Measurement of

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for Charged Higgs in the Decay of Top Quarks at D0.
Advertisements

Quark Compositeness Search with γ +Jet Final State at the LHC Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh Choudhary, Debajyoti Choudhury Department.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
III Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE. Frascati 1 Vertex reconstruction and selection strategies for D s detection in Pb-Pb collisions Sergey Senyukov,
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
University of Gaziantep Department of Engineering Physics August 2006 Page 1/18 A.Beddall, A.Beddall and A. Bingül Department of Engineering Physics University.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
1 4 th June 2007 C.P. Ward Update on ZZ->llnunu Analysis and Sensitivity to Anomalous Couplings Tom Barber, Richard Batley, Pat Ward University of Cambridge.
Analysis work by: Marina Artuso Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/dompi.ps Study of B  D   Jianchun Wang 05/12/00.
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Latest Physics Results from ALEPH Paolo Azzurri CERN - July 15, 2003.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
LCWS14, Belgrade, October M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.
-- Th. S. Bauer (NIKHEF) -- ECT Hera-B Physics results 1.Data of the year 2000 limited statistics 2.Commissioning: trigger and detector.
1 Top and Tau Measurements Tim Barklow (SLAC) Oct 02, 2009.
Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
2° ILD Workshop Cambridge 11-14/09/08 The sensitivity of the International Linear Collider to the     in the di-muon final state Nicola D’Ascenzo University.
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade Ivanka Bozovic-Jelisavcic, Strahinja Lukic, Mila Pandurovic Branching ratio.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Shawn Hayes Cohorts: Tianqi Tang, Molly Herman Higgs Analysis for CLIC at 380 GeV simulations.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Ayumi Yamamoto, Akimasa Ishikawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto (Tohoku University) Keisuke Fujii (KEK)
Multi-lepton and general searches at HERA Andrea Parenti (DESY-Hamburg) on behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaborations - DIS Outline: ● Multi-electron.
Discrimination of new physics models with ILC
The truth information in the hadronic samples
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Studies of prompt photon identification and 0 isolation in first p-p collisions at √s=10 TeV May 20, 2009 Meeting Frascati Raphaëlle Ichou.
Cross section of the process
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
A reconstruction algorithm for photons converted in tracker
Measurement of inclusive branching fraction for y(3686)fX
Overview of CMS H→ analysis and the IHEP/IPNL contributions
Impact of ILC Tracker Design on e+e-  H0Z0  m+m- X Analysis
ILC Software Meeting, Orsay 05/07
BSM search using Higgs to invisible decay at the ILC
An Important thing to know.
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Higgs Physics at a gg Collider
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
Measurement of the Gluon Polarization at COMPASS
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Event Shape Variables in DIS Update
Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
M. Ohlerich, A. Raspiareza, W. Lohmann DESY and MPI Munich
Study of Hb`b, c`c and gg in the `H channel
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Study of Top properties at LHC
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Search for a New Vector Resonance in the pp WWtt+X Channel at LHC
Presentation transcript:

Measurement of 𝐵𝑅(𝐻→𝛾𝛾) via 𝑍→𝑞 𝑞 channel in 𝑒 + 𝑒 − colliders at 250 GeV Yitian Sun May 8th, 2017

I. Introduction. 𝑒 + 𝑒 − →𝑍𝐻→𝑞 𝑞 𝛾𝛾 as part of the measurement of BR 𝛨→𝛾𝛾 . II. Signal and background. III. Photon recovery in the di-jet environment. IV. Event selection (motivation and optimization). V. Uncertainty of the BR measurement (Monte Carlo). VI. Dependence on Ecal performance and photon reconstruction.

irreducible background II. Signal & Background. event # signal irreducible background 5ab-1 expect: 1633 11011914 full simulation: 40000 11300000 SM expect: BR(H-->γγ) = 0.23% at MHiggs = 125 GeV.

{ ΙΙΙ. Photon recovery. General reconstruction: single γ: ~ 90% pair γ: ~ 81% recon γ1 matches… (Eγ1 > Eγ2). 10000 signal γ1Truth γ2Truth non 80.22% <0.01% 0.30% 2.30% 8.29% 7.84% 1.05% Good. Good but reversed. recon γ2 matches… { May caused by conversion; to save.

ΙΙΙ. Photon recovery. Additional reconstruction:* for all pairs of e+e-: momentum angle < 19 deg, invariant mass < 5 GeV, clean cone of 7 deg radius. 7° 19° 5 GeV γ1 γ2 recon !recon !conv 83.58% 1.43% conv 13.50% 1.50% total 97.08% 2.92% recon !recon 83.07% 2.55% 12.26% 2.12% 95.33% 4.67% Efficiency boost: γ1: 90.8% 97.1% γ2: 90.7% 95.3% pair: 82.5% 92.5% *Motivated by Boos, 2000.

IV. Event selection. How to separate signal from background? Guideline: Signal has 1 degree of freedom less than irreducible background. However, should not exploit this until fitting. Differences in distribution are always related to external geometry (like z-axis). Cut1 – Paraxial ISR. Direction consideration require a 2D cut.

IV. Event selection. signal background not to scale not to scale Optimized w.r.t. G=S/√S+B, where S and B signal and background event counting with diphoton invariant mass in the range 125+/-3 GeV ( ~ signal width).

IV. Event selection. How to separate signal from background? Guideline: Signal has 1 degree of freedom less than irreducible background. However, should not exploit this until fitting. Differences in distribution are always related to external geometry (like z-axis). Cut1 – Paraxial ISR. Direction consideration require a 2D cut. Cut2 - Angle with recoil momentum: further exploit the paraxial feature.

IV. Event selection. γ’s angle with recoil not to scale not to scale signal background

IV. Event selection. How to separate signal from background? Guideline: Signal has 1 degree of freedom less than irreducible background. However, should not exploit this until fitting. Differences in distribution are always related to external geometry (like z-axis). Cut1 – Paraxial ISR. Direction consideration require a 2D cut. Cut2 - Angle with recoil momentum: further exploit the paraxial feature. Cut3 - Trimming in E-M plane of di-photon system for better projection.

IV. Event selection. signal background (1 d.o.f. less) not to scale

IV. Event selection. How to separate signal from background? Guideline: Signal has 1 degree of freedom less than irreducible background. However, should not exploit this until fitting. Differences in distribution are always related to external geometry (like z-axis). Cut1 – Paraxial ISR. Direction consideration require a 2D cut. Cut2 - Angle with recoil momentum: further exploit the paraxial feature. Cut3 - Trimming in E-M plane of di-photon system for better projection. Precut simply loosen up the event selection criterion.

IV. Event selection: Cuts Polar angle cos θγ < 0.99; energy E > 25 GeV. Polar angles satisfy (cos θγ1+1)(cos θγ2−1) < −0.07 and (cos θγ1−1)(cos θγ2+1) < −0.07. Angle with recoil momentum cos θγ1,recoil > - 0.95 and cos θγ2,recoil < 0.70. Invariant mass- Energy plane of di-photons system Eγγ < 0.48*Mγγ+83 and Eγγ > 0.74*Mγγ+41. Unit: GeV

IV. Event selection: Efficiency. 122 GeV < Mγγ < 128 GeV UnCut Cut0 Cut1 Cut2 Cut3 SIGNAL Event: 24078 23909 18489 16027 14238 Expect: 982 976 754 654 581 AccumuEff: 100% 99.30% 76.79% 66.56% 59.13% StageEff: 77.33% 86.68% 88.84% BACK-GROUND* 335045 17724 16402 9897 6339 326503 17272 15983 9644 6177 5.29% 4.90% 2.95% 1.89% 92.54% 60.34% 64.05% 113 GeV < Mγγ < 150 GeV 37154 36540 27597 23821 20296 1516 1491 1126 972 828 98.35% 74.28% 64.11% 54.63% 75.53% 86.32% 85.20% 92362 85041 51049 29900 90007 82872 49747 29137 27.57% 25.38% 15.24% 8.92% 92.07% 60.03% 58.57% Near signal. G = S/√S+B = 7.07 Fit region. * background # is after precut

V. Uncertainty of BR measurement Di-photon invariant mass (after selection). Signal and background: fitted independently to perform Monte Carlo to evaluate uncertainty. Fit region: 113 GeV - 150 GeV, 18 bins. Signal: gaussian (signal width >> Higgs width). Background: quadratic.

V. Uncertainty: MC results for current photon recovery efficiency of 92.5% and signal width of 2.9 GeV: Signal count S Truth = 828. Fitted S = 850 +/- 131 (15.4%). Fit program reported uncertainty mean: 15.86% +/- 0.06% (0.4%). systematic shift (2.7%) ⊕ statistical uncertainty (15.4%) ≈ 15.6%

VI. Dependence on Ecal and photon recovery this result Agrees well apart from small uniform shift (shown before)

Conclusion. Motivated and optimized photon recovery algorithm and event selection for this specific channel. Uncertainty of BR(H-->γγ) = 15.6%. Dependence on Ecal performace and photon recovery as expected.