Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
Advertisements

Bode Diagram (1) Hany Ferdinando Dept. of Electrical Engineering Petra Christian University.
Heat Capacity II Sound Velocity Method CHEM 4396 (W237) Physical Chemistry Laboratory Fall 2009 Instructor: Dr. Aleksey I. Filin.
Chapter 4 Modelling and Analysis for Process Control
Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Laplace Transforms.
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
LABORATORY 3 Transient Thermal Behavior with Work and Heat Loss.
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Review. Please Return Loan Clickers to the MEG office after Class! Today! FINAL EXAM: Wednesday December 8 8:00 AM to 10:00 a.m.
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Frequency Response Analysis
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
1 Frequency Response Methods The system is described in terms of its response to one form of basic signals – sinusoid. The reasons of using frequency domain.
ABSTRACT Many new devices and applications are being created that involve transporting droplets from one place to another. A common method of achieving.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
Dr. / Mohamed Ahmed Ebrahim Mohamed Automatic Control By Dr. / Mohamed Ahmed Ebrahim Mohamed Web site:
B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
Linearizing ODEs of a PID Controller Anchored by: Rob Chockley and Scott Dombrowski.
1 Slides taken from: A.R. Hambley, Electronics, © Prentice Hall, 2/e, 2000 Frequency Response. Part D – Amplifiers at Low Frequency.
Experimental determination of motor model parameters ETEC6419.
Automatic Control Theory-
2-1 (a),(b) (pp.50) Problem: Prove that the systems shown in Fig. (a) and Fig. (b) are similar.(that is, the format of differential equation is similar).
Chapter 13 1 Frequency Response Analysis Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process For a first-order transfer function with gain K and time constant,
1 Chapter 5 Sinusoidal Input. 2 Chapter 5 Examples: 1.24 hour variations in cooling water temperature Hz electrical noise (in USA!) Processes are.
Chapter 4. Modelling and Analysis for Process Control
INC 341PT & BP INC341 Frequency Response Method Lecture 11.
Lecture 2: Measurement and Instrumentation. Time vs. Frequency Domain Different ways of looking at a problem –Interchangeable: no information is lost.
Sec. 3.3: Rules of Differentiation. The following rules allow you to find derivatives without the direct use of the limit definition. The Constant Rule.
Frequency Response Analysis and Stability
Phasors and Kirchhoff’s Current Law
Lecture 21: Intro to Frequency Response 1.Review of time response techniques 2.Intro to the concept of frequency response 3.Intro to Bode plots and their.
Periodic Function Review
G(s) Input (sinusoid) Time Output Ti me InputOutput A linear, time-invariant single input and single output (SISO) system. The input to this system is.
Lesson 16: Basic Control Modes
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Time Domain and Frequency Domain Analysis
DNT Control Principle Frequency Response Techniques DNT Control Principle.
Dynamic Behavior of Ideal Systems
Automatic Control System
Frequency Response Analysis
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Lesson 10: Sensor and Transducer Electrical Characteristics
Project 1: Brake System Modelling & Control
Frequency Response Method
دکتر حسين بلندي- دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده
Frequency Response Analysis
Example Combination of Systems Transfer Function:
Time-domain vs Frequency -domain?
Frequency Response Analysis
UNIVERSITÁ DEGLI STUDI DI SALERNO FACOLTÀ DI INGEGNERIA
Equations & Graphing Algebra 1, Unit 3, Lesson 5.
The Frequency-Response Design Method
Presentation transcript:

Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L

Overview Schematic of the system Results of Steady State Operating Curve Results of Step Function FOPDT Theory Model Theory FOPDT Results Frequency Response Frequency Response Modeling Conclusions

Pressure Schematic

Input M(t) - Specified by user Output - Air pressure resulting from motors response.

Experiment Data at a Specified Input

Graphical Results

Step Up Function (Range 15-30 cm-H2O)

Step Down Function (Range 30-15 cm-H2O)

FOPDT Model Equation C(t)= A*u(t-td-t0)*K*(1-e-(t-td-to/tau)) For the given output range of 15-30 cm-H2O, the following parameters were used: Td=15 sec. A=20 % K=0.75 cm-H2O/% t0=0.4 sec. Tau=1.5 sec. Inbl=45% Power Outbl=15 cm-H2O FOPDT

First Order Step Up Response with Time Delay K=0.76 +/-.02 cm-H2O/%Power Tau=1.5 +/-0.3 sec. To= 0.1 sec. First Order Step Up Response with Time Delay

First Order Step Down Response with Time Delay Experimental and Model inputs To=0.1 sec. K=0.74 +/-0.15 cm-H2O/%Power Tau= 2.1+/-0.2 sec. First Order Step Down Response with Time Delay

First Order Step Up Response Results Experimental Increasing Step Function Data Steady State Gain K= .76 +/- .02 cm H20 / % Power Dead Time to = 0.1 sec. Time Constant Tau = 1.5 +/- .3 sec. Model Increasing Step Function Data Steady State Gain K = .75 cm H20 / % Power Dead Time to = 0.4 sec. Time Constant Tau = 1.5 sec. First Order Step Up Response Results

First Order Step Down Response Results Experimental Decreasing Step Function Data Steady State Gain K= .74 +/- .015 cm H20 / % Power Dead Time to = 0.1 sec. Time Constant Tau = 2.1 +/- .2 sec. Model Decreasing Step Function Data Steady State Gain K = .75 cm H20 / % Power Dead Time to = 0.4 sec. Time Constant Tau = 1.5 sec. First Order Step Down Response Results

Sine Wave at .2 Frequency

Lissajous @ .2 Frequency

Bode Plot for range 2

Phase angle vs. Frequency

What we find with Bode Range 1 Range 2 Range 3 FU 0.46 cycles/sec k 1 cm-H20/% order 0.82 0.85 0.8 1/kcu 0.34 cm-H20/% 0.34 cm-H20/% 0.35 cm-H20/%

Modeling – Frequency vs. AR

Modeling – Frequency vs. PA

Understanding the Steady State Operating Range of the system allows the user to predict Output pressures Operating range of the motor was 5-45 cm-H2O FOPDT transfer functions are important to approximate the response of dynamic processes FOPDT Model Graph and Experimental Graph are consistent Pressure System has a quick response time of To=0.1sec. Differential of Tau: Step Up 1.5+/-.3sec. Step Down 2.1+/-.2 sec. Conclusion Part 1

Conclusion Part 2 Sine Wave Experiment Bode Graph –AR vs. Frequency Bode Graph – PA vs. Frequency Yellow team 1/kcu – k – order – FU calcs Frequency Response Modeling Conclusion Part 2