A comparison of open and endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia in a clinical decision model  Wouter Hogendoorn, MD, M.G. Myriam.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thomas F. O’Donnell, MD, Joseph Lau, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Advertisements

Simultaneous sizing and preoperative risk stratification for thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair: Role of gated computed tomography  Felix J.V. Schlösser,
Bart S. Ferket, MD, PhD, Jonathan M
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have shorter survival but superior endovascular outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair  Moqueet.
International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX2 endovascular graft: 1-year results  Jon S. Matsumura,
The chimney procedure is an emergently available endovascular solution for visceral aortic aneurysm rupture  Felix J.V. Schlösser, MD, PhD, John E. Aruny,
Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population  Samuel T. Edwards, MD,
Daniel L. Davenport, PhD, Eleftherios S
Wouter Hogendoorn, MD, Anthi Lavida, MBBS, M. G
Comparison of covered stents versus bare metal stents for treatment of chronic atherosclerotic mesenteric arterial disease  Gustavo S. Oderich, MD, Luke.
Daniel L. Davenport, PhD, Eleftherios S
A percutaneous arterial closure protocol can decrease complications after endovascular interventions in vascular surgery patients  Philip P. Goodney,
Benefit of immediate revascularization in women with critical limb ischemia in an intention-to-treat analysis  Jana Ortmann, MD, Eveline Nüesch, PhD,
Yuzhe Feng, Felix J. Schlösser, MD, PhD, Bauer E. Sumpio, MD, PhD 
Decision analysis model of open repair versus endovascular treatment in patients with asymptomatic popliteal artery aneurysms  Wouter Hogendoorn, MD,
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the chimney graft technique
Wouter Hogendoorn, MD, Anthi Lavida, MBBS, M. G
Frederik H. W. Jonker, MD, Felix J. V. Schlosser, MD, PhD, Jeffrey E
Neal R. Barshes, MD, MPH, James D
Screening individuals with intracranial aneurysms for abdominal aortic aneurysms is cost-effective based on estimated coprevalence  Benjamin Z. Ball,
Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with prolonged survival after lower extremity revascularization  Peter A. Soden, MD, Sara L. Zettervall, MD, MPH,
Ian S. Currie, BSc, MBChB, MD, PhD, Sonia J
Comparison of risk factors for length of stay and readmission following lower extremity bypass surgery  Scott M. Damrauer, MD, Ann C. Gaffey, MD, Ann.
Postoperative complications after common femoral endarterectomy
Long-term safety of cilostazol in patients with peripheral artery disease: The CASTLE study (Cilostazol: A Study in Long-term Effects)  William R. Hiatt,
Michael S. Conte, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Cost Effectiveness of Universal Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the Era of Direct-Acting, Pangenotypic Treatment Regimens  Mark H. Eckman,
Mesenteric stenting for chronic mesenteric ischemia
Presentation, treatment, and outcome differences between men and women undergoing revascularization or amputation for lower extremity peripheral arterial.
Decision analysis to define the optimal management of athletes with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery  Carlos M. Mery, MD, MPH, Keila N. Lopez,
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have shorter survival but superior endovascular outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair  Moqueet.
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair, open repair, and conservative management of splenic artery aneurysms  Wouter Hogendoorn, MD, PhD, Anthi Lavida,
Surgical revascularization versus endovascular therapy for chronic mesenteric ischemia: A comparative experience  Marvin D. Atkins, MD, Christopher J.
National trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
Open versus endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: Risk- stratified outcomes  Gustavo S. Oderich, MD, Thomas C. Bower, MD, Timothy.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular versus open surgical revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia  Fares Alahdab, MD, Remy.
Cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair based on aneurysm size  Kate C. Young, PhD, Nadia A. Awad, MD, Marcia Johansson, NP, David Gillespie,
A clinical decision model for selecting the most appropriate therapy for uncomplicated chronic dissections of the descending aorta  Wouter Hogendoorn,
In-hospital and 30-day outcomes after tibioperoneal interventions in the US Medicare population with critical limb ischemia  Todd R. Vogel, MD, MPH, Viktor.
Trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of acute lower extremity ischemia in the United States Medicare population  Donald T. Baril, MD, Kaushik.
