Carlo Gianelle, Fabrizio Guzzo

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.

Advertisements

Theory-Based Evaluation:

Linking regions and central governments: Indicators for performance-based regional development policy 6 th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF COHESION.

1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.

Fieldwork assessment The difference between AS and A2 David Redfern

CRITICAL THINKING The Discipline The Skill The Art.

Evaluating and Measuring Impact Presented by – Date –

Mywish K. Maredia Michigan State University

Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow

Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.

Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.

Problem Analysis Intelligence Step 2 - Problem Analysis Developing solutions to complex population nutrition problems (such as obesity or food insecurity)

ARQ part II data management Training pack 2: Monitoring drug abuse for policy and practice.

The evaluation of quality of the training offer at territorial level The evaluation of quality of the training offer within territorial systems Isfol –

Measuring Innovation and Smart Specialisation – What have we Learned? Dirk Pilat, OECD.

Evidence based research in education Cathy Gunn University of Auckland.

Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.

The aim / learning outcome of this module is to understand how to gather and use data effectively to plan the development of recycling and composting.

704: Conducting Business in Fiscally Challenging Times: Strategies and Tools to Get There PCYA Leadership Academy Presentation March 28, 2012.

4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.

Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.

The Professional Pedagogy Project Rationale and aims What made the PPP innovative and different? Monitoring the impacts of the PPP.

0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.

AF5.3 L1-2 Processing and analysing data to support the evaluation process and draw conclusions Say what happened in an investigation.

"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.

Case Studies and Review Week 4 NJ Kang. 5) Studying Cases Case study is a strategy for doing research which involves an empirical investigation of a particular.

1 Evaluation Utilization: the case of the Paris Evaluation (Phase 1) and its use in the Accra HLF3 process Paris Evaluation Phase 2 Planning Meeting, Feb.

4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development programs.

Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.

Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.

Welcome to the (ENTER YOUR SYSTEM/SCHOOL NAME) Data Dig 1.

Nursing Research Week Two Research Problem Definition: a perplexing or troubling condition. Sources – Clinical experience – Nursing literature – Social.

Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.

Thematic Working Group no. 3 Guidelines Evaluation of LEADER/CLLD

Understanding Theory and Research Frameworks

Accounting 9706.

Title Investigators and sites. Clinical Trial Proposal Presentation Template for open forum at the 2017 ASM.

Fabrizio Guzzo Barcelona, 4 May 2017.

Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations

Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions

Keeping Track in Complicated and Complex Situations

Evaluation : goals and principles

Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations

Data Collection Methods

UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,

Theory of Change template

EDU 633 Innovative Education- -snaptutorial.com

WELCOME HEIDI VAN DER WESTHUIZEN Cell:

Competency Based Learning and Development

Employment and Social Affairs Platform

© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Logical Framework I want to design a project by planning out the logic

Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert

Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior

Ian D. Rotherham Professor of Environmental Geography,

Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results-

Progress of the preparations for a White Paper on Adaptation to Climate Change Water Directors’ meeting Slovenia June 2008 Marieke van Nood, Unit.

Introduction to M&E Frameworks

LONELINESS What we know (so far) An overview of evidence reviews:

Antonio Cammarota DG EMPL/B3 Health and Safety

Chapter 3 The Idea Of Causation on Social Research

Monitoring Smart Specialisation Strategies

Implementing disruptive health innovations: Redefining traditional innovation vectors for impactful solutions Jayaram Subramanian*, Mark Barrow, Timothy.

Planning process in river basin management

Prepare to submit your SDG Story!

Research Proposal and Report

Theory of Change template

“ICTs for Development” Course

The nature of innovation in education The Road to Modernization of Education: Innovation and Sustainability The 2nd G20 Education Dialogue December.

Quality and Impact AIM PRIMARY DRIVERS SECONDARY DRIVERS INTERVENTIONS

Presentation transcript:

Carlo Gianelle, Fabrizio Guzzo Evaluation of Smart Specialisation: Some introductory notes to the brainstorming session Carlo Gianelle, Fabrizio Guzzo Brussels, 24 January 2019

Some reflections to start with What we mean by “evaluation” 01 Characteristics of Smart Specialisation policy and implications for evaluation 02 03 Choice of evaluation methods The (important) relationship between monitoring and evaluation 04

What do we mean by "evaluation"? 01 We use this term to refer to the application of quantitative or qualitative techniques with the aim to reach a better understanding of the mechanisms behind a certain observed course of action related to a policy intervention or relevant for the aim of the policy DIRECT influence of the policy intervention on the relevant socio-economic outcomes Factors and circumstances NOT directly related to the policy intervention which may influence the policy process and the policy outcomes

Characteristics of Smart Specialisation policy and implications for evaluation 02 Smart Specialisation: a complicated and complex policy framework Meta-policy – policy process reshaping other policy areas Multi-level governance setting and multiple objectives Selective public intervention – priority areas Smart Specialisation evaluation: what? POLICY – Impact of all strategies implemented in a defined area (e.g. EU level) STRATEGY – Impact of a single strategy (e.g effects on the regional innovation ecosystem) INSTRUMENTS (Specific objectives)

Choice of evaluation methods 03 There is no superior method of producing evidence The choice of methods needs to follow from the type of questions that are being asked Use of different perspectives and methods

The (important) relationship between monitoring and evaluation 04 The rationale is ultimately the same!  Better understand the reality of the policy intervention, compare it with expectations, and explain the possible gap MONITORING: describe what is going on EVALUATION: explain why we observe a certain situation …we start evaluation by analysing the result and output variables in the S3 monitoring system

Any questions? You can find us at Carlo.GIANELLE@ec.europa.eu Fabrizio.GUZZO@ec.europa.eu