The Use of Nutrient Credits in Virginia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 – Seattle Region 10 – Seattle
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
The Chesapeake Bay TMDL: Coming to an Impaired Water Near You? Sean M. Sullivan Williams Mullen 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC (919)
Jack E. Frye Virginia Director Chesapeake Bay Commission December 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading.
NEPA, CWA, THE FARM BILL, THE BAY ACT, ESC, ASA, WQIA Understanding Laws that Shape Virginia’s Soil and Water Conservation Districts defiance-county.com.
Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
Commonwealth of Virginia Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Russ Baxter, Chesapeake Bay Coordinator.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
1 Bay Restoration: Developing Policy Options to Support Local Actions Jack E. Frye, Virginia Director Chesapeake Bay Commission 201 N. 9 th Street, Room.
David K. Paylor Director, Department of Environmental Quality May 27, 2014 VEDP Lunch & Learn Environmental Permitting 101.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Department of Conservation and Recreation 1 Proposed Stormwater Management Requirements for Virginia Rappahannock River Basin Commission June 24, 2009.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Buyer Seller Nutrient Credits Compensation ($) Maryland’s Water Quality Trading Program Phase II – Agricultural Nutrient Trading in Maryland John Rhoderick.
Alternative Onsite Sewage Systems: New Regulations & Issues for Localities Potomac Watershed Roundtable January 7, 2011 Thomas E. Crow, Director Division.
Nutrient Trading and the Chesapeake Bay Paul K. Marchetti PENNVEST February 18, 2008.
David Johnson, Director, Department of Conservation and Recreation Russ Baxter, Chesapeake Bay Coordinator, Department of Environmental Quality October.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Ann Swanson Executive Director Chesapeake Bay Commission May 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading.
Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading: Nonpoint Source Offset Options Kurt Stephenson Dept of Ag & Applied Economics Virginia Tech
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Credit Trading Program
Non-point Source Update Marc T. Aveni Regional Manager.
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Critical Issues in Implementing Trading Programs in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed STAC Workshop May 14, 2013 Annapolis, MD.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
John Kennedy VA DEQ - Ches. Bay Program Mgr Tributary Strategies: Point Source Nutrient Controls Potomac Watershed.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
Impact of Recent Environmental Regulations on Land Use Sean M. Sullivan Williams Mullen 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC (919)
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
1 State Parks  Soil and Water Conservation  Natural Heritage Outdoor Recreation Planning  Land Conservation Dam Safety and Floodplain Management Chesapeake.
Draft Stormwater Proposal Home Builders Association of Virginia Richmond, Virginia June 29, 2009.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Nutrient Trading: Principles and Issues April 7, 2006 presentation to Potomac Watershed Roundtable.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Water Quality Credit Trading
Current VA Ag Initiatives
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

The Use of Nutrient Credits in Virginia Russ Baxter Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

Why Trading in Virginia? (policy statement in 2005 legislation) § 62.1 – 44.19:12 The General Assembly finds and determines that adoption and utilization of a watershed general permit and market-based point source nutrient credit trading program will assist in (a) meeting these cap load allocations cost-effectively and as soon as possible in keeping with the 2010 timeline and objectives of the Chesapeake 2000 Agreement, (b) accommodating continued growth and economic development in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and (c) providing a foundation for establishing market-based incentives to help achieve the Chesapeake Bay Program's nonpoint source reduction goals.

What’s a Credit in Virginia? "Point source nitrogen (or phosphorus credit" means the difference between (i) the waste load allocation for a permitted facility specified as an annual mass load of total nitrogen, and (ii) the monitored annual mass load of total nitrogen discharged by that facility, where clause (ii) is less than clause (i), and where the difference is adjusted by the applicable delivery factor and expressed as pounds per year of delivered total nitrogen load.” "Nonpoint nutrient offset" means nutrient reductions certified as nonpoint nutrient offsets under the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Nutrient Exchange Program (§ 62.1 – 44.19:12 et seq.).* *will change based on current regulatory process

“Nutrient Trading Regulation” GVPDESWPTNTPDNTCBWV or “Nutrient Trading Regulation” General VPDES Watershed Permit for Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Discharges and Nutrient Trading in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed in Virginia (9 VAC 25-820-10) (James, York, Rappahannock, Potomac/Shenandoah, Eastern Shore) Dischargers developed legislation in response to the possibility of all facilities having to upgrade at the same time.

Chesapeake Bay Watershed General Permit: Key Features Calendar year annual total N and total P load limits (“caps”) for facilities and river basins based on a policy of “stringent treatment at design capacity” (articulated in the tributary strategies Presumed that point source credits will eventually disappear as facilities reach design capacity • Point Source-to-Point Source trading for existing facilities to comply load cap for each covered facility and each basin • Point Source-to-Nonpoint Source trading reserved to accommodate new and expanding facilities that must offset entire load Approximately 165 facilities registered under the permit Trading confined to major basins except for Eastern Shore

Nutrient Credit Exchange Association VA Nutrient Credit Exchange Association http://www.theexchangeassociation.org • Voluntary membership in “non-stock Corporation” created by General Assembly in 2005 to facilitate the trading program • 105 facility members Facilitates trades, compliance Sets prices for credits among its members Key player in success of point source trading program

Baselines for Nonpoint Source Credits “Such best management practices shall achieve reductions beyond those already required by or funded under federal or state law, or the Virginia Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan, and shall be installed in the same tributary in which the new or expanded facility is located and included as conditions of the facility's individual Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit”

Current* Ag BMP Enhancements to Generate Nonpoint Source Credits “Beyond Baseline” only for New or Expanding Facilities Implementation of....... Soil Conservation Plan – Continuous No-Till Nutrient Management Plans – 15% N reduction on corn Cover Crops – Early planting date Livestock Stream Exclusion w/ 35’ buffer – Increase size 35’ Riparian buffer – Increase size Conversion of Land (only practice available for stormwater offsets) * May change as new regulations are developed

Transactions to Date (as of June 1, 2012) STORMWATER OFFSETS (DCR) 31 lbs of Phosphorus purchased in 19 transactions to meet stormwater loading requirements for new construction with certified “perpetual” credits POINT SOURCE TO POINT SOURCE (DEQ) Credits Purchased 629,587 lbs of N and 145,283 lbs of P Credits Used 272,824 lbs of N and 78,891 lbs of P 32 of 107 exchange members have purchased credits 3 non-exchange members have acquired credits from other non-exchange members So in order to hedge their bets and ensure compliance, facilities signed agreements several years ago to purchase more credits than they ended up needing.   Class A pledges are made up to 5 years in advance.  As more upgrades are completed and facilities have the operational experience to estimate their loads more accurately, the difference between Credits Purchased and Credits Used should narrow considerably.

Status of Nonpoint Source Credits Note: some credits not available pending Declaration of Restrictions and Financial Assurance Projects Approved or In Process Total Credits Released – Nitrogen/ Phosphorus Total Credits Used or Retired - Credits Available – 14 3961.2/1320.2 133.11/28.9 3828.13/1285.4

Using Credits to Meet Stormwater Requirements 10.1 – 603.8:1 Stormwater nonpoint nutrient offsets. B. B. A VSMP authority is authorized to allow compliance with stormwater nonpoint nutrient runoff water quality criteria established pursuant to § 10.1 – 603.4, in whole or in part, through the use of the applicant's acquisition of nutrient credits in the same tributary. H. … use credits certified as perpetual credits pursuant to Article 1.1:1 (§10.1 – 603.15:1 et seq.).

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Phase I Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Called for Study of Nutrient Credit Exchange to determine whether expansion would be beneficial to WIP implementation Key issues for review by the study committee identified in WIP General Assembly adopted SJR 334 which called on Secretary of Natural Resources to study expansion and report in 2012

Nutrient Credit Study Committee - 2011 Broad-based stakeholder committee selected to examine issues contained in the WIP and SJR 334, supported by state agency personnel, led by DEQ Secretary Submitted report containing recommended framework to the Governor McDonnell and the General Assembly in January 2012 (Senate Document 6) Legislation (SB 77/HB 176) introduced modeled on Secretary’s recommendations Legislation passed both houses of the General Assembly unanimously and signed by the Governor in April, 2012

Nutrient Credit Act – Key Provisions 1 Nutrient Credit Act – Key Provisions 1. Credit Evaluation and Certification Clear Regulatory Authority granted to DCR for certifying nonpoint source credits from traditional or nontraditional practices DEQ continues to certify point sources and operate existing trading program under the watershed general permit Regulations to establish process for submittal, approval of credits Enforcement and penalties prescribed Certified Credits could be “perpetual” or “term”; code establishes uses Credits may be “bundled” for sale Virginia Nutrient Credit Registry to be created: Only certified credits on the registry; only credits on the registry may be used to meet permit requirements

Expansion Framework 2. New Credit Uses Wastewater: Existing law and permit requirements remain in place; updated provisions. Stormwater : Existing Construction offset program remains in place MS4 may acquire credits for compliance from point sources or nonpoint source MS4’s may collectively meet allocations through voluntary partnerships Other Sources/purchasers: Industrial Stormwater, CAFO Unregulated entities Use of compliance credits contingent on waste load allocations or load reductions assigned in permits and such use subject to approval by relevant Board or Agency

Expansion Framework 3. Baselines Baselines will be established by regulation based on this statutory guidance: Urban: Comply with VSMP regulations and level of effort for urban lands contained in the TMDL Phase I WIP Agriculture: Level of Effort contained in the TMDL Phase I WIP Land Conversion: Based on pre-conversion land use and WIP level of reductions for that land use Other practices: Determined by relevant agency

Expansion Framework 4. Additional Elements Financial assurance required Conversion of wetland and stream banks to nutrient possible (no ability to sell both types) 5% of registered credits “retired” for water quality improvement Reporting, monitoring requirements established

Local Water Quality Provisions Stormwater Offsets: “No applicant shall use nutrient credits….in contravention of local water quality-based limitations ….” Watershed General Permit: “This section shall not be construed to limit or otherwise affect the Board's authority to establish and enforce more stringent water quality-based effluent limitations for total nitrogen or total phosphorus in individual permits where those limitations are necessary to protect local water quality. The exchange or acquisition of credits pursuant to this article shall not affect any requirement to comply with such local water quality-based limitations.” Nutrient Trading Act: regulations shall “provide that the option to acquire nutrient credits for compliance purposes shall not eliminate any requirement to comply with local water quality requirements.” “This section shall not …. limit or otherwise effect… the authority to establish and enforce more stringent water quality based limitation ….where those limitations are necessary to protect local water quality. “The exchange or acquisition of credits….shall not affect any requirement to comply with such local water quality-based limitations”

“The Virginia Way” Use of credits tied to permits with associated oversight and enforcement Permanent impact requires permanent credit Rigorous baselines (tied directly to WIP/TMDL levels of effort) 5% of certified credits retired for water quality improvement Establishment of public/transparent credit registry: Only registered credits will be available for sale and to meet permit requirements Clear certification procedures to be established by regulation Public notice of plans for credit use and establishment of proposed credit-generating facility Regulatory establishment of operation and maintenance, financial assurance, and other requirements Agency or Regulatory Board approval of use of credits for compliance Statutory protections for local water quality

Current Events Regulatory Process called for SB77/HB176 has begun (DCR) Study of trading ratio requirements (applicable only to new or expanding facilities) (DEQ) Ongoing work under current programs and authority (DEQ/DCR) Trading/Offsets “Technical Guidance” under development by EPA

For Further Information: russ.baxter@deq.virginia.gov 804-698-4382