Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Peter Kristensen Europan Environment Agency

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Peter Kristensen Europan Environment Agency"— Presentation transcript:

1 Peter Kristensen Europan Environment Agency
The EU water framework Directive typology and EUNIS The EUNIS habitat classification, governance & future developments, 3-4 October, 2011 Peter Kristensen Europan Environment Agency

2

3 170 RBMPs Analysis Other information DG Environment
Blueprint to Safeguard European Waters Analysis WFD imple-mentation Water scarcity & drought Climate change & water EEA State of European Water Synthesis/integrated Water assessment Other information Baseline (Status of waters and pressures affecting them) Further assessments – e.g. water resource efficiency, water accounts, ecosystem goods and services Thematic (focused) assessments

4 Some preliminary results (13 MS) ~70 000 inland surface water bodies
58% of the classified European freshwater water bodies have ecological status or potential less than good The percentage of freshwater water bodies with less than good ecological status or potential ranges from 33% in Finland to 100% in Belgium In 10 of the 13 countries the percentage of water bodies with ecological status or potential less than good is higher than 50%

5 C : Inland surface waters
C1 : Surface standing waters C1.1 : Permanent oligotrophic lakes, ponds and pools C1.2 : Permanent mesotrophic lakes, ponds and pools C1.3 : Permanent eutrophic lakes, ponds and pools C1.4 : Permanent dystrophic lakes, ponds and pools C1.5 : Permanent inland saline and brackish lakes, ponds and pools C1.6 : Temporary lakes, ponds and pools C1.7 : Permanent lake ice C2 : Surface running waters C2.1 : Springs, spring brooks and geysers C2.2 : Permanent non-tidal, fast, turbulent watercourses C2.3 : Permanent non-tidal, smooth-flowing watercourses C2.4 : Tidal rivers, upstream from the estuary C2.5 : Temporary running waters C2.6 : Films of water flowing over rocky watercourse margins C3 : Littoral zone of inland surface waterbodies C3.1 : Species-rich helophyte beds C3.2 : Water-fringing reedbeds and tall helophytes other than canes C3.3 : Water-fringing beds of tall canes C3.4 : Species-poor beds of low-growing water-fringing or amphibious vegetation C3.5 : Periodically inundated shores with pioneer and ephemeral vegetation C3.6 : Unvegetated or sparsely vegetated shores with soft or mobile sediments C3.7 : Unvegetated or sparsely vegetated shores with non-mobile substrates C3.8 : Inland spray- and steam-dependent habitats

6 http://eunis. eea. europa. eu/habitats-code-browser. jsp
C2.3 : Permanent non-tidal, smooth-flowing watercourses C2.31 : Epipotamal streams C2.32 : Metapotamal and hypopotamal streams C2.33 : Mesotrophic vegetation of slow-flowing rivers C2.34 : Eutrophic vegetation of slow-flowing rivers

7 Water body typologies The Water Framework Directive covers all waters, including inland waters (surface water and groundwater) and transitional and coastal waters up to one sea mile (and for the chemical status also territorial waters which may extend up to 12 sea miles) from the territorial baseline of a Member State, independent of the size and the characteristics (Articles 2 (1) (2) and (3)). WFD Annex II: 1.1 (ii) For each surface water category, the relevant surface water bodies within the river basin district shall be differentiated according to type. These types are those defined using either "system A" or "system B" identified in Section 1.2.

8 Water bodies Surface water bodies
A surface water body is a section of a river, a lake, transitional waters or coastal waters. Member States identify separate water bodies at the scale needed to manage the objectives of the directive. Each surface water body has distinguishing features – in particular, its geology and the pollution and other pressures it faces - that set it apart from other sections of the same river, lake, transitional or coastal water.

9 System A – standard boundaries for all MS
Rivers - Catchment > 10 km2 Lakes – Area > 0.5 km2 Ecoregion Altitude <200, & > 800 m R: size of catchment L: size and depth Geology of catchment

10

11 System B – MS adapted system
Rivers Lakes Obligatory factors: Altitude, Long/latitude, geology, size Optinal factors: Size, water quality, flow etc.

12 Intercalibation types
19 river types: 2 alpine; 6 central/Baltic; 2 eastern Continental; 4 Mediterranean & 4 Northern 15 lake types: 1 Atlantic; 2 alpine; 3 central/Baltic; 2 Mediterranean & 7 Northern Example Rivers, Alpine

13 Typology of Great Britain lakes
24 GB lake types based on geology, dept, and size. Total 2348 lakes 8 types with < 10 lakes; 9 types with lakes; and 7 types with more than 100 lakes – 85 % of total Siliceous – deep Calcareous, Deep & Shallow Source: UKTAG

14 Typology German rivers
Germany – Fließgewässertypen 9074 river water bodies avg. length 14 km 25 types

15

16 Weser RBD

17 Sweden

18 4. South Baltic Sea (Sweden)

19 Heavily Modified and Artificial Water Bodies
HMWB are bodies of water which as a result of physical alterations by human activity are substantially changed in character and cannot, therefore, meet the "good ecological status" (GES). AWB are surface water bodies which have been created in a location where no water body existed before and which have not been created by the direct physical alteration, movement or realignment of an existing water body.

20 Hydromorphological pressures

21

22 Navigation Storage Flood protection & drainage Source:

23

24 DG environment study – comparison of typologies
20 MS have reported RBMPs – Rivers and lakes more than 800 types Start October 2011 – results first half 2012 Comparison of methodologies used (incl. biological validation) – System A or B; factors (altitude, size etc.) taken into account. Overview of the different types used Some types may be very specific and not relevant at EU level Others may not be directly comparable due to methodology used List of the main/most frequent types and Most common shared types Results on status and pressures related to the main/most frequent types and most common shared types Ecological status/potential Main pressures e.g. diffuse pollution for lowland streams Deliverables: technical report and database

25 Thanks for your attention

26 Macrophytes Chironomides Diatoms


Download ppt "Peter Kristensen Europan Environment Agency"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google