FFEL Business Process and Data Standardization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CommonRecord: CommonLine How Implementing CommonRecord: CommonLine Can Benefit You Presented by [Enter your information here]
Advertisements

Federal Student Aid Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Data Flow Reengineering Focus Group Orlando, FL Sunday, October 29, 2006.
Financial Management Service Holden Hogue March 12, 2009 Standardizing, Consolidating, and Optimizing Budget & Financial Management Business Processes.
Global Business Blueprint Summary Presenters: Laurie Dempsey, CBP Lois McCluskey, eCP January 28, 2004.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
The National Declassification Center Releasing All We Can, Protecting What We Must Public Interest Declassification Board NDC Project Update April 22,
XML: Advanced Concepts and Long Term Vision Tim Bornholtz Holly Hyland Technical Track Session.
1 Data Strategy Overview Keith Wilson Session 15.
XML Registry and Repository for the Education Community Holly Hyland, Federal Student Aid.
2 Session # 50 Presented by: Russell Judd Chief Industry and Government Relations Officer Great Lakes Educational Loan Services Michael Sessa Executive.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Session 21-2 Session 11 Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) & Commonline: Dispel the Myths.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
1 CommonLine and the Common Record: The Building of Convergence Kim Shiflette, USA Funds Bob King, Citibank Student Loans Session 34.
Session 102 NSLDS Data Conflict Resolution and You.
Integrated Partner Management NASFAA Conference 2008 July 2008 Presenter Susan Stallard.
Open Data Future for Grants ANN EBBERTS, CEO AGA MIKE PECKHAM, DIRECTOR, DATA ACT PMO, HHS CHRIS ZELEZNIK, ENGAGEMENT LEAD, DATA ACT PMO, HHS.
MP Online Data Entry Project Update WMS / ROS August 2013 Troy Anderson.
Student Financial Assistance Presented by:. Session 53 CommonLine Release 5 Setting the Standard Presented by: Tim Cameron – NCHELP Candy Pfeiffer – Great.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
1 Session 13 Default Prevention A Plan for Student and School Success Craig Rorie Rosemary Foltis.
Session 49-1 Session 49 NSLDS Helping You Find the Answers.
Setting Standards for Higher Education Chicago, Illinois ~ December 12, 2001 Session #51.
FFEL Business Process and Data Standardization April 28, 2008.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
Common Record Update Holly A. Hyland, FSA Kim Shiflette, NCHELP.
Managing Change 1. Why Do Requirements Change?  External Factors – those change agents over which the project team has little or no control.  Internal.
1 Standard Student Identification Method Jeanne Saunders Session 16.
U.S. General Services Administration Introducing CORE.GOV The FEA’s Component Center A governmentwide collaborative COMPONENT ORGANIZATION & REGISTRATION.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on the Social Security Agency February 2005.
Session 3 Integrated Partner Management (IPM) Presenters Molly Wyatt Susan Stallard Margaret Ayanian Andrea DiDonna.
Diahann Greene| Dec U.S. Department of Education 2015 FSA Training Conference for Financial Aid Professionals Integrated Partner Management (IPM)
FFELP UPDATE FOR SCHOOLS Mark Putman NCHELP Session 8.
C-DERL is an application designed to be a Federal- wide, online repository for data standards, definitions, and context. It was authorized jointly by the.
Session 61 Financial Partners’ Journey Through NSLDS Pam Eliadis and Valerie Sherrer.
Serving Our Mutual Customers Through Common Services for Borrowers March 28, 2004 Dan Hayward Direct Loan Session.
CommonRecord: CommonLine Implementation Gary Allen David Steiner.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
Common Origination and Disbursement 2002 PESC Conference.
NSLDS Overview Current Status and Considerations for the Future Tuesday April 24, 2007, 2:30 pm 3:30 pm.
Common Record Paving the Way for Electronic Standards in Higher Education Common Record – COD Common Record – CommonLine Common Record – ISIR Collaboration.
Session 58 Integrated Partner Management (IPM) for Financial Institutions Presenters Molly Wyatt Susan Stallard Margaret Ayanian Andrea DiDonna.
August 14-15, 2003 Crystal Gateway Marriott Arlington, VA Software Developers Conference.
Session #23 Improving the School Eligibility Application Process with the Integrated Partner Management (IPM) Solution Molly Wyatt Susan Stallard U.S.
NSLDS Update Ron Bennett Valerie Sherrer U.S. Department of Education
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Dave Wallace ANDREA CHAPPELL IST September 13, 2012
Continuous Improvement Project (A Guideline For Sponsors)
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
Implementation Strategy July 2002
ServiceNow Implementation Knowledge Management
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on the Social Security Agency
XML Registry and Repository for the Education Community
Session 11 Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) & Commonline: Dispel the Myths Session 21-
Common Record: A Story of Convergence
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Capacity building on the use of Geospatial Data and Technologies
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
Default Prevention: A Beginners Guide to Implementation
Software Developers Conference
Update & Overview Postsecondary Electronic Standards Council
On Site Management Meeting 7.
NCHELP Update Common Record for FFELP & Alternative Loans Meteor
(Insert Title of Project Here) Kickoff Meeting
WORK STREAM TEAM DELIVERABLES
Presentation transcript:

FFEL Business Process and Data Standardization April 28, 2008

Agenda Panelist Introductions Purpose Project Mission FFEL Data Standards Phased Approach Phase I – Internal Analysis Phase II – External Analysis Questions

Panelist Introductions Pam Eliadis – Federal Student Aid Kristi Blabaum - GLHEC Justin Draeger - NASFAA Mark Putman - NCHELP

Purpose Provide an overview of the FFEL Data Standardization and Business Process Improvement Project What it is What’s been done Where we are today Next steps

Project Mission Develop FFEL process improvement recommendations and define data standards that will be exchanged between Federal Student Aid and its partners throughout the financial aid lifecycle for FFEL Program loans.

Proposed Business Process Improvements Goals: Streamline FFEL business processes for Federal Student Aid and the FFEL Community Eliminate current process weaknesses across the financial aid lifecycle Incorporate target state initiatives and concepts into FFEL business processes Resolve information/data deficiencies

Proposed Data Standards Goals: Eliminate duplicative reporting through collection of the right data from the right data provider at the right time Collect data based on business needs Establish in the XML Registry and Repository (XML R&R) a common definition for data attributes that Federal Student Aid and the FFEL Community exchange

Benefits to Federal Student Aid and Partners Improved accuracy and consistency of information Reduced redundancy of information and processes Improved timeliness of information Improved completeness and accessibility of information Improved ability to synthesize, report on and analyze information Streamlined data collection and integrated end-to-end processes

Benefits to Students and Parents Single integrated view of student information Improved default prevention by predictive modeling to identify at-risk borrowers and early intervention to assist those borrowers Reduced data entry burden through pre-population of information (e.g., consolidation application) Improved security of individual information through reduced reliance on the Social Security Number Information quality

FFEL Data Standards Phased Approach The FFEL Data Standards project consists of 3 phases: Phase I - Internal Analysis with Federal Student Aid and Department of Education Business Owners Phase II – External Analysis with the FFEL Community of Interest Phase III – Modify/Add Data Standards through Postsecondary Education Standards Council (PESC) Change Control Board Phase 1: Internal Analysis with Business Owners Phase 2: External Analysis with FFEL Community Phase 3: PESC CCB Data Requirements Gathering

Phase I: Internal Analysis Approach Internal Analysis with Business Owners Process Use feedback Meet with from Federal business Student Aid owners to business review owners to baseline data 2 evaluate draft Federal requirements Obtain approval Baseline Data 1 data standards Student Aid from Federal Draft Data Requirements Student Aid Requirements 3 4 Submit updated Develop updated Analyzed Federal Student requirements to Aid Interfaces: requirements and to - business owners for • DMCS be business processes • NSLDS approval of draft • FMS • Consolidation/LVC Phase 1: Internal Analysis with Business Owners Phase 2: External Analysis with FFEL Community Phase 3: PESC CCB Data Requirements Gathering

Phase I: Internal Analysis Outcomes FFEL Data Flows Requirements Document (V2 – Business Unit Lead Validated) Draft “To-be” FFEL lifecycle business process maps Draft FFEL data standard requirements Phase 1: Internal Analysis with Business Owners Phase 2: External Analysis with FFEL Community Phase 3: PESC CCB Data Requirements Gathering

Phase II: External Analysis Approach Internal Analysis with Business Owners Phase 2: External Analysis with FFEL Community Phase 3: PESC CCB Data Requirements Gathering

Phase II: FFEL Community Representatives 6 Federal Student Aid representatives 21 FFEL Community representatives Experience needed for workgroup Loan Assignments NSLDS Reporting CommonLine Common Record GA Financial Reporting Lender Financial Reporting Common Account Maintenance (CAM) Collection Support Processes (i.e., TOP, NDNH, etc) Consolidation LVC Processing Cohort Default Rates Claims Processing Discharge/forgiveness Processing Perkins Direct Loans Federal Grants

Phase II: Federal Student Aid Representatives Areas of the Federal Student Aid business representing Ron Bennett Ron.Bennett@ed.gov NSLDS Financial Partners Systems Financial Partners Services Portfolio Risk Management Program Operations Holly Hyland Holly.Hyland@ed.gov Lisa Elliott Lisa.Elliott@ed.gov Enterprise Data Management CIO XML Registry and Repository Adele Gabrielli Adele.Gabrielli@ed.gov Borrower Services – Default Resolution Borrower Services – Systems Borrower Services – Processing Group Borrower Services – Non-Default Group Angela Roca-Baker Angela.Roca-Baker@ed.gov Federal Student Aid CFO Lender Financial Reporting GA Financial Reporting Budget Service Zachary Vroman Zachary.Vroman@ed.gov Financial Partners Eligibility and Oversight School Eligibility Channel Enterprise Performance Management

Phase II: Meetings Kickoff meeting: November 29, 2007 in San Diego Federal Student Aid Conference Weekly external workgroup meetings In-person external workgroup meeting: March 10, 2008 Phase II results meeting with internal stakeholders

Phase II: External Workgroup Activities The external workgroup reviews data elements previously vetted with internal stakeholders during Phase I to support the FFEL financial aid lifecycle. The external workgroup specifically analyzes: Data element names Data element definitions Data element usage, field length and type The external workgroup members are given a week to accept or reject the proposed data elements. The external workgroup members determine whether some elements are duplicative or unnecessary

Phase II: Subgroups From the external workgroup, 2 subgroups were formed to discuss: Payment/Collection History: the subgroup will discuss the needs of Federal Student Aid to obtain borrower payment history to support loan assignment, financial reporting and program management. Lender financial reporting (ED Form 799): the subgroup will discuss ways to reduce the burden of lender financial reporting through the collection of aid-level data elements.

Phase II: Communications Plan to the FFEL Community A Communication Sub-Committee is responsible for developing and approving a monthly update to the FFEL community. Updates on project progress are provided through a link on the Financial Partners Portal (http://www.fp.ed.gov/PORTALSWebApp/fp/FFELDataStandProj.jsp). NCHELP, NASFAA and COHEAO provide the monthly communication to their respective listservs. A dedicated email address (DataStrategy@ed.gov) has been established for community comments and questions.

Phase II: Communications Plan to the FFEL Community Communication Sub-Committee Members: Ron Bennett (Federal Student Aid) Mike Balogh (NCHELP) Justin Draeger (NASFAA) Mark Putman (NCHELP)

Target State Context of FFEL Data Standards Data standards will lead to schema development for specific Target State Vision (TSV) implementations: Student Aid History Management (SAHM) Information Framework (IF)/Operational Data Store (ODS) Debt Management Collection System (DMCS)/Conditional Disability Discharge Tracking System (CDDTS) reengineering Loan Consolidation enhancements Financial Management System (FMS) enhancements

Federal Student Aid Target State Vision

Target State Architecture

Frequently Asked Questions Question: When does the FFEL Community have to begin reporting the approved data standards?

Frequently Asked Questions Answer: The data standards will be implemented as Federal Student Aid reengineers or enhances its legacy systems (i.e., NSLDS, Debt Management Collection System [DMCS], Financial Management System [FMS]) with planned target state vision solutions. Federal Student Aid will not implement all target state solutions at once. Federal Student Aid will use a phased implementation approach over a multi-year timeframe.

Frequently Asked Questions Question: Why do you have Perkins and Direct Loan representatives on a FFEL Data Standards workgroup?

Frequently Asked Questions Answer: Federal Student Aid wants to ensure that common data reported across aid programs are consistently defined and create information parity for Title IV programs.

Frequently Asked Questions Question: How can non workgroup participants provide feedback and input to the process?

Frequently Asked Questions Answer: An email address has been established to provide feedback and input, DataStrategy@ed.gov.

Frequently Asked Questions Question: Is this effort leveraging work already done for CAM, CommonLine Common Record, etc.?

Frequently Asked Questions Answer: Yes. During Phase 1 of this project Federal Student Aid mapped data that is currently collected with data elements in the XML R&R to see where previous work could be leveraged. Additionally, during workgroup discussions the workgroup references data elements and definitions already defined in CAM and CommonLine. Additionally, there are members of our workgroup with detailed knowledge and experience with previous data standardization efforts.

Frequently Asked Questions Question: How will the implementation of these standards impact schools?

Frequently Asked Questions Answer: FFEL schools will still provide data to lenders and guaranty agencies using the CommonLine standard. Federal Student Aid will conduct a similar project for Perkins schools at a later date.

We appreciate your feedback and comments Community Inquiries: Email: DataStrategy@ed.gov