ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Real World”: SVG, De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions Chronic Stable Angina, Silent Ischemia, Acute Coronary Syndromes Vessel Diameters:
Advertisements

3rd CEEGI Advisory Board1 Resolute in the DES era: Indications & Limitations Georgios I. Papaioannou, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI Athens Medical Center Cardiac.
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Drug Eluting Stents: Looking Forward Janine Lane
NOBORI New Generation Drug Eluting Stent Clinical Data Danny Detiege Clinical Manager - Cardiology Terumo Europe N.V. Leuven, Belgium.
1 of Presented by Gregg W. Stone, MD, ACC PROMUS Stent is a private-labeled Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured.
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
RESOLUTE US One-Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal Multicenter RESOLUTE US Study Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the Resolute.
The Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Device Description and Comprehensive Update of the Clinical Trial Program.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
RAVEL 4 YEAR FOLLOW-UP - Cordis Cardiology / Cardialysis – Euro-PCR – Sousa – 24 May 2005 RAVEL A RAndomised, double-blind study with the Sirolimus-eluting.
NEXT A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Cre8, a Polymer-Free Stent Eluting Sirolimus, to a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Didier Carrié, MD,PhD On behalf.
Final 5 year results from the all-comer COMPARE trial: a prospective randomized comparison between Xience-V and Taxus Liberté TCT 2013 San Francisco Pieter.
Durable Polymer DES: 5 Year Outcomes RESOLUTE Update Sigmund Silber, MD FESC, FACC, FAHA Heart Center at the Isar Munich, Germany On Behalf of the RESOLUTE.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
The OPTIMAX first-in-man study Mid-term clinical outcome of Titanium-Nitride-Oxide-coated Cobalt Chromium stents in patients with de novo coronary artery.
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
XIENCE V vs TAXUS: Game Over! The Studies are Definitive
The Abbott Vascular DES Pipeline
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Two-year clinical outcomes in the EVOLVE FHU trial: A randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting stent Ian Meredith.
Three-year results from the multicentre PROMUS Element European Post-Approval (PE-Prove) Registry: outcomes in 1010 unselected patients treated with a.
A Novel Abluminal Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent as a Treatment Option for Diabetic Patients: Results from an All-Comers Multi-center Study: the En-ABL.
Main Arena IV - Plenary Session XXVII: First Reports #4
12 Month Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Implanted with a Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent: Initial Results from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical.
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
ABSORB Japan: 3-year Clinical and Angiographic Results of a Randomized trial Evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Metallic Drug-eluting.
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
Update on the BioMatrix Program
TAXUS IV Trial Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single de novo coronary lesions Presented.
Elixir Medical Novolimus Elution from A Biodegradable Polymer
Novolimus Elution from a Biodegradable Polymer Coated Coronary Stent
EXCELLA Studies - Novolimus Elution from PLLA Polymer Coated Stents DESyne® and DESyne BD: Design Specifications and Clinical Updates Stefan Verheye,
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
The RESOLUTE Program: today and tomorrow
On behalf of J. Belardi, M. Leon, L. Mauri,
Second Generation DES Associated with Less Late and Very Late Stent Thrombosis Compared to First Generation DES Donald E. Cutlip, MD Beth Israel Deaconess.
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
FINAL FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE NOBORI2 TRIAL
Stenting of Coronary Arteries in Non Stress/Benestent Disease
SIRIUS Trial: Diameter Restenosis
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
TAXUS II and IV: two-year follow-up
A Randomized, Prospective, Intercontinental Evaluation of a Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent: the CENTURY II Trial: an Update with 2 Years.
REALITY: 8 month results
How and why this study may change my practice ?
Kyoto University Hospital, Japan
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Presented at ACC 2003 Late Breaking Clinical Trials
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Raimund Erbel
SIRIUS: A U.S. Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the SIRolImUS-Eluting Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Lesions Presented at TCT 2002.
Potential conflicts of interest
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
SORT-OUT III: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Michael.
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
TAXUS VI Randomized Trial of Moderate-Rate Release Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting TAXUS Stent for the Treatment of Longer Lesions Three Year Clinical.
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
IVUS-XPL Trial design: Patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary lesions were randomized to IVUS-guided PCI (n = 700) vs. angiography-guided.
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
TYPHOON Trial Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON) Trial Presented at.
Presentation transcript:

ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up Ian T. Meredith, MBBS, PhD MonashHEART Monash Medical Centre Melbourne, Australia On Behalf of the Endeavor II Investigators

Potential Conflicts Of Interest Speaker’s name: Ian T. Meredith I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Research contracts Consulting Employment in industry Stockholder of a healthcare company Owner of a healthcare company Other(s) I do not have any potential conflict of interest 2

Driver Cobalt Alloy Stent Endeavor DES System Driver Cobalt Alloy Stent Stent Delivery System PC Technology Drug: Zotarolimus

Polymer and Drug Matrix PC overspray (~0.1 µm thick) Stent strut Post-elution ~1-µm coating of PC polymer Drug layer 90% zotarolimus (10 µg/mm) 10% PC (~2–3 µm thick) Stent strut PC basecoat (~1 µm thick) ENDEAVOR CYPHER TAXUS Liberté XIENCE V Strut Thickness 91 µm 140 µm 97 µm 81 µm Polymer Thickness 4.8 µm 12.6 µm 17.8 µm 7.8 µm

ENDEAVOR II Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial vs Driver PI: Jean Fajadet, William Wijns et. al. Single De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions Reference Vessel Diameter 2.25 mm-3.5 mm Lesion Length: 14-27 mm Pre-dilatation required N = 1,200 patients 72 sites Europe, Asia Pacific, Israel, New Zealand and Australia Endeavor Stent Active Arm n=600 Driver Stent Control Arm n=600 Clinical/MACE 30d 6mo 8mo 9mo 12mo 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr Angiography/IVUS Angio = first 600 pts IVUS = first 300 pts (plus IVUS for overlapping stents) Primary Endpoint: TVF at 9 months Secondary Endpoints: MACE at 30 days and 9 months, BR at 8 months Drug Therapy: ASA and Clopidogrel >3 months Zotarolimus Dose: 10 g per mm stent length Fajadet et al. Circulation. 2006;114:98-806.

