Engineering Autonomy Mr. Robert Gold Director, Engineering Enterprise

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Engineering From a Life Cycle Perspective John Groenenboom Director Engineering – Mesa Boeing Rotorcraft Dec 12, 2007.
Advertisements

1 The Systems Engineering Research Center UARC Dr. Dinesh Verma Executive Director January 13,
School of Graduate Professional Studies Systems Engineering Research at Penn State Colin J. Neill Representing the work of: Kathryn Jablokow, Assoc Prof.
ERS Overview 5/15/12 | Page-1 Distribution Statement A – Cleared for public release by OSR, SR Case #s 12-S-0258, 0817, 1003, and 1854 apply. Affordable,
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
Panel 5: The Latest in OA Innovation and C4ISR 4 November, 2014 Mike Rice President / Senior Systems Engineer R2E Inc.
ASRR 2011/10/05 Page-1 Distribution Statement A – Cleared for public release by OSR, distribution unlimited. Affording Defense Capability: An SE- Centric.
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Electronic Warfare Information Operations 29 MAR 2011 Val O’Brien.
DoD CIO Brief to FCC-NTIA Model City Workshop
Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) Program Sam Weber Program Director March 2012.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
Provisional draft 1 ICT Work Programme Challenge 2 Cognition, Interaction, Robotics NCP meeting 19 October 2006, Brussels Colette Maloney, PhD.
IEEE JOINT TASK FORCE ON QUADRENNIAL ENERGY REVIEW Skilled Work Force Issues Presentation to the U.S. Department of Energy by the IEEE Joint Task Force.
Network Enabled Capability Through Innovative Systems Engineering Service Oriented Integration of Systems for Military Capability Duncan Russell, Nik Looker,
BPT 3113 – Management of Technology
Robots at Work Dr Gerard McKee Active Robotics Laboratory School of Systems Engineering The University of Reading, UK
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
Modeling and Simulation Leadership Summit West Coast Panel.
Collaboration to Meet Future T&E Needs ITEA 14 September Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director, Air Warfare Operational Test and Evaluation.
© 2013 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Systems Engineering: MITRE & SERC Dr. J. Providakes Director, SE Tech Center “The SERC-MITRE Doctoral.
INTERNET2 COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT Florence D. Hudson Senior Vice President and Chief Innovation.
The Climate Prediction Project Global Climate Information for Regional Adaptation and Decision-Making in the 21 st Century.
JAUS Architecture Overview. Why did we need JAUS? “Stove-Pipe” Design Subsystems common to all Unmanned Systems (US) were previously built from scratch.
AIAA’s Publications Business Publications New Initiatives Subcommittee Wednesday, 9 January 2008 Rodger Williams.
Chemical & Biological Defense Program Science & Technology
Panel Three - Small Businesses: Sustaining and Growing a Market Presence Open Interfaces and Market Penetration Protecting Intellectual Innovation and.
Command & Control Capabilities
DOE 2000, March 8, 1999 The IT 2 Initiative and NSF Stephen Elbert program director NSF/CISE/ACIR/PACI.
SBIR Final Meeting Collaboration Sensor Grid and Grids of Grids Information Management Anabas July 8, 2008.
AFRL Nuclear S&T Investment Strategy Dr. David Hardy SES Associate Director for Space Technology Air Force Research Laboratory 27 August 2010.
1 Institute Overview & Status Information Sciences Institute “We are the ‘&’ in R&D Arlington, VA Marina del Rey, CA Information Sciences Institute Presented.
Welcome! 11 th Annual MOVES Research and Education Summit On behalf of MOVES Faculty, Staff and Students CDR Joseph A. Sullivan, PhD USN
Protecting Against Cyber Challenges Pacific Operational Science & Technology Conference 15 March 2011 Rob Wolborsky Chief Technology Officer Space and.
UNCLASSIFIED The Open Group 01/07/10 Page-1 Kick-off Meeting for The Open Group Acquisition Cyber Security Initiative Ms. Kristen Baldwin Director, Systems.
1 The XMSF Profile Overlay to the FEDEP Dr. Katherine L. Morse, SAIC Mr. Robert Lutz, JHU APL
DoD Science and Technology Enterprise
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering
Megacities: Rebuilding A Roadmap for Sustained Collaboration, Learning, and Training Kevin M. Felix COL(R), US Army.
Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering Program
Transaction Processing Systems
Organization and Knowledge Management
Guiding Principles The Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Team must INNOVATE AND COLLABORATE to deliver EFFECTIVE, AFFORDABLE tools for the joint warfighter.
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
ASSET - Automotive Software cyber SEcuriTy
Better Buying Power 3.0 Continue Strengthening Our Culture of:
Chapter 18: Introduction to Assurance
HSCB Focus 2010 Overview August 5-7, 2009 Chantilly, Virginia
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
NAE Global Challenge Scholars Program Annual Meeting on October 30.
Information Technology (IT)
Strategic Partnerships to Increase Student and Faculty Opportunities
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Digital Artifacts and the Need for Portability
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Presentation for information days Units involved:
PROCESS PERFECTION THROUGH ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION
Steering Committee Brief to the DoD M&S Conference 2008
INNOVATION SUPERCLUSTERS INITIATIVE
WBB Corporate Capabilities
Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Industry-Government Roundtable
Sachiko A. Kuwabara, PhD, MA
KEY INITIATIVE Financial Data and Analytics
INCOSE Digital Artifacts Challenge Team
DDR&E AC: Aligned to the National Defense Strategy
IEEE RS Standards Status and Descriptions
Putting Together a DevOps Pipeline Leveraging Technology, Process, and People 1 May 2019 Mr. Patrick Bush.
Molly Donohue Magee, Executive Director June 2019
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

Engineering Autonomy Mr. Robert Gold Director, Engineering Enterprise Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Aerospace Standards Summit McLean, VA | October 2, 2018

Outline Defense Research and Engineering (R&E) Strategy Key Research and Development Areas Background Engineering Challenges Summary

Defense Research & Engineering Strategy Mitigate current and anticipated threat capabilities Enable new or extended capabilities affordably in existing military systems Create technology surprise through science and engineering Focus on Technical Excellence Deliver Technologically Superior Capabilities Grow and Sustain our S&T and Engineering Capability

Key Research & Development Investment Areas Autonomy & Robotics Electronic Warfare / Cyber Microelectronics Hypersonics Directed Energy Manufacturing Artificial Intelligence / Man-Machine Interface Future of Computing Novel Engineered Materials Precision Sensing: Time, Space, Gravity, Electromagnetism Emerging Biosciences Understanding Human and Social Behavior

Background DoD emphasis on the increased use of autonomous systems DASD(SE), in collaboration with Services, assessed current autonomy efforts and associated engineering challenges The purpose was to ascertain the ramifications of autonomous systems on DoD engineering practice

Engineering Challenges Increase Level of Experimentation Understand autonomy trade-space for architecture/conceptual designs Engage Warfighter in experimentation to set expectations Engage Service Laboratories and Industry Partners to conduct mission-specific experiments Leverage computational biosciences, cognitive and social sciences, and robotics opportunities Standardize Taxonomy Develop autonomy-consistent terms, definitions, and phraseology (e.g., authorized/control entities, flexible/supervised autonomy, human on/outside the loop) Refine Requirements Development Apply tools to translate natural language, imagery, and video to representations and relations usable for reasoning Advance methods to encode interactions between operators and the system for requirements traceability The source of these voice-over recommendations is AFRL 711 HPW: -The bullet “Increase Level of Experimentation” – add the concept of building repositories of large labeled datasets to support future AI development. Computational biosciences is the pioneering field of study that leverages computational power of computer that advance human health and molecular understanding of life. It is the science of using biological data to develop algorithms or models to understand biological systems and relationships.

Engineering Challenges Understand/Manage Human-Machine Interaction Allocation of functions between human and machine Explore techniques for ensuring operators trust autonomous systems Advance sensor development and assessment methodologies Leverage wearable electronic sensor development and adapt to the cognitive/physical state of the warfighter Facilitate Trust and Social Interactions Develop software assurance tools to enhance ‘trust’ Define techniques for monitoring and bounding autonomous system behaviors Understand social dynamics of autonomous systems to effectively communicate and collaborate with humans The source of these voice-over recommendations is AFRL 711HPW: It is recommended that under the “Understand/Manage Human-Machine Interaction” bullet: -Voice-over on “Allocation of functions between human and machine”: Humans will likely train machines and feedback mechanisms must be designed without interfering with the human’s normal operation of the machine. -Voice-over on “Advance sensor development and assessment methodologies”:, it is recommended to note: “Assessment methodologies” include (1) machine learning and (2) advancing cognitive modeling. Examples of cognitive modeling include realistic avatars, adaptive training, and performance monitoring and prediction. (2) It is recommended that under the “Facilitate Trust and Social Interactions” bullet: -The software design will have to take into account the leveraging of human perceptual and cognitive processes. The human will need to see the display of information in and explainable and usable manner to effectively establish trust.

Engineering Challenges Enhance Analysis, Evaluation, and Certification Explore use of formal methods to analyze autonomous systems Enable rapid evolution of autonomous capabilities thru: Rapid deployment of software upgrades Perform system certifications concurrently with design Use of modular open systems architecture Synchronize Technology Development with Life Cycle Planning Rapid autonomous system development and technology transition will mandate effective coordination between engineering and product support activities.

Engineering Challenges Understand Consequences of Self-Learning Systems Evaluate consequences of autonomous system behavior being dictated by hardware, software, and system data. Artificial intelligence will allow new levels of autonomy Understand Impact to the Workforce Develop the Body of Knowledge for autonomous systems to support competency development Mission-specific work force education, training, and experience in human-autonomy teaming Establish Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics relationships with academic institutions The source of this voice-over material is the AFRL 711 HPW: It is recommended that under the “Understand Consequences of Self-Learning Systems” bullet: -Self-learning systems will bring with them the ability to magnify the human-machine productivity. It will also bring with it the need to be cognitive of trust (including system safety) in its design, but also the requirement for system security to protect the system from cyber tampering. (2) Voice-over for “Understand Impact to the Work Force”: …it is important to state that DoD recognizes that the workforce must be educated and trained to support autonomous systems, artificial intelligence technologies, and the human-machine collaboration process.

Summary Fielding autonomy-enabled warfighting capability will require close collaboration with: Research, Engineering, and Test & Evaluation Acquisition and Operational Communities Our Industry Partners Collaboration needs to occur through planned demonstrations and prototyping, especially at Engineering Commands where these systems are currently designed. Autonomy technologies will impact the collective workforce, inclusive of the challenges unique to the engineering community.

Systems Engineering: Critical to Defense Acquisition Defense Innovation Marketplace http://www.defenseinnovationmarketplace.mil DASD, Systems Engineering http://www.acq.osd.mil/se

For Additional Information Mr. Robert Gold ODASD, Systems Engineering 703-695-3155 robert.a.gold4.civ@mail.mil