1. Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Statistics
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology

2. Announcements Tomorrow’s office hours Cancelled Readings:
Required: chapter 7
Recommended: chapter 14 (covers some specific hypothesis tests and reviews some of the SPSS how-to’s)
Announcements

3. Testing Hypotheses Step 1: State your hypotheses
Step 2: Set your decision criteria
Step 3: Collect your data from your sample(s)
Step 4: Compute your test statistics
Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, etc.)
Inferential statistics (t-tests, ANOVAs, etc.)
Step 5: Make a decision about your null hypothesis
Reject H0 “statistically significant differences”
Fail to reject H0 “not statistically significant differences”
When you “reject your null hypothesis”
Essentially this means that the observed difference is above what you’d expect by chance
Testing Hypotheses

4. From last time XA XB About populations Example Experiment:
Group A - gets treatment to improve memory
Group B - gets no treatment (control)
After treatment period test both groups for memory
Results:
Group A’s average memory score is 80%
Group B’s is 76%
H0: μA = μB
H0: there is no difference between Grp A and Grp B
Real world (‘truth’)
H0 is correct
H0 is wrong
Experimenter’s conclusions
Reject H0
Fail to Reject H0
Type I error
Type II error
Is the 4% difference a “real” difference (statistically
significant) or is it just sampling error?
Two sample
distributions XA XB
76%
80%
From last time

5. Testing for statistical significance
The generic test statistic - is a ratio of sources of variability
Observed difference
80% - 76%
Computed
test statistic =
Difference from chance ??
“Statistically significant differences”
When you “reject your null hypothesis”
Essentially this means that the observed difference is above what you’d expect by chance
“Chance” is determined by estimating how much sampling error there is
Factors affecting “chance”
Sample size
Population variability
Testing for statistical significance

6. Sample size on Sampling error
Population mean x
Sampling error
(Pop mean - sample mean)
Population
Distribution
n = 2
Population mean x
Population
Distribution
Sampling error
(Pop mean - sample mean)
Sample mean
n = 10
Population mean
Population
Distribution
Sampling error
(Pop mean - sample mean)
Sample mean x
Generally, as the sample size (n) increases, the “chance” (sampling error) decreases
Sample size on Sampling error

7. Pop. Var. on Sampling error
Typically the narrower the population distribution, the narrower the range of possible samples, and the smaller the “chance” (sampling error)
Large population variability
Small population variability
Pop. Var. on Sampling error

8. Sampling error Population Distribution of sample means
These two factors combine to impact the distribution of sample means.
The distribution of sample means is a distribution of all possible sample means of a particular sample size that can be drawn from the population
Population
Distribution of sample means XC
Samples of size = n XA XD
Avg. Sampling error XB
“chance”
Sampling error

9. “Generic” statistical test
Tests the question:
Are there differences between groups due to a treatment?
H0 is true (no treatment effect)
Real world (‘truth’)
H0 is correct
H0 is wrong
Experimenter’s conclusions
Reject H0
Fail to Reject H0
Type I error
Type II error
Two possibilities in the “real world”
One population
Two sample
distributions XA XB
76%
80%
“Generic” statistical test

10. “Generic” statistical test
Tests the question:
Are there differences between groups due to a treatment?
Real world (‘truth’)
H0 is correct
H0 is wrong
Experimenter’s conclusions
Reject H0
Fail to Reject H0
Type I error
Type II error
Two possibilities in the “real world”
H0 is true (no treatment effect)
H0 is false (is a treatment effect)
Two populations:
No treatment
Two populations:
Treatment XA XB XB XA
76%
80%
76%
80%
People who get the treatment change,
they form a new population
(the “treatment population)
“Generic” statistical test

11. “Generic” statistical testXB XA
ER: Random sampling error
ID: Individual differences (if between subjects factor)
TR: The effect of a treatment
Why might the samples be different?
(What is the source of the variability between groups)?
“Generic” statistical test

12. “Generic” statistical testXB XA
ER: Random sampling error
ID: Individual differences (if between subjects factor)
TR: The effect of a treatment
The generic test statistic - is a ratio of sources of variability
Observed difference
TR + ID + ER
ID + ER
Computed
test statistic = =
Difference from chance
“Generic” statistical test

13. “Generic” statistical test
The generic test statistic distribution
To reject the H0, you want a computed test statistics that is large
reflecting a large Treatment Effect (TR)
What’s large enough? The alpha level gives us the decision criterion
TR + ID + ER
ID + ER
Distribution of the test statistic
Test statistic
Distribution of sample means
α-level determines where these boundaries go
“Generic” statistical test

14. “Generic” statistical test
The generic test statistic distribution
To reject the H0, you want a computed test statistics that is large
reflecting a large Treatment Effect (TR)
What’s large enough? The alpha level gives us the decision criterion
Distribution of the test statistic
Reject H0
Fail to reject H0
“Generic” statistical test

15. “Generic” statistical test
The generic test statistic distribution
To reject the H0, you want a computed test statistics that is large
reflecting a large Treatment Effect (TR)
What’s large enough? The alpha level gives us the decision criterion
Distribution of the test statistic
Reject H0
“One tailed test”: sometimes you know to expect a particular difference (e.g., “improve memory performance”)
Fail to reject H0
“Generic” statistical test

16. “Generic” statistical test
Things that affect the computed test statistic
Size of the treatment effect
The bigger the effect, the bigger the computed test statistic
Difference expected by chance (sample error)
Sample size
Variability in the population
“Generic” statistical test

17. Significance “A statistically significant difference” means:
the researcher is concluding that there is a difference above and beyond chance
with the probability of making a type I error at 5% (assuming an alpha level = 0.05)
Note “statistical significance” is not the same thing as theoretical significance.
Only means that there is a statistical difference
Doesn’t mean that it is an important difference
Significance

18. Non-Significance Failing to reject the null hypothesis
Generally, not interested in “accepting the null hypothesis” (remember we can’t prove things only disprove them)
Usually check to see if you made a Type II error (failed to detect a difference that is really there)
Check the statistical power of your test
Sample size is too small
Effects that you’re looking for are really small
Check your controls, maybe too much variability
Non-Significance

19. Some inferential statistical tests
1 factor with two groups
T-tests
Between groups: 2-independent samples
Within groups: Repeated measures samples (matched, related)
1 factor with more than two groups
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) (either between groups or repeated measures)
Multi-factorial
Factorial ANOVA
Some inferential statistical tests

20. T-test Design Formula: Observed difference X1 - X2 T =
2 separate experimental conditions
Degrees of freedom
Based on the size of the sample and the kind of t-test
Formula:
Observed difference
T =
X X2
Diff by chance
Based on sample error
Computation differs for
between and within t-tests
T-test

21. T-test Reporting your results
The observed difference between conditions
Kind of t-test
Computed T-statistic
Degrees of freedom for the test
The “p-value” of the test
“The mean of the treatment group was 12 points higher than the control group. An independent samples t-test yielded a significant difference, t(24) = 5.67, p < 0.05.”
“The mean score of the post-test was 12 points higher than the pre-test. A repeated measures t-test demonstrated that this difference was significant significant, t(12) = 5.67, p < 0.05.”
T-test

22. Analysis of Variance XB XA XC Designs Test statistic is an F-ratio
More than two groups
1 Factor ANOVA, Factorial ANOVA
Both Within and Between Groups Factors
Test statistic is an F-ratio
Degrees of freedom
Several to keep track of
The number of them depends on the design
Analysis of Variance

23. Analysis of Variance More than two groups F-ratio = XB XA XC
Now we can’t just compute a simple difference score since there are more than one difference
So we use variance instead of simply the difference
Variance is essentially an average difference
Observed variance
Variance from chance
F-ratio =
Analysis of Variance

24. 1 factor ANOVA 1 Factor, with more than two levels XB XA XC
Now we can’t just compute a simple difference score since there are more than one difference
A - B, B - C, & A - C
1 factor ANOVA

25. 1 factor ANOVA The ANOVA tests this one!! XA = XB = XC XA ≠ XB ≠ XC
Null hypothesis:
H0: all the groups are equal
The ANOVA tests this one!!
XA = XB = XC
Do further tests to pick between these
Alternative hypotheses
HA: not all the groups are equal
XA ≠ XB ≠ XC
XA ≠ XB = XC
XA = XB ≠ XC
XA = XC ≠ XB
1 factor ANOVA

26. 1 factor ANOVA Planned contrasts and post-hoc tests:
- Further tests used to rule out the different Alternative hypotheses
XA ≠ XB ≠ XC
Test 1: A ≠ B
XA = XB ≠ XC
Test 2: A ≠ C
XA ≠ XB = XC
Test 3: B = C
XA = XC ≠ XB
1 factor ANOVA

27. 1 factor ANOVA Reporting your results The observed differences
Kind of test
Computed F-ratio
Degrees of freedom for the test
The “p-value” of the test
Any post-hoc or planned comparison results
“The mean score of Group A was 12, Group B was 25, and Group C was 27. A 1-way ANOVA was conducted and the results yielded a significant difference, F(2,25) = 5.67, p < Post hoc tests revealed that the differences between groups A and B and A and C were statistically reliable (respectively t(1) = 5.67, p < 0.05 & t(1) = 6.02, p <0.05). Groups B and C did not differ significantly from one another”
1 factor ANOVA

28. We covered much of this in our experimental design lecture
More than one factor
Factors may be within or between
Overall design may be entirely within, entirely between, or mixed
Many F-ratios may be computed
An F-ratio is computed to test the main effect of each factor
An F-ratio is computed to test each of the potential interactions between the factors
Factorial ANOVAs

29. Factorial ANOVAs Reporting your results The observed differences
Because there may be a lot of these, may present them in a table instead of directly in the text
Kind of design
e.g. “2 x 2 completely between factorial design”
Computed F-ratios
May see separate paragraphs for each factor, and for interactions
Degrees of freedom for the test
Each F-ratio will have its own set of df’s
The “p-value” of the test
May want to just say “all tests were tested with an alpha level of 0.05”
Any post-hoc or planned comparison results
Typically only the theoretically interesting comparisons are presented
Factorial ANOVAs