Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives 22/03/2012

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity EIONET - NRC Nature and Biodiversity Workshop Biodiversity – from datasets.

Advertisements

Biodiversity/HNV indicators and the CAP Zélie Peppiette Rural Development Evaluation Manager DG AGRI, European Commission UK seminar on HNV farming policy,

1 Expert workshop on components of EEA Ecosystem Capital Accounts Focus on biomass carbon and biodiversity data 24/03/2015.

European Commission, DG Environment, Nature Unit

Review of the ecosystem condition account

Development of a process for setting Conservation Objectives Dr Rebecca Jeffrey Science and Biodiversity Section National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland.

State of Nature 2015 Overview of results & available products from articles 12 & 17 reports ( ) Carlos Romão | Eionet – NRC Biodiversity

Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Reviewing methods and experience.

EEA Biodiversity, Agriculture and Forest work in 2010 and beyond EEA/NRC Agriculture Meeting 2010 Ivone Pereira Martins, HoG – Biodiversity, Agriculture.

Agenda item 4 Natura 2000: key facts and figures Data as of January 2011 CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 10 th meeting – 08/04/11.

Carlos Romao / Annemarie Bastrup-Birk 13 th meeting Standing Forestry Committee Brussels, 18 September 2015 State of nature in the EU - focus on forest.

Topic Conservation of Biodiversity. Unit Summary In this unit the students will learn about the number of species and the trend how their population is.

Break out discussion Topic 1 Restoring ecosystems and their services.

Break-out group discussion

REPORTING PURSUANT TO ART. 17 OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE

Expert Group on the Birds and Habitats Directives (NADEG)

Low Hanging Fruits Mora Aronsson ETC-BD/SLU

Low Hanging Fruits Mora Aronsson ETC-BD/SLU

Principles and rationale for SAC/SPA designation and management

Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document

Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document

EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Towards implementation & monitoring

Last developments of report formats

What are the potential synergies between

Two major points discussed

Constance von Briskorn BIO by Deloitte 13-14th October 2014

European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity 15th March 2016

Structure of the guidelines Reminder on next steps

ARTICLE 17 REPORTING: SUMMARY OF MAIN RESULTS

European Commission – DG ENV

Review Art.17/12 Outcomes of the ad hoc group 1:

MAES and its relation to marine environmental policies

Work on the coherence of data-flows / improving data-quality

Welcome to the 2nd Mediterranean Natura 2000 Seminar Limassol, Cyprus November 2017 A milestone event of the Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process.

8th Meeting Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives

on the new biogeographic process

Review Art.17/12 Outcomes of the ad hoc group 1:

EU 2010 biodiversity baseline

Follow up of Article 17 Report

The new Article 12 reporting system under the Birds Directive

Conservation objectives: The favourable conservation status

Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives

Measuring progress towards Target 1

Carlos Romão | Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives

Assessment of Conservation Status for Large Carnivores

When and how to best consider the provision of the Habitats directive

Dealing with change in Article 17 reporting

European Red List of Habitats

Timing of deliveries in 2019

Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive

RECOGNIZING NATURA 2000 BENEFITS AND DEMONSTRATING THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF CONSERVATION MEASURES Progress meeting EC 16 May 2011 Johan Lammerant.

Expert group on management of Natura 2000

Art 17 & 12 reporting Updated time-plan Dominique Richard, ETC/BD Expert Group on Reporting 14 October 2014.

HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas

Selection of 18 habitat types

Agenda item 3.3 (d) Common monitoring framework

INSPIRE & Art.17/12 reporting

The New Biogeographic Process General info – December 2011

Measuring progress under Target 1

The State of Nature in the EU

New Biogeographic process

8th Meeting Coordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature

What does it mean to have a forest in a Natura 2000 area?

EU biodiversity strategy to Target 1

Update on work of Natura 2000 management group

Natura 2000 & Article 17 databases: their potential use in the frame of the Prioritised Action Framework (PAF) Frank Vassen, Unit D3 – nature conservation,

Indicators reviewed for the SEBI2010

Measuring progress under Target 1 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy

Natura 2000 and Forests A new guidance document

Zelmira Gaudillat – ETC/BD Carlos Romão - EEA

Presentation transcript:

Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives 22/03/2012 1) How target 1 was built 2) Target 1 interpretation 3) Relation with Target 3 Carlos Romão

Feasibility calculation i) Calculations carried out by EEA and ETC/BD Assumption: some parameters will potentially improve quicker than others if adequate conservation measures and management are taken: Species: habitat area, population and future prospects Habitats: future prospects, structure & functions Range unlikely to change significantly over 10 years.

Feasibility calculation ii) Cases where the overall assessment could be improved by only changing one or two parameter to the better were considered more likely than those which would need several parameters to change. The analysis used 2240 assessments for species and 701 assessments for habitats at biogeographical level.

Feasibility calculation iii) Number of species and habitats assessments All FV assessments in 2001-2006 will remain FV in 2007-2012 Some U1 will become FV Some U2 will become U1 Some Population / Area of unfavourable features will improve = number of assessments where those parameters had a positive trend

TARGET 1: FULLY IMPLEMENT THE BIRDS AND HABITATS DIRECTIVES 100% more habitat assessments and 50% more species assessments under the Habitats Directive show a favourable or improved conservation status; and 50% more species assessments under the Birds Directive show a secure or improved status

So what does target 1 really mean? i) For birds: 80% of bird species assessments are either secure or improving by 2020 (now 52% secure) For other species: 26% of conservation status assessments (EU-biogeographical level) are favourable or show evidence of improvement by 2020 (now 17% favourable)

So what does target 1 really mean? ii) For habitats: 34% of conservation status assessments (EU-biogeographical level) are favourable or show evidence of improvement by 2020 (now 17% favourable)

TARGET 3 – Agriculture, Forests (extract linked to conservation status) … and to bring about a MEASURABLE IMPROVEMENT in the conservation status of species and habitats that depend on or are affected by Agriculture Forestry Measurable improvement = to be measured against the quantified enhanced targets for the conservation status of species and habitats of EU interest in Target 1

EU 2010 Biodiversity Baseline Agro-ecosystems

EU 2010 Biodiversity Baseline Forest ecosystems

EU 2010 Biodiversity Baseline http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eu-2010-biodiversity-baseline/at_download/file Annexes with habitats and species used for each ecosystem http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eu-2010-biodiversity-baseline/annexes-to-eu-2010-biodiversity-baseline

Comparing reports / outcomes between 2001-2006 and 2007-2012 A few technical challenges… … in the next presentation