I-26 Safety Project. Project Corridor I-26 between I-95 and Summerville Number one and three ranked location for interstate safety improvements AADT =

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heartland Coast-to-Coast Corridor Study ___________________ Presented Sept. 11, 2007 Sanibel Harbour Resort Spa Heartland Coast-to-Coast Corridor Study.
Advertisements

1 Work Zone Crash Analysis & Traffic Management in Work Zones –The ODOT MOT Process Presented by:David Holstein, P.E., Administrator Office of Traffic.
QUESTIONS (AND ANSWERS) FROM THE ALABAMA DRIVER’S MANUAL
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
Click to edit Master title style »Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level Fifth level Construction Update 11/13/2012 Larry.
DESTINATION INNOVATION PROGRAM SAFE COORIDOR ENHANCEMENT (SCorE) Jon Jackels Mn/DOT ITS Program Engineer Traffic Topics April 7, 2011.
R U M B L E S T R I P S By Gary Dirlam, Mn/DOT District 3 Traffic Engineer.
High Tension Cable Median Barrier March 17, 2011.
Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) Consistency Review Process House Resources Committee Hearing 1.
PLAYGROUND SAFETY 1. 2 Why is playground safety so important? 76% of injuries to children occur on public playgrounds 44% of all injuries are caused by.
Dennis L. Edwards Tunnel
Barrier Design Principles. Principle 1: Distance from Roadway Place Guardrail As Far From Traveled Way As Practical.
OR 42: County Line Curves Environmental Assessment Purpose and Need February 17, 2009.
DEL-71 Project at the US 36/SR37 Interchange Round Table Meeting Ferzan M. Ahmed, P.E.- District 6 Deputy Director Steve Fellenger, P.E. – Project Manager.
7 | Means of Egress (Life Safety Code)
Guard cable stretches across 500 miles of Missouri interstates. Cable was installed at locations where medians are less than 60 feet wide.
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) Standards
Insert the title of your presentation here Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date A reduction in fatal casualties Who, why and what does this mean? Louise.
VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT DEPLOYMENT EVALUATION I-270/I-255 Traffic and Safety Conference May 12, 2010 Missouri University of Science and Technology and HDR.
Florida Department of Transportation T EMPORARY B ARRIER S YSTEMS FDOT Contacts: District Construction Marshall Douberley marshall.douberley.
Public Meeting Presentation March 15, Project Location Project Purpose –Traffic reliever to I-95 –Integrate road with the Northwest Sector Plan.
CR 46A Realignment (Section 5)
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character Design Criteria for Bridges Maintenance of Traffic Right-of-Way & Utility Involvement General.
Drop Zone Selection.
Before Between After.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Zachary Tess D7 Project Manager. US 14 – New Ulm to North Mankato ADT & Serious Crashes 2009 AADT (HCAADT: 12.6%); K+A Crashes.
 Find the difference between the two numbers on the red boxes.  If the difference of the red boxes matches the blue box say “deal” f not, it’s “no.
Drivers Education Journal # Please pick up all the handouts Get out a sheet of loose leaf paper and something to write with Write the.
PSSA Preparation.
“You Could Learn a Lot About Guardrail From a Dummy…
Oklahoma’s Experience with Wire Rope Safety Fence.
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
1 Context Sensitive Design A.K.A. The “Think” Method of Design Howard Preston, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineering CH2M HILL.
I-69 Strategic Planning Corridor Study: Fulton To Eddyville, KY Fulton, Hickman, Graves, Marshall, Livingston, Lyon Counties Public Meeting November 15,
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Freeway Signing Plan Design April 29, 2008
Public Location/Design Hearings November 17, 2010 Laughlin, Nevada November 18, 2010 Bullhead City, Arizona.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Ch. 7 1.
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE CROSS- SECTION DESIGN OF 80 KM/H RURAL ROADS IN THE NETHERLANDS Jan Hendrik van Petegem Govert Schermers Paper ID 36.
Highway 169 Phase 2 (Part 2) – Cross Range Expressway April 30, 2014 Public Information Meeting Taconite Community Center.
Enosburg BRO 1448(40) Bridge 48 on TH 2 Over the Tyler Branch Alternatives Presentation.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
 Cross section elements consist of the following:  1.Traffic lanes (carriage ways);  2.Shoulders;  3.Medians;  4.Curbs;  5.Side slopes.
Fall 2014 Most of the Material taken from: Roadside Design Guide (2011) published by AAHSTO.
CAT Realignment and Reconstruction of Rt. 28A Town of Olive Ulster County, New York January 2009.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
Presentation Outline  Recommendation  Project Background  Public Involvement  Proposed Design  Citizen Comments/Questions  Summary and Recommendation.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 101 Wyoming DOT Place guardrail when there is a fill slope of.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Traffic Barrier Guidelines Other Considerations Workshop V September-October 2015.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
1 MD 5 (Point Lookout Road) Leonardtown (Phase 1) Intersection Reconstruction At Abell and Moakley Streets Informational Meeting January 19, 2016.
Ezzeldin Benghuzzi, P.E UPDATE TRAINING Contact Information: Ezzeldin Benghuzzi, P.E ezzeldin. Contact Information:
6-1 Module 6: Group Activity Wright County Safety Review Identifying Opportunities for Making Roads Safer 6-1.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
S.R. 30A / U.S. 98 / Panama City Beach Parkway
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Roadside Safety Design
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
HERO UNIT Training Module
Walker Street Reconstruction Project 25% Design Public Hearing
Presentation transcript:

I-26 Safety Project

Project Corridor I-26 between I-95 and Summerville Number one and three ranked location for interstate safety improvements AADT = 32,433 Posted S/L = 70 mph Crash Stats: January 2007 through November 2011 Total Crashes = 1934 Total Fatalities = 44 Total Injuries = % Run off Road Crashes Post and Courier coined the phrase Corridor of Death in 2010 articles

Project Corridor

Project Corridor Safety Data Existing Median Width = 84 – 86 Existing Median Shoulder = (paved) Distance from travel way to tree line = 25 Clear Zone Distance = 46 Berkeley Dorchester

Project Corridor Safety Data ** Vehicular speeds were estimated by investigating officer to be within posted speed limits.

Project Corridor Safety Data

0 I-77 US 601 I-95 FOUR HOLE SWAMP US 17 ALT US 21 US 301 CYPRESS SWAMP

I-26 Safety Alternatives Remove obstacles Provide clear zone clearing of median Median consists primarily of pines with light mixture of hardwoods environmental permit required Standard cable rail to be installed in center of median Initial cost estimate of $5M Would prepare median for future widening

I-26 Safety Alternatives Cable would be required for both directions of I-26 Initial cost estimate of $10M Considerable maintenance, repair and traffic impact concerns Shield Obstacles High tension cable rail only feasible option due to close distance of trees and existing shoulder slopes

Project Details Existing Conditions Total Length of project corridor – 29.6 Miles Total Length of Existing Guardrail along median– 2.2 Miles Median Length with no existing trees – 2.6 Miles Median Length with existing median cable rail – 0.9 Miles Median width occupied by trees – 36 feet maximum Wetlands within Project Limits – 4.2 Acres Overlap with Existing Projects Sheep Island Interchange I-26 Widening (Jedburg Road)

Preferred Alternative Details Alternative Feature Exclude median areas protected by existing guardrail Extension of existing steel beam guardrail in areas of steeper slopes 1.8 Miles of new steel beam guardrail Reduce tree impacts to only the trees necessary to allow for the installation of the guardrail Wetland impacts reduced from 4.2 to 1.9 acres SCDOT has received authorization from the Army Corps of Engineers based on these conditions

Preferred Alternative Details Alternative Considerations No glare shield provided Median width greater than 20 feet Can accommodate emergency crossovers and will bring up to standards with coordination with the local emergency agencies

Preferred Alternative Details Alternative Elements 23.0 miles of clearing, grubbing, dressing and grassing of the median ( 6 miles overlaps with the I-26 widening and Sheep Island Parkway Interchange) 24.7 miles of median cable rail 1.8 miles of new steel beam guardrail

I-26 Safety Project