Microsimulation @CBR Michal Horváth, Zuzana Siebertová Meeting of the Network of EU IFIs Workshop on Microsimulation Rome, 4th May, 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do public policies affect individual households? Design and uses of EUROMOD: an EU-wide tax/benefit model Herwig Immervoll OECD IZA, Bonn ISER, University.
Advertisements

MACROECONOMICS What is the purpose of macroeconomics? to explain how the economy as a whole works to understand why macro variables behave in the way they.
1 SIER Game Goals: 1. Understand how various key economic concepts may be linked in a market oriented society; 2. Understand how difficult proper policy.
CHILD POVERTY AND CHILD RELATED POLICIES: A COMPARISON OF ROMANIA AND CZECH REPUBLIC Silvia Avram*, Eva Militaru**, Silvia Cojanu**, Cristina Stroe** *National.
Introduction to STINMOD and Microsimulation Modelling in Australia Ben Phillips: Principal Research Fellow, NATSEM, 21 Feb 2015.
Rates of Return of Social Protection The case for non-contributory social transfers in Cambodia Franziska Gassmann Arusha, Tanzania – 17 December 2014.
How rapidly do reforms affect labour market outcomes? Jørgen Elmeskov Economics Department OECD.
ELM Part 2- Economic models Manuela Samek
‘Klin’-ing up: reforming taxes on labour in Poland Michał Myck, DIW-Berlin (joint work with Leszek Morawski, WNE-UW)
Chapter 3 Assessing Economic Conditions. Learning Objectives  Identify the macroeconomic factors that affect business performance.  Explain how market.
EHM Theory and Structure Behavioural Labour Supply Modelling in DWP Alan Duncan, 6 th May 2009.
Macroeconomics Introduction Frederick University 2014.
ARE TAX CUTS SELF-FINANCING? Presentation at the CEPOS conference on ”Tax Cuts, Employment and Growth” June 12, 2006 by Professor Peter Birch Sørensen.
Payroll taxes Source: Tito Boeri and Jan van Ours (2008), The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton University Press.
Fiscal Impacts of Korean Public Pension System: A Generational Accounting Approach Young Jun Chun University of Incheon, Korea January 2006.
SWITCH: Methods and Applications Michael Savage 25 th June 2015 SWITCH Team: T. Callan, M. Savage, B. Colgan, J.R. Walsh.
The redistributive effects of Personal Income Tax reforms during the Great Recession in Spain M. Adiego (IEF), O. Cantó (UAH), M. Paniagua (IEF) and T.
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Tax Burden Indicators for Labour (Taxing Wages model) and.
Research on redistributive effects of Croatian fiscal system Ivica Urban Institute of Public Finance.
ILUTE Microsimulation Modelling of Social/Financial Processes – An Overview Antoine Haroun June 2004.
A DECADE OF TAX - BENEFIT POLICIES IN BELGIUM. A SIMULATION EXERCISE TO ESTIMATE THE CHANGE IN REDISTRIBUTIVE EFFECT. Dieter Vandelannoote (University.
Tax-benefit micro simulation model for Serbia (SRMOD) based on EUROMOD platform: construction and first application Jelena Zarkovic Rakic Faculty of Economics.
1 BBVA Foundation workshop November 2004 MADRID Aino Salomäki DG: Economic and Financial Affairs European Commission MICROSIMULATION AS A TOOL FOR.
Policy Analyses at IZA Hilmar Schneider IZA IDSC Scientific Advisory Board Meeting, Bonn, May 29, 2009.
Income Distribution in the European Union Silvia Avram, Horacio Levy, Alari Paulus, Holly Sutherland Bucharest, 10 th November 2012.
ACTIVE WELFARE STATE POLICIES AND WOMEN LABOUR PARTICIPATION IN SPAIN Xisco Oliver and Amedeo Spadaro University of the Balearic Islands 2nd Microsimulation.
Hungary: assessing the impact of the package István Hamecz Director Head of Economics and Monetary Policy Directorate.
Simulating Distributional and Poverty Outcomes of the New Law on Social Welfare in Serbia Sonja Avlijaš (FREN, Belgrade) with Mihail Arandarenko, Saša.
2013 EUROMOD Research Workshop University of Lisbon, Portugal October 2013 Simulating a Low Income Social Assistance Reform in Time of Crisis Venelin.
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis: a User’s Guide – Economic tools Nairobi, 6-8 th December 2006.
Observatório Pedagógico MOVING THE GOALPOSTS NOT ONCE BUT TWICE: MINIMUM INCOME BENEFIT IN PORTUGAL Carlos Farinha Rodrigues ISEG / University of Lisbon.
9 © 2004 Prentice Hall Business PublishingPrinciples of Economics, 7/eKarl Case, Ray Fair The Government and Fiscal Policy Prepared by: Fernando Quijano.
Time, Money and Inequality in International Perspective Lars Osberg -Dalhousie University -I.S.E.R. U of Essex.
Making work pay: evidence from Serbia S. Randjelović, M. Vladisavljević, S. Vujić, & J. Žarković-Rakić EUROMOD 2nd Research Workshop Bucharest, October.
Behavioural and Welfare Effects of Basic Income Schemes Ugo Colombino (Department of Economics and CHILD-CCA ) and M. Locatelli, E. Narazani, I. Shima.
Using administrative data to produce official social statistics New Zealand’s experience.
Microsimulation modelling to inform policy debate: the case of SWITCH Tim Callan Economic and Social Research Institute.
Inflation Lesson Two Reflection – Inflation Lesson One Understand Aggregate Demand and Supply Illustrate Inflation on the: Aggregate Demand and Supply.
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development INTERNATIONAL TAX TRENDS: An OECD Perspective Jeffrey Owens.
Solutions to high unemployment rate – Case of Slovakia Peter Goliaš INEKO Director, Slovakia January 29, 2016 Webinar on Solutions to High Unemployment.
Impact on businesses of government policy
February 2016 Dr. Gordon Cleveland, University of Toronto Scarborough
EDABS 103 Economics for Business
AGGREGATE SUPPLY AGGREGATE DEMAND AS-AD MODEL
Celine Peyron Bista ILO 5 December 2013
Microeconomics VS Macroeconomics
Ch. 10: Aggregate Supply and Demand
3.4 Managing the Economy Fiscal Policy
Next topic: Policies for Growth and Development
Next topic: Policies for Growth and Development
Macro Free Responses Since 1995
Ch. 11: Aggregate Supply and Demand
Lessons from the Great Swedish Pension Reform Should we move
Flash estimates on income distribution dynamics
THE PROBLEM OF UNEMPLOYMENT
EDABS 103 Economics for Business
Preferential VAT rates, cash transfers and redistribution
Jonathan Bradshaw, Antonia Keung and Yekaterina Chzhen
Daniela Wegner Supervisor: Denise Doiron
Evidence from Chinese firm level data Ingrid Nielsen, Russell Smyth
Government in the Economy
“Reforming” non-standard contracts in Slovakia
The Government and Fiscal Policy
MISSOC NETWORK MEETING,NICOSIA
Financial Sector (continued)
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis: a User’s Guide – Economic tools
Effectiveness of Minimum Income Schemes in the reduction of poverty
Poverty and Inequality Statistics: Development of Methodology in the Russian Federation Geneva, 5-6 May 2015.
Statement of intent Key Stage: 5 Subject: Economics
Public Finance: Expenditures and Taxes
Presentation transcript:

Microsimulation @CBR Michal Horváth, Zuzana Siebertová Meeting of the Network of EU IFIs Workshop on Microsimulation Rome, 4th May, 2018

Part I Introduction

Background Evaluating realistic policy measures requires a tool that Captures national policy environment in fine detail Is based on good quality and well-adjusted micro data Generates outcomes that provide a good match with administrative data on aggregate ceteris paribus Takes a broader perspective (feedback effects) The CBR microsimulation tool aims for an improvement relative to previously used methods on all these fronts

Simulation model at a glance w_hat if model (1) SIMTASK: static tax-benefit calculator (2) Labour supply model (3) Integrated into a macro model with unemployment Model allows to answer “what if” type questions Policy impact at micro level (disposable income, inequality, METR, AETR) Immediate and long-run fiscal effects Full transition from one steady state to another for macro variables

Part II OUR APPROACH

Data & SIMTASK Re-weighting of the underlying micro-data More detailed control of selected categories: income distribution & children-age cohorts Microsimulation tool SIMTASK Runs on SK-SILC Inspired by EUROMOD: tailored to country-specific conditions Involves a maximum degree of user control —> can be incorporated within other models used by Slovak CBR New approach in general improves the fit between simulated output and official statistics

SIMTASK: Slovak Tax-Transfer Microsimulation Model SIMTASK simulates for every individual and policy scenario Personal income tax Social and health security contributions paid by employers, employees and self-employed Social transfers Family related transfers: child birth grant, child benefit, parental allowance Social assistance: material need benefit Unemployment benefit Net income VAT paid by households is simulated in a separate block

SIMTASK: validation of payroll taxes LEGEND: Ratios of aggregate PIT, SIC and HIC payments simulated by SIMTASK to aggregate amounts referred by the official statistics. Perfect match is achieved if the ratio equals to 1. PIT: Personal Income Tax SIC: Social Insurance Contrib. HIC: Health Insurance Contrib.

