Feedback Systems Joe Grames Hall A Parity Meeting Jefferson Lab

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Source Outlook High polarization strained-layer photocathodes were activated in both electron guns during the summer shutdown, with usual QE (0.2% at 850.
Advertisements

Hall A Collaboration Meeting S. Nanda, June 23, 2005 Hall A Compton Polarimeter For Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 23 rd 2005 Sirish Nanda Thomas Jefferson.
CEBAF Photoinjector: What’s new, what’s the same since HAPPEx 2004? What needs to be done? M. Poelker, HAPPEx collaboration meeting, Feb. 18, 2005.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) April 07, Notes: 1.For each BPM, the wires are: +X+, +X-, +Y+, +Y- 2.There are only two injector BPMs we are not reading:
Paul Emma LCLS FAC April 16, Initial Experience with Injector Commissioning P. Emma, et al. Facilities Advisory Committee.
Electronic Cross-talk & Ground Loop Elimination in Injector Riad Suleiman Center for Injectors and Sources.
JLab Polarized Source Happex Collaboration Meeting May 18, 2007 P. Adderley, J. Brittian, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Optical Anchor / Interferometer Status: June, 2004 Josef Frisch.
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
Real-time Parity Feedback John Hansknecht & Riad Suleiman April 28, 2009.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) Study Injector Group November 10, 2008.
Hall A Parity Workshop (May 10, 2002), 1 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson.
Ethernet Based Embedded IOC for FEL Control Systems J. Yan, D. Sexton, Al Grippo, W. Moore, and K. Jordan ICALEPCS 2007 October 19, 2007 Knoxville Convention.
Dirk Zimoch, EPICS Collaboration Meeting October 2008 PSI Large Research Facilities Status SLS, Proton Facility, PROSCAN, PSI-XFEL.
ASTA roadmap to EPICS and other upgrades Remote monitoring and control DAQ Machine protection Dark current energy spectrometer.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Strained Superlattice.
Short Tutorial on Causes of Position Differences… …and what we can do about them (most slides stolen from Cates PAVI ’04 talk)
G 0 Coordinator Update & “To-Do List” Joe Grames William & Mary, June 5-6, 2006  Hall C Beam Line Tasks  Accelerator Preparation Tasks  Beam Halo 
Polarized Injector Status QWeak Collaboration Meeting February 1, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman, R. Suleiman,
Abstract The Hannover Thermal Noise Experiment V. Leonhardt, L. Ribichini, H. Lück and K. Danzmann Max-Planck- Institut für Gravitationsphysik We measure.
MOLLER DAQ Aug 2015 meeting Team : R. Michaels, P. M. King, M. Gericke, K. Kumar R. Michaels, MOLLER Meeting, Aug, 2015.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility G0 Collaboration Meeting, June 18-19, 2003 Updates G0 Tiger Laser High Polarization Photocathodes Mott polarimeter.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Lifetime Measurements.
G 0 PC Installation and Beam Studies Stephanie Bailey Riad Suleiman.
Source Systematics PITA - type effects The importance of controlling the analyzer-axis –Two Pockels cells –Half-wave plate Position asymmetries –Lensing.
Beam Optics for Parity Experiments Mark Pitt Virginia Tech (DHB) Electron beam optics in the injector, accelerator, and transport lines to the experimental.
Injector Status & Commissioning QWeak Collaboration Meeting May 24, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, S. Covert, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Parity Experiments and JLab Injector Riad Suleiman February 5, 2016.
CEBAF Source and Injector Status PREx-II Collaboration Mtg Feb. 26, 2016 Matt Poelker and Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources.
G 0 Project Coordinator Report Joe Grames “Big Picture” Schedule Preparations Polarized Source Injector Accelerator Hall C Accelerator Plans for 687 MeV.
Operated by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Polarized Electron Beams.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) B-Team Meeting September 10, 2008.
AIP and Large Projects Arne Freyberger OPS 2015 StayTreat.
Polarized Injector & Upgrade Schedule QWeak Collaboration Meeting November 06, 2009 P. Adderley, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Polarized Injector Update
Charge Measurements on VELA
Parity Violation Experiments & Beam Requirements
Joe Grames Center for Injectors and Sources
with help from Riad Sulieman, Arne Freyberger, and Joe Grames
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, U.S.A.
Gingin Advisory Committee Meeting 08 Dec 2009
WP11: electron and proton beam testing
A Mini-Primer for Parity Quality Beam (as seen from the Accelerator)
G0 Backward Angle Accelerator Preparations
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
Parity Violation Experiments at JLEIC
Parity Quality Beam (PQB)
Upgraded Injector Test Facility
Accelerator Issues Raised in Hall A Parity Collaboration Meeting, April B-Team Meeting April 29, 2009.
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
QWeak Collaboration Meeting
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
Qweak Coordination Meeting
Polarized Source Development Run Results
Adiabatic Damping and Parity Quality of Low Energy
Riad Suleiman February 2, 2017
Injector Studies Using Superlattice Photocathode
Helicity Magnets for PQB Feedback Helicity Magnets for PZT Booster
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
A. Freyberg Aug 2016 ECT’16 =>
Polarized Source: Recent Activities
PQB Meeting March 05, 2009.
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Beam Position Noise from 500 keV MBO0I06 Dipole Sensor
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
Spot-Size Reduction 4/5/2017.
Injector Commissioning & Optimization
Comparison between 4K and 2K operation performance of CEBAF injector cryomodules Grigory Eremeev Monday, August 19, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Feedback Systems Joe Grames Hall A Parity Meeting Jefferson Lab May 10, 2002

Goals for HC Feedback Independent intensity control for each hall. This means providing parity quality intensity devices for both HAPPEx2 and G0. Hall B continues with a diode laser and TACO feedback. Independent position capability for the parity Halls (A&C). Alternative controls for the HC devices (direct fiber or software). Fast signal readback of the control devices (V-F-V’s). Compatibility with 3-hall laser configuration. Above all, provide users with what they require for successful experiments and continue to further JLab parity capabilities.

Our present layout... Each gun is equipped with PZT X/Y mirror (testing only) Insertable l/2-plate (systematic reversal) Pockels cell (circular light and PITA) Rotatable l/2-plate (corrective element)

Intensity Feedback Use a low voltage Pockels cell for intensity modulation. PC a V Intensity l/n Requirements: indendent control stable & sufficient gain low insertion loss low cell voltage compact footprint (Tsentalovich, BATES)

(insert here two plots showing I vs. a and dI/dV vs. a near V=0) IA-l/10 (insert here two plots showing I vs. a and dI/dV vs. a near V=0)

New IA under test

Position Feedback We use a mirror on a fast PZT driven stage for HC position control. The present setup uses a single common mirror (last one) ~10 cm upstream of the polarization Pockels cell. Independent position control requires multiple PZT mirrors for usual 3-laser combination. This doubles the moment arm reaching the cathode, but also increases the distance to the Pockels cell to about 100 cm. This capability could be installed during the summer shutdown, but requires advance re-work of pico-mirror mounts used for laser steering. The ITS laser room is an excellent resource for feasibility tests.

ITS laser room

Where would the new stuff fit ?

Device Controls Source DAQ Hardware controls (V-F-V’s) Feedback Signals (fiber) Source (IA, PZT,RWP) DAQ (BPM,BCM) Software control (Gateway/LockServer)

Helicity Lock Server Lock Server EPICS using Gateway 24/7 OPS coverage Fast DAQ/Device config 1 year in service, 3 halls Infrastructure for PZT

Injector Monitoring Two parity DAQ’s Signals TBA HAPPEx2 (ADC’s) G0/INJ (Triumf V/F’s & scaler) Provides redundancy for checkout & upgrades Signals TBA Injector cavity BCM Two 100 keV BPM’s Two 5 MeV BPM’s HC feedback levels Two batteries

April’02 - BPM work Prior to the April shutdown 60 Hz content of beam intensity in Hall B ~10-20% sourced in 100 keV region. During the April shutdown extensive effort to identify, remove & isolate 60 Hz sources. SEE BPM re-configured: 100 keV FFB Additional S/H cards Flexibility (3 vs 2 crates) Hall B coming on line now - results in soon.

April’02 - emittance filter HC beam motion at an aperture induces a HC beam intensity. PZT mirror tests have yielded charge asymmetries of 300-400 ppm/volt. Two injector apertures (A1/A2) defined the old T-Gun beam emittance. The P-Gun emittance is defined at the source, so in preparation for G0 and to reduce HC effects new sets of apertures were installed with increased sizes (1x, 2x, 3x). Initial tests are promising: using the 2x set resulted in a < 40 ppm/volt over the full range of PZT voltages (1-9 volts).

Injector beam monitoring Helicity correlated feedback from the injector is limited by the multi-user operation of JLab. The beam diagnostics “see” all beams in superposition. Conceptual design for independent beam monitoring: beam intensity modulation (~1 kHz) w/ lock-in technique use of DSP and Digital Receiver VME boards Andrew Hutton supports a feasibility initial design to test injector BCM cavity 0L02 (earliest Fall 2002)

Timeline May 2002 24th - G0 beam test Memorial day shutdown - install IA in Hall A laser @ 770 nm June-July 2002 Begin testing with new G0 helicity card No MD, but facility development and G0 beam test July-August 2002 - SHUTDOWN Independent IA’s for A & C laser into tunnel Independent PZT’s if desired are installed too September-October 2002 Parity beam for G0 run period Test capabilities for simultaneous parity beam (G0 & GDH) March-August 2002 Parity quality beam for HAPPEx2 Laser TBD

Conclusions This is an exciting time to be preparing for the upcoming parity experiments. We are looking forward to a strong collaborative effort and for achieving the design and controls you need. So, what else…?