Design of active-target TPC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEM Chambers at BNL The detector from CERN, can be configured with up to 4 GEMs The detector for pad readout and drift studies, 2 GEM maximum.
Advertisements

Ozgur Ates Hampton University TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design” And OLYMPUS Experiment “Study of Systematics” 1.
Ozgur Ates Hampton University HUGS 2009-JLAB TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design”
Drift velocity Adding polyatomic molecules (e.g. CH4 or CO2) to noble gases reduces electron instantaneous velocity; this cools electrons to a region where.
Beam tests of Fast Neutron Imaging in China L. An 2, D. Attié 1, Y. Chen 2, P. Colas 1, M. Riallot 1, H. Shen 2, W. Wang 1,2, X. Wang 2, C. Zhang 2, X.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
Bordeaux Meeting June 6-7th, 2005 Meeting starts at 2:30 pm, Monday June 6th 1)Summary of EURONS meeting (February 2005, Madeira) 2)Discussion of ACTAR.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
1 Pixel Readout of GEMs Motivation The Setup Results Next Steps A. Bamberger, K. Desch, J. Ludwig, M. Titov, U. Renz, N. Vlasov, P. Wienemann, A. Zwerger.
Prototype TPC Tests C. Lu 12/9/98 V = 0. Gas gain test for the low pressure chamber The chamber is constructed with the following parameters: D anode.
D. Peterson, “ILC Detector Work”, Cornell Group Meeting, 4-October ILC Detector Work This project is supported by the US National Science Foundation.
Linear Collider TPC R&D in Canada Madhu Dixit Carleton University.
Carleton University A. Bellerive, K. Boudjemline, R. Carnegie, A. Kochermin, J. Miyamoto, E. Neuheimer, E. Rollin & K. Sachs University of Montreal J.-P.
CJ Barton Department of Physics INTAG Meeting – GSI – May 2007 Large Acceptance Bragg Detector at ISOLDE.
PHENIX Drift Chamber operation principles Modified by Victor Riabov Focus meeting 01/06/04 Original by Sergey Butsyk Focus meeting 01/14/03.
Development of a Time Projection Chamber Using Gas Electron Multipliers (GEM-TPC) Susumu Oda, H. Hamagaki, K. Ozawa, M. Inuzuka, T. Sakaguchi, T. Isobe,
Stanford, Mar 21, 2005P. Colas - Micromegas TPC1 Results from a Micromegas TPC Cosmic Ray Test Berkeley-Orsay-Saclay Progress Report Reminder: the Berkeley-Orsay-
Yosuke Watanabe….. University of Tokyo, RIKEN A, KEK C, Development of a GEM tracker for E16 J-PARC 1 Thanks to ???????????
TPC R&D status in Japan T. Isobe, H. Hamagaki, K. Ozawa, and M. Inuzuka Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo Contents 1.Development of a prototype.
1 TRD-prototype test at KEK-FTBL 11/29/07~12/6 Univ. of Tsukuba Hiroki Yokoyama The TRD prototype is borrowed from GSI group (thanks Anton).
2. RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY Basic Principles.
EPS-HEP 2015, Vienna. 1 Test of MPGD modules with a large prototype Time Projection Chamber Deb Sankar Bhattacharya On behalf of.
TPC PAD Optimization Yukihiro Kato (Kinki Univ.) 1.Motivation 2.Simple Monte Carlo simulation 3.PAD response 4.PAD response for two tracks 5.Summary &
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
LC TPC R&D Results May Selected LC TPC R&D Results for the DESY RPC Meeting 2003 May 07 The LC TPC R&D Groups of the PRC R&D-01/03 Proposal Carleton,
Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.
Atsushi Aoza ( saga University ) A Simulation Study of GEM gating at ILC-TPC A.Ishikawa, A.Sugiyama, H.Fujishima, K.Kadomatsu(Saga U.) K.Fujii,M.Kobayashi,
Study of GEM Structures for a TPC Readout M. Killenberg, S. Lotze, J. Mnich, A. Münnich, S. Roth, M. Weber RWTH Aachen October 2003.