Abd Moain Abu Dabrh, MBBCh, MS, Mark W
National trends in utilization, mortality, and survival after repair of type B aortic dissection in the Medicare population  Douglas W. Jones, MD, Philip.
Comparison of open and endovascular treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia in the Vascular Quality Initiative  Jeffrey J. Siracuse, MD, Matthew.
Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of initial treatment strategies for nonembolic acute limb ischemia in real-life clinical settings  Fedor Lurie,
Marc L. Schermerhorn, MD, Kristina A. Giles, MD, Allen D
Optimizing Treatment for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: A Comparison of Open and Endovascular Repair in a Clinical Decision Model  Wouter Hogendoorn, M.G.
Outcomes of reoperative open or endovascular interventions to treat patients with failing open mesenteric reconstructions for mesenteric ischemia  Karina.
Cost-effectiveness of intensive smoking cessation therapy among patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms  Kevin Mani, MD, PhD, Anders Wanhainen,
Determinants of mortality and treatment outcome following surgical interventions for acute mesenteric ischemia  Panagiotis Kougias, MD, Donald Lau, BS,
Subclavian revascularization in the age of thoracic endovascular aortic repair and comparison of outcomes in patients with occlusive disease  Salvatore.
Cost-effectiveness of conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Results of a randomized trial  Monique Prinssen, MD, PhD, Erik.
Thrombotic mesenteric ischemia due to aortic dissection
Cost effectiveness of ovarian reserve testing in in vitro fertilization: a Markov decision- analytic model  Lobke M. Moolenaar, M.D., Frank J.M. Broekmans,
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Omalizumab for the Treatment of Severe Asthma in Japan and the Value of Responder Prediction Methods Based on a Multinational.
Endovascular stenting versus open surgery for thoracic aortic disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative results  Stewart R. Walsh,
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular revascularization compared to supervised hospital- based exercise training in patients with intermittent claudication:
Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar, MD, Michel S. Makaroun, MD, Luke K
Thomas C. F. Bodewes, MD, Peter A. Soden, MD, Klaas H. J
Clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prophylaxis of vascular events: a cost- effectiveness analysis  Mark D. Schleinitz, MS, MD, J.Peter Weiss, MS,
Long-term prognostic factors after thrombolysis for lower limb ischemia  Monica Kuoppala, MD, Sofia Franzén, MD, Bengt Lindblad, MD, PhD, Stefan Acosta,
Consequences of hypogastric artery ligation, embolization, or coverage
Creating functional autogenous vascular access in older patients
The Semmes Weinstein monofilament examination is a significant predictor of the risk of foot ulceration and amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus 
Cost-Effectiveness of Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Surveillance in Patients With Lung Cancer  Thibaut Lizée, MD, Ethan Basch, MD, MSc, Pierre Trémolières,
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting as first-choice treatment in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia  Bram Fioole, MD, PhD, Hendrik.
J. David Neel, MD, Robin L. Kruse, PhD, Viktor Y
Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm presentation, repair, and mortality in the Vascular Study Group of New England  Ruby C. Lo, MD, Rodney.
Sheela T. Patel, MD, Peter Korn, MD, Paul B. Haser, MD, Harry L
Why insurers should reimburse for compression stockings in patients with chronic venous stasis  Peter Korn, MD, Sheela T. Patel, MD, Jennifer A. Heller,
Prospective randomized study evaluating an absorbable cyanoacrylate for use in vascular reconstructions  Alan B. Lumsden, MD, Eugene R. Heyman, PhD  Journal.
Presentation transcript:

A comparison of open and endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia in a clinical decision model  Wouter Hogendoorn, MD, M.G. Myriam Hunink, MD, PhD, Felix J.V. Schlösser, MD, PhD, Frans L. Moll, MD, PhD, Bart E. Muhs, MD, PhD, Bauer E. Sumpio, MD, PhD  Journal of Vascular Surgery  Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 715-725.e2 (September 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009 Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 1 Simplified bubble diagram of the Markov state transition model for treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Each health state has a possible transition to itself that is not shown in this figure for clarity of the figure. The dotted lines indicate the start of the intervention or reintervention. EV, Endovascular revascularization; OR, open revascularization. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 2 Cost-effectiveness scatterplot of open revascularization (OR) and endovascular revascularization (EV) for treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) for the reference-case patients (65-year-old women). Each point represents one sample value based on the analysis of 10,000 reference-case samples in the Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicate that EV is dominant over OR because effectiveness is higher and costs are lower. See Results section for further details. QALYs, Quality-adjusted life years. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 3 Total expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for open revascularization (OR) and endovascular revascularization (EV), depending on age at initial intervention of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) for the reference-case patients (65-year-old women). See Results section for further details. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 4 a, Cumulative expected reinterventions per patient after initial treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) for the reference-case patients (65-year-old women). See Results section for further details. b, Number of expected reinterventions depending on the age at initial intervention for CMI for the reference-case patients (65-year-old women). See Results section for further details. EV, Endovascular revascularization; OR, open revascularization. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 5 Total expected costs for open revascularization (OR) and endovascular revascularization (EV) by age at initial intervention for the reference-case patients (65-year-old women with chronic mesenteric ischemia [CMI]). Shown is that EV is more expensive until the age of 60 years. After the age of 60 years, OR is more expensive. See Results section for further details. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 6 The 95% confidence ellipse for the cost-effectiveness of endovascular revascularization (EV) vs open revascularization (OR) for 10,000 samples of the reference-case patients (65-year-old women with chronic mesenteric ischemia [CMI]). On the x-axis, the incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for EV compared with OR. On the y-axis, the incremental costs for EV compared with OR. For each of the 10,000 samples, the difference between the QALYs (incremental QALYs) and the difference between the costs (incremental costs) for EV and OR are calculated and depicted as a dot in the figure. The circle depicts 95% of the distribution. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $60,000/QALY is indicated. All dots southeast of the WTP line are considered cost-effective. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 7 Acceptability curve for different willingness-to-pay threshold points for the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). On the x-axis, the willingness-to-pay; and on the y-axis, the percentage of samples that is cost-effective. Shown is that even if the willingness-to-pay decreases to $0, endovascular revascularization (EV) is cost-effective in the majority of the cases compared with open revascularization (OR). Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Fig 1 (online only) Total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) in the reference-case patient with open revascularization (OR) and endovascular revascularization (EV) for different relative risks. Expected QALYs for EV are always higher, independent of the relative risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Fig 2 (online only) Total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) in the reference-case patient with open revascularization (OR) and endovascular revascularization (EV) per perioperative mortality for OR. Expected QALYs for OR are higher if perioperative mortality of OR decreases to 3.1% (in reference-case: 7.1%), if we assume that perioperative mortality for EV is still 3.6%. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Fig 3 (online only) Two-way sensitivity analysis for perioperative mortality for endovascular revascularization (EV) and open revascularization (OR). The colored areas indicate which treatment is preferred on the basis of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The reference-case is indicated with an asterisk: perioperative mortality of 7.1% for OR and 3.6% for EV. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Fig 4 (online only) Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) in the reference-case patient per age at initial intervention. The ICER of endovascular revascularization (EV) vs open revascularization (OR) had a maximum at age 50 years: $4032 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). After the age of 60 years, costs for EV are lower and QALYs are higher, implying that EV dominates OR. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Fig 5 (online only) Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) in the reference-case patient per length of postoperative period for open revascularization (OR). The ICER of endovascular revascularization (EV) vs OR is always below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $60,000/QALY. A longer hospitalization period than 16 days for OR results in lower costs for EV and higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), implying that EV dominates OR. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Fig 6 (online only) Total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for patients with and without bowel resection. For patients with immediate bowel resection (100% chance) for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI), the QALYs are lower compared with patients without (0%) bowel resection. EV, Endovascular revascularization; OR, open revascularization. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Fig 7 (online only) Total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per quality of life for major morbidities for treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) in the reference-case patient with open revascularization (OR) and endovascular revascularization (EV). Expected QALYs for EV are always higher than for stenting and OR, regardless of the value of the quality of life for major morbidities. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Fig 8 (online only) Total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) in the reference-case patient if type of reintervention after initial open revascularization (OR) is endovascular revascularization (EV), tested over a wide range (0%-100%). Journal of Vascular Surgery 2014 60, 715-725.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.009) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions