EU Water Framework Directive

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Surface.
Advertisements

The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Water Framework Directive Programme of Measures River Basin Management Plans Milan Matuška Ministry of the Environment Slovak Republic Water Protection.
Extension of the EEA European Topic Centre’s Work Program to the West Balkan Countries in the field of water Norman Green, NIVA Nov 2006, Belgrade.
German Guidebook on the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive Dr. Harald Irmer Germany.
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
Water Framework Directive Implementation and Risk Analysis John Sadlier Water Quality Section.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Forest Economics Cost-Benefit Analysis- An Economic tool to measure costs and benefits of an.
WFD Characterisation Report Dr Tom Leatherland Environmental Quality Manager 29 October 2003.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
Reporting and compliance checking on RBMP in 2010 WFD Reporting Working Group D on Reporting Brussels, 17/18 October 2006.
AWJ MARINE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS Water Framework Directive Opportunities & Threats.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs WATER BODIES AND TYPOLOGIES Component 2 INCEPTION WORKSHOP ANKARA February María.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
EEA water report 2012 Upcoming EEA report state of our water environment 2012 In support of the Commission Report on WFD implementation Peter Kristensen.
Peter Kristensen Europan Environment Agency
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales
State of Implementation of CEA in Germany
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Legal framework of territorial classifications and typologies for European statistics – state of play NUAC meeting, Brussels June 2015 Gorja Bartsch.
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
European Commission DG Environment
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
Lists of commercially-exploited fish and shellfish
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Information on projects
Drafting group Mixing Zones
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Scaldit: Scaldis Integrated Testing
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
1.
Meeting of Water Directors 2/3 December 2004
EU Water Framework Directive
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment
Part I.
EU Water Framework Directive
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Intercalibration: problems of selecting types
Claire Vincent - EHS United Kingdom
WFD & Agriculture – Article 5
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
Guidance document on the identification of water bodies
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Typology and Intercalibration Typology System
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
European waters - assessment of status and pressures 2018
History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Horizontal Guidance on Wetlands Brussels, 5th May
WISE GIS Group 15 January 2008 John Cima.
Presentation transcript:

EU Water Framework Directive Guidance on Typology in Transitional and Coastal Waters 1st Meeting of Common Strategy Group 2.4 Brussels, 20-21Sept 2001 Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg Article 5 Characteristics of the river basin district, review of the environmental impact of human activity and economic analysis of water use Each Member State shall ensure that for each river basin district or for the portion of an international river basin district falling within its territory: an analysis of its characteristics [TYPOLOGY], a review of the impact of human activity on the status of surface waters and on groundwater, and an economic analysis of water use is undertaken according to the technical specifications set out in Annexes II and III and that it is completed at the latest four years after the date of entry into force of this Directive. Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Annex II Characterisation of surface water body types Member States shall identify the location and boundaries of bodies of surface water and shall carry out an initial characterisation of all such bodies in accordance with the following methodology. Member States may group surface water bodies together for the purposes of this initial characterisation. (i) The surface water bodies within the river basin district shall be identified as falling within either one of the following surface water categories - rivers, lakes, transitional waters or coastal waters - or as artificial surface water bodies or heavily modified surface water bodies. (ii) For each surface water category, the relevant surface water bodies within the river basin district shall be differentiated according to type. These types are those defined using either "system A" or "system B" identified in section 1.2. (iii) If system A is used, the surface water bodies within the river basin district shall first be differentiated by the relevant ecoregions in accordance with the geographical areas identified in section 1.2 and shown on the relevant map in Annex XI. The water bodies within each ecoregion shall then be differentiated by surface water body types according to the descriptors set out in the tables for system A. (iv) If system B is used, Member States must achieve at least the same degree of differentiation as would be achieved using system A. Accordingly, the surface water bodies within the river basin district shall be differentiated into types using the values for the obligatory descriptors and such optional descriptors, or combinations of descriptors, as are required to ensure that type specific biological reference conditions can be reliably derived. (v) For artificial and heavily modified surface water bodies the differentiation shall be undertaken in accordance with the descriptors for whichever of the surface water categories most closely resembles the heavily modified or artificial water body concerned. (vi) Member States shall submit to the Commission a map or maps (in a GIS format) of the geographical location of the types consistent with the degree of differentiation required under system A. Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg Transitional Waters System A Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg Transitional Waters System B Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg Coastal Waters System A Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg Coastal Waters System B Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg Typology For each water body type identify... Reference conditions Classifications Impact of human activities Monitoring Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg Statistical approach Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Types of Coastal Sediments in Lower Saxony Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Draft Typology German North Sea coast Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Draft Typology German North Sea Coast Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Draft Typology German Baltic Sea coast (not presented at the meeting) Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg

Scientific Top Down Approach ! Lessons Typology basis for monitoring and assessment free scientific approach in using Descriptors ready in 2004 (in fact end of 2002) restricted resources field knowledge time money Scientific Top Down Approach ! Bundle Forces ! Share Efforts ! Dr. Hartmut Heinrich Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg