Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Africa (ASG-QA: PART B: EQA and PART C: QAAs) Presented at: CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Debriefing/brainstorming meeting for the training of experts for agency reviews Decision making process on the reviews: experiences from the ENQA Board.
International guidelines: Similarities and Criticisms
The European standards and guidelines for quality assurance Peter Williams President, ENQA.
Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvosto Rådet för utvärdering av högskolorna The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC) Internal quality assurance.
ENQA – QAA meeting 8-9 December 2005 Birmingham, UK 8 December, – Introductions to workshop themes.
Presenting: Unit V1. Presenting: Unit V1 Who this presentation is suitable for? Internal verifier-candidates working towards Unit V1: ‘Conduct internal.
The Academic Infrastructure and IQER Wendy Stubbs Assistant Director
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvosto — Rådet för utvärdering av högskolorna — The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC) eLearning and Virtual.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
An Overview of Quality Assurance in the EHEA by Prof. Andreas G. Orphanides President of EURASHE, Rector of European University Cyprus, and Ex-President.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance Sarah Butler Assistant Director, Development and Enhancement Group Quality Assurance Agency for.
Alexandria, 2005 NQAAC Quality Assurance and Accreditation for Higher Education Dr. Salwa EL Magoli National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Launch of Quality Management System
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Prof. A.Rauhvargers First draft of the revised Standards and Guidelines for the Quality Assurance in the EHEA.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
Quality Assurance in a Changing World María José Lemaitre INQAAHE Conference Abu Dhabi, March 2009.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
The European standards and guidelines for quality assurance Séamus Puirséil, Vice – President, ENQA.
11 Workshop on Establishment of a Continental Accreditation Agency for Higher Education in Africa 10 – 11 April 2013, Addis Ababa Rationale for Establishing.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
ENQA a key player in the European Higher Education Area Meeting of the Belarus University System representatives Minsk, March 2013 Josep Grifoll / Жузэп.
Quality and Standards for Higher Education. The QAA Established in 1997, QAA safeguards quality and standards in UK HE. Primary responsibility for quality.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
FOURTH EUROPEAN QUALITY ASSURANCE FORUM "CREATIVITY AND DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE BEYOND 2010", COPENHAGEN, NOVEMBER IV FORUM-
ESG Part 2: European standards for the external quality assurance of higher education Conference on self-evaluation July, Belgrade Lewis Purser.
ENQA procedures for external review – the Bulgarian experience Vilnius,30 May 2009, Hrs.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
European Standards and Guidelines – ESG 2015 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Head of Higher Education Evaluation Unit, FINEEC Former Vice-President of ENQA Vi flyttar.
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
Implementing the European Standards and Guidelines on Quality Assurance in Higher Education Peter Williams President, ENQA.
Quality assurance in the draft Education Act of Ukraine Külli All, Ministry of Education and Research
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
African Standards and Guidelines for Higher Education in ASG-QA Presented At The HAQAA Initiative Training By Dr. Rispa A. Odongo Chair TWG, HAQAA.
Higher Education and Training Awards Council
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
ISO/IEC
Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
African Quality Rating Mechanism (AQRM)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Promoting an Internal Quality Culture in Mozambican Universities
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Quality and Standards An introduction.
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Bishkek, March 10th, 2017 Ole Espen Rakkestad, NOKUT
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Introduction to the training
Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Project Leader
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Roles and Responsibilities
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
National Correspondents for Qualifications Frameworks (QF-EHEA)
Presentation transcript:

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Africa (ASG-QA: PART B: EQA and PART C: QAAs) Presented at: CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS ON AFRICAN STANDRDS AND GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HGHER EDUCATION 15th -17th November 2017 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Presenter: Dr. Rispa Odongo Chair, of Technical Working Group (TWG)

Part B: External Quality Assurance (EQA) Part B describes the methodologies (or standards) used by QAAs for external quality assurance of higher education institutions. EQA ensures HEIs subject themselves to periodic external assessment for accountability and quality enhancement. EQA takes into account the standards and guidelines in Part A (IQA) to: Ensure that IQA examined is relevant to and efficient for the concerned higher education institution, and Ensure there is consistency between internal quality assurance by institutions themselves and external quality assurance.

