Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July 2003 Structure of Electricity Distribution Charges Update and Proposals Martin Crouch Director, Distribution.
Advertisements

Code Governance Review: WWU views on potential changes to UNC and the Modification Panel Simon Trivella – 30 th March 2010 Governance Workstream.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Review of NTS entry charge setting arrangements - IA 1 July 2010.
Third Energy Package for Change of Supplier 2009/73/EC.
Non-code User Pays. 2 What we will cover Background Current Services Governance Arrangements What is working well What is not working as well.
Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.
July 2003 Structure of Electricity Distribution Charges Welcome and Introduction Charles Gallacher Deputy Director, Scotland.
1 Reform of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications What it means for Access to Emergency Services Reform of the EU regulatory framework.
Operating Margins. 2 Competitive Provision of Operating Margins Change to National Grid Gas’s Transporter Licence which:  Introduced Special Condition.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
1 Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission Institutional structure of the Commission Giorgi Chakhnashvili 27 June - 3 July, 2008.
Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream, 4 th May 2006.
Capacity trade and transfer mechanism and the next AMSEC auction Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 9 May 2007.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May : EU Capacity Regulations – Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.
1 EHV DG Charging Nigel Turvey. 2 Background Our current EHV charging methodology was not vetoed on 18 th February 2010 with the following treatment of.
Delivering Connections and Capacity RIIO-T1 and associated commercial changes - Summary June 7th 2012.
Gas Emergency Arrangements Proposal Transmission Workstream 5 th April 2007.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
1 UNC Modification 429 Customer Settlement Error Claims Process – Guidance Document.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Open letter on Development of the regime ahead of winter 2007/8 Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 28 June 2007.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 25 October 2010.
CDCM Annual Review Workshop Mo Sukumaran SSEPD (on behalf of DNOs) 17 May May | Energy Networks Association - CMG.
11 User Pays User Committee 16th February Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
Madrid Forum 6-7 November 2008 Implementating the 3rd Energy Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper Lord Mogg, ERGEG chairman.
Code Administration Code of Practice Tim Davis KPIs Q
Michael Schmoeltzer Member of ERGEG Gas Working Group GIE Annual Conference, 6/7 May 2009, Groningen ACER & ENTSOG and their interaction.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Legal Text Production Options for Discussion. Legal Text Production 2 Issues with current approach Issues with the current approach to legal text production.
European Developments Transmission Workgroup 3 rd May 2012.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 19 November 2010.
Gas Transmission Charging Review: Final Capacity Charging Proposal Gas TCMF 14 th December 2006.
Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.
Presentation to the BSC Panel
CMP277 ‘Special License Condition 4J’ CMP278 ‘BSIS 2017 Housekeeping’
FlorenceForum November 2008
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Presentation to the BSC Panel
EU Implementation Programme
Transmission Planning Code – Draft Document
Background and Process
Review of UNC Section Q “Emergencies”
Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017
UNC Modifications 061 & 062 – An Overview
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Grid Code Review Panel 16th August 2017
Update on European Network Codes
CSEP NExA Update Marie Clark ScottishPower 28th September 2006.
CAP190: Workgroup Report CUSC Modifications Panel, 26th August 2011
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Code Administration Code of Practice
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Rebecca Hailes For 15 March 2018
Mod 0621 Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
Proposer: Transporter /
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Summary Issue Modification Aim Effect of the mod Impacts
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
EU Codes: Implementation Issues
CAM: Next Steps UNC Transmission Workgroup Lisa Martin 9 January 2014.
Introduction We hope that this webinar will provide you with the information you need to understand the DCUSA by covering the following:   What is the.
Presentation transcript:

Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678 29 January 2019 Effective

0678 Administration Session Time Morning 09:30 -10:50 Break Timings for each session (all timings are approximate) Session Time Morning 09:30 -10:50 Break 10:50 -11:00 11:00 -12:30 Lunch 12:30-13:00 Afternoon 13:00-14:20 14:20-14:30 14:30-16:00

0678 Administration Outputs from each day Daily Agenda. A topic summary will be produced at the end of each session for the Workgroup to confirm and it is anticipated this will then input into the Workgroup report. Summary of each day: Critical decisions Actions Points to be addressed at subsequent meetings. Actions log. Joint Office Administration

0678 Administration Website All materials will be published on the 0678 Joint Office webpage. Materials from each day will be published following the formal close of each session.

