K R Investigator Research Question

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

Writing a Fellowship Part 1. My Fellowship History In my third year as a post-doc fellow I received a Leukemia and Lymphoma fellowship for senior fellows.
Overview of Mentored K Awards Shawna V. Hudson, PhD Assistant Professor of Family Medicine and Community Health UMDNJ-RWJMS The Cancer Institute of New.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 2 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 3 OF AAPLS – PART 2: POLICY & APPLICATION COMPONENTS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Preparing Grant Applications
November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.
Helping Your Mentees Develop a Competitive K Award Application (K01, K07, K08, K23, K25, K99) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
1 NIH Grant-Writing Workshop Leora Lawton, Ph.D. Executive Director, Berkeley Population Center Summer 2015 Dlab Workshop Session 5: Human Subjects and.
11 1 Enhancing Peer Review Frequently Asked Questions on Application Changes.
Creating a Research Plan for a Career Development Award Jill Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
David Lodowski APPLYING FOR A K99. K99/R00 PROVIDES 2 PHASES OF SUPPORT 1 st Phase: mentored support 90,000/year for up to 2 years* with at least 1 year.
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Preparing a Successful SHRM Foundation Grant Application Lynn McFarland, Ph.D. August 23, 2012.
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
NIH Electronic Grant Proposals (SF 424) K08 – K 23 Grant Applications Individual Career Development Awards Isidro B. Salusky, MD Distinguished Professor.
Grant Research Basics. Asking the Question  Before you start, you must have both clearly stated research question and primary outcome measure.  What.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
Helping Your Mentees Develop a Competitive K Award Application (K01, K07, K08, K23, K25, K99) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Dept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Checking off your tenure “to do” list Maureen Gannon, PhD Vanderbilt University Medical Center Associate Professor of Medicine, Molecular Physiology and.
Tips on Fellowship Writing A Reviewer’s Perspective Wendy Havran.
Career Development Awards (K series) and Research Project Grants (R series) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University.
Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
GRANT & PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF THE VICE DEAN, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CIHR Project Scheme st Live Pilot Workshop Translating the Open Operating.
OCTOBER 18, 2011 SESSION 9 OF AAPLS – SELECTED SUPPORTING COMPONENTS OF SF424 (R&R) APPLICATION APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
FULBRIGHT STUDY/RESEARCH GRANT Statement of Grant Purpose Workshop.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
Writing an Effective K Application
NIH Fellowships Overview
Writing an Effective K Application
The NIH Biosketch UZ-UCSF CTU Writer’s Workshop July 2017
Career Development Plan: the cornerstone of the K award
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Future Fellowships: perspective from a SAC member
Grant Writing Information Session
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
Writing an Effective K Application
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
Grants Academy Session Four
How to Write a Successful NIH Career Development Award (K Award)
Writing that First Research Grant
Preparing Research Proposals for NSF and NIH April 20, 2018
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
Russell Center Small Research Grants Program
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
How to Succeed with NSF: September 14, 2018
Inclusive Excellence Grants for Faculty and Graduate Students
PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director,
K Awards: Writing the Career Award Development Plan
A reviewer’s perspective on K-awards:
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Writing a Successful Career Development (K) Award. Paula Gregory, PhD
Presentation transcript:

BU Career Development Grant Writing Course- Session 1 Part II, CDA Overview

K R Investigator Research Question Continuum of emphasis – Ks fund the candidate, Rs fund the research question. Continuum because Investigator has to prove competent to carry out the research study and the candidate needs a strong research question.

K Awards Look up parent award Awards are Institute specific: Research area and priorities Salary limit Research costs Funding lines FILL IN PARENT AWARD #s

Section Page Limit 2. Candidate’s Background * 3. Career Goals & Objectives for the Award 4. Career Development/Training Activities during Award Period 5. Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research 1 7. Statements by Mentors, Co-Mentors, Consultants 6 8. Description of Institutional Environment 9. Letter of Institutional Support 10. Specific Aims 11. Research Strategy 14. Protection of Human Subjects none Letters of Reference (submitted separately) 3-5 Abstract 12 * 12 pages total for Sections 2-4, 11

Candidate’s Background Use this section to provide any additional information not described in the Biosketch personal statement such as research and/or clinical training experience This begins your scientific story– what have you done, and how has it brought you to this moment where you require additional training

Career Goals & Objectives Goal always to be independent researcher If there are consistent themes or issues that have guided previous work, these should be made clear; if your work has changed direction, the reasons for the change should be indicated. It is important to justify the award and how it will enable you to develop or expand your research career. You may include a timeline, including plans to apply for subsequent grant support.

Career Development/Training Activities During Award Do not underestimate this section Stress the new research skills you will acquire Describe structured activities, such as course work or technique workshops Briefly discuss each of the activities, except research, in which you expect to participate. Include a percentage of time involvement for each activity by year and explain how the activity is related to the proposed research and the career development plan. Must be SPECIFIC and logical Should link well with research aims If you have considerable research experience in the same areas as the proposed research, reviewers may determine that the application lacks potential to enhance your research career.

Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Describe a plan to acquire instruction in the responsible conduct of research. This section should document prior instruction or participation in RCR training during the applicant’s current career stage (including dates) and propose plans to either receive instruction or participate as a course lecturer, etc. in order to meet the once every 4 yr requirement. The role of mentor in RCR instruction must be described.

Mentor, Co-Mentor Letters Completed by Mentor, go in with application The mentor must explain how they will contribute to the development of the candidate’s research career. Describe the nature of supervision, activities, etc. and a plan for transitioning the candidate to independent investigator. Mentor’s experience mentoring Best if you have prior paper with mentor Must MATCH your career development and research plans

Description of Institutional Environment Document a strong, well-established research program related to the candidate’s area of interest, including the names of key faculty members relevant to the candidate’s proposed development plan. Indicate how necessary facilities and other resources will be made available for career enhancement as well as research proposed. Describe opportunities for intellectual interactions with other investigators, including courses, journal clubs, seminars, etc. Make boiler plate personal

Institutional Commitment to Candidate’s Research Career Letterhead, from Chair Describe commitment to the Candidate’s career development, independent of receipt of award Agree to provide adequate time (75% and support to devote the proposed protected time to research and career development for the entire period of the proposed award Commitment to retention, development & advancement of Candidate during award

Specific Aims– *Carter to go into depth here State precisely the goals of the proposed research and summarize the expected outcome(s) including the impact that the results of the proposed research will exert on the research field(s) involved. List succinctly the specific objectives of the research proposed, e.g., to test a stated hypothesis, create a novel design, solve a specific problem, challenge an existing paradigm or clinical practice, address a critical barrier to progress in the field, or develop new technology.

Research Strategy *Carter to go into depth here Significance Innovation Approach Preliminary studies for new applications

Letters of Reference Minimum of 3, maximum 5 Candidates competence and potential to develop into an independent investigator Meaningful comments about candidate’s professional training and qualifications Outside institution if possible

CDA Pearls Early on in the process (now) map out each part of the application that must be completed and a proposed timeline Other sections to be completed that can be time consuming on which we will spend less time this course = human subjects, budget narrative and budget creation You want your reviewer to like you (and s/he is not inclined to like you)- make his or her job easier with nice tables & figure, no type-os, few abbreviations