Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR) You’re representing OSD and Army as the current assessment manager. No need to highlight TACOM as a POC. Okay, but it did explain why Dave was there. He’s my boss and the one Dubin tasked with giving this briefing. I don’t mind him not on the slide, but will hate explaining it to him. Suggest eliminating 2 slides: #10 “Value of Initiative” and #13 “Annual Funding Requirement”. I thought #10 was embodied in “assessment objective” slide. Funding slide could lead to discussion on each line. Included FY00 and FY01 funding requirements as sub-bullet on recommendation slide. I put slide 10 because it will give Gen Foss an opportunity to explain to C3 what it can add to DISC4. We may not get to it, but would like it in there for now. I’ll talk to Foss and see what he thinks. February 2006

Brief Outline Background Objectives Process Areas of Investigation Team’s Ground Rules Cost What We Hope to Accomplish

Background Oct 98: Tri-service Assessment Initiative (TAI) founded by OSD to address software acquisition issues Army selected as Executive Agent May 00: Defense Science Board recommends independent assessments for all ACAT I-III programs Jun 01: Independent Expert Program Reviews incorporated into DoD 5000.2-R ACAT IC/ID programs shall conduct an IEPR between MS B and CDR Apr 04: OSD re-directed Systems engineering efforts toward Defense Acquisition Program Support (DAPS) and transferred TAI to DCMA for execution Present: ASN (RDA) continues to perform IEPRs for Navy PM’s using TAI process

IEPR Objectives Provide Assistance to Program Managers Identify specific program risks Provide PMs with actionable recommendations Use the Total DoD Capability (expertise and tools) IEPR Teams leverage DoD, FFRDCs, academia, agencies, industry resources Analyze Systemic Issues that Plague Projects Across Navy Make recommendations to acquisition leadership to improve Navy acquisition as a whole

Typical Assessment Process Initiate & Plan Assessment Meet with PM, establish scope and initial issue areas Collect program information Assign appropriate team Conduct Assessment Team meeting to review program information, strategy Team visits (Prime Contractor, Program Office, Other) Integrate and Report Results Analyze issues Generate recommendations and report Provide IEPR Program Assessment consistent with RDA Reporting (e.g. Dashboard) Review with Program Office Finalize report Solicit customer feedback

Assessment Team Groundrules Overall objective - contribute to program success Non-Disclosure - confidentiality Adherence to the defined Assessment Process Prepare questionnaires if necessary Non-attribution interviews Open and objective communication Multiple perspectives Consensus based recommendations

Assessment Issue Areas Environment - Regulatory, Workplace, Political Mission Requirements - Stability, Dependencies Financial - Funding, Budget Resources - Personnel, Facilities, Tools, Products Management - Acquisition Strategy, Project Planning, Contracting/Subcontracting Technical Process - Capability, Conformance, Enhancement Technical Product - Product Line, Quality, Safety Schedule - Progress, Dependencies User / Customer - Satisfaction, Training Project / Team Specific - Project/Team Defined

Cost IEPR are conducted on a reimbursable basis DASN ACQ personnel travel costs only Government Team Members DBOF activities on a Reimbursable Basis Other activity members for Travel only Contractor/Consultant SME’s on a full Basis DASN ACQ will coordinate all required contracting actions Reimbursable funds provided to DASN ACQ via MIPR

What We Accomplish for a Program Identify and Prioritize Program Issues: Use experience and expertise of the team members Build on knowledge gained from other IEPR assessments Investigate and Evaluate Identified Issues: Discussions, Document Reviews, and Analysis Capitalize on different perspectives gained Cause and Effect, and Issue Inter-relationships Deliver a comprehensive Assessment Report/Outbrief: Strengths Prioritized issues and associated risks Actionable recommendations and follow up activities Overall Assessment consistent with RDA reporting Provide PM the Knowledge to be Successful