Introducing GeneSTAR ® MVP Molecular Value Predictions for Beef Quality and Production Traits.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Advertisements

Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
1
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
and 6.855J Spanning Tree Algorithms. 2 The Greedy Algorithm in Action
Whiteboardmaths.com © 2004 All rights reserved
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Measurements and Their Uncertainty 3.1
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
CALENDAR.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
1 Discreteness and the Welfare Cost of Labour Supply Tax Distortions Keshab Bhattarai University of Hull and John Whalley Universities of Warwick and Western.
2010 fotografiert von Jürgen Roßberg © Fr 1 Sa 2 So 3 Mo 4 Di 5 Mi 6 Do 7 Fr 8 Sa 9 So 10 Mo 11 Di 12 Mi 13 Do 14 Fr 15 Sa 16 So 17 Mo 18 Di 19.
ZMQS ZMQS
1 Click here to End Presentation Software: Installation and Updates Internet Download CD release NACIS Updates.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
DOROTHY Design Of customeR dRiven shOes and multi-siTe factorY Product and Production Configuration Method (PPCM) ICE 2009 IMS Workshops Dorothy Parallel.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
ABC Technology Project
The genetic dissection of complex traits
Tonya Amen, Ph.D Cattle Genetics Specialist Pfizer Animal Genetics
VOORBLAD.
Target Costing If you cannot find the time to do it right, how will you find the time to do it over?
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Employment Ontario Program Updates EO Leadership Summit – May 13, 2013 Barb Simmons, MTCU.
Before Between After.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Risk, Return, and the Capital Asset Pricing Model
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Essential Cell Biology
Selection For Carcass Marbling and Muscling-- Benefits and Pitfalls Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Matt Spangler Beef Genetics Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.. Next Four Seminars John Pollak – DNA Tests and genetic Evaluations and sorting on genotypes. John Pollak.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
Use of DNA information in Genetic Programs.
Presentation transcript:

Introducing GeneSTAR ® MVP Molecular Value Predictions for Beef Quality and Production Traits

2 Welcome! A new DNA era for GeneSTAR ® Review of technical background and materials Customer applications Customer report Value discussion

3 What is GeneSTAR? Pfizer Animal Genetics DNA-testing platform for economically important traits Feed efficiency, marbling and tenderness Facilitates genetic improvement in seedstock and cow- calf operations Enables precision management in cow-calf, stocker and feedlot operations

4 Evolution of GeneSTAR

5 Molecular Value Predictions (MVPs) Are: Molecular breeding values, in units of the trait, that incorporate the sum total of marker effects, and have an associated reliability value Based currently on a panel of 56 DNA markers that are used to predict feed efficiency, marbling, and tenderness in beef cattle

6 Traits – Measures Feed efficiencynet feed intake MarblingDegree of marbling TendernessWarner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) at 14 days postmortem

7 MVP Advantages Quantifies animals ability to perform Measured in relevant units for each trait on a single scale Accounts for relative size of marker effects Reliability of MVP provided Compatible with EPD Applicable for multi-trait selection

8 GeneSTAR MVP Development Intensive four-step process: 1.Marker discovery 2.Development of marker predictions – MVPs 3.Internal validation of relationship between MVPs and phenotypic performance 4.Third-party validation

9 MVP Populations In the first three steps, Pfizer Animal Genetics employed the use of: 13 cattle populations More than 7,000 animals representing diverse breeds and composite lines Range of environmental and management conditions 2,866 animals in the discovery and prediction phase 4,455 animals in the internal validation phase Included both Australian and North American populations

10 MVP Populations

11 MVPs – Selection Opportunity

12 MVP Reliability Standard for assessing accuracy and predictive power of the MVP for a trait Based on correlation (R) between the MVP and the animals genetic breeding value if all information were known Expressed as a percentage of the maximum accuracy attainable Indicates how much information may be added in the future as greater numbers of markers are added to the panels used to calculate the MVP

13 MVPs – Selection Opportunity

14 MVPs – Third-party Validation Designed to confirm the statistical significance of relationships between MVPs and performance

15 MVPs – External Validation

16 Meta-Analysis Combined statistical results into outcome groups by geographic location and cattle subpopulations

17 Validation Conclusions Validation for tenderness across all populations and markets Validation of feed efficiency in U.S. and Australia in Bos Taurus Feed efficiency for Bos Indicus in Australia Significant association in NBCEC validations with % IMF estimated by ultrasound scanning 60 days prior to harvest Significant association documented in U.S. Bos Indicus with % Choice

18 MVPs – Reporting Format MVP expressed on a +/- scale from 0, where 0 = average of all animals in our research database Reliability based on individual genotype and marker effects

19 MVPs – Reporting Format

20 MVPs – Reporting Format

21 MVPs – Selection Example Potential Sires Sire A: FE= lbs Marb = 0.4 Sire B: FE= lbs Marb = 0.3 Sire C: FE=-0.20 lbs Marb = -0.4 The genetic merit of sires for average daily gain was assumed equivalent

22 Decision Tree: DNA Test or Dont DNA Test! $69,595 $68,977 $64,344 $66,962 $69,595 MVP Selection Example – Test or Not?

23 Best decision is to test with MVPs: Difference = $2,633 MVPs enable superior decisions in choosing sires based on feed intake, marbling potential and tenderness Best economic decision avoids uncertainty and chooses Sire A instead of making an uninformed decision MVP Selection Example – Test or Not?

24 Stars to MVPs 11 individual markers56-marker panel Number of STARSTrait units for greater selection opportunity Number of favorable allelesCollective effects of markers contribute to trait prediction Equal effects of each markerAccounts for varying individual marker effects No calculated reliability% reliability described: 26 – 49% Good selection toolA new era in genetic improvement

25 Bottom Line Valuable Selection Tool More markers, more reliability. More Powerful Tool!

Next Step – Mating Schemes Planned mating tool in development Predicts genetic outcomes based on MVP analysis of potential sire matings Interactive tool available late 2009

Quantitative Genetics New Reduced Animal Model Unknown genes Phenotypicdata Breeding Value for unknown and known polygenes for unknown and known polygenes EPDs including DNA marker information DNA Marker info Genetic effects Feed Efficiency EPD acc.

28 Literature

29 New Web Site Resource center for genomic technology Interactive sales map Webinars and presentations Public results section (coming soon!)

30 New Location Lab operations and customer service team now located in Kalamazoo, Michigan Based within Pfizer Animal Health Research and Development headquarters New contact information: 333 Portage Road Kalamazoo, MI BEEF DNA Customer Service: Fax:

31 Conclusions The time is now to enter the new era in precision management with DNA-marker technology. Pfizer Animal Genetics portfolio of testing includes: GeneSTAR MVPs SireTRACE ® SureTRAK ® GeneSTAR Elite Tender ® Arthrogryposis Multiplex testing

Contact your Pfizer Animal Genetics representative, call BEEF DNA or go to to order your test kit today.