University of Toledo Gender Equity Salary Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Do Female and Male Faculty Members Construct Job Satisfaction? Diana Bilimoria, Susan R. Perry, Xiangfen Liang, Patricia Higgins, Eleanor P. Stoller,
Advertisements

College of Education Gender Equity Study Mitzi Schumacher, Chair Mindy Isaacs, Graduate Assistant President’s Commission on Women Subcommittee on Economic.
Using Internal Market Ratios to Detect Gender Differences in Faculty Salaries Chunmei Yao, Ed. D SUNY College at Oneonta.
1 TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS Summer 2005 Michigan State University.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Closing the Gender Disparities Gap in Academic Medicine: Negotiating for Parity in Support. Marianne E. Felice, M.D. Professor & Chair, Department of Pediatrics,
WOMEN FACULTY AND THE SOCIAL–CULTURAL NEXUS IN HIGHER EDUCATION Karla A. Henderson, North Carolina State University To examine the social- cultural nexus.
Salary Equity: College of Arts & Sciences Mitzi Schumacher, Chair PCW Economic Opportunity Subcommittee.
Insert client logo Equal Pay findings QMUL November 2011.
Implication of Gender and Perception of Self- Competence on Educational Aspiration among Graduates in Taiwan Wan-Chen Hsu and Chia- Hsun Chiang Presenter.
Hispanic Challenge for Equity Behind the Podium American Association of Hispanics in Higher Education, Inc. Seventh Annual National Conference March 8-10,
1 Research Method Lecture 6 (Ch7) Multiple regression with qualitative variables ©
STEM Faculty from Underrepresented Groups at MSI and TWI Institutions: are their lives different? Muriel Poston, Ph.D. Dean of the Faculty and Professor,
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Faculty Gender Composition in STEM Disciplines: A Case Study Santiago-Rivas, M., Harlow, L. L., Silver, B., Stamm, K., & Mederer, H. University of Rhode.
Employment, unemployment and economic activity Coventry working age population by gender Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics.
Faculty Senate Gender Equity Task Force Report K. Klimek (Chair) History, R. Hernandez-Julian, L. Hathorn, A. Sgoutas, K. Elkins, B. Mathews.
Closing the Equity Gap: A Portrait of Canada’s University Teachers CAUT Education Review Vol. 6, No. 2.
Background: The status of women in academia Percent of faculty who are women decreases with  rank Few women in positions of leadership Little change in.
ITEC6310 Research Methods in Information Technology Instructor: Prof. Z. Yang Course Website: c6310.htm Office:
Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.
Maintaining Excellence When You Don’t Control Funds Flow Barbara Petit 1 AASA Annual Meeting October 6, 2015.
Bonds and bridges: The relative importance of relations with peers and faculty for college student achievement Sandra Dika, PhD Assistant Research Professor.
Staff Survey Results Research Excellence Framework All Staff Open Meeting Monday 23 February 2015.
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
SALARY EQUITY SUMMARY Faculty Council April 13, 2012 Bruce W. Carney Executive Vice Chancellor & Provost.
Analysis of Faculty Data Presentation to Commission on Women October 9, 2002.
BACKGROUND The gender wage gap has long been an issue for U.S. workers. This was apparent in 1963 when President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act, and.
Gender Equity Task Force Report Presentation to the UT Austin Faculty Council January 26, 2009 Profs. J Moore, Chandra Muller & Gretchen Ritter.
College of Charleston Faculty Salary Resolution Update and Recommendations Presented by the Faculty Compensation Committee to the Faculty Senate.
Statistics & Evidence-Based Practice
Title of Presentation A Roundtable Discussion: Pay Equity Issues
Taking Part 2008 Multivariate analysis December 2008
CSUMB campus-based salary equity issues and solutions
Standard Level Diploma
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
A Study of the Student-Athlete’s Academic Achievements: The Relationship Between Student-Athlete Academic Support Programs and Academic Progress Rate Dr.
Association of Women Surgeons
How Do Female and Male Faculty Members Construct Job Satisfaction?
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for Mechanical Engineering faculty Wednesday, December 14, 2016.
Overview Background UPS Operational Policy TC 4
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for Chemistry faculty
IPEDS COMPARISON FALL 2010 – FALL 2014
Visualizing Women Status: Developed vs. Developing Worlds
Division of Biological Sciences
Status of Women Faculty in the College of Medicine
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for Computer Science faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for faculty with 4 – 9 years experience Wednesday, December 14, 2016.
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for Economics and Business faculty Wednesday, December 14, 2016.
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for Mining Engineering faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for AMS faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for tenure-track faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for male faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for non-white faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for faculty with ten or more years experience Wednesday, December 14, 2016.
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for Physics faculty
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for CBE faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for research faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for teaching faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for CASE faculty
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for MME faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for white faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for Geophysics faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for library faculty
Faculty Climate Survey 2016: results for tenured faculty
Gender Pay Gap Reporting
Presentation transcript:

University of Toledo Gender Equity Salary Study 12/4/2018 University of Toledo Gender Equity Salary Study A Study Prepared for the Women’s Leadership Forum 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

12/4/2018 Research Question Are faculty salaries at UT significantly different for women and men? 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Review of Prior Studies 12/4/2018 Review of Prior Studies University Studies The University of Pennsylvania The University of Virginia The University of California System The University of California-Irvine The University of Wisconsin-Madison The University of Illinois-Chicago The University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign The University of Michigan Bowling Green State University Other Sources Paychecks: A Guide to Conducting Salary Equity Studies for Higher Education Faculty, (AAUP) “Interpreting Nondiscrimination Requirements of Executive Order 11246 With Respect to Systemic Compensation Discrimination,” (OFCCP) Prior UT Studies 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Factors that may influence salary Gender Rank Time at rank Years of employment Scholarship College Degree Interaction between gender and college 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Procedures Collect the data Determine the appropriate statistical methods Analyze the data Interpret and present the results 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Methods Transform salaries to 9 month salaries 12/4/2018 Methods Transform salaries to 9 month salaries Analyze tenured and tenure track faculty together Analyze lecturers separately because factors that affect lecturers salaries are different from those of tenured and tenure track faculty Use ANOVA with Rank and Gender as independent variables 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Distribution of Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty Salaries 12/4/2018 Distribution of Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty Salaries Average Note: distribution based on Fall 2005 data. N=622 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Overall breakdown of women and men by rank 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Average Salary by Rank and Gender 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Questions that led to further analysis Is this difference solely due to gender or do the following contribute? Rank College Time at rank 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Potential Risk of Aggregated Effect In certain situations looking at aggregate data (here overall averages for males and females) gives a misleading pattern of bias that does not exist at the disaggregated level Are more men employed in higher salaried college than women? 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Correlation between Average Salary and Percentage of Male Faculty r = .81, p <.01 Interpretation: There is a strong positive correlation between the average college salary and the % of male faculty 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Removing the college effect Subtract the average college salary from each faculty salary Each centered salary represents how much above or below the average in the college Example: A faculty member paid $76,000 in a college with an average salary of $85,000 has a centered score of -$8,000 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Results Interpretation: There is no significant difference in salary by gender at assistant and associate professor levels. However, there is a significant difference in salary between males and females at the full professor level t = 2.67, p = .008 t = .334 t = -.618 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Does time at rank contribute to the significant difference in salaries for full professors? Females have been at full rank an average of 8.2 years while males 13.9 years. The difference is significant (t = 3.657, p<.001) Although time at rank interacts with rank, time at rank can be partialed out at each level independently After controlling for the effect of time at rank, the difference in female and male salaries at full professor level no longer significant (t = 1.15, p = .257) 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Analysis of Salary of Lecturers The number of female and male lecturers at UT is 49 and 39 respectively with average salaries of 31,274 and 32,679. This difference in salaries does not reach significance (t = 1.006, p=.317). 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Conclusions Using centered salaries (standardized) by each college, there is no significant difference in salary between males and females at the assistant and associate professor levels; however, there is a significant difference between female and male salaries at the full professor level After factoring out time at rank at the full-professor level, the salary difference between males and females is not significant. 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost

Recommendations Use these findings as a benchmark to track UT’s progress To determine if the trend is continuing, conduct the study on a regular basis. 12/4/2018 Office of the Provost