CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fabián E. Bustamante, Spring 2007
Advertisements

Virtual Memory October 25, 2006 Topics Address spaces Motivations for virtual memory Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs class16.ppt.
Carnegie Mellon 1 Virtual Memory: Concepts : Introduction to Computer Systems 15 th Lecture, Oct. 14, 2010 Instructors: Randy Bryant and Dave O’Hallaron.
Virtual Memory Oct. 21, 2003 Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs class17.ppt “The course that gives.
Virtual Memory Chapter 8.
Virtual Memory Nov 27, 2007 Slide Source: Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs class12.ppt.
Virtual Memory.
Virtual Memory October 2, 2000
Virtual Memory Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs CS213.
Virtual Memory October 30, 2001 Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs class19.ppt “The course that gives.
Virtual Memory Chapter 8.
Virtual Memory October 29, 2007 Topics Address spaces Motivations for virtual memory Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs class16.ppt.
Virtual Memory May 19, 2008 Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs EECS213.
Virtual Memory Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!”
CML CML CS 230: Computer Organization and Assembly Language Aviral Shrivastava Department of Computer Science and Engineering School of Computing and Informatics.
Virtual Memory: Concepts
1 Virtual Memory: Concepts Andrew Case Slides adapted from Jinyang Li, Randy Bryant and Dave O’Hallaron.
Virtual Memory March 23, 2000 Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating address translation with TLBs Pentium II/III memory system
Virtual Memory 1 1.
Virtual Memory April 3, 2001 Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs class20.ppt.
University of Amsterdam Computer Systems – virtual memory Arnoud Visser 1 Computer Systems Virtual Memory.
Virtual Memory Additional Slides Slide Source: Topics Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs class12.ppt.
Review °Apply Principle of Locality Recursively °Manage memory to disk? Treat as cache Included protection as bonus, now critical Use Page Table of mappings.
Virtual Memory.  Next in memory hierarchy  Motivations:  to remove programming burdens of a small, limited amount of main memory  to allow efficient.
Carnegie Mellon 1 Bryant and O’Hallaron, Computer Systems: A Programmer’s Perspective, Third Edition Virtual Memory: Concepts Slides adapted from Bryant.
Virtual Memory Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!”
CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!”
Virtual Memory Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs VM1 CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!”
1 Virtual Memory (I). 2 Outline Physical and Virtual Addressing Address Spaces VM as a Tool for Caching VM as a Tool for Memory Management VM as a Tool.
Constructive Computer Architecture Virtual Memory: From Address Translation to Demand Paging Arvind Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Lab. Massachusetts.
Virtual Memory CS740 October 13, 1998 Topics page tables TLBs Alpha 21X64 memory system.
1 Virtual Memory. 2 Outline Virtual Space Address translation Accelerating translation –with a TLB –Multilevel page tables Different points of view Suggested.
University of Washington Indirection in Virtual Memory 1 Each process gets its own private virtual address space Solves the previous problems Physical.
Virtual Memory Alan L. Cox Some slides adapted from CMU slides.
Computer Architecture Lecture 12: Virtual Memory I
Virtual Memory Chapter 8.
CS161 – Design and Architecture of Computer
ECE232: Hardware Organization and Design
Memory COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE
CS161 – Design and Architecture of Computer
Lecture 12 Virtual Memory.
Section 9: Virtual Memory (VM)
From Address Translation to Demand Paging
CS703 - Advanced Operating Systems
Section 9: Virtual Memory (VM)
From Address Translation to Demand Paging
Today How was the midterm review? Lab4 due today.
CS 704 Advanced Computer Architecture
Virtual Memory.
CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!”
CSE 153 Design of Operating Systems Winter 2018
CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!”
CSE 153 Design of Operating Systems Winter 2018
Virtual Memory: Concepts /18-213/14-513/15-513: Introduction to Computer Systems 17th Lecture, October 23, 2018.
CSCI206 - Computer Organization & Programming
CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!”
Lecture 12 Virtual Memory
Instructors: Majd Sakr and Khaled Harras
Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Memory Hierarchy: Virtual Memory
Virtual Memory Nov 27, 2007 Slide Source:
CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!”
CSE 153 Design of Operating Systems Winter 2019
CS703 - Advanced Operating Systems
CSE 153 Design of Operating Systems Winter 2019
Virtual Memory Use main memory as a “cache” for secondary (disk) storage Managed jointly by CPU hardware and the operating system (OS) Programs share main.
CS161 – Design and Architecture of Computer
Virtual Memory.
Design of Digital Circuits Lecture 25b: Virtual Memory
Instructor: Phil Gibbons
Virtual Memory 1 1.
Presentation transcript:

CS 105 “Tour of the Black Holes of Computing!” Virtual Memory Topics Motivations for VM Address translation Accelerating translation with TLBs

What Is Virtual Memory? If you think it’s there, and it’s there…it’s real. If you think it’s not there, and it’s there…it’s transparent. If you think it’s there, and it’s not there…it’s imaginary. If you think it’s not there, and it’s not there…it’s nonexistent. Virtual memory is imaginary memory: it gives you the illusion of a memory arrangement that’s not physically there.

