The Difference between a Tax credit vs. Tax Deduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IPED HOUSING TAX CREDITS “101” COMBINING SOLAR AND HOUSING TAX CREDITS
Advertisements

Solving Challenges Others Cannot Statutory Frameworks for Public Private Partnerships HMFA Lone Star Chapter 2009 Winter Institute Dallas, TX Christopher.
John J. Schultz Energy Consultant RESNET/HERS Certified Rater Stevens Point, Wisconsin SchultzEnergyConsulting.com
YIN Jie China National Cleaner Production Center CP Promotion Law in China
Small Business Tax Saving Strategies for the 2013 Filing Season.
Evolution of Parametric Analysis within Rolls-Royce Purchasing
PRETON PRESENTATION PRINT COST SAVING (PCS) TECHNOLOGY PRETON - PRINT AND SAVE February 2006.
Target Costing If you cannot find the time to do it right, how will you find the time to do it over?
1.Quality-“a characteristic or attribute of something.” As an attribute of an item, quality refers to measurable characteristics— things we are able to.
2. Computer Aided Design and Production Process Dr. Ahmet Zafer Şenalp Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü.
2. Computer Aided Design and Production Process Assoc.Prof.Dr. Ahmet Zafer Şenalp Mechanical Engineering.
IRS Practice & Procedure: Research Credit
Regulatory Proposal December We provide distribution services to 1.4 million residential and business customers We deliver electricity to.
MIS 325 PSCJ. 2  Business processes can be quite complex  Process model: any abstract representation of a process  Process-modeling tools provide a.
©2010 LarsonAllen LLP 1 Tax Incentives for Manufacturers Simulation Association December 6, 2011 Steve Roark, CPA Marni Spence, CPA.
Small Business Tax Saving Strategies for the 2012 Filing Season Updated December 12, 2011.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
1 Highly Accelerated Life Test (HALT) Wayne Bradley 8 April 2014.
Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) Tax Incentive Program.
1 Financial Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making, 4th Ed. Kimmel, Weygandt, Kieso CHAPTER 1 Prepared by Dr. Joseph Otto CSLA.
Date: 03/05/2007 Vendor Management and Metrics. 2 A.T. Kearney X/mm.yyyy/00000 AT Kearney’s IT/Telecom Vendor Facts IT/Telecom service, software and equipment.
SR&ED Tax Incentives Life Sciences B.C. 28 January 2009.
80 years of excellence Commercial Buildings Tax Deduction Ed Gray Director, Energy Infrastructure National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
The Difference between a Tax credit vs. Tax Deduction Black Line Group – Confidential Credit = dollar for dollar reduction in the amount of taxes paid.
Manufacturing Engineering Department Lecture 1 - Introduction
Introduction to Computer Technology
Nancy J. Hall, CPA Going Green Tax Incentives  Federal Tax Savings come in two forms - Tax Credit Tax Deduction.
Genesis Solar Module Brochure ™
MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Operations Management.
Chapter 4 How Businesses Work McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Advice from CPAs Ten Ways To Protect Your Business.
KEEPING LABOR AND OVERHEAD COSTS DOWN Controlling Labor and Overhead Costs as a Long Term Strategy.
AQM for business innovation 1 METEF AQM for business innovation AQM is a large technical services center based in Provaglio d’Iseo – BS offering.
Services include: Sourcing, Product Development, Design, Engineering, Tooling, Manufacturing Delivery, Warehousing, Order Processing Quality Control, Logistics.
Specialized Tax Credits Within Your Reach R&D (Manufacturer’s) Tax Credit Presentation for MFG.Com This document and/or electronic file contains information.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Chapter 33 Tools & Techniques of Life Insurance Planning  What is it?  Contractual agreement between an employer.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 1.
Cost of Quality - COQ MGMT-5060 Operations Management.
From Research Prototype to Production
© 2012 | Mueller Prost PC | R&E Tax Credit Presentation | July 17, 2012Page 1 Research Tax Credit for Manufacturers presented by Michael J. Devereux II.
North American Lighting and TQM Kevin Blatnik. My Background 1998: Graduated from EIU with BSIT 1998: Graduated from EIU with BSIT Went to work for Navistar.
October 7, 2010 A Webinar on: The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 – What You Need to Know By: Blue & Co. Jerry Hammel, Director of Taxation.
Research and Development Credit November Background  Section 41 of Internal Revenue Code provides a tax credit based on taxpayer’s spending on.
The R&D Tax Credit April 28 th, 2011 CALED Annual Conference.
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan The current qualification and verification.
13 Step Approach to Network Design Steps A Systems Approach 8Conduct a feasibility Study 8Prepare a plan 8Understand the current system 8Design.
1 Lecture #1: PD - Ch 1. Introduction Ref: Product Design and Development by Karl T. Ulrich and Steven D. Eppinger, McGRAW-Hill
Stephen M. Lukinovich, CPA, CVA, PFS Wally S. Brown, CPA.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering department 1 Introduction to Concurrent Engineering Computer Aided Design (CAD) Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM)
Manufacturing Systems
14-1 CHAPTER 14 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Cost Analysis for Planning.
CONTRACT PRICING ALTERNATIVES Presented by: Fahad H. Al-Anazi CEM 520 February 27,1999.
Chapter 27 The Engineering Design Process. Learning Objectives Describe the various factors that are changing the design process Discuss the steps in.
Research Tax Credit: The Basics Michael A. Krajcer, JD, CPA Tax Credits Group, LLC Office: (440) Mobile: (216)
Defining Design Goals and Design Requirements © 2013 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Engineering Design and Development.
Financial Management and Budgeting The Details. What Is a Budget? A useful tool for keeping track of funds. A useful tool for keeping track of funds.
Black Line Group – Confidential2 Seminar Agenda The R&D Tax Credit - It’s found money –The story behind the credit –Who gets to use it From $15,000 to.
Designing Goods and Services Chapter 3, Part 1. MGMT 326 Foundations of Operations Introduction Strategy Quality Assurance Capacity, Facilities, & Work.
1 A Seminar On Pharmaceutical Outsourcing A Seminar On Pharmaceutical Outsourcing.
Army Directorate of Public Works Support Contractor of the Year Building a government contractor for the 21 st century By Carlos Garcia Owner and CEO KIRA.
Quality Health Claims Consultants, LLC City of Joliet Dependent Verification Audit Proposal.
Tax Year 2016 Section 41 Research & Experimentation Tax Credits Presented By: Mike D’Alessandro, MBA Green Outsourcing, PA.
Product Development Chapter 12. Vocabulary Research and development (R&D): the process of gathering information and using that information to develop.
Formulating a Better Bottom Line With The R&D Tax Credit
Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract
New Tax Law for 2016 Tax Year New tax law enacted December 2015 effective with 2016 tax year with R&D credit cash benefit opportunity beginning in 2017.
(Additional materials)
DEFINING REQUIREMENTS (REV. 05/22/2008)
The Difference between a Tax credit vs. Tax Deduction
R&D Tax Incentive ATY Advisory.
Presentation transcript:

The Difference between a Tax credit vs. Tax Deduction > Credit = dollar for dollar reduction in the amount of taxes paid Deduction = income on which you do not pay tax Black Line Group – Confidential

What is the R&D Tax Credit? A tax incentive provided by the U.S. government to encourage businesses to invest in activities within the U.S. that will provide for product and process improvements and/or the introduction of new products or processes Applicable to C-Corps, S-Corps, LLC’s Partnerships, Sole Proprietorships and Joint Ventures Black Line Group – Confidential

History of the R&D Tax Credit R&D Tax Credit has a history over 32 years Used by the majority of Fortune 1000 companies Much legislative activity The tax credit is a valid tax planning opportunity which is permitted under IRC §41 and §174. Black Line Group – Confidential

An opportunity there for the asking It is estimated that the amount of credits claimed by businesses each year has risen to nearly $8 billion Black Line Group – Confidential

Where is the R&D? Qualified R&D spending takes place in many areas within a business, not just an R&D or Engineering department Black Line Group – Confidential

Get credit for your investment in your business R&D spending includes: Internal labor (i.e. salaries, wages, bonus) Direct research Direct supervision of research Direct support of research Supply costs (prototype costs, lab supplies, etc.) External labor (contractor payments) if: Payment is contingent on success (fixed price) Rights are retained as to the R&D Black Line Group – Confidential

Activities that are R&D Friendly To qualify as a legitimate R&D activity, it must be: Conducted for a permitted purpose Intended to resolve technological uncertainties Involve a process of experimentation Use a permitted science Non-intuitive examples?? In general, activities are eligible for the R&D tax credit if they are: Being conducted for a permitted purpose (i.e. improved quality, reliability, functionality or cost reduction), Intended to resolve technological uncertainties through a process of experimentation, Using a permitted science (i.e. any of the engineering sciences, chemistry, biology, or computer science) Any new OR improved product, process or software development initiative has potential for R&D tax credit qualification Black Line Group – Confidential

1st R&D Test for Qualification Permitted Purpose Test: “What is the goal of this project?” EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT SWAP AND PLACE “EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT” BELOW THE PICTURES OF THE CARS Goal examples – include regulatory concerns and FDA approvalsYou do not need to obtain your goal Goal needs to increase function, performance, quality, or reliability or improve cost efficiency Goal can not be purely aesthetic or cosmetic in nature Black Line Group – Confidential

2nd R&D Test for Qualification Technological Uncertainty Test: “What is not known at the outset of the project?” Black Line Group – Confidential

3rd R&D Test for Qualification Process of Experimentation Test: “What was done to eliminate the uncertainties?” FAILURE IS REWARDED Evaluation of one or more alternatives Modeling, simulation or prototyping Conducting experiments to test the hypotheses, refining the hypotheses, or discarding the hypotheses Black Line Group – Confidential

4th R&D Test for Qualification Technical in Nature Test: “What science is being relied upon as you perform the activity?” Evaluation of one or more alternatives Modeling, simulation or prototyping Conducting experiments to test the hypotheses, refining the hypotheses, or discarding the hypotheses Black Line Group – Confidential

Custom Spring and Stamping $70,000+ Total Federal Credits since 2010 Case Study #1 Custom Spring and Stamping $70,000+ Total Federal Credits since 2010 $100,000+ Total State Credits since 2010 Goal- To develop a very small tab in a very small tube (.028" diameter) used within a medical device, and an inspection system to view the forming Technical uncertainty- Could engineers develop a tab small enough to meet customer requirements? How should the tube be handled in order to maintain its shape? Experimentation- Technical personnel evaluated whether current development techniques could be used to form tab. Current tools were unsuccessful since the tab could not be made small enough for tube. Engineers had to design and build a custom fixture that allowed tube to be held and rotated into proper position and then design and build a tool that would fit the tab. The tube is slightly magnetic so technical personnel tried using slight magnetism to pick up and orient the part but this proved to be unreliable and slow. Standard tweezers caused the part to deform. Ultimately, engineers had to develop custom tweezers to handle the tube Black Line Group – Confidential

Precision Spring and Wire Form Manufacturer Case Study #2 Precision Spring and Wire Form Manufacturer $22,000+ Federal Tax Credits Identified $23,000+ State Tax Credits Identified $325,000+ Total Credits Identified Goal- To develop a bi-foldable door hinge that can contract and expand within a 150º range. The hinge needed to meet functionality and quality requirements Technical uncertainty- How to create a reliable manufacturing process for the double body spring configuration. The process required several steps and it was unsure if the material would flow correctly Experimentation- Tested different design dimensions for the spring, including diameter, weight of material, as well as fixture designs Black Line Group – Confidential

Precision Metal Fabricator Case Study #3 Precision Metal Fabricator $82,000+ 2012 Federal Tax Credits Identified $86,000+ 2012 State Tax Credits Identified $493,000+ Total Credits Identified Goal- To develop a fixture to mimic bolts and mounting surfaces of car to help reduce false failures during the inspection process Technical uncertainty- What design and materials could be used for the fixture so the it reduced testing times while meeting performance and quality requirements Experimentation- Evaluated alternative designs, materials, positions and rotated measurements until a solution was discovered Black Line Group – Confidential

Precision Metal Fabricator Case Study #4 Precision Metal Fabricator $44,000+ 2012 Federal Tax Credits Identified $56,000+ 2012 State Tax Credits Identified Goal- To develop new tooling that could withstand extreme stamping pressures while generating a part with the correct flatness necessary to meet quality requirements Technical uncertainty- What design could be used to generate the correct flatness and dimensions necessary for successful sealing on the assembly Experimentation- Evaluated alternative designs and materials, specifically improving the counterbore of the tooling where the die roll is activated Black Line Group – Confidential

Precision Metal Fabricator Case Study #5 Precision Metal Fabricator $69,000+ 2012 Federal Tax Credits Identified $212,000+ Total Federal and State Tax Credits Identified Goal- To develop a component that would meet weight and crash/safety requirements for the automotive industry Technical uncertainty- How to manufacture the part from a two piece welded assembly, using various fastener combinations so that customer and hydro form specifications were achieved Experimentation- Evaluated alternative designs and materials, specifically experimenting with the hydro form wall thicknesses until a product was produced that met quality and functionality requirements Black Line Group – Confidential

Metal Stamping and Fabrication Case Study #6 Metal Stamping and Fabrication $46,000+ Federal Credits Identified for 2012 $161,000+ Total Credits Identified Goal- To improve the functionality, performance and design for an electrical vehicle motor Technical uncertainty- What materials and tool designs could be used to manufacture an interlocked mechanism that was revolutionary to the industry Experimentation- Evaluated different design placements of the interlock tool, including a double interlock, an additional path of interlocks and inserting a double end lamination. Each design was assessed until the most efficient and uniform one was discovered Black Line Group – Confidential

Metal Stamping/Tooling/Component Manufacturer Case Study #7 Metal Stamping/Tooling/Component Manufacturer $52,000+ 2012 Federal Tax Credits Identified $12,000+ 2012 State Tax Credits Identified $264,000+ Total Federal and State Tax Credits Identified Goal- To develop a new product for the coal mining industry that would be functional in high stress environments while meeting quality and durability requirements Technical uncertainty- Unsure of where the bolt preload force could be applied in order to exceed industry standards to make a superior product over ones currently on the market Experimentation- Evaluated durability and the point of onset buckling on different designs and models until a solution was discovered Black Line Group – Confidential

