State of WTO Agricultural Negotiations Meeting on the Integrated Assessment of Trade Liberalization in the Agriculture Sector 19-20 February 2003 Note:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOHA and the EU. Intro Trade of industrial goods Trade in services Trade in agricultural goods Trade and the Environement.
Advertisements

WTO AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE: LEGAL AND CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries FINDINGS FROM A GLOBAL GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL Director, Trade, Equity and Development.
Session 1: WTO Work on Transparency in Government Procurement January, Dar es Salaam Vesile Kulaçoglu,WTO Secretariat.
Completing the Doha Round Who Needs to Do What to Ensure Success? NFTC Session WTO Public Symposium April 20, 2005 Prosperity Through Trade.
RIS South Centre Panel at WTO Public Symposium 1 WTO, Development and Developing Countries: Ten Years After Nagesh Kumar RIS
The Benefits of a New WTO Agreement for Agri-food Trade Shiferaw Adilu Alberta Agriculture and Food.
Non-Agricultural Market Access Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
Chapter 6 Tariffs. Copyright © 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 6-2 Topics to be Covered Types of Commercial Policies Tariffs and Types.
The Multilateral Trading System: Opportunities and Challenges for the East African Community (EAC) Countries Anne Kamau Ministry of Trade Department of.
Food & Agricultural Trade Liberalisation: Can a balance be found? Allan N Rae Director Centre for Applied Economics and Policy Studies Supported by PGSF.
WTO Forum Kaliningrad State Technical University March 2014 Clem Boonekamp Aspects of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture.
Non Agricultural Market Access Prabhash Ranjan National University of Juridical Sciences (NUJS), Kolkata, India. E mail –
1 Inter-Agency "Data Day"18-19 May 2009 at WTO Geneva, 18 th May 2009 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Ralf Peters DITC UNCTAD, Geneva.
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
Agriculture Negotiations in the WTO Dr Biswajit Dhar Professor and Head Centre for WTO Studies Indian Institute of Foreign Trade New Delhi WTO Cell, IIFT.
WTO AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS Portfolio Committee Agriculture and Land Affairs April 2003 Günter Müller Directorate: International Trade National Department.
U.S. Agricultural Policy Joseph W. Glauber U.S. Department of Agriculture Silverado Symposium on Agricultural Policy Reform / Napa, California /January.
WTO Agriculture Negotiations Outstanding Issues for Developing Countries Tim Ruffer Oxford Policy Management
EU-LDC NETWORK CONFERENCE Trade and Poverty Reduction ISSUES FACING DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN THE ONGOING WTO NEGOTIATIONS IN AGRICULTURE ’ ‘A POVERTY REDUCTION.
1 [Giovanni Anania, IAAE Congress, Durban, August 2003] The Fischler reform of the CAP and the WTO negotiations Giovanni Anania Department of Economics.
The Doha Round Lecture 21 The Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
The Doha Round – background and issues Lecture 25 The Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement Lecture 20. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
AGRICULTURAL POLICY REFORM IN THE WTO The Road Ahead.
Intellectual Property Rights, Services and Trade Facilitation CARSTEN FINK African/LDCs Ambassadors Seminar on Post-Hong Kong Assessment of the Doha Round,
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENT and EXPORT CREDITS UPDATE
The U.S. and World Sugar Industries under the EU and DOHA Trade Liberalization Won W. Koo   Chamber of Commerce Distinguished Professor and Director  
Impact of WTO on Indian Agriculture
The Ongoing Negotiations on Agriculture: Some Observations
WTO Agreement on Agriculture: What’s it all about? What should be our advocacy?
WTO Trade Negotiations Current Status San Antonio, Texas May 23, 2002 USDA-Economic Research Service.
The WTO negotiations: Will developing countries benefit from a new agreement?
Negotiations on Agriculture State of Play by Surabhi Mittal WTO &The Doha Round : The Way Forward 6-7 April, 2006.
1 Agriculture in July Package: Nepal Presentation by South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment (SAWTEE), Kathmandu.
Options for Modalities and Treatment of Special Products.
1 Nepal’s WTO Membership and the Agriculture Sector Navin Dahal South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment.
IPC Seminar Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Update on The Doha Development Round MARCELO REGUNAGA Hanoi – October 2005.
UNCTAD 1 OVERVIEW OF THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED BY DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTAD
1 Overview of the Doha Work Programme Implications for the Developing Countries Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTADWWW.UNCTAD.ORG/COMMDIP December 2001.
WORKSHOP ON MARKET ACCESS IN THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME Ministry of Foreign Trade & International Cooperation and UNCTAD Guyana, September 2002 WTO NEGOTIATIONS.
Global Agriculture Policy Institute WTO/DDA Negotiations on Agriculture Global Agriculture Policy Institue CHOI, Yong Kyu.
WTO Compatibility of Agricultural Policy Changes in North America Tim Josling Stanford University.
Agriculture Negotiations: Moving Forward Ashok Gulati IFPRI Director in Asia WTO and The Doha Round: The Way forward ICRIER-SRTT Conference 6-7 April,
DEPARTMENT: AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS GERDA VAN DIJK SENIOR MANAGER: INTERNATIONAL TRADE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE FOR AGRICULTURE 22 FEBRUARY.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE MULTILATERAL AGRICULTURAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS ON CEMAC COUNTRIES By: Ernest BAMOU & Jean Pierre TCHANOU UNCTAD workshop on Trade.
“July Package” & South Asian Agriculture Prof. J. George Faculty of Economics & Development Planning (FEDP), Haryana Institute of Public Administration,
AG -1 © WTO – OMC 2012 The WTO Agreement on Agriculture Serafino Marchese, Chief, Training and Capacity Building Section WTO Institute for Training and.
1 DOHA WORK PROGRAMME CURRENT SITUATION AND ISSUES FOR PAKISTAN Presentation at the EC-Pakistan TRTA Seminar at Islamabad By Dr. Manzoor Ahmad Ambassador.
The Potential Impacts of Changes in Export Competition Policies.
Brown Bag Seminar The Current State of the Agricultural Trade Negotiations in the WTO Tuesday, September 16, 2003.
CUTS Institute for Regulation & Competition Strengthening Skills on Commercial and Economic Diplomacy Training Programme for Civil Servants and Executives(CDS.05)
Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft) Embassy of China, P.R. Weining Zhao March, 2005.
Manila, June Fisheries in the WTO. Manila, June DDA and Fisheries Main centre of interest to fisheries and aquaculture are negotiations.
Expectations from LDCs WTO 10 th Ministerial Conference in Nairobi
Lecturer: Erika Chávez
WTO Status of Negotiation, July 2004 Framework... and Beyond Debra Henke USDA/ Foreign Agricultural Service.
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
WTO Hong Kong Ministerial Gains & Losses for India Pradeep S. Mehta CUTS International Jaipur, India
Update on Multilateral Trade Negotiations “The July Package” PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE 09 November 2004.
ORGANIZED SYMPOSIUM The Impacts of U.S. Trade Policies on Southern Agriculture The Impacts of the World Trade Organization on U.S. Agricultural Policy.
Non-agricultural market access negotiations Marc Bacchetta ERSD WTO.
Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Update on The Doha Development Round A European Perspective Dr Rolf Moehler.
WTO Support Commitments and U.S. Farm Policies
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
The WTO-Ministerial Decisions at Nairobi (MC 10)
European agriculture, the future of the CAP and the WTO negotiations
The WTO-Agreement on Agriculture
The EU-US Agricultural Framework Agreement
Agriculture in the July Framework
Presentation transcript:

