Reliability and Safety Analysis. Abstract Design and build a compact robot to traverse a maze Use the robot to generate an ASCII representation of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bridging Theory in Practice Transferring Technical Knowledge to Practical Applications.
Advertisements

CHARGING SYSTEMS Induced Voltage AC Charging Systems
CMOS Logic Circuits.
John Ogilvie High School - CfE Physics
Multivibrators and the 555 Timer
Chapter 4 Ohm’s Law, Power, and Energy. 2 Ohm’s Law The current in a resistive circuit is directly proportional to its applied voltage and inversely proportional.
V i t a l i s ECE Spring 2013 TEAM 13 Presenter: Yi Shen Wireless Biometric Sensor Team Members: Aakash Lamba Di Mo Shantanu Joshi Yi Shen Reliability.
Reliability and Safety Analysis Team 12: Android Street Car Zongyang Zhu.
Software Design Considerations. Abstract  Design and build a compact robot to traverse a maze  Use the robot to generate an ASCII representation of.
Team 4: Shicheng Guo, Kyle Haver, Ethan Price, Wesley Tso.
Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister, Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips Group Nine Reliability and Safety Analysis DART.
Schematic Overview. Abstract  Design and build a compact robot to traverse a maze  Use the robot to generate an ASCII representation of the entire maze.
Cartographic Order Specified Task Robot. Overview  Design and build a compact robot to traverse a maze.  Perform tasks located throughout the maze in.
Design Constraints. Abstract  Design and build a compact robot to traverse a maze.  Use the robot to generate an ASCII representation of the entire.
Lecture 1: Safety and Protection. 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey.
Copier Jam Detector Design Problem
Team 8:Recon Robot Safety and Reliability Analysis Abhinav Valluru (presenter) Vinit bhamburdekar Arjun Bajaj Aabhas Sharma.
RELIABILITY & SAFETY ANALYSIS PRESENTED BY: ANDREW BATEK Team # 15: Acoustic Storm Interweaving the impressive visual power of electricity and the visceral.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT CAROLINE TRIPPEL, ANDREW LOVELESS, ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS, ANDREW LOVELESS, CAROLINE TRIPPEL.
MARCELO L. BRANDON G. ADITYA B. NIKHIL S. THE INCREDIBLE HUD.
ECE 477 R ELIABILITY & S AFETY A NALYSIS Team 5 – myATM Xue Yuan Wong.
Technical Communication Skills Practicum (TCSP) Presented by Nuhairi & Azad Team 10: “Hazard Rover” 2/21/2007.
Technical Communication Skills Practicum (TCSP) Presented by Nuhairi & Azad Team 10: “Hazard Rover” 2/21/2007.
Kian Hui Wong Chia Siong Goh Wan Qi Choo Jun Jun Peh Presenter: Kian Hui Wong.
ECE 477 Group 3 The Gauntlet George Hadley Kelli Hacker Sean Ma Jacob Champion.
Pop’em Drop’em Robots TCSP #8 – Reliability & Safety Analysis Duncan Swartz.
P ROJECT PRINT TCSP 8 – R ELIABILITY & S AFETY A NALYSIS Team 8 – Siddharth Bhosale.
Text Message DJ – Reliability & Safety Team 22 Garrett Strzelecki The Text Message DJ allows party guests the opportunity to choose which songs they want.
Team 13 Michael Stuckenschneider Loren Garby Arin Chakraverty Janell Niekamp.
TCSP – Reliability and Safety. Reliability Analysis Major component chosen for analysis:Major component chosen for analysis: Switching Regulators (LM2679SD-5.0,
Reliability Analysis - Overview 4 main components considered Glove Micro - PIC24FJ128GA310 Base Micro - PIC18F87K90 3.3V Power Supply - CC3-0503SR-E 5V.
Solar Telematics System
Madalina Vintila David Wilkinson Michelle Zhang Zac Greenawalt.
Not So Deep Blue. LED chess board Detect piece movement Magnets/Reed switches Show possible moves Track game time (picture taken from a DIY project)
Troubleshooting Equipment Containing Integrated Circuits Jimmie Fouts Houston County Career Academy.
Team 9 - Scribacious Rabble Safety and Reliability Analysis Mitchell Erdbruegger (presenting) Paul Rosswurm William Hess Ben Kobin.
RCD Laser System Corey Lane, Ryan Scott, Danny Barjum.
Grant Thomas Anthony Fennell Justin Pancake Chris McCord TABLEGAMES UNLIMITED.
Matt Waldersen (Presenting) TJ Strzelecki Rick Schuman Krishna Jharjaria.
The “Drink Mixer” Reliability and SafetyAnalysis.
Wall-E Prototype I TCSP #8 Safety and Reliability Analysis Team 1 Xin Jin Ranmin Chen Hang Xie Zelun Tie.
Home Enhancement Suite Presenter: Allen Humphreys William Bouchonnet, Daniel Sabo, Nathan Irvin.
Josh Marchi, Jeff King, Paul Rosenberger, Dan Chambers – RM&S Analysis–
Technical Communication Skills Practicum (TCSP) Presented by Team 10: “Hazard Rover” 2/21/2007.
(Left to Right) Matt Finn Brian Crone Samuel Oshin Yonatan Feleke.
Fly Spy – Group 12 Reliability and Safety Analysis Heather Barrett.
DOODLE DRIVE Presenter: Peachanok Lertkajornkitti Team 6 Reliability and Safety Analysis.
Team 3 ATV Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers.
SWISH SLEEVE Safety and Reliability Analysis Stephen MacNeil, Michael Kobit, Sriharsh Achukola, Augustus Hong.
Criticality measures Low  General annoyance – screen stops working, buttons don’t work  λ < High  Parts get hot, catch fire, and/or explode 
Application Case Study Christmas Lights Controller
INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS/ELECTRICITY
Safety and Reliability Analysis
Autonomous Rescue Vehicle (Team 10)
connect a DC-Motor with an arduino
Team 16 : Project Minotaur Presenter : John Hubberts
Reliability and Safety Analysis
D.H.S. Digijock Home Security
Presenter: Ujjwal Karki, PhD Candidate, PE Lab, MSU
ECE 477 Digital Systems Senior Design Project  Spring 2013
Safety and Reliability
Reliability & Safety Analysis
Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey
Copier Jam Detector Design Problem
ECE477 Team 6: The Soviet Challenge
Reliability and Safety Analysis
Dong-Han Ryu Yukeun Sim Shiv Biddanda Po-Cheng (Robert) Wang
Reliability & Safety Analysis
Team 2: Bluetooth Mass Storage Device
Presentation transcript:

