Pollution from Diesel Generators – Gurugram

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Determination of Size Fractions and Concentrations of Airborne Particulate Matter Generated From Construction and Demolition Waste Processing Facilities.
Advertisements

 UK Power Networks. All rights reserved Distribution Network Visibility Low Carbon Networks Fund Tier 1 project UK Power Networks & PPA Energy Omer.
DRAYTON MINE IMPROVEMENTS TO DUST AND EMISSIONS MANAGEMENT – AIR QUALITY INFORMATION SESSIONS October 2014.
Particle pollution is linked to adverse health effects ~350,000 premature deaths a year within the EU are related to exposure to particulate matter (PM)
1 Modelled Meteorology - Applicability to Well-test Flaring Assessments Environment and Energy Division Alex Schutte Science & Community Environmental.
Overview of Key Skills Intelligence and Future Challenges Presentation to South Yorkshire Lifelong Learning Network Alison Wilson.
Air Quality Monitoring In Singapore
Phase IV Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.
Measurement of NO 2 Concentration in Ambient Air in Karachi using Diffusion Sampling By Zia-ul-Islam Director, Pak-EPA.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Climate, Air Quality and Noise Graham Latonas Gartner Lee Limited RWDI Air Inc.
SUBMICRON AEROSOL PARTICLES IN A SMALL SETTLEMENT NEAR HIGHWAY J. HOVORKA, Z. STAŇKOVÁ Institute for Environmental.
P. Otorepec, M. Gregorič IVZ RS Use of rutinely collected air pollution and health data on local level for simple evaluation of health impact.
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
Study of ambient air particulates pollutants near Taichung airport sampling site in central Taiwan Journal of Hazardous Materials 144 (2007) 492–498 Student.
Mark J. Schultz, P.E. Chief, Environmental Assessment and Contaminant Control Branch Dust Division Mine Safety and Health Administration Pittsburgh Safety.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule January 17, 2006.
Pinal County Air Quality July 23, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
Air Pollution Control Program Regulation Update Presented to City Council Public Safety and Health Subcommittee Mamie Colburn, M.S, R.S. Missoula.
Hamilton Air Quality Trends Denis Corr Department of Engineering Physics McMaster University Lidar Workshop April 25, 2007.
What organism is a major disease carrier in the Harris county area?
Timing and synchronisation J. Jones, A. Moss and E.W. Snedden April/May 2015.
Cave Air By Galen Jamison Mr. Spangler, WHS Research Question: How does PM 2.5 differ between caves and the outside environment? Hypothesis: Cave air,
Power Generation and Distribution
Power Quality at Solar Distributed Generation Facilities
BRE: urbaneer findings
BEST PRACTICE GUIDE Audience Counting.
Veolia Rye House Energy Recovery Facility
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
By Lewis Dijkstra Deputy Head of Unit Economic Analysis Unit,
Update on WHO and TFH activities
EXPOSURE OF CHILDREN TO ULTRAFINE PARTICLES AROUND AN URBAN INTERSECTION S Kaur, M J Nieuwenhuijsen & R Colvile Environmental Processes & Systems Research.
Effects of frequent away travel on training loads, recovery and injury in professional Australian soccer players Peter Fowler1, Rob Duffield2, Adam Waterson3.
User Habits & Trends – An analysis of how TRICS is used
Francesc Pedró Katerina Ananiadou Seoul, 9 – 11 November 2009
Ambient Temperature (˚C) Results and Discussion
How Do Wind Turbines Operate? Environmental Benefits
Motion in Two Dimensions
Measurement Method & Combined Results Obtained for Vehicle Flows and Queues measured in Quorn 16th and 23rd April 2018.
Additional clarifications on economic and adequacy running hours
A Snapshot in Time Prepared for: Prince George FREP Overview
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
Tackling Deteriorating Air Quality in Gurugram
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
West Gate Tunnel – Air quality expert evidence
in US East Coast Using SMAT-CE Software
Examples of 1-Hour NO2 and SO2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP April 28, 2011.
Gurugram – Energy Issues
School of Civil Engineering
Geoffrey Cheung IME Winter 2010
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
Brief Synopsis of Air Quality and Local/Regional Meteorology
The Time T.V. Takes … Cory Williams Winter 2010.
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
How to tackle air pollution
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Air Quality and Health Dr Liz Robin Director of Public Health
Presentation transcript:

Pollution from Diesel Generators – Gurugram Pratha Jhawar Centre for Science and Environment pratha@cseindia.org Centre for Science and Environment

CSE Study - Overview Aim - Assess the impact of diesel generator set operation on the increase in pollution levels in its immediate vicinity CSE selected generator sets from five residential areas with following criteria Low rise buildings or high rise buildings with short chimneys (height less than 5 m) No other significant source of pollution present near the DG set's chimney like construction work, high traffic laden roads Convenient location for air pollution monitoring equipment chosen– safety, uninterrupted power supply CSE along with Envirotech installed automatic air pollution monitoring equipment to record dust pollution (PM levels) for five days.  Operation hours of DG sets were noted separately. The impacts during non-operation and operation of the DG sets were studied. Centre for Science and Environment

Representative Sample locations Gurugram – Popular for both flat and villa type houses – sites for the study were selected such that it gives a representative idea of both the types Residents used DG of size 50kVA – 750 kVA – focussed to sample DG of various sizes DLF Phase 2 DLF Phase 1 New Colony Devinder Vihar Location Houses DG size in kVA DLF Phase 1 20 – 25 villas 150 DLF Phase 2 50 villas 325 Time Residency 875 units in 7 towers 750 New Colony 1 commercial, 3 units 64 Devinder Vihar 450 units in 9 blocks 325 X 2 Time Residency Most locations – generator owned and operated by a third party Third party operates similar to DISCOM Centre for Science and Environment

Data Collection Data has been collected by the air pollution monitoring devices for - 5 different locations for - 5 five consecutive days over - 24 hours a day in - 5 min interval - Particulate Matter (PM) 1, PM 2.5, PM 4, PM 10 and Total Suspended Particles (TSP) The DG set operation timings have been noted from DG usage logs. Centre for Science and Environment

DG Set Operation Duration DLF Phase 1 and 2 are relatively newly developed areas. During the monitored days, the power cuts have been less than half an hour. There were massive power shut downs in Devinder Vihar and New Colony. These are relatively old colonies and we assume line faults and congestion could be a reason for that. The area near the Times Residency is going through constructions. Several projects are close to completion, hence there is rising the demand for electricity in the area. Therefore, the power cuts are humungous and too frequent. Further, the Time Residency itself is undergoing some fixations and the DG set we monitored has long operating hours making the dilution of pollution a lesser event. Power cuts in DLF Phase-1 and DLF Phase-2 were not significant enough to make relevant observations and draw the conclusions. Centre for Science and Environment

Devinder Vihar – Analysis Monitoring Period – 17/05/2018 to 21/05/2018 DG set under operation – Day 2 (18/05/2018 between 02:34 and 06:44 hrs) Studied PM 2.5 and PM 10 as the indicator of the pollution generated by DG operator. As per National Ambient Air Quality Standards, the safe levels of PM2.5 and PM10 are 60 and 100 ug/m3 respectively. Trends show a visible increase in the pollution, before and after the DG set operation. Here, the DG set was operational for 4 hours. The pollution started building up with the start of the DG set. PM2.5 max levels increased from 130 to 180 ug/N.cu.m and avg. levels from 90 to 110 ug/N.cu.m during DG operations. The avg remains above 100 for next 2 hrs. The PM 2.5 level during the DG operation time is 35% higher than the rest of the day. Centre for Science and Environment

Devinder Vihar – Analysis (Monitoring Period – 17/05/2018 to 21/05/2018) (DG set under operation – Day 2 (18/05/2018 between 02:34 and 06:44 hrs)) Trends show a visible increase in the pollution, before and after the DG set operation. Here, the DG set was operational for 4 hours. The pollution started building up with the start of the DG set. After the DG set running for 2 hours, the average for rest of the time is more than 450 for rest of the 2 hours. The PM 2.5 level during the DG operation time is 35% higher than the rest of the day. PM10 max levels increased from 250 to 500 ug/N.cu.m during DG operations, post DG operations the levels remained ~300 ug/N.cu.m over 2 hrs. After the DG set running for 2 hours, the average for rest of the time is more than 450 for rest of the 2 hours. Centre for Science and Environment

New Colony – Analysis Monitoring period - 23/05/2018 to 27/05/2018 DG operation timing – On 23/05/2018 (04:07-07:30). Again from the graphs, it is fairly evident that the pollution levels shoot up during the DG set operation interval and average pollution levels are high even for the next hour. The average PM 2.5 levels are close to 100 for 4/5 of all the monitored days. PM2.5 max levels increased from 130 to 280 ug/N.cu.m and avg. levels from 120 to 150 ug/N.cu.m during DG operations. The avg remains over 150 for next 1 hr. Centre for Science and Environment

New Colony – Analysis Monitoring period - 23/05/2018 to 27/05/2018 DG operation timing – On 23/05/2018 (04:07-07:30). Again from the graphs, it is fairly evident that the pollution levels shoot up during the DG set operation interval and average pollution levels are high even for the next hour. For this location the average PM 10 levels were higher than 600 for all 5 days. PM10 max levels increased from 650 to 1900 ug/N.cu.m during DG operations, post DG operations the levels remained ~1500 ug/N.cu.m over 2 hrs. Centre for Science and Environment

Time Residency – Analysis Monitoring period - 22/05/2018 and 26/05/2018 DG set operation interval - 24 May 2018 (03:00-10:01, 11:09 - 22:42) Checked for the outliers. The high pollution levels persist PM2.5 max levels increased from 150 to 220 ug/N.cu.m and avg. levels almost similar. Centre for Science and Environment

Time Residency – Analysis Data shows clear link between duration of DG operation and pollution – analysis was done for the day with longest duration of DG operation PM10 max levels increased from 250 to 500 ug/N.cu.m during DG operations, post DG operations the levels remained ~300 mg/N.cu.m over 2 hrs. When this highest PM 10 levels were reached, for over 25 mins the levels were above 1000. At the same time PM2.5 was over 250. Centre for Science and Environment

Observations - Average PM 2.5 levels 2 hours before 1 hour during DG set operation 1 hour after 2 hours after Or Second time DG operation after second power cut DG size kVA Devinder Vihar 89 95 111 129 115 - 325 New Colony 120 123 149 174 118 65 Times Residency 135 126 131 137 93 72 85 750 The average PM2.5 pollution seems to accumulate over the DG operation time and the pollution levels are higher for next one hour. Even small size DG contributes to pollution significantly (15-20% increase in PM2.5 levels) if operated for more than two hours. Evidently even in the worst polluted locality of Gurgaon - New Colony - the pollution level increase due to DG set operation was clearly evident. The average levels of PM2.5 during the hour after DG operation is more than double the safe values. Data from 3 of the 5 locations shows steep increase in pollution during the times of DG operation At the other two locations the time for which DG was under operation is not very significant to make observations and draw conclusions. Centre for Science and Environment

Observations- Maximum PM 2.5 levels 2 hours before 1 hour during DG set operation 1 hour after 2 hours after Or Second time DG operation after second power cut DG size kVA Devinder Vihar 122 164 156 - 325 New Colony 129 278 205 146 65 Times Residency 154 136 214 362 113 128 750 The maximum PM 2.5 levels shoot up during DG operation. The maximum values increase from 35% to 250% at different locations. These maximum values have significance as close range of such values persist for more than 15 mins at a time. Centre for Science and Environment

Observations - Average PM10 2 hours before 1 hour during DG set operation 1 hour after 2 hours after Or Second time DG operation after second power cut DG size kVA Devinder Vihar 220 190 235 296 269 - 325 New Colony 642 633 909 1314 845 65 Times Residency 306 277 278 328 324 209 274 750 The average PM 10 levels are highest in 1 hour after the DG operation shuts down. The average PM 10 levels one hour before and after the DG operation time has been doubled in New Colony. DG operation significantly contributes to PM10 pollution. Centre for Science and Environment

Observations - Maximum PM 10 2 hours before 1 hour during DG set operation 1 hour after 2 hours after Or Second time DG operation after second power cut DG size kVA Devinder Vihar 300 247 500 352 - 325 New Colony 751 687 1894 1686 1479 65 Times Residency 372 302 566 1880 377 520 750 The maximum PM10 levels are 5 to 19 times more than the safe limits. The case of Times Residency brings out the relation of pollution to the DG set operation time if dilution time is negligible. As the weather conditions (wind speed etc.) play a role in detecting air pollution, the five day data is not enough to Centre for Science and Environment

Shifting to SRT 1. Economically more viable A CSE study has already established that SRT are have economic benefits over DG set operations 2. Potential The potential of the SRT in Gurugram is immense and there is a lack of progress in this direction 3. DG set pollution study The pollution generated by DG sets is very significant and have adverse impact on environment and health. Centre for Science and Environment