Areas Covered Objectives of EQA and Consideration for IQA Designing External Quality Assurance Mechanisms Fit-for-Purpose Implementation Processes of EQA Independence of Evaluation Decision and Reporting of EQA Outcomes Periodic Review of Institutions and Programmes Complaints and Appeals

Examples of EQA Standards with Guidelines

3. Implementation Processes of EQA Standard The criteria, processes, and procedures for EQA shall be pre-defined, reliable, published, and consistently implemented for purposes of accountability.   Guidelines EQA is carried out professionally, consistently and transparently to ensure it is acceptable to HEIs. EQA is done on the basis of the self-assessment/self-evaluation by the HEIs. EQA process include: Self-assessment/self-evaluation by the HEI and Self-Assessment Report (SAR)/Self-Evaluation Report (SER); Assessment of SAR/SER by Panel of Peers Site visit to the institution - Interviews stakeholders, verify facilities and documentary evidence for quality. Exit Oral Report by Peers to HEI Management before the Review Panel leaves the institution; Preliminary report provided to the institution for confirmation of factual data Final report of the external review prepared. Follow up on recommendations

4. Independence of Evaluation Standard EQA shall be carried out by panels of external experts/peer reviewers drawn from a wide range of expertise and experience. Guidelines Best practices of EQA is based on the consistent use of a wide range of expertise and experiences: Peer reviewers are drawn from academics, employers or professional practitioners, and students; To ensure professionalism, consistency and transparency of output of experts/peer reviewers, it is necessary that they: Are carefully selected, Have appropriate skills and competency to perform tasks assigned to them, Are adequately inducted on EQA principles and procedures before undertaking the external review, and Are independent, no -conflict-of-interest, sign a “Declaration of Independence Form”;  

Guidelines (continued) In the case of possible conflict of interest, the institution is given the opportunity to object to any member of the proposed review panel; and d) Involvement of international experts is considered a good practice in EQA.

6. Periodic Review of Institutions and Programmes Standard External quality assurance of institutions and programmes should be undertaken on a cyclical basis.   Guidelines The length of the review cycle is clearly defined and published: For academic programmes, the review cycle is consistent with the duration of the programme; Depending on the context of the quality assurance system, for institutions, the cyclical institutional review is carried out preferably every five years; and Every cyclical review results in a report of general findings of the review.

7. Complaints and Appeals Standard Processes of lodging complaints and appeals should be clearly defined and communicated to the institution concerned. Guidelines Safeguard the rights of the HEI and ensure fairness in the decision-making process. There is a process for HEI to raise issues of concern with the QAA if it can demonstrate that the outcome of the external review is not based on sound evidence. It is, therefore, critical that: There is established an appeals system/committee/board; The institution is allowed to raise issues of concern consistent with the appeals system; There are clearly defined complaints and appeals processes and procedures, which are consistently applied; and Appeals are handled professionally, are consistently applied, and feedback is provided.

Part C: Internal Quality Assurance for Quality Assurance Agencies Part C of the ASG-QA is for the purpose of internal quality assurance of QAAs. It involves the following: Self-assessment by QAA’s of its policies, practices, procedures and activities; and/or External assessment by another body/peer organisation.

Areas Covered Legal Status Vision and Mission Statement Policies, Processes and Activities Financial and Human Resources Independence of QAA Internal Quality Assurance Criteria and Processes Benchmarking, Networking and Collaboration Periodic Review of QAAs

Examples of QAA Standards with Guidelines

2. Independence of QAA Standard The QAA shall be independent and autonomous in its operations, outcomes, judgements and decisions. Guidelines The QAA make independent decisions and judgements that are not subject to change by third parties. Independence of an agency includes the following: Organisational independence - demonstrated by official documentation, such as legislative acts or statutes and instruments of governance, that stipulate the independence of the agency’s work from third parties (e.g. HEIs, governments, other stakeholders). Operational independence - the definitions and operations of the agency’s procedures and methods, nomination and appointment of qualified external experts (including the provision of no objection). Independence of formal outcomes – the final decision of quality assurance activity remains the responsibility of the QAA even if experts / peers are involved in the quality assurance activity.

3. Vision and Mission Statement Standard The QAA shall have written and published vision and mission statements or set of objectives taking cognisance of the higher education context. Guidelines The vision, mission and objectives show that: EQA is the major activity of the agency; There is a systematic approach to achieving the vision, mission and objectives of the QAA; The objectives are implemented in line with a practical management plan that is linked to the agency’s resources; and The ownership and governance structure is appropriate for the mandate and objectives of the agency.

6. Financial and Human Resources Standard The QAA shall have adequate and appropriate human, financial and material resources to carry out its quality assurance mandate effectively and efficiently. Guidelines Due to the public interest of the QAA and the importance of higher education institutions, the QAA is adequately funded to: Recruit adequate and qualified human resources, to carry out its external quality assurance activities; cognisant of gender, disadvantaged groups and persons with disabilities; Carry out its external quality assurance mandate professionally, effectively and efficiently; Ensure improvement of its practices and development; and Inform the public about its activities and results/outcomes.

8. Periodic Review of QAAs Standard The QAA shall undergo periodic internal and external reviews in order to demonstrate its compliance with the ASG-QA.   Guidelines The QAA has a system for continuous quality assurance of its own practices and activities that emphasises flexibility in response to the changing nature of higher education, effectiveness of its operations, and its contribution towards the achievement of its objectives. The QAA, therefore: Conducts a comprehensive internal self-assessment of its processes, practices and activities periodically, including data analysis; Subjects itself to periodic external review on the basis of self-assessment every five years by regional, continental or international quality assurance bodies; and Ensures that required recommendations are disclosed and implemented for improvement.

Challenges Faced During Drafting Process ODL – Stand alone or Incorporate into IQA (HEIs) – finally incorporated into IQA Students support stand alone or incorporated into / Student Recruitment, Admission, Support Services and Certification. The number of standards – Too many – merged a number of them. Guidelines - level of details Translation challenges – words mean different things in different languages. Gender or / Inclusiveness Independence / autonomy of QAA – implication on source of funding.

Working Document - Part A: IQA Zero Document – Part A: IQA Draft 1 – Part A: IQA 1. Vision, Mission, and Goals Objectives 1. Vision, Mission, and Strategic Objectives (2) 1. Vision, Mission, and Strategic Objectives 2. Planning and Strategic Development (Policy Plan) 2. Governance and Administration 3. Governance and Administration 3. Human Resources 4. Human Resources (Academic Staff / Teaching Staff) 4. Pre-testing or Piloting of Learning Materials 4. Design, Approval and Monitoring of Programmes (4) 5. Design and Approval of Academic Programmes 5. Design and Approval of Programmes 5. Teaching, Active Learning and Assessment 6. Teaching and Learning 6. Teaching, Active Learning and Assessment (11) 6. Infrastructure and Facilities 7. Facilities and Infrastructure 7. Infrastructure Facilities and Students’ Support Services (10) 7. Student Recruitment, Admission, Support Services and Certification 8. Linkage with Industry 8.. Student recruitment, admission, progression and certification 8. Research and Innovation 9. Student Recruitment and Admission 9. Postgraduate Studies, Research and Innovation (12), (18) 9. Community Engagement 10. Student Support Service 10. Community Engagement 10. Information Management 11. Student Assessment 11. Information Management 11. Public Communication (12) 12. Management of Postgraduate Studies 12. Advertising and Public Communication 12. Cooperation, Staff and Student Mobility 13. Research and Innovation 13. Cooperation, Staff and Student Mobility (16) 13. Financial Resource Management 14. Community Engagement 14. Financial Resource Management 15. Information Management 16. Collaboration (Internationalization) 17. Institutional Quality Assurance Management System (IQMS)/ Monitoring and Evaluation) 18. Institutional Integrity & Ethos 19. Financial Resources Management

1. Objectives of EQA and Consideration for IQA (1), (2), (3) Working Document - Part B: EQA Zero Document – Part B: EQA Draft 1 – Part B: EQA 1. Principles of EQA 1. Objectives of EQA and Consideration for IQA (1), (2), (3) 1. Objectives of EQA and Consideration for IQA 2. Mission (EQA Policy)) 2. Designing Mechanisms Fit-For- Purpose 3. Objectives of EQA 3. Implementation Processes of EQ 4. Designing Methodologies fit-for-purpose (Standards and Guidelines and Processes foe EQA) 4. Independence of Evaluation 5. Implementation Processes (Consideration of IQA) 5. Decision and Reporting of EQA Outcomes (7), (8) 5. Decision and Reporting of EQA Outcomes 6. Independence of Evaluation (Use of Peer Review Experts) 6. Periodic Review of Institutions and Programmes 7. Decisions of EQA Activities (Outcomes) 7. Complaints and Appeals 8. Reporting of EQA Activities (Disclosure) 9. Periodic Review of Institutions and Programmes 10. Complaints and Appeals 11. Coherence of National and Regional Policies and Practices

1. Legal Status of QAA (Official Status) Working Document - Part C: QAA Zero Document – Part BC QAA Draft 1 – Part BC QAA 1. Legal Status of QAA (Official Status) 1. Policies, Processes and Activities of Quality Assurance Agency (6) 1. Legal Status 2. Mission Statement and Governance 2. Legal Status 2. Vision and Mission Statement 3. Resources 3. Vision and Mission Statement 3. Policies, Processes and Activities of Quality Assurance Agency 4. Independence of QAA 4. Financial and Human Resources 5. External Quality Assurance Criteria and Processes used by QAA (Thematic Analysis) 5. Independence of QAA 6. Activities for Quality Assurance 6. Internal Quality Assurance Criteria and Processes Used by QAA (8) 6. Internal Quality Assurance Criteria and Processes Used by QAA 7. Periodic and Institutional and Programme Review 7. Benchmarking, Networking and Collaboration 8. Accountability (Internal Quality Assurance and Professional Conduct) 8. Periodic Review of QAAs 9. Exyternal Review of QAA 10. Benchmarking , Networking and Collaboration

Summary: It is hoped that these standards and guidelines will ensure quality provision and enhancement of quality in higher education in Africa, and the development of a sustainable quality culture for competitive higher education. HAVE A QUALITY DAY Thank you and God bless