ENDEAVOR Clinical Program ENDEAVOR I First in Human 5 Years n = 97/100 (97%) ENDEAVOR II Double-blind Randomized Trial 5 Years n = 577/598 (97%) ENDEAVOR II CA Continued Access Registry 4 Years n = 287/296 (97%) ENDEAVOR III Confirmatory Trial vs. Cypher 4 Years n = 307/323 (95%) ENDEAVOR IV Confirmatory Trial vs. Taxus 2 Years n = 742/773 (96%) ENDEAVOR PK Pharmacokinetic Trial 2 Years n = 42/43 (98%) E-Five Post Market Surveillance 2 Years n = 2054/2116 (97%)

ENDEAVOR II Patient Flowchart Patients Enrolled N = 1197 Endeavor Driver n = 599 Randomized Angio F/U (8 mo) 264/298 88.6% Angio F/U (8 mo) 265/302 87.7% Clinical Follow-up Clinical Follow-up (1yr) 590/598 98.7% (2yr) 588/598 98.3% (3yr) 585/598 97.8% (4yr) 583/598 97.5% (5yr) 577/598 96.5% (1yr) 590/599 98.5% (2yr) 588/599 98.2% (3yr) 587/599 98.0% (4yr) 584/599 97.5% (5yr) 582/599 97.2%

ENDEAVOR II TVF and TLR at 9 Months Primary Endpoint Target Vessel Failure* TLR P<0.001 P<0.001 47% 61% Driver Endeavor Driver Endeavor *Target Vessel Failure is a composite of target vessel revascularization, MI, or cardiac death.

Time after Initial Procedure (years) ENDEAVOR II Cumulative Incidence of TVF to 5 years Endeavor Driver Log rank P = <0.001 24.3% 15.3% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 9m 1 2 3 4 5 Time after Initial Procedure (years) Cumulative Incidence TVF Δ 7.1% Δ 9.0% Days 270 360 720 1080 1440 1800 Endeavor 597 584 541 525 515 497 487 % CI 2.2 7.9 10.0 11.0 12.6 13.5 15.3 Driver 596 580 501 465 446 435 2.7 15.0 16.5 19.6 21.2 22.4 24.3

Cumulative Incidence TLR Time after Initial Procedure (years) ENDEAVOR II Cumulative Incidence of TLR to 5 years Cumulative Incidence TLR Log rank P = <0.001 16.5% 7.4% 30% Time after Initial Procedure (years) Endeavor Driver 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 9m 1 2 3 4 5 Δ 7.2% Δ 9.1% Days 270 360 720 1080 1440 1800 Endeavor 597 595 552 538 529 515 505 % CI 0.3 4.6 6.0 6.5 7.2 7.4 Driver 596 504 489 474 456 445 0.2 11.9 13.2 14.2 14.8 15.9 16.5

ENDEAVOR II TLR at 5 years TLR (%) P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001

ENDEAVOR II Summary of Clinical Events at 5 years Endeavor N = 598 Driver N = 599 P Value Death (all) - % (n) 6.2 (36) 7.6 (44) 0.418 Cardiac 3.1 (18) 3.6 (21) 0.745 MI (all) – % (n) 3.8 (22) 4.8 (28) 0.470 Q Wave -% (n) 0.3 (2) 1.2 (7) 0.178 Non Q Wave - % (n) 3.5 (20) 1.000 Death (cardiac) + MI (all) – % (n) 6.6 (38) 8.4 (49) 0.265 TLR – % (n) 7.5 (43) 16.3 (95) <0.001 TVR (non-TL) – % (n) 4.3 (25) 0.188 TVR – % (n) 10.7 (62) 20.1 (117) MACE – % (n) 15.4 (89) 24.6 (143) TVF – % (n) 24.4 (142) Table 4h

ENDEAVOR II Clinical Performance at 5 years (%) P<0.001 P<0.001 38% TVF 54% TLR

ENDEAVOR II Summary of ARC Stent Thrombosis to 5 years Endeavor Driver n = 599 P Value Stent Thrombosis (ARC Def/prob) - %(n) 0.9 (5) 1.7 (10) 0.299 Early: 0-30 days 0.5 (3) 1.2 (7) 0.342 Late: 31-360 days 0.2 (1) 1.000 Very Late: 361-1800 days 0.3 (2)

Pivotal Trials TLR: DES Arms Rates of TLR Over Time ENDEAVOR II (n=577/598) SIRIUS (n=501/533) TAXUS IV (n=618/662) 9.4 9.1 7.9 7.8 7.5 7.2 7.2 6.5 6.8 6.9 5.9 6.3 TLR (%) TLR (%) TLR (%) 5.6 4.9 4.4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Years of Follow-up Years of Follow-up Years of Follow-up 5 Year Clinical Results of TAXUS IV, Stone, ACC 2007 5 year Outcomes in the Sirius Trial, Weisz et al. JACC Vol. 53, No. 17, 2009 Results come from separate clinical trials. Data may differ in a head-to-head comparison.

ENDEAVOR II Conclusions Sustained clinical benefit out to 5 years with a excellent safety profile with no new (ARC) stent thrombosis events These long term outcomes could be due in part to the unique biocompatible nature of the PC polymer The Endeavor ZES when compared with the Driver stent demonstrated: