Ten years of centralised data collection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Mr.Meng Kimhor DDG, NIS/MoP Cambodia
Advertisements

MANUFACTURING STATISTICS IN LESOTHO MAY 2009 LUSAKA, ZAMBIA Prepared by TšepisoThabane.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic Reducing respondents burden by Czech Statistical Office - technological.
Business Case for Industriali- sation in Statistics Estonia: Small Example of a Large Trend MSIS 2013 Allan Randlepp Tuulikki Sillajõe.
Metadata management and statistical business process at Statistics Estonia Work Session on Statistical Metadata (Geneva, Switzerland 8-10 May 2013) Kaja.
Overview of quality work in Statistics Denmark Kirsten Wismer.
The Adoption of METIS GSBPM in Statistics Denmark.
Accelerating the Centralisation of Data Collection at the Australian Bureau of Statistics Jenine Borowik, Adrian Bugg, Bruce Fraser Program Delivery Division,
KEY GENDER ISSUES IN LABOUR MARKET AND PRODUCTION OF LABOUR STATISTICS IN MALAWI Household Surveys and Measurement of Labour Force with Focus on Informal.
Dr. Mojca Noč Razinger SURS Data collection in the Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia (SURS)
Centralizing Data Collection at Statistics Canada Marc St-Denis Lise Rivais.
Toward Generic Systems Shifra Haar - Central Bureau of Statistics-Israel.
Using UNECE GSBPM for ABC/M in Statistics Estonia Tuulikki Sillajõe Conference Q2010, Helsinki May 5, 2010.
Electronic data collection System in CSB of Latvia By Karlis Zeila, Vice President, CSB of Latvia IT DG meeting, October , Eurostat.
The experience of a National Statistical Institute after a law change: Estonia First Regional Workshop Microdata Access in European Countries ― Cooperation.
Statistics Estonia on its way to improving efficiency UN ECE Seminar on New Frontiers for Statistical Data Collection Geneva, ‒ Tuulikki.
High-Level Forum on Strategic Planning for Statistics in Central Asia Countries Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic, May 2006 Oleg Kara, Deputy Director General,
1 Case Study Integrated Metadata Driven Statistical Data Management System (IMD SDMS) CSB of Latvia METIS 2010.
1Your reference The Menu of Indicators and the Core Set from the South African Point of View Moses Mnyaka 13/08/2009.
1 Process Orientation at statistics Sweden – Implementation and Initial Experiences IAOS Conference, October 15, 2008 Mats Bergdahl, Deputy Director Process.
How official statistics is produced Alan Vask
Profiling procedure Sarmite Prole Head of Business Register Section Business Statics Department Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia May 19-23, 2014.
Introduction to Statistics Estonia Study visit of the State Statistical Service of Ukraine on Dissemination of Statistical Information and related themes.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Statistical Office FSO Profiling in Switzerland Costs and benefits David Ackermann 28th September 2010.
Epp Karus Statistics Estonia Enterprise Statistics Department
Statistical Business Register– the Estonian experience
The 2000 Latvian Population and Housing Census methodology
Mirjana Boshnjak Skopje, 20 to 22 September 2017
Planning, Monitoring and Performing Surveys
Standardized and modernized data editing in Statistics Denmark
Designing Low Cost Rapid Data Collection Systems
Contents Introducing the GSBPM Links to other standards
Anna Długosz Central Statistical Office of Poland
State of Palestine Generic Statistical Business Process Model )GSBPM) - Palestine Case August 2017.
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
COOPERATION WITH NBS Ramesh Kolli Additional Director General
Omurbek Ibraev Project coordinator December 2014
Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in the Republic of Uzbekistan Geneva, April 12, 2017.
Workshop on ESS Enterprise Architecture
The usage of web interviewing in Lithuanian Labour Force Survey
Guidelines on Integrated Economic Statistics
Organisational design and transformation approach
SDMX Global Conference 2017
Profiling in Switzerland Costs and benefits
Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM)
Three areas that have proved successful and one area where improvements are needed in the Statistical Office of Estonia by Tuulikki Sillajõe International.
ESTP COURSE ON PRODCOM STATISTICS
13th Workshop on Labour Force Survey Methodology
User profiling in Statistics Estonia
International Comparison Program 2011
Metadata in the modernization of statistical production at Statistics Canada Carmen Greenough June 2, 2014.
Changed Data Collection Strategies
Organization of efficient Economic Surveys
Agenda Context of the BR Redesign Redesign Objectives Redesign changes
NTTS 2009 conference Tuulikki Sillajõe
Implementation of ISCO-08: Bulgarian experience
Importance of regional cooperation in development of metadata based on IST Gordana Radojevic.
in cooperation with the MNE:
Better availability of statistics – all products on the web
The mandate to develop crime statistics
Statistical Business Register– the Estonian experience
Contents Introducing the GSBPM Links to other standards
Mapping Data Production Processes to the GSBPM
Assurance of Quality of German National Accounts by Management
Business Process Improvement in the LFS
GSBPM AND ISO AS QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TOOLS: AZERBAIJAN EXPERIENCE Yusif Yusifov, Deputy Chairman of the State Statistical Committee of the Republic.
Hanna Gembarzewska, Monika Grabani
METIS 2011 Workshop Session III – National Implementation of the GSBPM
Work Session on Statistical Metadata (Geneva, Switzerland May 2013)
« Survey on PRODCOM data collection in other MS
Presentation transcript:

Ten years of centralised data collection Seminar on New Frontiers for Statistical Data Collection Geneva, 25-27 September 2013 Tuulikki Sillajõe

Outline Organisation of the data collection Lessons learnt Further steps Conclusions 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Central data collection Central Data Collection Department established in 2004 Data collection for all surveys not dependent on the subject matter Serves both: individuals and economic entities Mainly collection of raw data 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Communication with respondents The contact centre handles 99% of respondents’ questions via telephone, e-mail, mail Simultaneous informing of respondents (economic entities) about all the questionnaires they have to complete in the following year E-mail reminders are sent to economic entities before (not after) the deadline of each statistical questionnaire 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Collection method Completely paperless data collection from individuals Ca 85% paperless data collection from economic entities Design of data collection instruments is still decentralised; the building of electronic instruments is done centrally CAPI, CAWI, CATI available depending on the suitability for a particular survey 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Common software Single authorisation point on the Internet called eSTAT Physically two different software programs: one better suited for surveys on economic entities, the other for surveys on individuals The respondent is not informed whether he or she is using the economic entity’s part or individual’s part 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Response rate of small economic entities in the survey “Wages and salaries” 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Response rate of Labour Force Survey, % 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Applying the GSBPM The working time of the employees of Statistics Estonia has been analysed since 2007, in the framework of the GSBPM Collect and Disseminate are centralised Specify Needs, Design, Build, Analyse, Archive and Evaluate are decentralised 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Processes in current structure, share of working hours by departments in 2012 7. Dissemination 6. Analyse 5. Processing 4. Data collection 3. Build 2. Design 1. Specify needs 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Current division of work Data Collection Department Statistical subject matter departments Dissemination Department Current division of work Population and Social Statistics Department Enterprise Statistics Department Agricultural Statistics Department Price and Wages Statistics Department National, Financial and Environmental Accounts Department 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Main changes Data Collection Department is going to handle all contacts with respondents and make all manual corrections in data Data Processing and Statistical Registers Department is going to process data in a more standardised and efficient way based on best practices of the office Statistical departments will be able to concentrate on analysis and creation of products 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

New division of work Data Collection Department Data Processing and Statistical Registers Department Statistical subject matter departments Dissemination Department New division of work 1. Population and Social Statistics Department 2. Business and Agricultural Statistics Department 3. Economic and Environment Statistics Department 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

New structure Director General DDG on data collection and processing 1. Data Collection Department 2. Data Processing and Statistical Registers Department 3. Data Warehouse Department 4. Metadata Department 5. Development Department DDG on analysis and dissemination 1. Methodology and Analysis Department 2. Population and Social Statistics Department 3. Business and Agricultural Statistics Department 4. Economic and Environment Statistics Department 5. Dissemination Department General Department 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Work flow in new structure

Ten years of centralised data collection Data Collection Department Dissemination Department Data Processing Department Statistical Departments General Department Data Warehouse Department Metadata Department 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Conclusions Respondents behave like users when adopting new features Office-wide generic software could be developed, but hardly implemented, if there is no central department acting as the owner and main user of that software Centralisation of functions has not harmed quality Centralisation of functions has enhanced efficiency Communication is essential 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

Thank you for your attention! tuulikki.sillajoe@stat.ee 25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection

25.09.2013 Ten years of centralised data collection