Supporting Document for Wall Penetration Loss

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1376r2 Submission Nov 2013 Slide 1 Discussions on Penetration Loss Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1227r3 SubmissionSlide 1 OFDMA Performance Analysis Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Sept 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0623r1 May 2015 Guido R. Hiertz, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 TGax simulation scenario “Box 5” – calibration results Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0179r1 Indoor Wall Propagation Loss Measurements January, 2015 Chuck Lukaszewski, Aruba NetworksSlide 1 Date:
January 2011 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for Wall Penetration Loss Authors: doc.: IEEE /0078r1 Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Jan 2009 Alex Ashley, NDS LtdSlide 1 OBSS Simplification Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0630r1 Submission May 14th, 2009 NamesSlide 1 Importance of Overlapped BSS issue in ac Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1110r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 September 2015 BSS-TXOP NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE /0838r0 Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios Date: September 2009.
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0572r0 Slide 1 Revisions of In-home Entertainment Simulation Scenario Date: Authors:
July 2009 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, RalinkSlide 1 Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology Authors: doc.:IEEE /0838r1 Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /0176r0 Submission Jan 2013 Bo Sun, ZTE/CWPANSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Proposal of Channelization for aj.
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0108r0 January 11 Slide 1 Evaluation of neighbors impact on channel allocation for dense environment and Video use cases.
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1032r0 Slide 1 Simulation Scenario for OBSS in Home Network Date: Authors: September.
Doc.: IEEE /0499r1 Submission May 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Simulation Scenario Floor Plans Date: Authors:
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
PHY Abstraction for MU-MIMO in TGac
Considerations on HEW Evaluation Methodology
Supporting Document for TGac Evaluation Methodology
Requirements Discussion
TG ax Indoor Enterprise Scenarios, Color, DSC and TPC
Proposal for TGad Evaluation Methodology
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
MMAC Update November 2003 Yasuhiko Inoue NTT November 2003
Revisions of Home Network Simulation Scenario with OBSS
DFS/DCS and TPC Requirement References
Revisions of Home Network Simulation Scenario with OBSS
Revisions of Home Network Simulation Scenario with OBSS
Home Network Simulation Scenario with OBSS
System Capacity Evaluation in OBSS Environment at 5 GHz band
TGad Channel Model Update
Importance of Overlapped BSS issue in ac
Indoor Channel Measurements for TGac
Simultaneous Beam Training
OBSS issue and simulation scenarios in TGac
Enhanced Beam Tracking Against Blockage: Resolution to CID 145
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
The need and complexity of in-home entertainment scenario with OBSS
20/40MHz Channel Selection
Multiple Data Rates for WUR
Interference and Co-existence Issues of EUHT network
Link Budget Analysis Date: Authors: November 2015
Interference and Co-existence Issues of EUHT network
System Capacity Evaluation in OBSS Environment at 5 GHz band
TGac May2009 Closing Report
TX Mask Shoulders vis-à-vis ACI
Box 5 Calibration Result
Revisions of Home Network Simulation Scenario with OBSS
July, 2002 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Propagation notes to P SG3a from IEEE.
Proposal for TGad Evaluation Methodology
EUHT Status Description
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
Results for SS6 calibration case for single BSS and OBSS
Box 5 results for Single BSS Calibration Case
DSC Calibration Result
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Enhanced Beam Tracking Against Blockage: Resolution to CID 145
Presentation transcript:

Supporting Document for Wall Penetration Loss Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Supporting Document for Wall Penetration Loss Authors: Submission Slide 1 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink Page 1 John Doe, Some Company

January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Background In TGac simulation scenario #4 (in-home entertainment with OBSS), there are two types of walls. (room walls, outside walls) It is needed to define its wall penetration loss for realistic network simulation. Submission Slide 2 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

AP and STA Locations in Scenario #4 January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 AP and STA Locations in Scenario #4 Room walls are introduced at x=-39 and x=41. Slide 3

When We Set Wall Penetration Loss, January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 When We Set Wall Penetration Loss, It depends quite a lot upon several factors such as Frequency Structure of wall (& number of layers in the structure) Materials of wall (& mixing or not) Wet or dry Window or not (& size of window) And so on It is not possible to set a typical value covering all cases. Instead, we try to pick an acceptable one which can be roughly applied to general case. From several references (measurements @ 5GHz band) Slide 4

Measurement by USC (2002) [1] January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Measurement by USC (2002) [1] < 0.01dB (blinds) ~ 15dB (brick) according to various materials Submission Slide 5 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

Measurement by Lund Univ. (1999) [2] January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Measurement by Lund Univ. (1999) [2] For a mixture wall 1 dB ~ 10 dB loss variation according to frequency (5~6GHz) Submission Slide 6 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Document by UK Government (1997) [3] Radio Comm. Agency in Department of Trade & Industry This document concluded that - 10 dB would be a practical figure for outside wall - based upon 9 other references. Submission Slide 7 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Measurement by ERC (1999) [4] ERC : European Radio-communications Committee Typical interior materials : 0.4 dB ~ 3.4 dB loss Typical exterior materials : 6.9 dB ~ 11.7 dB loss Submission Slide 8 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Measurement Results 10 dB per an outside wall can be an acceptable figure at 5GHz band for wall penetration loss based on various references. 3 dB per a room wall can be an acceptable figure at 5GHz band for wall penetration loss based on various references. Submission Slide 9 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

Applying Double-Walled Structure January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Applying Double-Walled Structure Nowadays, double-walled structure becomes more and more popular thanks to Good prevention of noises Good preserving of heat in a room Wall penetration loss of double-walled structure is two time that of an outside wall So, it is not a bad idea to apply a double-walled structure to one or two of outside walls in scenario #4. Submission Slide 10 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

Applying Double-Walled Structure January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Applying Double-Walled Structure When we apply double-walled structure, link budget calculations for one of most distant pairs of STAs (between STA17 in BSS B and STA20 in BSS C) are Max tx power is assumed : +23 dBm Thermal noise is assumed : -90 dBm Path Loss & SNR Double-wall structure is applied to one outside wall (btw. B and A) Path Loss = 113 dB SNR = 0dB Double-wall structure is applied to two outside walls Path Loss = 123 dB SNR = -10dB I think it is more desirable to apply double-walled structure to two outside walls. Submission Slide 11 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 Conclusion So, it can be described in simulation scenario #4 of Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology Document “Attenuation factor of each room wall is set to 3 dB” “Attenuation factor of outside wall is set to 20 dB”.  Submission Slide 12 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink

January 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0078r0 References [1] Propagation losses through common building materials: 2.4GHz vs. 5GHz, 2002. [2] Wideband measurement and analysis of penetration loss in the 5GHz band, 1999. [3] Building shielding loss at 5GHz, 1997. [4] Compatibility studies related to the possible extension band for HIPERLAN at 5GHz, 1999. Submission Slide 13 Minho Cheong, ETRI and Peter Loc, Ralink