SIMTASK: validation of social transfers (amounts) LEGEND: Ratios of aggregate amounts of transfers simulated by SIMTASK to aggregate amounts referred by the official statistics. Perfect match is achieved if the ratio equals to 1.

Model of labour supply Extensive margin response Method to assess how the tax-benefit system affects motivation to work Participation decision of individuals on the labour market is examined by comparing two states Being economically active Being inactive Probit model for economic activity Estimated as a pooled regression 2012-15 separately for males and females Most responsive groups were found females and low-educated

Labour supply model (contd.) Intensive margin response Change in hours worked … can be expressed as a function of net-of-tax rates marginal and average elasticities Response calibrated based on estimations for Hungary (Kiss and Mosberger, 2015) … marginal net-of-tax rate elasticity 0.2 for top 20% earners

Macro model A model with unemployment Dynamic general equilibrium model with matching frictions Equilibrium wage determination Labour demand from firms’ profit maximisation Theoretical bargaining replaced by an aggregate schedule (w, L) Interaction with the micro part Aggregate labour supply schedule is based on individual decisions coming from empirical decision functions Combines empirical work with calibration A number of macro model parameters calibrated in line with external data and literature

How does w_hat if work? “Baseline” and “scenario” evaluation Compute net wages (observed/predicted for employed/unemployed) and transfers (if employed/inactive) using SIMTASK Evaluate probability of being economically active, being employed and effective hours worked using elasticities Aggregation Aggregate up individual adjustments at extensive and intensive margins This is done for different simultaneous wage shocks The result is an aggregate labour supply schedule Macro model solution Use standard methods to solve dynamic general equilibrium models Final steady state solution equivalent to a popular iterative approach

EXAMPLES OF MODEL OUTPUTS Part III EXAMPLES OF MODEL OUTPUTS

Effective tax rates Cuts in family transfers One tax rate 22% Average Marginal

Distributional effects Cuts in family transfers One tax rate 22% Disp. income household Probability of economic activity (individual)

An aggregate labour supply schedule

Macro IRFs

Fiscal effects One tax rate 22 % Fiscal effect Fiscal revenue   SIC and HIC paid by Fiscal exp Inequality PIT employ- ees employ- ers self- empl VAT CIT GINI Kakwani baseline, 2018 (in mil. euros) 9 284 17 851 2 414 2 616 6 922 1 108 3 115 1676 8 567 27.4 6.4 Short-run 4.11 2.14 16.8 0.0 -0.7 -0.35 0.61 Behavioural effects 3.55 1.85 16.2 -0.3 -0.2 -0.9 -0.41 0.68 Long-run 3.63 1.89 16.5 -0.1 -0.8 -1.1 0.01 -0.4 0.67 Reduction of family related transfers and credits   Fiscal effect Fiscal revenue SIC and HIC paid by Fiscal exp Inequality PIT employ- ees employ- ers self- empl VAT CIT GINI Kakwani baseline, 2018 (in mil. euros) 9 284 17 851 2 414 2 616 6 922 1 108 3 115 1676 8 567 27.4 6.4 Short-run 1.52 0.24 2.1 0.0 0.1 -0.3 -1.2 -0.2 0.16 Behavioural effects 1.51 0.23 -0.01 -0.21 0.15 Long-run 1.48 0.21 2.0 -0.1 0.03 0.2 Notes: First row (baseline) represents direct output from the simulation model; monetary variables in mil. euros. Subsequent rows display changes in % from baseline values. In case of inequality measures the numbers express changes in percentage points. SIC - social insurance contributions, HIC - health insurance contributions, PIT - personal income tax, VAT - value added tax, CIT - corporate income tax. CIT is computed directly using the effective tax rate.

Making the tool accessible Part IV Making the tool accessible

An online tool SIMTASK on web on-line version of the simulation model tool to assess immediate fiscal and distributional effects of reforms, impact on inequality targeted to public: analysts, journalists, students available at http://simtask.rozpoctovarada.sk

Thank you for your attention