PNPI R&D on based detector for MUCH central part (supported by INTAS ) E. Chernyshova, V.Evseev, V. Ivanov, A. Khanzadeev, B. Komkov, L.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Design and performance of Active Target GEM-TPC R. Akimoto, S. Ota, S, Michimasa, T. Gunji, H. Yamaguchi, T. hashimoto, H. Tokieda, T. Tsuji, K. Kawase,
A TPC for ILC CEA/Irfu, Apero, D S Bhattacharya, 19th June Deb Sankar Bhattacharya D.Attie, P.Colas, S. Ganjour,
Wenxin Wang 105/04/2013. L: 4.7m  : 3.6m Design for an ILD TPC in progress: Each endplate: 80 modules with 8000 pads Spatial Resolution (in a B=3.5T.
A. SarratTPC jamboree, Aachen, 14/03/07 1 Full Monte Carlo of a TPC equipped with Micromegas Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia Motivation Simulation content.
1 Design of active-target TPC. Contents I.Physics requirements II.Basic structure III.Gas property IV.Electric field Distortion by ground Distortion of.
The BoNuS Detector: A Radial Time Projection Chamber for tracking Spectator Protons Howard Fenker, Jefferson Lab This work was partially supported by DOE.
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
Construction and Characterization of a GEM G.Bencivenni, LNF-INFN The lesson is divided in two main parts: 1 - construction of a GEM detector (Marco Pistilli)
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni. TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Performance Study of TU-TPC Prototype Using Cosmic-ray  Tsinghua University TPC group 
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
10/25/2007Nick Sinev, ALCPG07, FNAL, October Simulation of charge collection in chronopixel device Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
View of TPC Optimization from Reconstruction Working Group Xin Qian and Tingjun Yang 1.
GEM-MSTPC for direct measurements of astrophysical reaction rates H. Ishiyama 1, K. Yamaguchi 2, Y. Mizoi 3, Y.X. Watanabe 1, T. Hashimoto 4, M.H. Tanaka.
Performances of a GEM-based TPC prototype for the AMADEUS experiment Outline: GEM-TPC in AMADEUS experiment; Prototype design & construction; GEM: principle.
Design and performance of Active Target GEM-TPC R. Akimoto, S. Ota, S, Michimasa, T. Gunji, H. Yamaguchi, T. Hashimoto, H. Tokieda, T. Tsuji, S. Kawase,
TPC for ILC and application to Fast Neutron Imaging L. An 2, D. Attié 1, Y. Chen 2, P. Colas 1, M. Riallot 1, H. Shen 2, W. Wang 1,2, X. Wang 2, C. Zhang.
1 straw tube signal simulation A. Rotondi PANDA meeting, Stockolm 15 June 2010.
Focal plane detector discussion Kwangbok Lee Low Energy Nuclear Science team Rare Isotope Science Project Institute for Basic Science July 11,
Beam test Analysis Micromegas TPC by Wenxin Wang.
The NA61 TPCs (1) Overview: Mechanics readout Position resolution
Activities on straw tube simulation
A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
Updates on the Micromegas + GEM prototype
Giant Monopole Resonance
BoNuS: Radial-Drift TPC using Curved GEMs
Question 3 The proponents should show more details about the modification of the detector system to be built in P42 Answers 3-1. Liquid-Hydrogen Target.
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Micromegas module for ILC-TPC
DE/dx Study at CEPC TPC An Fenfen
Ionization detectors ∆
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
MINOS: a new vertex tracker for in-flight γ-ray spectroscopy
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Bi-Weekly Meeting 2004/09/08 Susumu Oda
p0 detection and reconstruction with the
Pad Response Function Nuclear Physics Group Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Jia-Ye Chen
Presentation transcript:

Design of active-target TPC

Contents Physics requirements Basic structure Gas property Position difference Distortion of electric field by ions created by beam Around GEM Pad shape

Physics requirements Study for nuclear property of unstable nuclei → Use of inverse kinematics is needed. Measurement of forward scattering → Measuring the recoil light nuclei can lead to precise measurement. → But the energy of the recoil nuclei for forward scattering is very small. → Gaseous target (or thin foil) is needed. Gas Target : a → He gas Target : d → d gas (or Cd4) To separate the objective reaction from other reaction, Angler resolution : 7.45mrad(RMS) Position resolution of vertex point : 1mm(RMS) Energy resolution : 10%(RMS) is needed for .

Basic structure Mask the beam track area It is difficult to measure the track of beam(Z: 10-50) and the track of recoil nuclei(Z: 1 or 2) at the same detector. (Energy loss of beam is several hundreds times larger than that of recoil nuclei.) → TPC can be operate in high rate beam condition. (Only the rate of recoil nuclei has to be taken into account.) Use of GEM Electron multiplication can be done at high rate. Pad shape(rectangular triangle) To lessen the number of pads, rectangular triangle is used for the pad shape. Position is derived by the charge ratio of the neighboring two pads.

Schematic view 1 Beam Recoil nuclei 10cm ☓10cm Thickness : 100mm Field cage GEM 10cm ☓10cm Thickness : 100mm Pad Total volume : 565mm ☓ 668mm ☓ 520mm

Schematic view 2 4cm NaI (CsI) Wire (pitch: 2.5mm) GEM Field cage Recoil nuclei Beam 4cm 25cm Beam GEM Mesh GEM Recoil nuclei Pad NaI (CsI)

Electric field

Gas property He(90%) + CO2(10%) (760 Torr, 300 K) Drift velocity Townsend coefficient

He(90%) + CO2(10%) (760 Torr, 300 K) Longitudinal diffusion Transverse diffusion

Ar(70%) + CO2(30%) (760 Torr, 300 K) Drift velocity Townsend coefficient

Ar(70%) + CO2(30%) (760 Torr, 300 K) Longitudinal diffusion Transverse diffusion

D2(100%) (760 Torr, 300 K) Drift velocity Townsend coefficient

D2(100%) (760 Torr, 300 K) Longitudinal diffusion Transverse diffusion

Distortion of electric field If the beam rate is very high, beam comes before the ions created by previous beam go away. → Ions (electrons) created by beam are piled up, and distorts the electric field. After a few seconds, charge distribution will be stationary. ← This Charge distribution is simulated by Monte-Carlo simulation. Distortion of the electric field is simulated by Garfield, ← Put stationary charge distribution into Garfield’s configuration, substitute wire for electric charge. and simulation of the position gap during electron drift has done.

Condition for simulation Gas property Gas: He(90%) + CO2(10%) Electric field : 1kV/cm Pressure : 760 Torr Temperature : 300 K Drift velocity : 3 [cm/ms] Ion mobility : 2.5☓103[cm2·Torr·V-1·s-1] Beam Beam rate : 107 Hz Energy loss : 4 MeV/cm = 105 ions(electrons)/cm ← corresponds to Sn with 100MeV/u Beam spread : 5cm (RMS) for drift direction 1cm (RMS) for the other direction

y Charge distribution Field cage Field cage Recoil nuclei 25cm Beam Generate random number (Gaussian; mean: 12.5cm, RMS: 5cm). ← corresponds to beam hit position, where ions(electrons) are created. Add to the histogram. GEM Pad Move each bin data to the next bin. ← corresponds to time change, the move of ions(electrons). count count y y repeat

Distribution of ion Ion distribution for each 1[ms] stationary Take the average of these histogram

Distribution of electron Electron distribution for each 1[ms] stationary Take the average of these histogram

Position difference Put electrons at x : every 5mm from x=2.5cm to x=13.0cm y : 24.0cm Drift electrons to the end of field cage, and subtract the point where electron is put from end point. → Position difference < 0.745mm. The effect of diffusion is not considered Simulate position difference in 3 different shield wire configuration. Without shield wire 5mm pitch 2.5mm pitch y Field cage Field cage y=24cm x 2cm 13cm Shield wire

Electric field Without shield wire Shield wire : 5mm pitch

Electric field Shield wire : 2.5mm pitch

Result 1 Active area of GEM is 2.5cm < x < 12.5cm Without shield wire Shield wire : 5mm pitch Without shield wire Maximum position difference is over 1mm Shield wire : 5mm pitch Maximum position difference : ~ 0.745mm

Result 2 Active area of GEM is 2.5cm < x < 12.5cm Shield wire : 2.5mm pitch Shield wire : 2.5mm pitch; Without ions & electrons Shield wire pitch : 2.5mm Maximum position difference is within 0.3mm < 0.745mm → Change of track angle is less within 3mrad.(flight length: 10cm)

Position gap between mesh to pad GEM Pad Frame of GEM 0.6 0.25 0.19 ~ 0.20 0.14 x -1.3 1.3 -15.4 -12.7 -2.3 2.3 12.7 15.4 Put electrons at x : every 1mm (-13.5cm<x<-11.5cm & -3.5cm<x<-1.5cm) y : Between mesh and GEM → 0.59cm(0.01cm below Mesh) Between GEM(or frame) and pad → 0.18cm(-12.6cm<x<-11.5cm or -3.5cm<x<-2.4cm; 0.01cm below GEM) or 0.13cm(other area; 0.01cm below frame) Drift electrons from mesh to GEM & from GEM(frame) to pad, and derive the position difference.

Result (Mesh-GEM) -13.5 < x < -11.5 -3.5 < x < -1.5 Frame width : 10mm Active area of GEM -13.5 < x < -11.5 -3.5 < x < -1.5 Overlap with GEM & frame : 1mm Overlap with GEM & frame : 0.5mm Overlap with GEM & frame : 0mm

Result (GEM-Pad) -13.5 < x < -11.5 -3.5 < x < -1.5 Frame width : 10mm Active area of GEM -13.5 < x < -11.5 -3.5 < x < -1.5 Overlap with GEM & frame : 1mm Overlap with GEM & Frame : 0.5mm Overlap with GEM & Frame : 0mm

Result (Mesh-GEM) -13.5 < x < -11.5 -3.5 < x < -1.5 Overlap with GEM & frame : 0mm Active area of GEM -13.5 < x < -11.5 -3.5 < x < -1.5 Frame width : 5mm Frame width : 10mm Frame width : 15mm

Result (GEM-Pad) -13.5 < x < -11.5 -3.5 < x < -1.5 Overlap with GEM & frame : 0mm Active area of GEM -13.5 < x < -11.5 -3.5 < x < -1.5 Frame width : 5mm Frame width : 10mm Frame width : 15mm

Pad shape Pad shape : rectangular triangle (16mm☓16mm) Position is derived by the charge ratio of the neighboring two pads. Angler resolution < 7.45mrad(RMS) Hit position is fitted by line using the least squares method. 16mm

Derivation of position 1 Recoil nuclei Q1 z = Q2 / (Q1 + Q2) ☓ 16mm x = Q2 / (Q1 + Q2) ☓ 16mm x z Q2 Recoil nuclei Q2 Q1 x z = Q1 / (Q1 + Q2) ☓ 16mm x = Q1 / (Q1 + Q2) ☓ 16mm z Q2 Derive wrong position! → Thinking about the algorism to derive correct position in such case Q1 x Recoil nuclei z

Derivation of position 2 Recoil nuclei x Q1 Q2 For these cases, position is derived by the same way. z Recoil nuclei Q1 x z Q2

Condition Energy loss of recoil nuclei : 500 electrons/cm proton 30MeV @Ar(70%)+CO2(30%) : 700 electrons/cm a with 15MeV/u @He(90%)+CO2(10%) : 500 electrons/cm Transverse diffusion (RMS) Transverse diffusion coefficient of He(90%)+CO2(10%) : 200mm for 1cm(RMS) 200mm 400mm 600mm 1000mm

Simulation Arrival position of electron x : z : q 16mm Simulation x 16mm Arrival position of electron x : z : Ru : uniform random number between -1 and flight length+1 Rdx : Gaussian random number, which corresponds to diffusion length for x direction Rdz : Gaussian random number, which corresponds to diffusion length for y direction : incident angle z0 : incident position Number of generated random number : n±√n n=500[electrons/cm]×(flight length+2) Number of events : 10000 z

Diffusion Other than the border of 2 pads → Almost same z Diffusion : 200mm : 400mm : 600mm : 1000mm z : injection position for z Other than the border of 2 pads → Almost same Border of 2 pads → Better angular resolution for the smaller diffusion.

Pad size 16mm×16mm : most good angular resolution z : injection position for z 16mm×16mm : most good angular resolution

Oblique incidence (angular resolution) Diffusion : 1000mm Better angular resolution can be achieved in the case of q<0 than in the case of q>0. q = -15° q = -30°

Oblique incidence (vertex resolution) Diffusion : 1000mm Vertex resolution is less than 1mm. q = -15° q = -30°

Summary & Outlook Final design is Wire pitch : 2.5mm Frame of GEM Overlap of GEM & frame : 0mm Frame width : 10mm Pad size : 16mm × 16mm → Performance Angular resolution : 4.5mrad Position resolution of vertex point : 0.5mm Position difference : < 0.3mm(Field cage) + 0.2mm(Mesh-Pad) Outlook Tracking algorism

Substitution wire To consider the beam spread for x-axis, wires are put at x=1. The voltage which supplied to substitution wire(V) is V0 : electrical potential made by field wires q : electric charge at unit length lground : distance from wire to ground lwire : diameter of wire y Field cage Field cage x Substitution wire for electric charge (x=1)