Course evaluations at Chalmers Common process from academic year 2007/08 Overview for teachers and students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simon Laing (in place of Tina Huddart) Science Recruitment Officer Converting pupils to students : What might customer relationship management mean for.
Advertisements

Presenters: Maureen Chalmers (NWCC) and Terry Delaney(TRCC)
THE DOS AND DONTS OF GIVING EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK TO COLLEAGUES January 24, 2012 Department of Medicine.
© 2008 Brigham Young University–Idaho. © 2010 Brigham Young University–Idaho COURSE LEAD RESPONSIBILITIES TRAINING Feb. 7,
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
© Dr I M Bradley CG109 - Individual Project (Undergraduate) Overview Briefing.
TASK FORCE CALL TO ARMS Henninger High School 2012.
Chairing a Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Visitation.
Houston Independent School Technology Plan for
Stoas Research Designing Web-based Constructivist Learning Environments Emiel van Puffelen Stoas Research Wageningen The Netherlands.
The quality assurance system in Sweden Håkan Hult Linköping University Gdansk March 13, 2009.
Science & Technology Department University of Peloponnese Socrates Comenius 1 School partnerships Selection 2005 Bari October 2005 Project Activities.
INTRODUCTION.- PROGRAM EVALUATION
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Student Academic Representative (StARs) Scheme Training 2010/11 Please sign the register and take a seat.
Linnaeus-Palme A programme aiming to create and stimulate cooperation between HEI in Sweden and low- and middle income countries.
University Writing Project Faculty Feedback
The role of management - How to organize meaningful and powerful environment of learning in the net.
NAME: NTANDOYENKOSI SATAMWE INSTITUTION: HILLSIDE TEACHERS’ COLLEGE TITLE: LECTURER CONTACT DETAILS:
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Spring Quarter Department Chair Forum May 25, 2007.
CBEI Essentials for Residents, Fellows, and Faculty A 10-minute primer on student performance assessment in required clerkships Stanford School of Medicine.
ASE Support for Teaching From Beginning Science Teachers through to Heads of Science Adrian Fenton Formerly Curriculum Support Manager, ASE Now Science.
Data Coaching Getting to the human side of data. Session Goals  Identify the purpose of using data in an educational setting.  Describe ways to connect.
Unit 11 Meetings. Overview  Meetings In Business  Types of Meeting  Attending Meetings  Notice and Agenda  Chairman’s Agenda  Minutes of Meeting.
Collaboration with Adolescents’ Parliament promoting a new regulation on students’ councils Matoula Papadimitriou Senior Investigator Department of Children’
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
Taking the Chair A National Development Programme for Chairs, Vice Chairs and Chairs of Committees Module Three Activity 3.1 OHT 1.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
INTRODUCTION  It was established in 1997 with just 25 students of CA and today the institute achieved an esteem position all over the country by showing.
Becoming a Skilled Mentor: Tools, Tips, and Training Vignettes Rebecca Pauly, M.D. Cecilia Lansang, M.D. Gwen Lombard, PhD. Gwen Lombard, PhD. *Luanne.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Student Council Training Eddie Rowley Students’ Union Liaison & Quality Coordinator.
Strategies for Managing the Online Workload CADE 2003 St. John’s Newfoundland June, 2003.
Countryside Elementary School Site Council Meeting Tuesday, September 13, 2011 Agenda: Review by-laws Officers Call to public Adjourn Meeting.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
CBEI Essentials for residents, fellows, and faculty A 10-minute primer on the Criterion-Based Evaluation Initiative and student performance assessment.
The Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki
University of Florida College of Education Master’s Degree Online in Educational Leadership.
Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 2015 HSE Academics for Exchange Students Orientation Spring
Professional Development
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Critical Thinking as an Educational Tool: A Justification for the Revival of the Speech and Thought Paradigm Presented by: Elizabeth L. Chupp Illinois.
© 2015 Deloitte Belgium1 Enhancing the management culture at DG EAC Implementation of a 360° feedback exercise.
M253 Students Study Guide Mrs. Fatheya Al Mubarak – AOU Dammam.
Ellinogermaniki Agogi Research and Development Department DigiSkills Network DigiSkills: Network for the enhancement of Digital competence skills.
Academic Cooperation: Terminology Research for IATE.
Stage 3. Consultation and Review Standard Setting Training Course 2016.
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
NTNU’s quality system for education
UCL Peer Dialogue Scheme
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
SPECIAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS STATUS CTS Fall Planning Meeting San Marcos September 6, 2013 Don Drumtra Good morning.
European Labour Law Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli:
Simplified Reporting Initiative
Syllabus Guidelines and Other Instructor/Student Policies
Engaging Students in Quality Processes at UJ
Presenters: Maureen Chalmers (NWCC) and Steve Krevisky (MXCC)
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Be part of developing KI
Personal and Professional development for
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Programme Rep Election
CSC 492 – Senior Design – Spring 2019
Teaming Class 2 Notes – Section 1
Teaming Class 2 Notes – Sections 2 & 3
Special Features of the Swedish Government Sector
WP4- Piloting and Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Course evaluations at Chalmers Common process from academic year 2007/08 Overview for teachers and students

Course evaluations at Chalmers Continuous course development Course evaluations are a part of the never-ceasing efforts to improve courses and programmes at Chalmers. Student experiences, as expressed and collected in course evaluations, form an essential input to this development of quality.

Course evaluations at Chalmers Which courses are affected? All courses at Chalmers are evaluated as described here … with the possible exception of courses at the master level with few (< 20) students. These may adopt a simplified process, where teacher and students continuously discuss the course.

Course evaluations at Chalmers What does Swedish law say? According to Swedish law, the university shall give each student, who participates in a course, an opportunity to express his/her views on the course in a course evaluation organized by the university. The university shall put evaluations together and inform about the results and possible actions taken in response. Results shall be made available to the students.

Course evaluations at Chalmers Goals for the evaluation process The aim of the process is to develop the goals, contents and pedagogy of the courses, focusing on student learning. The process shall encourage a dialogue between teachers and students on how the education can be improved. The process shall profit from student experiences, in order to improve current and future courses, as well as the study programmes as a whole.

Course evaluations at Chalmers The process Three meetings between 2-6 student representatives and the teacher. In the final meeting, also representatives from the programme, the department and the student union may attend. Brief, web-based, anonymous questionnaire to all students. Minutes from the final meeting available in the student portal Exam Course intro Meeting 1 Meeting 2 Meeting 3 Questionnaire Minutes Portal Representatives presented Notes on course website

Course evaluations at Chalmers Chalmers centrally, responsibilities Maintains and develops course evaluation process. Provides IT support (questionnaire system, minutes template, routines for linking from portal). Informs about process and tools.

Course evaluations at Chalmers Programme leadership, responsibilities Appoints (in collaboration with student union) student representantives; informs teacher. Assembles and distributes standard questionnaire. Puts questionnaire results together. Schedules and calls to final meeting. Chairs final meeting and archives minutes in Chalmers document system.

Course evaluations at Chalmers Teacher, responsibilites Informs briefly about process during course introduction and in course documents; presents student representantatives. Calls two first meetings together, publishes notes from 2nd meeting on course website. Presents his/her views and experiences at final meeting. Develops course for next year, according to departmental decisions and routines.

Course evaluations at Chalmers Student representantatives, responsibilities Inform themselves of their fellow students views on the course. Pass these views on at the meetings and participate in discussions in a personal capacity. May propose course-specific questions in questionnaire. Inform fellow students of discussions and recommendations at the meetings. Each representative is reimbursed with a voucher for 200 SEK, valid at Cremona.

Course evaluations at Chalmers Meetings 1 and 2 First meeting (week 1) is brief and will typically take place in connection with a teaching activity. Aims: to establish contact, clarify teachers and students thoughts regarding the course and to decide on and publish time for meeting 2. The second meeting (week 3-4) discusses e.g. –Changes in the course since last year. –Study climate (communication, work load, supervision). –Problematic course items; can resources be used better? –Course-specific questions in questionnaire; other material for final meeting? Notes are published on course website..

Course evaluations at Chalmers Final meeting Takes place in week 4 of the subsequent study period. Examination complete, questionnaire summarized. More attendees: representatives for programme, department and student union. Summarizing judgment. Goal fulfilment. Organisation and pedagogy. Study climate. Desirable changes for next year. Link to minutes from course plan in student portal.