Business Retention and Expansion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tag and Attribute Understanding appropriate citations and copyrights using creative commons licenses. Marcus Clark.
Advertisements

Minnesota State Community and Technical College Critical Thinking Assignment Example and Assessment.
Reality Check For Extension Programs Deborah J. Young Associate Director University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
“Walking Through the Steps and Standards” Presented by: Tom Chapel Focus On…
Sociology 3322a. “…the systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards.
Program Evaluation EDL 832 Jeffrey Oescher, Instructor 6 June 2013.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
WELNS 670: Wellness Research Design Chapter 5: Planning Your Research Design.
EVALUATION THEORY AND MODEL Theory and model should have symbiotic relationship with practice Theory and model should have symbiotic relationship with.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
Session VI Evaluation & Wrap Up. Evaluation Activities directed at collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information about the effectiveness.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
AUDIT EVIDENCE AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ASSERTIONS 1.
BEHAVIOR BASED SELECTION Reducing the risk. Goals  Improve hiring accuracy  Save time and money  Reduce risk.
Experimental Design © 2013 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Principles of Biomedical Science.
Stages of Research and Development
Social return on investments (SROI)
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
Rebecca McQuaid Evaluation 101 …a focus on Programs Rebecca McQuaid
IE 102 Lecture 6 Critical Thinking.
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Experimental Design Principles of Biomedical Science
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
AF1: Thinking Scientifically
QIC-AG Logic Model Template
Internal Assessment 2016 IB Chemistry Year 2 HL.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Internal assessment criteria
Introduction to Program Evaluation
Business Retention and Expansion
CASE STUDY BY: JESSICA PATRON.
MaryCatherine Jones, MPH, Public Health Consultant, CVH Team
Local Leaders are the Key to a Successful BR&E Visitation Program
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Business Retention and Expansion
Business Retention and Expansion
Cause or Effect in BR&E Visitation Programs
Local Leaders are the Key to a Successful BR&E Visitation Program
Business Retention and Expansion
Taking Charge of Your Health
Business Retention and Expansion
Cause or Effect in BR&E Visitation Programs
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Business Retention and Expansion
Experimental Design Principles of Biomedical Science
Business Retention and Expansion
Business Retention and Expansion
EVALUATION THEORY AND MODEL
Business Retention and Expansion
Business Retention and Expansion
Business Retention and Expansion
Business Retention and Expansion
In your packs.... Two pieces of Learner work. Note: based on live examples Unit Specification Marking Sheet (blank) Standardisation Activity Unit.
A LEVEL Paper Three– Section A
A Framework for Program Evaluation
Descriptive Analytical
Setting Writing Goals in Science The Living Environment
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
IENE – INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION OF NURSES AND MEDICAL STAFF IN EUROPE
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Writing Response Vocabulary
Changing the Game The Logic Model
Managerial Decision Making and Evaluating Research
Using Logic Models in Project Proposals
Megan Smoot 4th Quarter Project 5/1/19
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Presentation transcript:

Business Retention and Expansion An Economic Develop Strategy to Work With Your Existing Businesses

Is Evaluation Important? Why would a BR&E visitation program be interested in evaluation? What factors could indicate whether or not a program is successful? Why would demonstrated program success be important to the future of the program? What stakeholders would be interested in the documented success of the program?

Four Components of Evaluation Utility – How useful is program evaluation to you and your stakeholders Feasibility – How practical is evaluation for a program? Propriety – How appropriate is evaluation for those who are involved? Accuracy – How accurate is program evaluation and the information it conveys? Source: Ways to Improve the Quality of Your Program Evaluations. University of Wisconsin Extension. www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/resources/pdf/Tipsheet9.pdf

Utility State your purpose clearly – Describe the reasons you are doing the evaluation Consider your audience(s) – Describe the users of the evaluation and the type of information they require and find credible Communicate your findings – Develop a plan to share information and how you can increase the chances that the information will be used Provide value to stakeholders – Draw a connection between the evaluation and how it provides useful information. Does it provide new information or confirm previous information?

Feasibility Show practicality – Show that the evaluation does not disrupt the program and that it can be implemented given existing costs, resources and the situation Consider political viability – Predict political contingencies or consequences that might affect the evaluation’s implementation or the misuse of its results. Calculate costs relative to benefits – Determine whether the value of the evaluation output can be justified with regard to its costs.

Propriety Respect people and their rights – Demonstrate honesty, ethical practice and respect for human dignity in the choice of evaluation plan, methodology and result use. Disclose evaluation findings properly – Develop a plan for the effective communication of findings to the persons involved in or affected by the evaluation. Assess completely and fairly – Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the BR&E program so that your evaluation information can be used to strengthen it.

Accuracy Describe the program’s implementation – Document the program clearly Explain evaluation procedures – Describe the evaluation questions in detail so that the evaluation program could be replicated Demonstrate defensible information sources – Describe sources of information in detail to determine their appropriateness Ensure valid and reliable information – Describe the sources of information in detail so that appropriateness can be determined

Accuracy (continued) Use appropriate analysis – Analyze the data in an appropriate and correct way. Draw justified conclusions – Link the interpretation to the data. Consider alternative explanations for documented program outcomes. Do not draw generalizations beyond what your evidence can support! Report impartially – Only communicate evaluation findings, not feelings, opinions or biases.

Program Evaluation Structure The logic model is a picture of a program in response to a given situation Demonstrates the logical relationships that take place among the: Resources that are invested Activities that take place Benefits or changes that may result Provides an underlying rationale of the program or initiative Core of program planning, evaluation, program management and communications http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html

In the past, we’ve focused on outputs Inputs Outputs Outcomes Activities Partici-pation Short Term Medium Term Long Term What we invest What we do Who we reach What the short term results are Learning What the medium term results are Actions What the long term results are Conditions Situation Assumptions External Factors In the past, we’ve focused on outputs

We now need to focus on outcomes Inputs Outputs Outcomes Activities Partici-pation Short Term Medium Term Long Term What we invest What we do Who we reach What the short term results are Learning What the medium term results are Actions What the long term results are Conditions Situation Assumptions External Factors We now need to focus on outcomes

SMART GOALS S – specific/measurable M – motivating A – attainable R – relevant/rigorous T – trackable/time bound

Creative Commons License This work carries an attribution non-commercial share alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Trained and certified instructors by BREI or the Cooperative Extension System are allowed to remix, tweak, and build upon this work non-commercially, as long as they credit original authors and they must license their new creations under the identical terms. This work can be downloaded and redistributed, but all new work based on this work must carry the same license, so any derivatives will also be non-commercial in nature.