State of WTO Agricultural Negotiations Meeting on the Integrated Assessment of Trade Liberalization in the Agriculture Sector February 2003 Note: The views expressed do not represent the WTO Secretariat or the member states of the WTO.

Introduction A first draft of the modalities was presented to WTO Ministers last week in Tokyo by the Chair of the Special Session (Mr S. Harbinson). They will be proposed again at the special session of the committee on agriculture at the end of this month. The paper is available at the WTO website: The proposals cover market access, export competition, domestic support, S & D provisions and non-trade concerns. Overall members are still far apart on many of the proposals. Fundamentally, the issue is the level of ambition of further reform in agricultural trade These spill over into the methods to be applied in preparing draft schedules and matters relating to the rules and disciplines of the Agreement

Outline Mandate of negotiations Timeline of negotiations Major areas of negotiations –Market access (tariffs, tariff quotas, special safeguard, special treatment) –Export competition (export subsidies, export credits) –Domestic support (amber, green, blue boxes) Background information on rice

Doha Mandate Doha Declaration 14 November 2001 on Agriculture –Building on the work undertaken already –Long term objective of fair and market orientated agriculture trading system Doha Work Programme: –substantial improvements in market access –Reductions of, with a view to phasing out, export subsidies –substantial reductions in trade distorting support –Special and differential treatment integral to negotiations and outcome –Take account of non-trade concerns

Timeline, Ministerial Meeting in Tokyo (1 st draft of modalities) February 2003 – Special Session of Committee on Agriculture 31 March Modalities to be established. Fifth Ministerial Conference (Cancun) in September members are to produce their first offers or comprehensive draft commitments The negotiations are to end by 1 January 2005