Reliability and Safety Analysis

Abstract Design and build a compact robot to traverse a maze Use the robot to generate an ASCII representation of the entire maze Mark light locations on map as they are discovered Revisit lights intelligently throughout the maze in a user-defined order

Reliability Analysis PIC18F4550 Microcontroller Model Equation: λP= (C1πT+C2πE)πQπL Parameter nameDescription ValueComments C1Die complexity failure rate.14Based on the MIL-Hdbk-217f [1] for 8 bit microcontrollers πTπT Temperature factor.98Assuming a worst case junction temperature of 85C based on worst operating temp of microcontroller C2Package failure rate Based on equation from MIL-Hnbk-217f page 5-14 [1] for SMT with 44 pins πEπE Environment factor4Handbooks value for mobile devices πQπQ Quality factor10Assumed from the notes that this is the value to use, most likely the value is too large πLπL Learning factor1Number used for devices older than 2 years in production λPλP Failure rate per 10^6 hours MTTFMean Time To Failure Approximately 55 years to a failure for one device

Reliability Analysis Parameter nameDescription ValueComments C1Die complexity failure rate.01Based on the MIL-Hdbk-217f [1] for devices with 100 or less bipolar transistors πTπT Temperature factor58Assuming a worst case junction temperature of 125C based on worst junction temp of the regulator C2Package failure rate.00092Based on equation from MIL-Hnbk-217f page 5-14 [1] for SMT with 3 pins πEπE Environment factor4Handbooks value for mobile devices πQπQ Quality factor10Assumed from the notes that this is the value to use, most likely the value is too large πLπL Learning factor1Number used for devices older than 2 years in production λPλP Failure rate per 10^6 hours MTTFMean Time To Failure Approximately 19.5 years to a failure for one device MIC29150 Low Dropout Regulator Model Equation: λP= (C1πT+C2πE)πQπL

Reliability Analysis Parameter nameDescription ValueComments C1Die complexity failure rate.01Based on the MIL-Hdbk-217f [1] for devices with 100 or less bipolar transistors πTπT Temperature factor58Assuming a worst case junction temperature of 125C based on worst estimated junction temp of the H-bridge C2Package failure rate.0056Based on equation from MIL-Hnbk-217f page 5-14 [1] for SMT with 16 pins πEπE Environment factor4Handbooks value for mobile devices πQπQ Quality factor10Assumed from the notes that this is the value to use, most likely the value is too large πLπL Learning factor1Number used for devices older than 2 years in production λPλP Failure rate per 10^6 hours MTTFMean Time To Failure Approximately 19 years to a failure for one device TI L293 Quadruple Half-H Driver Model Equation: λP= (C1πT+C2πE)πQπL

Reliability Analysis Parameter nameDescription ValueComments λbλb Base failure rate.027Based on the MIL-Hdbk-217f [1] for devices with 20 MHz frequency πQπQ Quality factor2.1Based on devices with a non MIL- SPEC πEπE Environment factor10Handbooks value for mobile devices λPλP Failure rate per 10^6 hours.567 Based on a quartz oscillator calculation MTTFMean Time To Failure Approximately 201 years to a failure for one device CTS CB3 HCMOS/TTL Clock Oscillator Model Equation: λP= λb*πQ*πE

Criticality Analysis 5 Subsection Microcontroller Fuel Gauge User I/O Power Motor contoller

Criticality Levels High Criticality Over discharge of the battery Over heating of components Over charge of battery Erratic movement of robot Low Criticality No power No input/output Does not run

Criticality Analysis – Micro Controller Failure Mode: Output stuck at 1 Possible causes: Overvoltage to the micro Effects: LEDs always off, H-bridge shorted Detection: Observation – Overheated H- Bridge, no LEDs Criticality: High

Criticality Analysis – Fuel Gauge Failure Mode: Reading battery discharging too quickly Possible causes: Rsense shorted, Cf shorted Effects: Misinformation to user about battery state Detection: Observation – Battery indicator drops quickly Criticality - Low

Criticality Analysis – Fuel Gauge

Criticality Analysis – User I/O Failure Mode: User input fails Possible causes: R13/14/15 open Effects: User buttons are floating Detection: Observation – Erratic button presses Criticality - Low

Criticality Analysis – User I/O

Criticality Analysis – Power Failure Mode: 5 V rail > 5V Possible causes: Linear regulator failed Effects: Damage to 5V components Detection: Observation – Regulator too hot, smoke Criticality - High

Criticality Analysis – Motor Control Failure Mode: No output to motors Possible causes: Digital isolators failed, H-bridge failed Effects: Motors will not run Detection: Observation – robot does not move Criticality - Low