Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nigeria Case Study HIVAIDS Specific Slides. ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA.
Advertisements

Contraceptive discontinuation in urban Honduras Janine Barden-O’Fallon, PhD Ilene Speizer, PhD University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA 29 September.
LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.
UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.
Building Capacity on Program Evaluation in Latin America: The Experience of the Partnership between Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health (INSP)
MEASURE Evaluation DATIM Data Exchange Denise Johnson
Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
ADX Workflows James Kariuki, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Denise Johnson, MEASURE Evaluation August 25, 2015 Virtual OpenHIE Architecture.
Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.
Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.
PLANNING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION Day 2 - Session 4.
MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.
Management of RHIS Resources
RHIS Governance ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 7:
Module 2 Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool Database.
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:
Community Health Information System in Action in SSNPR/Ethiopia
RHIS Data Integration and Interoperability
Difference-in-Differences Models
Ensuring Data Quality for Monitoring and Evaluation
Data Quality Assurance Workshop
Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:
RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 10:
From the Conceptual Framework to the Empirical Model
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Using Data to Inform Community-Level Management
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 8:
Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia
Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use
Right-sized Evaluation
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
The PLACE Mapping Tool Becky Wilkes, MS, GISP Marc Peterson, MA, GISP
Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.
ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero
Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification
Use of Community Health Data for Shared Accountability
Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia
Assessment Implementation
Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis
Training Content and Orientation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:
Data and Interoperability:
Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation:
Information Systems for Health:
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Information Systems for Health:
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,
Data and Interoperability:
Use of Information for Decision Making
Measuring Data Quality
Component 10 – Fundamentals of Workflow Process Analysis and Redesign
Introduction to Health Informatics
Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
EHRs and Privacy Protection in LMICs
Willis Odek, PhD Chief of Party/Senior Technical Advisor,
Presentation transcript:

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation Health Informatics in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Short Course for Health Information System Professionals Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation Activity 3: Process Analysis for Organizational Units

Activity 3: Process Inventory List of the main processes that an organizational unit uses: Logistics Laboratory Human resources Financial administration Health programs Pharmacy Clinical care Additional detail that we alluded to is needed for process analysis. An inventory should also specify which of the common process variations are in use at the practice. For example, virtually all practices need to obtain biological samples and have the samples analyzed. However, how and where the lab samples are processed varies among clinics. The common variations are: All lab tests are processed and analyzed at the clinic Blood is drawn at the clinic but samples are sent to a central lab for processingSome of both 1) and 2) depending on the type of sample and the tests that are needed on the sample The workflow, data flow, and information needs for each of these variations differs. In the following scenario, which of the following process variations are used? “PA James tells Patient Paul that there is an unusually high number of strep cases in the community over the past month, and that based on the appearance of his throat, he may have strep throat, and that he would like to swab his throat and do a rapid strep test. Patient Paul agrees. PA James swabs his throat with a long cotton tipped swab and does the test. Five minutes later, PA James returns and tells Patient Paul that the test was positive…” In this scenario for the rapid strep test, the practice is obtaining the sample (a throat swab) and performing the test in the clinic. Importantly, most clinics will use multiple process variations. The occurrence of multiple variations is a signal to the analyst that 1) the EHR must support multiple options, and 2) that there are criteria for making the decision on which variation is used and that the EHR will likely need to show different screens or otherwise facilitate the process variants based on the criterion. Process choices, sometimes called branches, indicate important functionality needed in an EHR.

This presentation was produced with the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of MEASURE Evaluation cooperative agreement AID-OAA-L-14-00004. MEASURE Evaluation is implemented by the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with ICF International; John Snow, Inc.; Management Sciences for Health; Palladium; and Tulane University. Views expressed are not necessarily those of USAID or the United States government. www.measureevaluation.org