Motivations for Virtual Memory Use physical DRAM as cache for the disk Address space of a process can exceed physical memory size Sum of address spaces of multiple processes can exceed physical memory (more common modern case) Simplify memory management Multiple processes resident in main memory Each with its own address space Only “active” code and data is actually in memory Allocate more memory to process as needed Provide protection One process can’t interfere with another Because they operate in different address spaces User process cannot access privileged information Different sections of address spaces have different permissions

Motivation #1: DRAM as “Cache” for Disk Full address space is quite large: 32-bit addresses: ~4,000,000,000 (4 billion) bytes 64-bit addresses: ~16,000,000,000,000,000,000 (16 quintillion) bytes Disk storage is ~300X cheaper than DRAM storage 250 GB of DRAM: ~ $25,000 (667 MHz, late 2006 prices) 250 GB of disk: ~ $55 To get cost-effective access to large amounts of data, bulk of data must be stored on disk 1GB: ~$110 250 GB: ~$55 4 MB: ~$250 Disk DRAM SRAM

Levels in Memory Hierarchy cache virtual memory CPU regs C a c h e Memory 8 B 32 B 4 KB disk Register Cache Memory Disk Memory size: speed: $/Mbyte: line size: 32 B 0.3 ns 8 B 32 KB-4MB 2 ns? $65/MB 32 B 2048 MB 7.5 ns $0.10/MB 4 KB 250 GB 8 ms $0.0002/MB larger, slower, cheaper

DRAM vs. SRAM as a “Cache” DRAM vs. disk is more extreme than SRAM vs. DRAM Access latencies: DRAM ~10X slower than SRAM Disk ~100,000X slower than DRAM Importance of exploiting spatial locality: First byte is ~100,000X slower than successive bytes on disk vs. ~4X improvement for page-mode vs. regular accesses to DRAM Bottom line: Design decisions made for disk caches in DRAM driven by enormous cost of misses SRAM DRAM Disk

Impact of Properties on Design If disk cache were organized like L1/L2 cache, how would we set following design parameters? Line size? Large, since disk better at transferring large blocks Associativity? High, to mimimize miss rate Write through or write back? Write back, since can’t afford small writes to disk What would the impact of these choices be on: Miss rate Extremely low: << 1% Hit time Must match cache/DRAM performance Miss latency Very high: ~20ms Tag storage overhead Low, relative to block size

Locating an Object in a “Cache” Review of SRAM (L1/L2) Cache Tag stored with cache line Maps from cache block to memory blocks From cached to uncached form Save a few bits by only storing tag of blocks that are in cache No tag for block not in cache Hardware retrieves information Can quickly match against multiple tags Tag Data D 243 X 17 J 105 • 0: 1: N-1: = X? “Cache” X Object Name

Locating an Object in a “Cache” DRAM (disk) Cache Each allocated page of virtual memory has entry in page table Mapping from virtual to physical pages From uncached form to cached form Page table entry (tag) even if page not in memory Specifies disk address Only way to know where to find page OS retrieves information from disk as needed Page Table “Cache” Location Data 243 17 105 • 0: 1: N-1: X Object Name D: J: X: On Disk • 1

A System with Physical Memory Only Examples: Most Cray machines, early PCs, nearly all embedded systems, etc. CPU 0: 1: N-1: Memory Physical Addresses Addresses generated by the CPU correspond directly to bytes in physical memory

A System with Virtual Memory Examples: Workstations, servers, modern PCs, etc. Memory 0: 1: N-1: Page Table Virtual Addresses Physical Addresses 0: 1: CPU P-1: Disk Address Translation: Hardware converts virtual addresses to physical ones via OS-managed lookup table (page table)

Page Faults (Like “Cache Misses”) What if object is on disk rather than in memory? Page table entry indicates virtual address not in memory OS exception handler invoked to move data from disk into memory - VM and Multiprogramming are symbiotic Current process suspends, others can resume OS has full control over placement, etc. Before fault After fault Memory Memory Page Table Page Table Virtual Addresses Physical Addresses Virtual Addresses Physical Addresses CPU CPU Disk Disk

Servicing Page Fault Processor signals controller Read occurs (1) Initiate Block Read Processor signals controller Read block of length P starting at disk address X and store starting at memory address Y Read occurs Direct Memory Access (DMA) Under control of I/O controller I / O controller signals completion Interrupt processor OS resumes suspended process Processor Reg (3) Read Done Cache Memory-I/O bus (2) DMA Transfer I/O controller Memory disk Disk Disk disk

Motivation #2: Memory Mgmt Multiple processes can reside in physical memory. How do we resolve address conflicts? What if two processes access something at same address? memory invisible to user code kernel virtual memory %esp stack Memory-mapped region for shared libraries Linux/x86 process memory image the “brk” pointer runtime heap (via malloc) uninitialized data (.bss) initialized data (.data) program text (.text) forbidden

Solution: Separate Virtual Address Spaces Virtual and physical address spaces divided into equal-sized blocks Blocks are called “pages” (both virtual and physical) Each process has its own virtual address space Operating system controls how virtual pages are assigned to physical memory Physical Address Space (DRAM) Virtual Address Space for Process 1: Address Translation VP 1 PP 2 VP 2 ... N-1 (e.g., read/only library code) PP 7 Virtual Address Space for Process 2: VP 1 VP 2 PP 10 ... M-1 N-1

Motivation #3: Protection Page table entry contains access-rights information Hardware enforces this protection (trap into OS if violation occurs) Page Tables Memory Physical Addr Read? Write? PP 9 Yes No PP 4 XXXXXXX VP 0: VP 1: VP 2: • 0: 1: N-1: Process i: Physical Addr Read? Write? PP 6 Yes PP 9 No XXXXXXX • VP 0: VP 1: VP 2: Process j:

VM Address Translation Virtual Address Space V = {0, 1, …, N–1} Physical Address Space P = {0, 1, …, M–1} M < N—Usually… PDP 11/70, modern Pentiums violate this Address Translation MAP: V  P  {} For virtual address a: MAP(a) = a′ if data at virtual address a is at physical address a′ in P MAP(a) =  if data at virtual address a is not in physical memory Either invalid or stored on disk

VM Address Translation: Hit Processor Hardware Addr Trans Mechanism Main Memory a a' virtual address physical address part of on-chip memory mgmt unit (MMU)

VM Address Translation: Miss page fault fault handler Processor Hardware Addr Trans Mechanism  Main Memory Secondary memory a a' OS performs this transfer (only if miss) virtual address physical address part of on-chip memory mgmt unit (MMU)

VM Address Translation Parameters P = 2p = page size (bytes). N = 2n = Virtual-address limit M = 2m = Physical-address limit n–1 p p–1 virtual page number page offset virtual address address translation m–1 p p–1 physical page number page offset physical address Page offset bits don’t change as a result of translation

Page Tables Virtual Page Number Memory-resident page table (physical page or disk address) Physical Memory Valid 1 1 1 1 1 1 Disk Storage (swap file or regular file system file) 1

Address Translation via Page Table virtual page number (VPN) page offset virtual address physical page number (PPN) physical address p–1 p m–1 n–1 page table base register if valid=0 then page not in memory valid access VPN acts as table index

Page Table Operation Translation Separate (set of) page table(s) per process VPN forms index into page table (points to a page table entry)

Page Table Operation Computing physical address Page Table Entry (PTE) provides information about page If (valid bit = 1) then page is in memory. Use physical page number (PPN) to construct address If (valid bit = 0) then page is on disk (or nonexistent) Page fault

Page Table Operation Checking protection Access-rights field indicates allowable access E.g., read-only, read-write, execute-only Typically support multiple protection modes (e.g., kernel vs. user) Protection-violation fault if user doesn’t have necessary permission

Integrating VM and Cache CPU Trans- lation Cache Main Memory VA PA miss hit data Most caches “physically addressed” Accessed by physical addresses Allows multiple processes to have blocks in cache at same time else context switch == cache flush Allows multiple processes to share pages Cache doesn’t need to be concerned with protection issues Access rights checked as part of address translation Perform address translation before cache lookup Could involve memory access itself (to get PTE) So page table entries can also be cached

Speeding up Translation With a TLB “Translation Lookaside Buffer” (TLB) Small hardware cache in MMU Maps virtual page numbers to physical page numbers Contains complete page table entries for small number of pages CPU TLB Lookup Cache Main Memory VA PA miss hit data Trans- lation

Address Translation With a TLB p p–1 virtual page number page offset virtual address valid tag physical page number TLB . . . = TLB hit physical address tag byte offset index valid tag data Cache = cache hit data

Multi-Level Page Tables Given: 4KB (212) page size 32-bit address space 4-byte PTE Problem: Would need a 4 MB page table! 220 *4 bytes Common solution Multi-level page tables E.g., 2-level table (P6) Level-1 table: 1024 entries, each of which points to a Level 2 page table. Level-2 table: 1024 entries, each of which points to a page Level 1 Table ...

Main Themes Programmer’s View System View Large “flat” address space Can allocate large blocks of contiguous addresses Process “owns” machine Has private address space Unaffected by behavior of other processes System View User virtual address space created by mapping to set of pages Need not be contiguous Allocated dynamically Enforce protection during address translation OS manages many processes simultaneously Continually switching among processes Especially when one must wait for resource E.g., disk I/O to handle page fault