Curriculum Journeys A GPS for Effective and Engaging Learning Opportunities for Gifted Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
Advertisements

Qualifications Update: National 5 Drama Qualifications Update: National 5 Drama.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
Improving Literacy Instruction: Strategies for All Content Areas
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
© 2008 by PACT PACT Scorer Training Pilot.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Meeting the Needs of “Talented” and “Gifted” Learners in the Regular Education Classroom Kristina M. Gartrell K -6 Gifted Education Teacher Central York.
Talent Development Department 1 CMS Elementary Talent Development Program.
1. 2 Objectives: Review the Characteristics of Effective Instruction and make connections to our professional development efforts. Begin to think about.
Teaching the Gifted Student in the Regular Classroom
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 4 HAEAnet-public Password: education0309
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
PLC Year 2 Day 2 Inquiry Cycle
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Presenters: Drs. Thomas Koballa, Jr. & Tracy Linderholm
Rich Tasks.
Welcome to 2nd Grade.
Induction NICOLE STEWART.
Outcome: Participants will be able to identify and apply teacher behaviors that support a learner-centered environment. Indicator: Participants will explore.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Professional Learning Communities
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION
Work Session Expectations:
Education Transform Resources
MENTEP, Brussels Janet Looney
SPHERE Study Visit: University of Edinburgh (October 2017)
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Questar III Regional 2017 Professional Learning Day Middle School Math
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
The Year of Core Instruction
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Personalized Learning Aren’t We Already Doing That?
Summer Leadership Conference Summer 2017
Secondary Strand November 3, 2014
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM. A school district shall ensure that all teachers are provided with an orientation of the Professional Development.
BLOOM’s Taxonomy Parent Information Session: Monday 23rd April 2018.
Inclusion A school district shall use the term “inclusion” to mean that a student is receiving education in a general education regular class setting,
Smarter School Spending Community of Practice
Board Presentations Protocol:
CCRS Implementation
Best Practices.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
UDL Academy Session 7 Cohort 1
Building the future Workshop 3 24 November 2017
Beyond the Furniture: Space
Developing 21st Century Classrooms: Connecting the Dots IV
NISD Leadership Academy
Fulton County Schools Personalized Learning Instructional Model: Ocee Elementary January 2016.
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
  Bridging the Common Core Standards and Gifted Education: Instructional Resources Project NAGC - November 2013 Presenters Caroline C. Eidson and Sneha.
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Implementing Race to the Top
The online safety curriculum your learners need
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Learning that deepens knowledge and understanding
Looking Back to Look Ahead
Assessing Pupil Progress in Science (APP) Department CPD session Spring 2009 Slide 0.1.
Leadership of and for learning
DIFFERENTIATION REVIEW
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Groveton ES Our Local Level iv Journey
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

Curriculum Journeys A GPS for Effective and Engaging Learning Opportunities for Gifted Students

High-Quality Curriculum for Gifted Learners Reliable map for the pursuit of important learning outcomes Systematic, defensible connections between gifted and general education Cornerstone element of educational programming for gifted learners

It’s about a recognition that we start from strong curriculum and strong instructional materials, focused on important learning outcomes, reflecting key features like a focus on depth and complexity and abstractness. It’s about using assessment effectively and consistently to inform instruction, and about applying flexible grouping in ways that will promote learning outcomes relevant to our groups of students. It’s about appealing to learners but not catering to learners; opening points of entry but not dumbing down or differentiating by volume. Often the two default approaches to differentiation for the gifted, now that differentiation lives much more in the middle, are differentiation by volume – which is illogical because more of the same doesn’t make us better; or differentiation by independent study, which can be ok but can’t be solely independent, because then we lose the support of teaching and the guidance of higher levels of expertise; or differentiation by peer tutoring, which is its own world of problem, because when you press on that one for the intended outcomes for advanced learners, you get nothing. [Explain the wordle]. And differentiation is fundamentally about providing learning experiences that support growth and progress toward learning outcomes – and where is the steadiness? Differentiation that is grounded in high-level curriculum designed for the learners, strategic use of grouping approaches, and use of assessment to inform instruction. – which leads us to our next buzzword.

Some Guiding Questions and Challenges How do we understand the vocabulary of high-quality curriculum – depth, complexity, rigor, and so forth? How does high-quality curriculum for the gifted relate to and differ from a broader conception of high-quality curriculum? How do we make wise choices regarding resources and approaches? How do we invest in the development of high-quality curriculum? How do we ensure that gifted learners are part of broader discussions about curriculum?

Structure of the Day 8:20-9:10: Panel discussion: Mapping the Terrain: What defines high-quality curriculum for gifted learners? 9:15-10:00: Panel discussion: Charting a Path: How are the needs of gifted learners part of district/state conversations about curriculum? 10:10-11:05: Breakout Roundtable Sessions: High-Quality Curriculum as a Vehicle for Broader Programming Goals 11:15-12:10: Breakout Panel Discussions: Roadblocks and Traffic Jams Limiting High-Quality Curriculum in Practice 12:10-12:55 LUNCH (Grand Ballroom E 3rd-Floor) 1:00--1:45: Breakout Small Group Discussions: Decision-Making for High-Quality Outcomes 1:45-2:30: Closing Session: Where Do We Go Next? Takeaways from the Workshop and Next Steps

Structure of the Day – 8:20-10:00 Panel discussion: Mapping the Terrain: What defines high-quality curriculum for gifted learners? Panel discussion: Charting a Path: How are the needs of gifted learners part of district/state conversations about curriculum?

Structure of the Day – 10:10-11:05 Breakout Roundtable Sessions: High-Quality Curriculum as a Vehicle for Broader Programming Goals Implementing curriculum-centered professional learning – Marquette III Using curriculum for talent spotting and identification – Marquette VI Curriculum worth a side trip – structuring curriculum in out-of-school settings – Marquette VII

Structure of the Day – 11:15-12:10 Breakout Panel Discussions: Roadblocks and Traffic Jams Limiting High-Quality Curriculum in Practice When educators believe “my kids can’t do it” – Marquette III When educators feel trapped by standards – Marquette VI When a district has too many initiatives – Marquette VII When efforts to build high-quality curriculum are too limited in time, resources, and training – Symphony I

12:10-12:55 Grand Ballroom East (3rd Floor) LUNCH 12:10-12:55 Grand Ballroom East (3rd Floor)

Structure of the Day – 1:00-1:45 Breakout Small Group Discussions: Decision-Making for High-Quality Outcomes Challenges of fidelity of implementation across the learning contexts of gifted learners – Marquette III Ensuring gifted learners are considered in the conversation about curriculum adoption – Marquette VI Evaluating resources and using evaluation data in selecting curriculum for advanced learners – Marquette VII Tailoring curriculum to the community context – Symphony I

Structure of the Day – 1:45-2:30 Closing Session: Where Do We Go Next? Takeaways from the Workshop and Next Steps – Marquette IV What will YOU take away? Share ideas, questions, points you want to remember here: