Summary of responses to questionnaires on integrated approach of VA Permanent Mission of Iraq Summary of responses to questionnaires on integrated approach of VA THANK YOU for sending back the questionnaire. We do realize that there were no easy questions and probably far from the current priorities in affected states that are still under conflicts. Diversity in responses Cross-checked with previous researches by the ISU or the Landmine monitor, or Cross-checked with national VA action plans and a few Working groups ToR, that provide indication the approach they take

Permanent Mission of Iraq 1. Understanding the situation and priorities of survivors and indirect victims Donor States Affected Sates Recognized as a challenge Rely on governments and partners to provide information Many efforts to collect data but many challenges No integrated systems fully functional yet Surveys = needs assessments A few initiatives to analyze barriers from a rights perspective

2. VA used as a catalyst for disability inclusion Permanent Mission of Iraq 2. VA used as a catalyst for disability inclusion Donor States Affected Sates Support to services to survivors and other persons with disabilities (physical rehabilitation, peer support, social support) Support to disability inclusive policies and programmes Great achievements: In provision of specialized services In promoting rights of persons with disabilities No report on use of VA and support to indirect victims to raise the profile of other vulnerable people

3. Contribution of broader sectors to realizing VA obligations Permanent Mission of Iraq 3. Contribution of broader sectors to realizing VA obligations Donor States Affected Sates All have a right-based approach but not all translate into practice Guidelines on disability inclusion Disability inclusive strategies No clear evidence of measures for equitable access No clear evidence of inclusion of indirect victims, apart of community-based approach Some collaborations but no evidence that responsibilities have been fully transferred to key ministries. Low capacities sometimes. Commitments & initiatives disability- inclusive policies (CRPD) No clear evidence of measures for equitable access No report about indirect victims Little use of SDGs and WB/WHO report on disability

4. Monitoring Donor States Affected Sates Key concern Permanent Mission of Iraq 4. Monitoring Donor States Affected Sates Key concern Requirements and guidelines but very few on disaggregated data No evidence that monitoring tracks impact on victims (quality of life) Recognized as a challenge (capacities, funding) Untracked records from broader sectors Dry on good practices from affected states!

5. Coordination and awareness raising Permanent Mission of Iraq 5. Coordination and awareness raising Donor States Affected States No evidence of clear mechanisms for coordination across sectors (Mine action & development departments) A few initiatives to train coworkers on VA and disability A few initiatives on focal points Well established coordination bodies Several initiatives (from MACs) on alliance building & participation of survivors and other persons with disabilities Focal point is effective but focus on disability (not VA); lack capacities and support