Aspiring Principals Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Advertisements

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
EEF SESSION #3 MARCH 2013 Analyzing & Documenting Progress Toward Goals Please have a seat and fill out the reflection sheet (Do Now)
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS FACILITATORS SESSION #2 JANUARY 2013 Unpacking Well-Structured Lessons.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
EDL 505 Week 5 Individual Plan for Professional Development Session To purchase this material click below link
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
Differentiating Disciples: Maximizing the Learning of All Students
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Welcome! Session 2 Theme: Instruction and Assessment
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Component 2 Differentiation in Instruction
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Safe and Supportive Schools Grant (FC 335)
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Perry Community School District Opportunity for Learning
Assessment and Instructional Planning
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Core Competencies: Moving forward with Self-Assessment
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
Survey Results Overview
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
From Compliance to Impact: Utilizing the School Systems Review as part of a Continuous Improvement Process Ann LaPointe, Educational Improvement Consultant.
Leveraging Evaluation Data: Leading Data-Informed Discussions to Guide SSIP Decisionmaking Welcome Mission of IDC- we provide technical assistance to build.
Monitoring-Stakeholder Engagement
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Improving student achievement through teacher observation and feedback
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Unpacking Effective Instruction
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Supporting Effective Teaching through Educator Performance Evaluation: Goal-Writing Summer Institute 2012.
Using Data to Assess High Quality Professional Development Findings From Interviews With Massachusetts Educators May 2015 Massachusetts Department.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Cooperating Teacher Training
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Our Leadership Journey
ELA Department Data Talk
State of the School Title I Meeting Folwell School, Performing Arts Magnet October 9, /8/2019.
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
My name (and my picture?)
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Aspiring Principals Program Boston public Schools ~ Office of educator effectiveness Session #1 April 4, 2013

Today’s Agenda Welcome & Introductions Overview of Program Framing the work with Bolman & Deal School profiles Educator Evaluation: rubric & prioritization Closing and Homework Introduce ourselves No Q & A section, but will post-its on tables, will collect questions throughout

Welcome and Introductions Overview of the Program Introduce ourselves No Q & A section, but will post-its on tables, will collect questions throughout

Framing the work with Bolman & Deal Review the text silently, highlighting or using post-it notes to identify those parts of text that: raise questions for you confirm what you already believe make you say, “Ah Ha” conflict with your beliefs cause you to reconsider prior assumptions   Choose two different “golden lines” that you want to share with the group. Introduce ourselves No Q & A section, but will post-its on tables, will collect questions throughout

School profiles Read through the data with your group. If you were a new leadership team in this school, what are three strengths and three potential areas for growth that the data reveal? Using the language from the frames, prepare to present to the larger group as if you were presenting to your School Parent Council. Introduce ourselves No Q & A section, but will post-its on tables, will collect questions throughout

Educator Evaluation: the rubric & prioritization Introduce ourselves No Q & A section, but will post-its on tables, will collect questions throughout

How are district priorities reflected in the rubric? District Priority Element of rubric Common-core shifts Well-Structured Lessons (I-A-4) Data Adjustments to Practice (I-B-2) Educator Effectiveness Goal Setting (IV-A-2) Cultural Proficiency Access to knowledge (II-D-3) Family and Community Engagement Parent/Family Engagement (III-A-1) and Two-way Communication (III-C-1) 9.15 -9.25 This slide shows district priorities (with corresponding priority elements) ask participants to share current practices in their school which are linked to these priorities Notes: Priority elements reflect academic priorities, and PD and supports will be provided around these elements. These elements should be used in making decisions relative to an overall rating on a standard. Other elements may also be used that are relative to a school / team goals when rating a standard. Use these priority elements when helping people to plan to do their self-assessment. The Acceleration Agenda should guide school goals and targets and should guide team and individual goals and targets. Professional Practice goals should be related to the priority elements on the rubric. They should reflect in groups about this question on the bottom of the screen. The district has 4 priorities : data analysis common core standards differentiated instruction ---- there is a mistake in the slide. Note that participants should cross off cultural proficiency and instead write “differentiated instruction.” teacher effectiveness

Educator Evaluation: the rubric & prioritization Based on the data in the case studies, including the school’s self-assessment and goals reports, prioritize elements in the rubric for your case study school. Explain why you made your decisions. Introduce ourselves No Q & A section, but will post-its on tables, will collect questions throughout

Closing and Homework Include in your portfolio evidence / examples of your school’s own priorities and artifacts and how this was communicated to your staff. OR, based on the case study discussion today, what would you do or do differently? Introduce ourselves No Q & A section, but will post-its on tables, will collect questions throughout

Upcoming meetings, 3:00-6:00 pm April 9 April 25 May 7 May 28 June 4 June 11 Make-up session

Feedback Please complete the Plus / Delta sheet What was positive about today? What would you change?

Resources: on the Weebly http://educatoreffectiveness.weebly.com

Contacts Ross Wilson (rwilson@boston.k12.ma.us) Jared Joiner (jjoiner) Emily Kalejs Qazilbash (eqazilbash) Kris Taylor (ktaylor2)