the work of MARZOUKI Hicham (master student), for winter season The only difference between the 2 simulations is the data assimilation frequency (3h 1h) 8 initialisations/day 24 initialisations/day WSN05 september 2005

LVP: 3h data assimilation vs 1h data assimilation Météo-France + Improvements can be observed in HR (5%) & FAR by decreasing the data assimilation frequency to 1 hour. WSN05 september 2005

CONCLUSIONS Météo-France + Advections have a important impact on LVP forecasts - moist/cold advections impact is more significant dry/warm advections - advections impact is cumulative more important for long term simulation (4 -12 hours) + Fog and low clouds initialisation is very important - IR radiative impact significant improvement in FAR + Improvements can be observed in HR & FAR by decreasing the data assimilation frequency to 1 hour. WSN05 september 2005

Thank you Météo-France WSN05 september 2005

Advection STD computation Météo-France Time UTC 00Z06Z18Z12Z24Z30Z + site R=10 km 1- Advection spatial mean & std 2- Advection temporal mean & std On all levels: WSN05 september 2005