Metal Stamping / Molding Manufacturer Case Study #8 Metal Stamping / Molding Manufacturer $266,000 + Federal & State Tax Credits for 2012 $1,798,000 + Total Tax Credits Identified Goal- To develop and manufacture a part using stamping techniques that use a staging bar method to deliver a zero defect part Technical uncertainty- The company was technically challenged with designing and molding the part at an elevated 300 degree F temperature. They were also unsure what design would meet a 45 second cycle time within the quality requirements set forth by the customer Experimentation- They evaluated alternate loading methods, including possibly automating the process. Alternative stamping methods and mold and press timing was evaluated in order to determine how to meet the correct temperature and design requirements ~$25,000 for federal and ~$31,000 for state for 2008 Black Line Group – Confidential

If you can answer YES to these…. Do you have an R&D, product development or design department? Do you provide design, engineering, or testing services to your customers? Are you manufacturing a product or in the business of software/technology development? Have you recently applied for and/or received patents? Black Line Group – Confidential

Examples of “Qualifying Activities” Develop new, improved or more reliable products, processes or formulas Develop prototypes and models including computer generated models Design tools, jigs, molds and dies Develop or apply for patents Perform certification testing Conduct testing of new concepts and technology Develop new technology Attempt using new materials Perform environmental testing Add new equipment Automate/streamline production process or manufacturing process Develop software or hardware Improve or build new manufacturing facilities Black Line Group – Confidential

What We Need To Determine If the company can generate a meaningful R&D Tax Credit If and when the credits can be used Can you document your Qualified Research Expenditures Black Line Group – Confidential

Maximizing the R&D Tax Credit Who has the expertise to maximize the R&D tax credit? Calculation vs. Study Approach Educate company/employees about definition of R&D Identify ALL Amounts for the Form 6765 Documentation of the activities and costs that go onto the Form 6765 Most CPAs do not to specialize in the R&D Tax Credit R&D Firms Partner with your existing CPA firm Black Line Group – Confidential

Many states have R&D Tax Credits Legislative Guidance LEGISLATION: Credit has always been included in temporary tax bills and has expired and been extended 15 times since 1981 American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 Extends the credit retroactively back to January, 1st of 2012 and through December 31, 2013 Many states have R&D Tax Credits Black Line Group – Confidential

Will filing an R&D Tax Credit trigger a tax audit? Filing an amended return for an R&D Tax Credit does not automatically trigger an audit. Exception: If you have a credit in excess of $1 million Black Line Group – Confidential

What Documentation Is Necessary To Sustain A Credit? “Audit Technique Guide for Research Credit Claims” issued in May 2008 Establish nexus between QREs and QRAs Implement a project tracking approach to support the wages associated with R&D Track supply costs by project for expenses which are consumed or “used up” during the development process (at a minimum place into an account designated specifically for R&D expenses) Document the development process not just the end result Black Line Group – Confidential

What Documentation Is Necessary To Sustain A Credit? Retain research activity documentation, such as: Email Communications which show failures, problems, or concerns encountered during the development Product or Project Specifications, Descriptions, or Proposals Technical Reports / Test Reports and Results Documentation of alternative supplies/materials/technology evaluated Project Diagrams/Drawings/Pictures including older versions and conceptual drawings which differ from the final product Issue Logs / Meeting Minutes /Flowcharts or Time Schedules / Schedules of Releases Patent Applications or Abstracts Contractual Agreements with Consultants and Customers Black Line Group – Confidential

Reading The Small Print Determination of “open” years for amended R&D tax credits is contingent on usability of the credit (GBC rules) R&D Credits can not reduce federal tax below the TMT/AMT Credits can be carried back 1 year and carried forward 20 years Binders will spin upon clicking Black Line Group – Confidential

Evaluate whether it makes sense to go back to prior years Action Steps At a minimum, evaluate the R&D Tax Credit opportunity for the current tax year Evaluate whether it makes sense to go back to prior years Can tax credits be used? Can the claim be adequately documented? Put in place a methodology/process for utilizing the R&D Tax Credit going forward Black Line Group – Confidential

Substantial R&D tax credit savings going unclaimed The Bottom Line… Substantial R&D tax credit savings going unclaimed This is a valid tax planning opportunity – NOT a tax shelter Even if you are claiming the R&D tax credit, you may be leaving dollars on the table Black Line Group – Confidential

Don’t hesitate to contact us after the seminar with any additional questions Scott Schmidt scott@blacklinegrp.com (763) 550-0111 3030 Harbor Lane Suite 216 Plymouth MN 55447 www.blacklinegrp.com Black Line Group – Confidential