New Faculty Orientation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Reappointment, Promotion & Continuous Appointment (Tenure) Process and Issues.
Advertisements

Retention Reviews Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
Your Career at Queen’s The annual review process for QUFA faculty Brenda Brouwer Vice-Provost and Dean School of Graduate Studies.
Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Faculty Performance Evaluation (FPE) Plan
Workload Agreements New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Professor of English Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
Faculty Affairs presents:.  Conditions of Appointment  Lecturer Evaluation Process  Reappointment  Entitlements  Order of Assignment  Salary  New.
Workload Agreements New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
Workload Agreements New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.
Preparation for Faculty Evaluation Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences March 27, 2015.
Negotiations Committee Special Meeting Annual Report Ratification.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
Workload Fulfillment New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Senior Associate Dean College of Arts & Sciences.
Semester Conversion CPP Academic Senate March 12 th by F.A.Neto Semester Conversion Director 3/12/20141FAN.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
ARTICLE X, DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION PROCEDURES GOVERNING TENURE, PROMOTION, AND CONTRACT RENEWAL contract, unchanged for
Wrestling with Workload: Valpo’s Faculty Workload Task Force Kraig Olejniczak, Dean, College of Engineering Mike Owens, Assistant Provost for Faculty Affairs.
FA Awarding of Supervisory Units. Purpose Investigate issues related to assignment and awarding of supervisory units and respond to questions.
Retention Reviews Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences August 1, 2008.
Sabbatical Workshop. Topics to be Discussed What Policies Govern the Sabbatical Process The Sabbatical Application The Role of the Professional Leaves.
Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Retention / Progress toward Tenure.
Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Evaluation.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
CHAIRS AND DIRECTORS ORIENTATION August 16, 2016.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2016.
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
CURRICULUM-CHANGE APPROVAL PROCESSES
Workload Fulfillment Term Faculty Appointments Patricia Linton
NTTF Rights and Responsibilities
Sabbatical Leave Information Session
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
ATF FACULTY MEMBER TRAINING ACADEMIC YEAR
FACET Assignments of Responsibilities System Overview
Faculty Council Meeting February 7, 2017
Introduction to SMC’s Online Flex Tracking System
Promotion: Policy and Procedures for COM Faculty in State College
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
Academic Year UNC Asheville
Training for Reviewers Fall 2017
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Faculty Evaluation Faculty Workshop on Retention April 2, 2010
Patricia Linton Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
What you need to know now to be promoted later!
Informational Report Faculty Handbook Review Committee April 5, 2011.
ATF FACULTY MEMBER TRAINING ACADEMIC YEAR
Standards and Certification Training
Faculty Evaluation Plan
The Departmental Performance Review (PR)
EFFORT REPORTING TRAINING
Office of Sponsored Programs & Research
Preparing for Promotion and Annual Review August 22, 2018
Sabbatical Orientation
The Departmental Performance Review Committee
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
PSC CUNY Research Award Program
Some Approaches to Faculty Assignments
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Some Approaches to Faculty Assignments
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Training for Reviewers Fall 2018
UPI Membership Negotiations: Tentative Agreement (TA)
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
New Faculty Orientation Non-tenure-track Faculty Appointments
University of Pittsburgh
Sabbatical and Difference-in-Pay Leaves Office of Faculty Advancement
Some Approaches to Faculty Assignments
Presentation transcript:

New Faculty Orientation Workload Fulfillment New Faculty Orientation

Process of proposing, approving, and updating the annual workload agreement Importance of fulfilling the workload agreement

Workload Agreement Document that establishes expectations of the faculty member across the academic year (Fall & Spring). Basis of faculty evaluation. Link to “Workload Templates” on UA Labor Relations page: http://www.alaska.edu/labor/unac/

Role of the Workload Agreement in Evaluation Annual evaluation of faculty is based upon an Annual Activity Report (AAR) submitted by the faculty member. The AAR consists of a current CV plus the Annual Activity Report form, which includes a brief narrative self- evaluation narrative. The AAR form follows the basic outline of the Workload Agreement. Evaluations are based upon fulfillment of the workload assignment and professional responsibilities as well as guidance for professional development.

Annual Workload Agreement Annual Activity Report Comprehensive Review File (cumulative)

Development of Annual Workload Agreement Proposal initiated by Workload assigned by Dept. Faculty Chair Dean or Program Administrator

Development of Workload Agreement Proposed by faculty member – submitted to chair or director by March 1 or at least 60 days before the end of the current contract period. Recommendations by chair or department head to the appropriate administrator by April 1 or 30 days before the end of the current contract. Assignment by Dean – May 1 or 5 days before contract end. The standard faculty Workload Agreement establishes faculty responsibilities during a 9-month contract period, typically Fall and Spring semesters.

Development of Workload Agreement The standard faculty Workload Agreement establishes faculty responsibilities during a 9-month contract period, typically Fall and Spring semesters. If a Summer Additional Assignment or Contract Extension is assigned and accepted, it should be documented either on a separate summer workload, or as “plus one, two, or three months” on the base workload, depending on the nature of the work. (The University is not obligated to offer an additional assignment outside the 9-month contract, and the faculty member is not obligated to accept it.) Workload agreements for summer assignments are often developed later than the standard Workload Agreement.

Workload Components Activities that comprise the workload are calculated in terms of workload units or credits – 30 units per academic year. One workload unit equals one credit of teaching or equivalent research or service effort. Components of a faculty workload may include teaching, research or creative activity, and service. Not every faculty workload includes all categories of faculty activity. There is no prescribed distribution of effort across components of the workload.

Workload components Teaching: course assignments very specific Research: less specific Service: varies Workload components of individual faculty may vary from semester to semester and/or contract period to contract period to permit variations in emphasis across teaching, research or creative activities, and service.

Midyear Revision of Workload Proposed changes in actual workload require revision of workload document and formal approval by the Dean. Changes should be discussed with the appropriate administrator before commitment. Workload Agreement should be accurate before the contract period ends in May.

Revision of Workload Agreement Change in teaching – common for specific courses to change, but workload agreement should be corrected before the end of the contract period (academic year). Modification of research /creative activity – generally no workload revision. Activity Report will be more specific. Change in Service – no revision for minor changes. Revision if anything substantial is deleted from the signed agreement. Activity Report will be more detailed.

Fulfillment of Workload Agreement Avoid overloads (formal or informal). Do not anticipate that overload compensation will be available or workload adjustments approved after the fact. Stay within the assigned workload proportions. If you propose an addition to your workload, subtract or narrow the scope of something else. Protect research time

Teaching Assignments According to the UNAC Collective Bargaining Agreement, teaching encompasses (among other things) Delivery of instruction (whatever the format) Preparation of course materials Development or revision of curriculum General advising of students “Other activities benefitting students’ academic development.”

Service Often minimal and vague in the first year of service “To be determined” or “As requested” – adequate for the workload agreement only in the first year. Proposal for service activity must be more specific in subsequent workloads proposed by the faculty member.

Service Departmental (not department meetings or general advising) College/University Professional Public Service (non-remunerative, drawing on professional expertise; not general good citizenship)

Service Requests / invitations for service often come after submission of the original workload proposal. In many units, there is ongoing evaluation of essential service in light of fiscal constraints. Do not take on additional service activities on the assumption that expectations in other areas of the workload will change, unless a workload revision is signed by the Dean or Dean’s designee. Stay within the specified service proportion of the workload.

Cautions Faculty performance is evaluated against the workload agreement signed by the dean or dean’s designee. Not fulfilling part of the signed workload agreement leads to problems in review. Faculty may not self-assign revised workloads.