‘Improving Outcomes for people with skin tumours, including Melanoma’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karen Pocock Skin Cancer Clinical Nurse Specialist
Advertisements

Dermatology Clinical Assessment and Treatment Service: NW Hertfordshire (St Albans, Harpenden and Hertsmere) Dr. Simon Dawe Consultant Dermatologist.
March 2002 Outcomes in thyroid cancer: what factors are important? Information Projects Team Outcomes in thyroid cancer: what factors are important? NYCRIS.
The LCA: Implementing a Quality Assurance and Informatics Strategy to Enhance Cancer Care Dr Shelley Dolan LCA Clinical Director.
Children and Young People Improving Outcomes Guidance  Key aims of guidance and age specific requirements  Designation of Principal Treatment Centres.
Guidance on Cancer Services Improving Outcomes for People with Skin Tumours including Melanoma NICE Stateholder Consultation version July 2005.
Healthcare in the UK Margaret Costello – Gorlin Syndrome Group.
Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer Chemotherapy Conference 19 th March 2009 Linda Devereux Associate Director.
C&H Skin Cancer Referral Pathway 2013 Dr Sara Ritchie CCG GP Dermatology Lead.
BCCs & GPs Dr Victoria Brown Consultant Dermatologist West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust.
Linda Devereux Associate Director Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Network - why we are here and what’s next!
I’m not just a child. I’m a daughter. I’m a son. I’m also a friend, a parent, a wife, a husband…
Specialist Breast Units – Does it improve Breast Cancer care? These Power Point presentations are free to download only for academic purposes, with due.
The management of low-risk basal cell carcinomas in the community Implementing NICE guidance in general practice May 2010 NICE guidance on cancer services.
Implementing NICE guidance on autism – developing a local autism team January 2014 Autism: the management and support of children and young people on the.
Two-week wait referrals for malignant melanoma: A clinical audit carried out across four UK Cancer Networks South West Cancer Intelligence Service
Peer Review for Paediatric Diabetes Ruth Bridgeman.
Macmillan Ipswich Diagnostic Assessment Service (MIDAS)
Walking alongside you, against the tide
Market Engagement Event
Consultant Medical Oncologist
Oesophago–Gastric Cancer
National Oesophago–Gastric Cancer Audit 2015.
Skin Cancer Diagnoses and Treatments.
A Model for Breast Services in North Wales
Daniel Keith – Dermatology Registrar
Assessing the uptake of national initiatives
NICE Guidance – Service delivery for patients with Sarcomas
‘ACHIEVING WORLD CLASS CANCER OUTCOMES’
Managing Headache.
Mr Michael Thomas, Colorectal Cancer SSG, 27th June 2018
Managing Headache.
Pathway for patients with suspected Breast Cancer
Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes A Strategy for England
Gynae Oncology Trials Update
Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes A Strategy for England
Pelvic floor education
Management of Vulval Melanoma
Pathway for patients with suspected Skin Cancer
Specialised Commissioning Improving specialised services for severe intestinal failure adult patients What will this mean for you?
Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes A Strategy for England
Information for Patients Please return to reception
Barts Health Trust 2WW Colorectal Workshop Dr Angela Wong,
Inquiry into geographical inequalities in breast cancer
Principal recommendations
Making MDTs better Steve Falk
Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes A Strategy for England
Chemotherapy Services in England: Ensuring quality and safety
Community Clinics Teledermoscopy Service
National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit 2018 Annual Report: Slide set
Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes A Strategy for England
Principal recommendations
Skin Cancer NICE Quality Standard
Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes A Strategy for England
Regional Melanoma & Complex Skin Cancer Meeting
Health and Social Services in the Department of Health
Impact of 2019 Sarcoma Service specification for Bristol
Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting Reforms
Patient centred care & Concept of Multidisciplinary team (MDT) Mr A A Ayantunde, MD; FRCS; FWACS, FRCS (Gen & Colorectal Surgery) Consultant Laparoscopic.
SWAG Cancer Network Meeting 23 May 2018
Pathway for patients with suspected Breast Cancer
How will the NHS Long Term Plan work in our community?
Living With & Beyond Cancer: SWAG Breast SSG Update
MULTIDISCIPLINARY (MDT) APPROACH TO CLINICAL CARE MODEL FOR EFFECTIVE AND BEST EVIDENCE PATIENT CARE DR EZEKIEL ALAWALE MBBS, FWACS, FRCS(I), JCPTGP, GP.
NCL Teledermatology Service Lead by:
Squamous cell carcinoma pathway update
Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Living With & Beyond Cancer (Personalised Care): SWAG Colorectal CAG Update 5th June 2019 Catherine Neck, Macmillan Cancer Rehabilitation/ LWBC Lead On.
New Primary Care Networks in Greenwich
NHS Long Term Plan: Rapid Diagnostic Centres (RDC) The SWAG Approach
Presentation transcript:

‘Improving Outcomes for people with skin tumours, including Melanoma’ Dr Dafydd Roberts Consultant Dermatologist, Swansea NHS Trust Lead Clinician Skin Cancer NICE Guidance Development Group

How Common Is NMSC? Much commoner than expected! Crude incidence rate – 173/100,000, 1988 Crude incidence rate – 265/100,000, 1998 55% increase in 10 years Over 125,000 new cases per annum in England and Wales. Cancer registry rate – 60-80/100,000 Australia - 2002 National non-melanoma skin Cancer survey - 1200/100,000. 374,000 people per annum with NMSC each year.

