Adapt – Adopt Module 7 Activity Overview Approximate Time: ___ minutes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intel® Teach Program Essentials Course Day 4.
Advertisements

The 21st Century Context for
Instructional Learning Cycle
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
The Teacher Perfor m ance Assessment. The Teacher Performance Assessment is a tool that requires the beginning teacher to document the essential steps.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Looking for evidence of PLC attributes using case studies.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Evaluation: A Challenging Component of Teaching Darshana Shah, PhD. PIES
Planning Backward: Goals-Led Lesson Design Janice Gallagher May 3rd, 2011.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI STEERING TEAM TRAINING Selecting the Areas of Concern Document
TPGES & PPGES Training Modules TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING PGES IMPLEMENTATION.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Citywide Expectations for
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Designing Professional Development Session 1 – Introduction to Instructional Rounds Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
An AAC Professional Learning Module Book Study based on the AAC publication Creating Credible Criteria Creating Credible Criteria Module 4: The “I Can”
Danielson Framework 3D – Using Assessment in Instruction.
Combining Clinical Supervision with Teacher Evaluation
August 2013 Day 2 Grand Valley Learning Network. Activating Your Instructional Model If your school has an articulated instructional model (or definition.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Essential Attributes of Faculty Professional Development: The Excellence in Online Education Initiative Carol McQuiggan, D.Ed. Senior Instructional Designer,
Module 8: Effective Innovation Review and Selection Process
Professional Growth and
Essentials Course Module 8: Showcasing Unit Portfolios
Creating Credible Criteria Module 1: Defining Terms and Roles
SPE 578 STUDY perfect education/spe578study.com
A guide for holders of initial and transitional certificates
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
EDU 310 Help Bcome Exceptional / uopedu310.com
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING-I ACCT 2003
Using the CPE Rubric to Develop Non-Credit Online Programs www. bsu
Innovative Approaches to Learner Success
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
All Sure Start Educators
EED 400 Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
Instructional Look Fors in Special Education Settings
Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):
Georgia Department of Education
T-TESS Goal-Setting.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Module 7. Designing Assessment Opportunities
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Defining Effective and Identifying Observation Rubric Titles
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Adapt – Adopt Module 7 Activity Overview Approximate Time: ___ minutes Module Outcomes Create group “effective teaching” posters Create a statement that reflects attributes of effective teachers Identify rubric titles Explore bodies of research that support rubric title Handout(s) M3 Additional Materials Sticky notes Markers (enough for all participants) Chart paper Purpose Participants will work within small groups to reach consensus and create a paragraph that describes effective teachers. Subsequently, the entire team will analyze all groups’ paragraphs to (1) identify commonalities that will ultimately become the titles of the observation rubrics to be constructed and (2) develop a final statement that articulates the LEA’s definition of effective teaching.

Module 5 Review The following rubrics were constructed at the conclusion of Module 5: Self Assessment, PLP, & Evidence Professionalism Collaboration Impact Beyond the Classroom (Professional Showcase)

Identify Desired Resource Identify which identified expectations are addressed in the resources provided. Resources Danielson Marzano Others identified by group research

Adopt or Adapt Using the research findings, determine the next course of action, adopting or adapting an existing teacher evaluation system.

Adopt The team has decided to adopt an existing plan. Our final task is to create the document that will celebrate teachers’ efforts outside of the classroom, the Professional Showcase rubric.

Adapt The team has decided to adapt an existing plan. Our current task is determine which components must be modified and determine a plan of execution.

Professional Showcase Rubric Our final task is to create the document that will celebrate teachers’ efforts outside of the classroom, the Professional Showcase rubric.

Final Task Submit all documents to your facilitator.