The Every student succeeds act (ESSA): serving the interests of Utah

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Advertisements

ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student. Brad Neuenswander, Deputy Commissioner KSDE.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Reauthorization / Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) February 2016.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): Overview and Implications for New Jersey Peter Shulman & Jill Hulnick Deputy Commissioner.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Title I, Part A & Title III, Part A Changes Under ESSA New Jersey Department of Education The Office of Supplemental.
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Federal Programs Department Parent Summit March 10, 2016.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Accountability Update
Title I Program Overview for SWP
Stephanie Graff, Chief Accountability Officer
Outreach Division of School Improvement September and October 2016
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Title I Program Overview for SWP
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
The Every Student Succeeds Act: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? New Jersey Association of Federal Program Administrators March 17, 2017.
Title III Fiscal Requirements and ESSA changes
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
AGENDA Purpose of the ESSA Key Provisions Impacting Perkins
The every student succeeds act
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act and the Tile I, Part A Program
Illinois State Board of Education Public Nonpublic Conference
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
North Carolina State Board of Education Update
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools.
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Equitable Services Sections 1117 and 8501 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA),
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
The Alabama Continuous Improvement Plan ACIP
Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting
Supports for ESSA Implementation
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Title I Program Overview for SWP
Arkansas Perkins V Stakeholder Meetings 2019
Nancy Reder, Esq. Deputy Executive Director NASDSE
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA):
ESSA accountability & Report Card Proposed regulations
Arkansas Perkins V Stakeholder Meetings 2019
Arkansas Perkins V Stakeholder Meetings 2019
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

The Every student succeeds act (ESSA): serving the interests of Utah Utah School Boards Association 94th Annual Conference Working together for Utah’s Future Rich K. Nye, PhD Deputy Superintendent Utah State Board of Education rich.nye@schools.utah.gov

The elementary and secondary education act of 1965 (ESEA) Since 1965 ESEA has been reauthorized approximately every 5 years. The law was last reauthorized in 2002 as the No Child Left Behind Act. As of 2015, the law was 8 years overdue for reauthorization “full educational opportunity should be our first national goal” –President Johnson

The Every Student succeeds act (ESSA) ESSA was signed by President Obama on December 10, 2015 with bipartisan support ESSA includes several provisions that will help ensure success for students and schools: Advances equity by upholding critical protections for disadvantaged and high- need students Requires all students be taught to high academic standards Ensures information is provided to educators, families, students, and communities through annual statewide assessments Maintains an expectation of accountability and action to effect positive change in the lowest-performing schools. The Department of Education encourages each State Education Agency (SEA) to reflect on its overall vision and how the different sections of the ESSA work together to create one comprehensive approach to improving outcomes for all students. The Department encourages each SEA to consider: what is the SEA’s vision with regard to its education system; how does this plan help drive toward that vision; and how will the SEA evaluate its effectiveness on an ongoing basis?

ESSA: Consolidated State plan Section 8302 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), permits the Secretary to establish procedures and criteria under which, after consultation with the Governor, a State educational agency (SEA) may submit a consolidated State plan designed to simplify the application requirements and reduce burden for SEAs. The Department identified five overarching components and corresponding elements that integrate the included programs and that must be addressed by each SEA. These components encourage each SEA to plan and implement included programs in a comprehensive way to support local educational agencies (LEAs), schools, and all subgroups of students.

Consultation & performance Management

Academic Assessments

Accountability, Support, and Improvement for schools

Supporting excellent educators

Supporting all students

Consultation & Performance management Each SEA must engage in timely and meaningful consultation with stakeholders in developing its consolidated State plan, consistent with 34 C.F.R. §§ 299.13 (b) and 299.15 (a). The stakeholders must include the following individuals and entities and reflect the geographic diversity of the State: The Governor or appropriate officials from the Governor’s office; Members of the State legislature; Members of the State board of education; LEAs, including LEAs in rural areas; Representatives of Indian tribes located in the State; Teachers, principals, other school leaders, paraprofessionals, specialized instructional support personnel, and organizations representing such individuals; Charter school leaders; Parents and families; Community-based organizations; Civil rights organizations, including those representing students with disabilities, English learners, and other historically underserved students; Institutions of higher education (IHEs); Employers; Representatives of private school students; Early childhood educators and leaders; and The public.

Consultation & Performance management Consolidated Plan Team USBE Leadership Account - ability System & Report Cards Teaching & Learning Student Assessment System School & District Improvement Effective Educators English Learners ( EL ) Fiscal Licensure Parent & Community Engagement Early Childhood Education Students With Disabilities SWD Utah State Board of Education

Academic Assessments State Academic Assessments states must administer annual assessments in grades 3 through 8 and once in high school in English Language Arts and Math Science must also be given annually in the following grade spans, 3-5, 6- 9, 10-12. Provide assessments in languages other than English Maintains the 95% student participation requirement Provide alternate assessments for the most significant cognitively disabled

Accountability, Support, and Improvement for Schools Each SEA must describe its accountability, support, and improvement system consistent with 34 C.F.R. §§ 200.12-200.24 and section 1111(c) and (d) of the ESEA. The following indicators must be used in the accountability system: Academic Achievement Academic Progress (growth) Graduation English Learner Progress/Proficiency School Quality Report of student subgroup performance Annual Meaningful Differentiation

Accountability, Support, and Improvement for Schools School Identification for Comprehensive Support or Targeted Support the State identifies schools for comprehensive support and improvement under section 1111(c)(4)(D)(i) of the ESEA and 34 C.F.R. § 200.19(a) and (d), including: lowest-performing schools; schools with low high school graduation rates; and schools with chronically low-performing subgroups. Schools who fail to meet the 95% student assessment participation threshold may be subjected to the following: Lower summative performance rating Lowest level on academic indicator Identified for targeted support Other State determined action

Supporting excellent educators Describe how the SEA will use Title II, Part A funds and funds from other included programs, consistent with allowable uses of funds provided under those programs, to support State-level strategies designed to: Increase student achievement consistent with the challenging State academic standards; Improve the quality and effectiveness of teachers, principals, and other school leaders; Increase the number of teachers, principals, and other school leaders who are effective in improving student academic achievement in schools; and Provide low-income and minority students greater access to effective teachers, principals, and other school leaders consistent with the educator equity provisions in 34 C.F.R. § 299.18(c). Describe how the SEA will improve the skills of teachers, principals, or other school leaders in identifying students with specific learning needs and providing instruction based on the needs of such students, consistent with section 2101(d)(2)(J) of the ESEA. Provide definitions, using distinct criteria for: Ineffective teacher Out-of-field teacher Inexperienced Teacher

Supporting All students SEA must describe how it will use Title IV, Part A funds and funds from other included programs, consistent with allowable uses of fund provided under those programs, to support State-level strategies and LEA use of funds. The strategies and uses of funds must be designed to ensure that all children have a significant opportunity to meet challenging State academic standards and career and technical standards, as applicable, and attain, at a minimum, a regular high school diploma. The descriptions that an SEA provides must include how, when developing its State strategies, the SEA considered the academic and non-academic needs of the following specific subgroups of students: Low-income students; Lowest-achieving students; English learners; Children with disabilities; Children and youth in foster care; Migratory children, including preschool migratory children and migratory children who have dropped out of school; Homeless children and youths; Neglected, delinquent, and at-risk students identified under Title I, Part D of the ESEA, including students in juvenile justice facilities; Immigrant children and youth; Students in LEAs eligible for grants under the Rural and Low-Income School program under section 5221 of the ESEA; and American Indian and Alaska Native students.

Supporting All students Articulate the State’s strategies and how it will support LEAs to support the continuum of a student’s education from preschool through grade 12, including transitions from early childhood education to elementary school, elementary school to middle school, middle school to high school, and high school to post-secondary education and careers, in order to support appropriate promotion practices and decrease the risk of students dropping out.

Timeline May Refine and revise State Plan based on April feedback June  June Board Meeting Review and approve Draft Three  Draft Three for feedback  July  USBE ESSA Leadership Group refine for final draft August  Board Approval of Final Draft  September 18, 2017- Submit to Department of Education  January  USBE ESSA Team  Workgroup: Review populated Consolidated Plan Template  Conduct a Gap Analysis  Conduct an Alignment Analysis  Complete Draft One: January 30th  February-March  Writing State Plan Draft Two   Draft Two Completed March 10th  April  April Board Meeting Review Draft Two  Publish Draft Two for Public feedback  Timeline

Information Please visit: http://schools.utah.gov/assessment/ESSA.aspx For information regarding ESSA Opportunities to participate Latest ESSA news