How Common Is MM? SCOTLAND – rise of 300%(M), 187%(F) in 30yrs, 10/1000,000 5yr survival rose by 30% to 80% WALES - Crude incidence rate – M 15.5/100,000 – F 18.1/100,000 Increase of 74% in 10 years Australia and New Zealand - 23 – 59/100,000

Current provision for skin cancer services Fragmented and varies across country. Most skin cancer managed by Dermatologists. Less than 30% of hospitals have a skin cancer MDT. Some (? how many) NMSC and MM managed in primary care. Between 1% and 15% of skin biopsies occur in primary care. No organised audit of management. Poor data collection, especially for NMSC. No agreement for need or funding by NHS for SNB, Mohs etc

NICE Skin Cancer Guidance - Guidance Development Group Dermatologist - 2 Plastic Surgeon Surgical Oncologist Maxfax Surgeon Members of Public – 2 Palliative care Radiotherapist/oncologist AHP – Radiographer GP Public Health Consultant Specialist Dermatology nurse Commissioner

Scope All skin cancers (not benign skin tumours) All health care settings Services for clinical management – including diagnosis, staging, treatment and follow-up. Supportive care and palliative care. Prevention and education – excluded.

Key Recommendations

MDT working Cancer Networks should establish two levels of skin cancer MDT - Local hospital based and specialist MDTs based in Cancer Centres. All clinicians who treat patients with any type of skin cancer should be a member of a skin cancer MDT, whether they work in the community or in a hospital setting.

Precancerous Lesions (AKs, Bowen’s) May be treated by any GP. Or GP may refer to GPwSI or other doctor working in the community (member of a MDT) or to a hospital specialist. If there is doubt about the diagnosis the patient should be referred to the local hospital skin cancer specialist. Follow up may be with the GP

Low risk BCC Patients with low risk BCC may be diagnosed, treated and followed up by a doctor working in the community who is a member of the local MDT, or a hospital specialist (‘normally a Dermatologist’).

High risk BCC, SCC and MM All patients with skin lesions which are suspicious of these skin cancers, including all suspicious pigmented lesions and skin lesions where the diagnosis is uncertain , should be referred to a hospital specialist (Dermatologist). GPs will no longer be allowed to treat these cancers.

Cancer Networks should ensure that local and specialist MDTs work to network-wide protocols for referral, management and audit.

Follow up Agreed jointly between patient and doctor Low risk – self examination and/or community based High risk – secondary care plus self examination backed by written and photographic information

Information All patients and carers should have access to high quality information about their condition and support services.

High Risk groups Network wide protocols for high risk group and rare skin cancers. To include patients with Genetic disorders, Transplant patients, rare skin tumours, cutaneous lymphoma, children and young adults.

Data collection Cancer registration, particularly for NMSC very poor or non-existent. Improve data collection – establish two centres to collect accurate data on NMSC.

Research Commissioners should create an infrastructure to encourage research into all aspects of skin cancer.

Suggested pathway for patients with suspicious skin lesions

Patient presents to GP with skin lesion Benign or pre-cancerous - treat Benign pigmented lesion – oral and written advice to return if changes occur Patient presents to GP with skin lesion Pre-cancerous or low risk BCC High risk BCC Diagnosis uncertain ? MM or SCC Rapid referral Community skin cancer clinic LSMDT Hospital pigmented lesion clinic/rapid access clinic /Dermatology clinic SSMDT

Specific issues Multidisciplinary Teams Histopathology SNB Adjuvant Alfa-interferon Mohs surgery Specialist nurses Organ Transplant patients Data collection

Multidisciplinary Teams Meet at least every two weeks Core membership to include Dermatologist, Surgeon, Oncologist, palliative care, Nurse, pathologist. Must attend 50% of meetings except for GPs who must attend four meetings per annum. Extended membership could include psychologist, radiologist etc

Cases for discussion All high risk BCCs and SCCs – incomplete excisions and recurrent lesions, All MMs Rare skin tumours Cutaneous lymphoma High risk patients eg transplant patients and those with genetic disorders

Specialist MDTs MMs stage 2a or higher Metastatic tumours Patients for SNB Patients suitable for clinical trials

Histopathology Cases referred to the Specialist skin cancer MDT should have a formal histopathology review. All MMs and severely atypical naevi should be double reported if resources allow the report to be generated within 2 weeks. ‘…it is desirable that eventually all MDT skin cancers are double reported’ An appropriately resourced national system of histopathology review should be established.

Sentinel Node Biopsy Not routine in UK currently. Evidence – excellent as a staging investigation but no evidence of overall survival benefit. SNB should only be carried out in centres where there is clinical experience of the procedure and only in the context of clinical trials.

Adjuvant alpha interferon Evidence – no firm evidence of overall survival but may be of benefit to some subsets of patients Should only be given as part of clinical trial

Mohs’ surgery Currently about six trained Mohs’ surgeons in UK. Excellent evidence of margin control and reduced recurrent rate in selected cases. Availability should be extended At least one Mohs’ surgeon for each cancer network - 34 networks

Skin Cancer Specialist Nurse Currently very few in UK Role may include – health education, counselling, treatments (PDT, cryotherapy (skin surgery), and follow up. Increase numbers so that all patients with skin cancer will have access.

Transplant patients Those who have developed a skin cancer should be seen in a dedicated ‘transplant patient skin clinic’ Dermatologists should liase closely with the transplant team to discuss management and consider reduction in immunosuppression, use of retinoids and other treatments.

Data collection Cancer registration, particularly for NMSC very poor or non-existent. Improve data collection – establish two centres to collect accurate data on NMSC.

Conclusion Some of the recommendations are controversial and will affect the way skin cancer care is delivered in the UK. Evidence base sometimes lacking. Changes will not happen overnight and some may take years to be fully implemented. Hopefully skin cancer care in the UK will improve and all patients will have access to high standards of care regardless of where they live and who carries out the treatment.