Recall: Major Provisions

Recall: UR commitments

Proposal on Tariffs (Applied to Developed Countries) The following reductions shall apply to final bound tariffs over a period of 5 years: –For all tariffs greater than 90%, average reduction by 60 percent with a minimum cut of 45 percent per tariff line –For all tariffs lower than or equal to 90% and greater than 15%, average reduction by 50 percent with a minimum cut of 35 percent per tariff line –For all tariffs lower than or equal to 15%, average reduction by 40 percent with a minimum cut of 25 percent per tariff line

Other Aspects of Tariff Proposals Tariff preferences –To minimize the loss of tariff preferences received by some developing countries, the tariff reduction can be implemented in 8 (instead of 5) years – However, this shall be applicable only for products representing a quarter of total exports of beneficiary countries Tariff Escalation –Where tariffs on processed products are higher than on primary products, the tariff reduction must be higher on the processed products

Proposal on Tariffs (Applied to Developing Countries) Strategic Products –Developing countries can exempt certain products as strategic products with respect to food security, rural development and/or livelihood security. Tariffs would be reduced by 10% over ten years with a minimum cut of 5% Other agricultural products (implemented over 10 years) –For all tariffs greater than 120%, average reduction by 40 percent with a minimum cut of 30 percent per tariff line –For all tariffs lower than or equal to 120% and greater than 20%, average reduction by 33 percent with a minimum cut of 23 percent per tariff line –For all tariffs lower than or equal to 20%, average reduction by 27 percent with a minimum cut of 17 percent per tariff line

Tariff Quotas (Applied to Developed Countries) Final bound tariff quotas, which are less than 10% of current domestic consumption, shall be increased to 10% in equal installments over a 5 year period. Up to a fourth of tariff lines can be bound at 8% provided that a corresponding number of tariff lines are bound at 12% Current domestic consumption is the average consumption over the period In-quota duty free access shall be given for tropical products, whether in processed or primary form

Tariff Quotas (Applied to Developing Countries) Tariff quota volumes need not be expanded for strategic products For other agricultural products, final bound tariff quotas that are less than 5.5% of current domestic consumption shall be increased to 6.6% in equal installments over a 10 year period. Up to a fourth of tariff lines can be bound at 5% provided that a corresponding number of tariff lines are bound at 8%

Special Safeguards These are to be eliminated for developed countries after the period of tariff reductions Developing countries shall retain the right to use special safeguards

Export Subsidies (Applicable to Developed Countries) All export subsidies shall be eliminated within 10 years. This shall be conducted in two phases: –For agricultural products representing at least half of the aggregate final bound level of budgetary outlays, subsidies shall be eliminated within 5 years –The remaining products shall be reduced so that by the 10th year, budgetary outlays and quantities shall be reduced to zero

Export Subsidies (Applicable to Developing Countries) All export subsidies shall be eliminated within 13 years. This shall be conducted in two phases: –For agricultural products representing at least half of the aggregate final bound level of budgetary outlays, subsidies shall be eliminated within 10 years –The remaining products shall be reduced so that by the 13th year, budgetary outlays and quantities shall be reduced to zero

Domestic Support Developed Countries: –Amber box (final bound total AMS) measures shall be reduced by 60% over a period of 5 years. –Blue box measures shall be bound at the average level of the period and reduced by 50% over a period of 5 years. Developing Countries –Amber Box measures shall be reduced by 40% in equal installments over a period of 10 years. –Blue box measures shall be reduced by 33% over a period of 10 years. –Article 6.2 has been enhanced with additional measures (concessional loans, risk management, etc.) which are exempt from reduction commitments

Domestic Support: Green Box Green box measures shall be maintained. Proposal to include animal welfare and new S & D elements, including support for staple crops for food security purposes and for maintenance of small scale family farms.

Final Tariff Bindings on Rice CountryFinal Bound Tariffs China65 Columbia189 Indonesia160 Nigeria150

Export Subsidies on Rice

Domestic Support Notified

Trends in Rice Production and Trade Over the past twenty years, rice production, yield and trade have all gone up. –Production has gone up by 2.1 per cent annually. –Trade measured by rice imports has gone up more at 2.7 per cent. –Area devoted to rice has only grown by 0.3 percent per annum so that yields have gone up world-wide from 2.8 metric tons per hectare in 1980 to about 4 metric tons per hectare in 2001.

Trends in Rice Trade

Trends in Production

Increasing Trade in the 1990s

Share of Trade in World Production of Rice

Top Rice Traders in 2001