National Grid Update on 0678 Compliance with EU Tariff Network Code (TAR NC). Management and timing of legal text. Management and timing of analysis. Management and timing of amended Modification.

0621 Decision Letter Ofgem’s compliance assessment focussed on 3 issues on the basis that were either cumulatively or individually relevant to all of the UNC0621 modifications. Interim contracts, Transition period, and NTS Optional Charge (NOC).

0678 Urgency Decision Letter TAR NC compliance Timetable Alternatives

Structure/contents of the Workgroup Report Ofgem’s views 0621 decision letter TAR NC Compliance Compliance Assessment Comparison table

0678 – Relevant Objectives and Compliance Assessment against the Relevant Objectives TAR NC compliance Review of commentary provided by ACER Consideration of Workgroup views.

0678 Overall Timeline

Alternatives: MR 6.4 Raised by a party other than the Proposer Alternatives can only be raised when original Modification is at Workgroup Discussed by Workgroup provided proposal received 5 days or more before meeting date, if not deferred to next meeting More than one Alternative can be raised if the proposer of first Alternative does not wish to amend the proposal in response to Workgroup request Alternatives cannot be raised after the Workgroup Report has been sent to be discussed by Panel and it has been sent out to Members (“published for Panel”) or if the Panel has referred the Workgroup Report back to the Workgroup for revision or further work, or if a decision to proceed to consultation has been made.

Impact of Modification 0678 on the Relevant Objectives: Identified impact a) Efficient and economic operation of the pipe-line system. None b) Coordinated, efficient and economic operation of (i) the combined pipe-line system, and/ or (ii) the pipe-line system of one or more other relevant gas transporters. c) Efficient discharge of the licensee's obligations. Positive d) Securing of effective competition: (i) between relevant shippers; (ii) between relevant suppliers; and/or (iii) between DN operators (who have entered into transportation arrangements with other relevant gas transporters) and relevant shippers. e) Provision of reasonable economic incentives for relevant suppliers to secure that the domestic customer supply security standards… are satisfied as respects the availability of gas to their domestic customers. f) Promotion of efficiency in the implementation and administration of the Code. g) Compliance with the Regulation and any relevant legally binding decisions of the European Commission and/or the Agency for the Co-operation of Energy Regulators.

Impact of Modification 0678 on the Relevant Charging Methodology Objectives: Relevant Objective Identified impact a) Save in so far as paragraphs (aa) or (d) apply, that compliance with the charging methodology results in charges which reflect the costs incurred by the licensee in its transportation business; Positive aa) That, in so far as prices in respect of transportation arrangements are established by auction, either: no reserve price is applied, or that reserve price is set at a level - (I) best calculated to promote efficiency and avoid undue preference in the supply of transportation services; and (II) best calculated to promote competition between gas suppliers and between gas shippers; b) That, so far as is consistent with sub-paragraph (a), the charging methodology properly takes account of developments in the transportation business; c) That, so far as is consistent with sub-paragraphs (a) and (b), compliance with the charging methodology facilitates effective competition between gas shippers and between gas suppliers; and d) That the charging methodology reflects any alternative arrangements put in place in accordance with a determination made by the Secretary of State under paragraph 2A(a) of Standard Special Condition A27 (Disposal of Assets). None e) Compliance with the Regulation and any relevant legally binding decisions of the European Commission and/or the Agency for the Co-operation of Energy Regulators.