LincRNAs expressed in specific subpopulations of mESCs and NPCs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Original Figures for "Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring"
Advertisements

Cluster analysis of 50 genes identified as affecting variability and or pheromone response output Cluster analysis of 50 genes identified as affecting.
by Sonia Nestorowa, Fiona K
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Exploration of the data set with age as a continuous variable.
Dynamic Heterogeneity and DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Cell-Line Selectivity Improves the Predictive Power of Pharmacogenomic Analyses and Helps Identify NADPH as Biomarker for Ferroptosis Sensitivity  Kenichi.
Dynamics and variability of SMAD2 signaling in single cells
The ribozyme approach distinguishes RNA-dependent and RNA-independent functions of lincRNA genes. The ribozyme approach distinguishes RNA-dependent and.
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Analysis of total and polysomal RNA clk-1(qm30) and clk-1(qm30)+WT.
Patient neural progenitors show a neurodevelopmental phenotype.
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (January 2017)
Widespread Inhibition of Posttranscriptional Splicing Shapes the Cellular Transcriptome following Heat Shock  Reut Shalgi, Jessica A. Hurt, Susan Lindquist,
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Disrupted dynamics of early stages of differentiation perturbs neural cell fate specification. Disrupted dynamics of early stages of differentiation perturbs.
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Individual genes exhibit distinct stage-specific expression among female gametocytes. Individual genes exhibit distinct stage-specific expression among.
Individual genes exhibit distinct female-enriched expression patterns.
K-Means clustering of protein and mRNA expression patterns after PPAR agonists treatments. k-Means clustering of protein and mRNA expression patterns after.
Bar plot representation of the transcriptomic changes in Δsaci_ptp and Δsaci_pp2a. Bar plot representation of the transcriptomic changes in Δsaci_ptp and.
In situ confirmations of Sepw1-enriched genes.
Four major patterns identified through hierarchical clustering plotted by IPD ratio over time. Four major patterns identified through hierarchical clustering.
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Robustness of TRU, Proximal-proliferative (PP), and Proximal-inflammatory (PI) classification. Robustness of TRU, Proximal-proliferative (PP), and Proximal-inflammatory.
The nuclear RNA degradation landscape of mESCs.
Antisense expression associates with larger gene expression variability. Antisense expression associates with larger gene expression variability. (A–D)
Patterns and regulation of age‐related splicing changes.
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
MAGs and testes transcript expression levels in the An. gambiae complex. MAGs and testes transcript expression levels in the An. gambiae complex. (A) Percentage.
FACT regulates neurogenesis through Pol II/nucleosome dynamics.
Expression profiles of 5,493 transcripts grouped by k-means clustering
Analysis of the nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions dN/dS (ω) for the 5,493 1:1 ortholog transcripts. Analysis of the nonsynonymous to synonymous.
CiCo relation to linear transcripts.
p-S6 S240/244 is observed across the V-SVZ lineage.
LATS2-associated gene expression pattern is down-regulated specifically in lumB breast tumors. LATS2-associated gene expression pattern is down-regulated.
Identification of highly variable transcripts.
Consistency of results across images and time.
No correlation between the distance of the duplicated alleles and the transcription levels on each of the alleles. No correlation between the distance.
No correlation between the position of the gene in the nuclear volume and the transcription levels on each of the alleles. No correlation between the position.
Comparative single cell transcriptional profiling of standard kidney organoids and micro-organoids demonstrates an equivalent nephrogenic patterning. Comparative.
5mC-loss/5hmC-gain loci characterize neurogenic genes up-regulated during fate commitment. 5mC-loss/5hmC-gain loci characterize neurogenic genes up-regulated.
Comparison ofMyc-induced zebrafish liver tumors with different stages of human HCC and seven mouse HCC models. Comparison ofMyc-induced zebrafish liver.
Functional classification and visualization of differentially expressed genes. Functional classification and visualization of differentially expressed.
CD4-CTL precursor cells in the TEMRA subset.
Relationship between blood cell and plasma miRNA expression among published circulating cancer biomarkers. Relationship between blood cell and plasma miRNA.
Extended analysis of differential expression datasets.
Single-cell atlas of lincRNA expression during mESC to NPC differentiation. Single-cell atlas of lincRNA expression during mESC to NPC differentiation.
Derivation of ImSig. Derivation of ImSig. A, An example of a correlation network generated from a tissue data set where nodes represent unique genes and.
A, unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the expression of probe sets differentially expressed in the oral mucosa of smokers versus never smokers. A,
Integrated mRNA and microRNA expression and DNA methylation clusters.
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (May 2015)
Heat map of genes for which CR significantly altered expression versus AL. Cluster analysis of genes significantly changed by the CR intervention compared.
Building pattern  Complete the following tables and write the rule 
Transcriptional and genomic targets of EN1 in TNBC cells.
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages e7 (July 2019)
Distinct subtypes of CAFs are detected in human PDAC
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Gene expression heatmap of non–T-cell-inflamed, intermediate, and T-cell–inflamed testicular germ cell tumors from TCGA. Genes are on the row, and samples.
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e4 (May 2019)
TME characteristics of TCGA-STAD subtype and cancer somatic genome.
Construction of TME signatures and functional annotation.
Characteristic gene expression patterns distinguish LCH cells from other immune cells present in LCH lesions. Characteristic gene expression patterns distinguish.
Fig. 3 Gene expression analysis in 48-plex drug treatment experiments.
Presentation transcript:

LincRNAs expressed in specific subpopulations of mESCs and NPCs. LincRNAs expressed in specific subpopulations of mESCs and NPCs. (A) Expression of highly variable lincRNAs (rows; listed in Table S1B) in single cells (columns), clustered by lincRNA expression. Cell types (mESCs in 2i + LIF or serum + LIF, and day 6 and 8 NPCs) and cell cycle stages (assigned by clustering on cell cycle marker gene expression) are indicated at the top. (B) Cell-to-cell variation in expression for mRNAs (grey) and lincRNAs (red), across mESCs (top), or NPCs (bottom), quantified using the DM method (Kolodziejczyk et al, 2015). The median DMs for lincRNAs and mRNAs are listed, and the distributions tested for similarity using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. (C) Scatter plot comparing the 90th expression percentile across single cells versus the median expression, for each lincRNA (red) and mRNA (grey). (D, E) Single cell expression pattern of a highly variable mESC lincRNA (D, Pvt1) and a uniformly expressed mESC lincRNA (E, linc1333), overlaid on the t-SNE projection. (F) An example of correlated lincRNA-mRNA single cell expression across mESC to NPC differentiation, with cells ordered by pseudotime determined using Monocle (Trapnell et al, 2014). (G) Top panels: cell cycle stage assignments for day 8 NPCs based on single cell expression of marker genes (Kolodziejczyk et al, 2015). Bottom panels: examples of three lincRNAs expressed during specific cell cycle stages (XLOC_071380 = G1/S enriched, and Miat and Rmst = G2/M enriched). For each lincRNA, the heat bars show expression levels across the 67 G1/S cells (top bar) and 48 G2/M cells (bottom bar). In (B, C), key lincRNAs selected for detailed exploration are highlighted in green. See also Fig S1 and Tables S1A, B, and S3. Alex C Tuck et al. LSA 2018;1:e201800124 © 2018 Tuck et al.